--- title: Why Kyrsten Sinema Could Control the Future of the Filibuster description: Breaking news and analysis from time.com. Politics, world news, photos, video, tech reviews, health, science, and entertainment news. canonical: https://time.com/6071524/kyrsten-sinema-filibuster/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2021-06-04T18:24:18.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T10:00:29.282Z article:section: Politics og:title: Why Kyrsten Sinema Could Control the Future of the Filibuster og:description: Breaking news and analysis from time.com. Politics, world news, photos, video, tech reviews, health, science, and entertainment news. og:url: https://time.com/6071524/kyrsten-sinema-filibuster/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt508b57b54a13e2d7/698a1a27b3fce3ba170c7ffb/Kyrsten-Sinema-democrats.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: Senator Kyrsten Sinema og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why Kyrsten Sinema Could Control the Future of the Filibuster twitter:description: Breaking news and analysis from time.com. Politics, world news, photos, video, tech reviews, health, science, and entertainment news. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt508b57b54a13e2d7/698a1a27b3fce3ba170c7ffb/Kyrsten-Sinema-democrats.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why Kyrsten Sinema Could Control the Future of the Filibuster > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=70d8c923-9469-46df-85e6-cf279b74f2cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=70d8c923-9469-46df-85e6-cf279b74f2cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=70d8c923-9469-46df-85e6-cf279b74f2cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Jun 4, 2021 6:24 PM UTC  Senator Kyrsten Sinema at the Capitol, in Washington on May 26, 2021. Senator Kyrsten Sinema at the Capitol, in Washington on May 26, 2021. Graeme Sloan—Sipa USA  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Jun 4, 2021 6:24 PM UTC _This article is part of the The DC Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [_here_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/newsletter%5Fopt-in?qs=3a19a0aa35903a2d9f214b74f69a37910b58de73cf3f2b89adc123fac024f0478c72f91010ae9d01f08f46c616068cab3e74726837cd2cce70dac3796e46c2b4) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox every weekday._ Kyrsten Sinema came to Washington back in 2012 as something of an unpredictable player. A former Green Party spokeswoman, anti-war activist and progressive state legislator, Sinema first won her U.S. House seat by trashing the place she sought to serve—seldom a bad strategy. Once here, she actually acted on her anti-establishment impulses. She broke with her party Leadership on an array of issues, including twice voting against Nancy Pelosi’s bid to lead the Democratic Caucus and siding with some of President Donald Trump’s most aggressive proposals to crack down on immigration. Sinema’s personal quirks are legendary: she leads bipartisan fitness classes for her colleagues, her bold [fashion](https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/politics/a25737896/kyrsten-sinema-swearing-in-outfit/) sense is [unmatched](https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2020/07/22/colorful-wigs-senator-kyrsten-sinema-arizona-turns-age-old-tradition-congress-its-head/5486843002/) in the stodgy Capitol and, per a Pew [analysis](https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2013/01/03/first-member-of-congress-describes-religion-as-none), she was the first lawmaker to list “none” as their religion. In 2018, she became the first woman elected to the Senate from Arizona as well as the first bisexual to serve in the Upper Chamber, where she moved from Pelosi’s problem-child to Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer’s nagging headache. Well, all that zaniness is looking less appealing now that she—and perhaps she alone—controls what her fellow Democrats can get done between now and the 2022 elections. While the equally-vexing-to-progressives Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia is more often the subject of [ire](https://time.com/6048700/biden-infrastructure-pressure-left/) for his pursuit of bipartisanship and his tight grip on the middle of the road, Sinema is the one who actually stands today to tank the agenda. It is now fairly obvious to anyone watching Congress that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell isn’t going to drop his favorite tactic of delay and deny using the filibuster, a procedural hurdle demanding almost every single piece of legislation clear the 50-50 Senate with 60 votes. This means big-ticket items like Biden’s [infrastructure](https://time.com/6053398/joe-biden-bipartisan-infrastructure/) push, voting-rights protections, [policing](https://time.com/6061624/what-is-qualified-immunity/) reform, LGBTQ [protections](https://time.com/5949316/lgbtq-proections-equality-act/) and limits on guns need GOP buy-in to pass in normal course. Some progressive Democrats have been arguing since this Congress convened that getting rid of the filibuster will be the only way to get anything done between now and the midterms. It long seemed a secondary concern for most lawmakers. But the appetite for [ditching](https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/05/22/arizona-democrats-call-kyrsten-sinema-mark-kelly-junk-filibuster/5222229001/) that 60-vote threshold seems to have grown since Senate Republicans deployed the tactic to shut down a [proposal](https://time.com/6052664/republicans-capitol-riot-commission/) to form a bipartisan independent commission to probe the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. Republicans, sensing the political cost the findings could bring on them, stood against it. Separately, Sinema didn’t join her other Democrats in supporting the measure; she was away tending to a personal matter, her aides said. But Manchin—who for months has staunchly defended the filibuster as a check on hot passions—was [furious](https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/556805-manchin-isnt-ready-to-support-democrats-passing-infrastructure-on-their-own) about the Republicans’ move. “I never thought I’d see it—up-close-and-personal—that politics could trump our country. And I’m going to fight to save this country,” he said after the Jan. 6 commission vote failed. While Manchin isn’t yet ready to offer a eulogy for the filibuster, you can see in the West Virginian the same level of frustration with Washington that threatened his decision to seek a second term in 2018\. Back then, a clearly reluctant Manchin [sniped](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/01/24/eight-reasons-joe-manchin-is-right-the-senate-sucks/) at his party’s Leadership team, begging him to run again, that “this place sucks.” In a sign that Manchin is open to hearing the arguments, he’s sitting down next week with the NAACP to [hear](https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/556568-manchin-to-meet-with-naacp-next-week-to-discuss-voting-rights), in part, why the filibuster needs to be dealt with so the Senate can pick up legislation to undo what state lawmakers are [deploying](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/manchin-voting-rights/2021/06/02/103db892-c320-11eb-93f5-ee9558eecf4b%5Fstory.html) to limit voting rights. Sinema, meanwhile, is on a roadtrip with Republican Sen. John Cornyn, a member of McConnell’s true braintrust and one of the 35 Senators who voted to filibuster the Jan. 6 commission. Standing beside him on Tuesday in Arizona, Sinema offered up a tortured [history](https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/fake-history-senate-filibuster-sinema-founders-constitution.html) of the filibuster and [said](https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-06-04/filibuster-kyrsten-sinema-arizona-joe-manchin-west-virginia-joe-biden) it was a tool for comity and compromise. “The filibuster was not created to accomplish one thing or another. It was created to bring together members of different parties to find compromise and coalition,” she said. Twitter immediately called-out Sinema for her [errant](https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a36618396/kyrsten-sinema-filibuster-bipartisanship/) history, noting that the founders didn’t picture a two-party system, the filibuster didn’t make an appearance until 1837 and the tool found utility most often for those in the political minority to block civil-rights legislation. A columnist with the biggest paper in her state said she spoke “[daftly](https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2021/06/03/sen-kyrsten-sinema-daftly-doubles-down-filibuster-support/7516145002/)” about the tradition. History matters, but right now the future matters more. And if Democrats stand any chance of passing the big items on their agenda, they’re going to have to end the filibuster or avail themselves of the budget [trickery](https://time.com/5952581/infrastructure-senate-parliamentarian/) of reconciliation that could give them another chance to make law with just a simple majority. Even then, both options require Manchin, Sinema and fellow Arizona maverick Sen. Mark Kelly to stay in line. All three are fastidious in not appearing to be party stooges. A naked political move would foul their identities back home and make it that much harder for them to win their next election. Manchin is openly speaking against using reconciliation to get an infrastructure plan across the finish line, though some of his colleagues think [he may be able to be persuaded](https://time.com/6070438/biden-infrastructure-bipartisan-negotiatons/). Democrats are unlikely to get any credit with voters for half-passing ambitious [measures](https://thehill.com/homenews/556587-sinema-defends-filibuster-sparking-progressive-fury). They have to have something to show for winning the White House and both chambers of Congress. That means right now, Sinema has every Democratic Senator’s electoral future in her grip. They can’t do a big spending plan without [unified](https://time.com/5935347/democrats-reconciliation-relief-bill/) Democratic support to slide it in through a loophole, and they can’t change the rules without her, either. Which is why she can pretty much do what she wants. And she is. For all the time spent [commenting](https://www.npr.org/2020/05/05/850545524/purple-state-senator-rocks-wig-at-work) on her colorful [wigs](https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2020/07/22/colorful-wigs-senator-kyrsten-sinema-arizona-turns-age-old-tradition-congress-its-head/5486843002/), perhaps her bold politics have always mattered more. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [_Sign up for the daily D.C. Brief newsletter._](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/politics?source=dc%5Farticle) ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6071524/kyrsten-sinema-filibuster/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6071524/kyrsten-sinema-filibuster/"},"headline":"Why Kyrsten Sinema Could Control the Future of the Filibuster","datePublished":"2021-06-04T18:24:18.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T10:00:29.282Z","description":"","url":"https://time.com/6071524/kyrsten-sinema-filibuster/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","feature"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt508b57b54a13e2d7/698a1a27b3fce3ba170c7ffb/Kyrsten-Sinema-democrats.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt508b57b54a13e2d7/698a1a27b3fce3ba170c7ffb/Kyrsten-Sinema-democrats.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Senator Kyrsten Sinema","caption":"Senator Kyrsten Sinema at the Capitol, in Washington on May 26, 2021.","creditText":"Graeme Sloan—Sipa USA","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6071524/kyrsten-sinema-filibuster/","name":"Why Kyrsten Sinema Could Control the Future of the Filibuster"}}]}] ```