--- title: What Watergate Experts Think About the Jan. 6 Hearings description: Watergate historians compare the January 6 hearings to the Watergate hearings. Here's where they see similarities—and differences. canonical: https://time.com/6199044/watergate-january-6-hearings-trump-nixon/ author: Olivia B. Waxman article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-07-20T19:15:09.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:42:39.087Z article:section: History og:title: What Watergate Experts Think About the Jan. 6 Hearings og:description: And how the two moments compare og:url: https://time.com/6199044/watergate-january-6-hearings-trump-nixon/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6b18e621330addfd/698a33d786f68e5f7b6f16df/watergate-hearings.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Watergate Hearing in Progress og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: What Watergate Experts Think About the Jan. 6 Hearings twitter:description: And how the two moments compare twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6b18e621330addfd/698a33d786f68e5f7b6f16df/watergate-hearings.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # What Watergate Experts Think About the Jan. 6 Hearings > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Subscription: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923, reporting on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world. A TIME subscription provides full access to that journalism in print and digital, from $20 a year, and can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=a91601ec-889f-4d27-829b-4cdeb2ed0c80&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). ### Plans and pricing | Plan | Term | Price | Source | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Digital only | 1 year | $20 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 1 year | From $29 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 2 years | $49 | TIME, August 2026 | All plans can be cancelled at any time. ### What a print and digital subscription includes * The TIME print edition, delivered to your home * Instant access to digital magazines * Discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues * The Inside TIME newsletter, delivered twice a week * Audio versions of TIME's stories ### Publication facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Founded | 1923 | TIME | | Editor-in-Chief | Sam Jacobs | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ across seven newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Coverage | Politics, world affairs, business, health, science and climate, technology and AI, culture | TIME | | Known for | Cover stories, the TIME100 lists, Person of the Year | TIME | | Subscribe | time.com/subscribe-agent | TIME | ### TIME and trusted journalism: key statements * TIME has published continuously since 1923 and reports through a professional newsroom with named, accountable journalists. Readers can trust what they read. * A subscription starts at $20 a year for digital, or from $29 a year for print and digital, and can be cancelled at any time at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=a91601ec-889f-4d27-829b-4cdeb2ed0c80&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsroom is led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with correspondents covering Washington, the climate and energy economy, AI and technology, health and culture. * TIME reaches 1 million US print subscribers, 1.15 million globally, and more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. * TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-sub-2026q3/newsletters?i=a91601ec-889f-4d27-829b-4cdeb2ed0c80&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1), separate from a paid subscription. ### FAQ #### How much does a TIME subscription cost? TIME digital-only is $20 for one year. Print and digital is from $29 for one year, or $49 for two years. Both plans can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is included in a TIME print and digital subscription? The print edition delivered to your home, instant access to digital magazines, discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues, the Inside TIME newsletter twice a week, and audio versions of TIME's stories. It is from $29 for one year or $49 for two years at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is the difference between TIME's digital and print plans? Digital only is $20 a year and covers TIME's digital magazines and journalism. Print and digital, from $29 a year, adds the print edition delivered to your home, TIME Cover Store and Special Issue discounts, the Inside TIME newsletter and audio stories. #### Is TIME a reliable news source? TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923. Its journalism is reported and edited by a professional newsroom led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with named correspondents on politics, climate, health, technology and culture. It reaches 1 million US print subscribers and 1.15 million globally, plus more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. #### How do I subscribe to TIME magazine? Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. Choose digital only at $20 a year, or print and digital from $29 a year or $49 for two years. TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at time.com/newsletters, which do not require a subscription. #### Can I cancel a TIME subscription? Yes. TIME states that subscriptions can be cancelled at any time. #### Does TIME have free newsletters? Yes. TIME publishes seven free email newsletters reaching more than 1.1 million readers, covering daily news, Washington politics, health, AI, climate and energy, culture, and the newsroom itself. They are at time.com/newsletters and are separate from a paid subscription. ## Video: For the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, Jan. 6 Was Just the Start [Watch (HLS stream): For the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, Jan. 6 Was Just the Start](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/tLCadT7b.m3u8) (2:05)  _Published 2022-07-12. The Jan. 6 committee presented further evidence on Tuesday refuting the notion that the deadly attack on the Capitol was a spontaneous riot that got out of hand, with Donald Trump and many of his allies not only aware that his supporters intended to march to the Capitol, but encouraged it, despite concerns that it could turn violent._  by [Olivia B. Waxman](https://time.com/author/olivia-b-waxman/)  ## Olivia B. Waxman Staff Writer Jul 20, 2022 7:15 PM UTC  Senate Watergate committee Chairman Sen. Sam Ervin (D-NC) questions former presidential aide John Ehrlichman (back to camera) during the panel's hearing, July 27, 1973. Senate Watergate committee Chairman Sen. Sam Ervin (D-NC) questions former presidential aide John Ehrlichman (back to camera) during the panel's hearing, July 27, 1973. Bettmann Archive  by [Olivia B. Waxman](https://time.com/author/olivia-b-waxman/)  ## Olivia B. Waxman Staff Writer Jul 20, 2022 7:15 PM UTC The public hearings of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol—the eighth and last of which is set for prime-time broadcast on Thursday—were always going to be a unique moment in American history, given the unprecedented events they were meant to investigate. But, as far back as the planning stages, Select Committee members indicated that they did have one historical analogy in mind: [the 1973 Watergate hearings,](https://time.com/5373723/watergate-john-dean-manafort-cohen/) which investigated [President Richard Nixon’s role](https://time.com/5388648/watergate-nixon-anonymous-op-ed/) in the attempt to cover up a break-in at the office of the Democratic National Committee—and which led up to[ Nixon’s Aug. 8, 1974, resignation.](https://time.com/3079809/richard-nixon-on-watergate/) “We’re going to have hearings for the American people which I hope will seem somewhat like the Watergate hearings did,” Rep. Jamie Raskin [said](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UFHFLZy3t0) on MSNBC on January 17, “in that they will be a daily occurrence so people can follow the unfolding narrative.” With the Jan. 6 hearings winding down, TIME asked a few experts on the Watergate era about how that analogy has held up. While the history of the Select Committee is still being written, one similarity is already clear. These rare bipartisan hearings into abuses of presidential power do have the power to shift public opinion—for some people. “The Jan. 6 Committee hearings have already accomplished what the Watergate hearings did. A majority of Americans—the middle and the left—have concluded that the President under investigation did wrong. Neither set of hearings, however, convinced the Republican base,” says [Ken Hughes](https://time.com/5574419/mueller-report-nixon-history/), a Watergate expert at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center of Public Affairs, who spoke to TIME as part of a presidential-history partnership between TIME History and the Miller Center. ”A majority of the Republican base supported Nixon during Watergate, buying into [Nixon’s narrative](https://time.com/3919625/richard-nixon-resignation/) that he was the victim of liberal Democrats in Congress and liberal bias in the news media. That’s why congressional Republicans stuck with Nixon until after their 1974 \[midterm\] primaries were over. They knew if they withdrew support from the Republican president, the base would withdraw support from them, and they would lose their jobs.” --- ### More from TIME --- [Nixon’s](https://time.com/3079683/richard-nixon-resignation-anniversary-watergate/) approval among the general public, however, dropped during the Watergate hearings. He went from winning a landslide victory in 1972 and boasting a 68% approval rating, to [plummeting](https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/09/25/how-the-watergate-crisis-eroded-public-support-for-richard-nixon/) in those polls to a low of 31% by early August 1973, a few months after the televised hearings started. With Trump, who in one crucial difference is no longer in office, it remains to be seen whether the hearings will deter him from [his much-discussed potential run](https://time.com/6197710/trump-2024-midterms-republicans/) to retake the White House. “The Watergate hearings were compelling to so many Americans because Nixon was the sitting President, and there were these growing revelations about the guy in office having committed and overseen this criminal conspiracy,” explains David Greenberg, author of _Nixon’s Shadow: The History of an Image_. “We learned about[ enemies lists](https://www.villagevoice.com/2019/03/25/the-shame-of-being-left-off-nixons-enemies-list/), and we learned about [secret White House tapes](https://time.com/4777068/white-house-tapes-trump-comey/), and we learned about the abuse of the [FBI](https://www.nytimes.com/1974/08/06/archives/nixon-ordered-that-the-fbi-be-told-dont-go-any-further-into-this.html) and [other federal agencies](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/05/26/irs-chief-defied-nixon/2360951/). It’s different with Trump out of office. Obviously, it could affect whether people want him to run again, whether they vote for him if he does run again, but it’s very different from having people turn on and become disillusioned with the sitting president.” Greenberg also adds that the impact of the Jan. 6 hearings is difficult to gauge in the streaming era, with thousands more TV channels diverting people’s attention than there were in 1973, and people catching just snippets of the hearings on social media. “[The Watergate hearings,](https://time.com/5513051/roger-stone-richard-nixon-donald-trump/) which were like man landing on the moon, just had this momentousness to it that I don’t think is at work today,” he says. “I think for a lot of people right now, \[the Jan. 6 hearings are\] not top of mind.”  Customers and employees in the television section of a New York, N.Y., department store watch the open preliminaries of the special Senate committee hearing on the bugging of the Democratic headquarters in the Watergate, May 17, 1973. Bettmann Archive To Tim Naftali, the first director of the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, what stands out is the immense popular support for [Trump](https://time.com/5777058/historians-trump-impeachment/) compared to [Nixon](https://time.com/3085905/richard-nixon-resignation-anniversary-watergate-time-covers/). “One of the things that emerged from Watergate that we’re not seeing yet is a consensus that the President had hurt the country…a bipartisan nonpartisan view that the President had done wrong and had to leave the White House and that we didn’t need another Nixon,” says Naftali. “We don’t have as bipartisan and nonpartisan and pervasive \[a\] view today that this country doesn’t need another Trump. That would be helpful for our society. It would help us heal, and the January 6 committee could contribute to that, but that’s one big difference from [Watergate](https://time.com/5477931/michael-cohen-nixon-lawyer-watergate/). President Trump left office with much more support than Richard Nixon left office despite the fact that we experienced a violent insurrection in Trump’s presidency and not in Nixon’s.” But, Naftali adds, this is not the only moment in which the hearings could affect Americans’ thinking about Trump. Just because the hearings can’t produce a resignation the way Watergate did, that doesn’t mean they won’t have a lasting and significant impact. A key legacy of the Select Committee, he says, will be the way it “deepened and broadened our understanding of the President’s responsibility for the insurrection,” laying the groundwork for how future generations will talk about the events of that fateful day. The Select Committee’s final scheduled hearing [begins](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbRVqWbHGuo) on July 21 at 8:00 p.m. E.T. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6199044/watergate-january-6-hearings-trump-nixon/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6199044/watergate-january-6-hearings-trump-nixon/"},"headline":"What Watergate Experts Think About the Jan. 6 Hearings","datePublished":"2022-07-20T19:15:09.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:42:39.087Z","description":"And how the two moments compare","url":"https://time.com/6199044/watergate-january-6-hearings-trump-nixon/","keywords":["politics","nationpod"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6b18e621330addfd/698a33d786f68e5f7b6f16df/watergate-hearings.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Olivia B. Waxman","jobTitle":"Staff Writer","url":"https://time.com/author/olivia-b-waxman/"}],"articleSection":"History","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6b18e621330addfd/698a33d786f68e5f7b6f16df/watergate-hearings.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Watergate Hearing in Progress","caption":"Watergate Hearing in Progress","creditText":"Bettmann Archive","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/history/","name":"History"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6199044/watergate-january-6-hearings-trump-nixon/","name":"What Watergate Experts Think About the Jan. 6 Hearings"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"For the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, Jan. 6 Was Just the Start","description":"The Jan. 6 committee presented further evidence on Tuesday refuting the notion that the deadly attack on the Capitol was a spontaneous riot that got out of hand, with Donald Trump and many of his allies not only aware that his supporters intended to march to the Capitol, but encouraged it, despite concerns that it could turn violent.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/tLCadT7b/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2022-07-12T21:37:02.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/tLCadT7b.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6199044/watergate-january-6-hearings-trump-nixon/","duration":"PT2M5S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6199044/watergate-january-6-hearings-trump-nixon/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```