--- title: Jan. 6 Committee Has Succeeded Despite Low Expectations description: The Jan. 6 committee has won if the goal was to find information that disqualifies Trump from running again. canonical: https://time.com/6195074/jan-6-committee-unexpected-success/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-07-08T14:43:28.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T14:28:40.413Z article:section: Politics og:title: The Jan. 6 Committee Has Already Won og:description: What the committee has produced so far may be damning enough to stop Trump from running again. og:url: https://time.com/6195074/jan-6-committee-unexpected-success/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4f65298038550a89/698a338de6e84a71052af164/GettyImages-1241592925.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: US-POLITICS-CAPITOL-UNREST og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Jan. 6 Committee Has Already Won twitter:description: What the committee has produced so far may be damning enough to stop Trump from running again. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4f65298038550a89/698a338de6e84a71052af164/GettyImages-1241592925.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Jan. 6 Committee Has Succeeded Far Beyond What Anyone Imagined > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=303a2fd3-5454-4da8-9b40-a8a2149d43f7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=303a2fd3-5454-4da8-9b40-a8a2149d43f7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=303a2fd3-5454-4da8-9b40-a8a2149d43f7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Jul 8, 2022 2:43 PM UTC  Former President Donald Trump appears onscreen during the sixth hearing by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the US Capitol, in Washington, DC, on June 28, 2022. Former President Donald Trump appears onscreen during the sixth hearing by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the US Capitol, in Washington, DC, on June 28, 2022. Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Jul 8, 2022 2:43 PM UTC _This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [_here_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox._ Shotgun marriages are tricky. They are, by their very nature, rooted in rapid efficiency. They are seldom elegant; no one really wants an altar designed by a Wegmans flower desk or a cheese board built by a Kroger clerk. Arranged marriages defined more territorial and familial borders in the Old World that anyone will freely admit and today’s political matchmaking is just as opportunistic. That doesn’t mean such partnerships are sustainable. Just ask the Republican Establishment how well that elopement with Donald Trump is [working out](https://time.com/4563946/election-2016-donald-trump-victory-how/). Yes, the Republicans won in 2016 and cut taxes and secured a majority on the Supreme Court. But very seldom do ex-Presidents dominate so much congressional attention after they leave office. Washington prefers to focus on those who have actual power in the moment, and parties typically like to look ahead for its next class of leaders. Yet, Congress is coming back next week with even more [hearings](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/jan-6-committee-announces-public-hearing-rcna36791) about the failed insurrection launched by a pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6, 2021, and the GOP is trying to calculate just how much longer it has to treat Trump as its infallible leader and father-knows-best partner. After all, as is the case with all races to the altar, divorce _does_ remain an uncomfortable option for those willing to admit the error. While Trump remains the patriarch of this FrankenBrady Bunch of a GOP, the ground beneath him has shifted over the last month. Trump is [no longer](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/01/us/politics/trump-republicans-campaign-2024.html) the guaranteed 2024 [frontrunner](https://morningconsult.com/2022/03/23/trump-2024-election-survey-desantis-running-mate/) he once was. He will dominate the field—until he doesn’t—but that day seems far more plausible. Inside Washington, there’s a not-so-quiet [hum](https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/06/11/republican-president-2024-trump/) that maybe those claims of Trump being the most powerful Republican in the country are no longer true. That maybe his hold on the GOP is an arthritic one. And that his time at the head of the pack may be coming to an end—here’s where the plot twists—thanks to another unexpected shotgun marriage, this one between two principled Republicans and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In the immediate aftermath of the Jan. 6 attack, lawmakers set out to investigate how it happened and to prevent anything like it from happening again. [Hopes](https://time.com/6137435/january-6-anniversary-commission/) of a 9/11 Commission-style probe fell apart in short order, and Congress instead settled on a select committee made of its own members. Then Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy made the calculated risk of unveiling a Republican roster that included unabashed Trump apologists who were adherents to the Big Lie. As is permitted by the rules establishing the committee, Pelosi [rejected](https://time.com/6082950/pelosi-mcarthy-january-6-committee/) the panelists she found objectionable, and McCarthy responded by [yanking](https://time.com/6137871/january-6-partisan-divide/) the entire slate. [Enter](https://time.com/6192383/donald-trump-knew-jan-6-hearings/) the unexpected arrivals to the altar: Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger. The two true-dyed conservatives had found the Jan. 6 attacks abhorrent and agreed to serve on the panel investigating it. At blockbuster public hearings, they have often handled the questioning of witnesses with the most damning testimony, and they have shown zero signs that they are allowing fear for their own political futures to get in the way of finding the truth. In fact, they both appear to be viewing the assignment as a worthy trade: likely shepherding their exile from politics for at least a while in exchange for a possibly similar fate for Trump. Polling to this point on the hearings is mixed, if not contradictory. While some Republicans are watching, Democrats are tuning in more closely, and the [delta](https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2022/06/23/what-are-americans-thinking-about-the-january-6-hearings/) between the two groups has grown. The [audience](https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/2e7fbuwkn8/20220610%5Fyahoo%5Ftabs.pdf) is mostly folks who approve of Biden’s performance as President and [identify](https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/i873rvg5xx/econTabReport.pdf) as Democrats at that. And the hearings are swaying few Republican minds about Trump’s culpability, according to some surveys. However—and it’s a big one—almost 4-in-5 Americans now [believe](https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/i873rvg5xx/econTabReport.pdf) Trump tried to overturn the results of the 2020 election. He might not have been responsible for the events of Jan. 6, but he definitely tried to change the election outcome. Significantly, about half of Republicans agree with that assessment. More critically, 3-in-5 Americans [think](https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2022-06/Topline%20ABC%5FIpsos%20Poll%20June%2018%202022.pdf) Trump should be charged with a crime over the riot. Even among Trump’s biggest stans, it’s tough to rationally nominate someone widely seen as meriting prosecution as a presidential nominee. Trump’s antics, as they’ve been documented by the Jan. 6 team, have become simply too much to ignore for these Republicans, many of whom were among those who held their noses and backed Trump in 2016 because at least he wasn’t Hillary Clinton. But before NeverTrumpers think the fever is finally breaking, it’s necessary to [remember](https://time.com/4529433/inside-donald-trump-total-meltdown/) that the laws of politics and even gravity don’t apply to Trump. He still [won](https://time.com/5422644/trump-white-women-2016/) a plurality of white women in 2016, despite boorish behavior that included being caught on [tape](https://time.com/5038934/donald-trump-access-hollywood-authentic-tape/) bragging about sexual assault without consequence. Scandals dogged him but didn’t drag him, no criticism dented his gold-plated bumpers, an [ever-changing](https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/us/politics/corey-lewandowski-donald-trump.html) campaign hierarchy never cost him. He is a survivor, and his nuptials with the GOP may have more reconciliations than a telenovela. Trump has never been mistaken as a model character. Even Mike Pence—his snap spouse of 2016—[knew](https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/07/10/american-carnage-excerpt-access-hollywood-tape-227269/) he had made an [error](https://time.com/4793901/vice-president-mike-pence/) in joining the ticket well before the one Election Day that went Trump’s way. When the Jan. 6 crowd went chasing Pence around Capitol Hill to escort him to a hangman’s noose, it was as clear as ever that he had accepted a toxic proposal. Like many others, Pence is looking at polling and the 2024 field, and [plotting](https://time.com/6180484/mike-pence-georgia-kemp-trump-2024/) his own revenge. So, in that sense, the Jan. 6 committee has already won. They won’t admit it; it would be bad politics. But they’ve won if the goal was to find information that disqualifies Trump from running. Or even thinking about it. It’s tough to imagine the many, many skeptics of the committee’s work ever picturing such an outcome. Yet here we are. The committee is still working but even what it has produced so far may be damning enough to stop Trump from ever again slashing open the MAGA movement’s artery of grievance and violence. What’s pretty clear at this point is that few establishment-minded Republicans still fear Trump, even if he remains the most powerful member of the party. In that sense, Trump’s shotgun marriage to the party may have run its course. The shadow campaign to be the party’s next spouse is already underway. So, too, might have Washington watched succeed the Jan. 6-themed wedding between the principled Republicans and Pelosi. Sometimes, you just have to root for those crazy kids and their ill-considered love. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [_Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6195074/jan-6-committee-unexpected-success/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6195074/jan-6-committee-unexpected-success/"},"headline":"The Jan. 6 Committee Has Succeeded Far Beyond What Anyone Imagined","datePublished":"2022-07-08T14:43:28.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T14:28:40.413Z","description":"What the committee has produced so far may be damning enough to stop Trump from running again.","url":"https://time.com/6195074/jan-6-committee-unexpected-success/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","republicans","Congress","White House","Donald Trump","January 6"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4f65298038550a89/698a338de6e84a71052af164/GettyImages-1241592925.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4f65298038550a89/698a338de6e84a71052af164/GettyImages-1241592925.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US-POLITICS-CAPITOL-UNREST","caption":"US-POLITICS-CAPITOL-UNREST","creditText":"Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6195074/jan-6-committee-unexpected-success/","name":"The Jan. 6 Committee Has Succeeded Far Beyond What Anyone Imagined"}}]}] ```