--- title: How Facebook Is Failing Myanmar Again description: Facebook is rejecting a request to release data for a genocide investigation in Myanmar. Congress needs to intervene canonical: https://time.com/5880118/myanmar-rohingya-genocide-facebook-gambia/ author: Matthew Smith article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-08-18T05:18:50.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T09:07:16.814Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Facebook Wanted to Be a Force for Good in Myanmar. Now It Is Rejecting a Request to Help With a Genocide Investigation og:description: If Facebook won’t do the right thing now, then Congress should make them og:url: https://time.com/5880118/myanmar-rohingya-genocide-facebook-gambia/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e14bf68aee16a90/698a11664ee2625eff317d26/facebook_gambida_myanmar_genocide_data_request.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: facebook_gambida_myanmar_genocide_data_request.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Facebook Wanted to Be a Force for Good in Myanmar. Now It Is Rejecting a Request to Help With a Genocide Investigation twitter:description: If Facebook won’t do the right thing now, then Congress should make them twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e14bf68aee16a90/698a11664ee2625eff317d26/facebook_gambida_myanmar_genocide_data_request.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Facebook Wanted to Be a Force for Good in Myanmar. Now It Is Rejecting a Request to Help With a Genocide Investigation > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=e424d352-9576-4c60-a53f-e3f02d0ed1e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=e424d352-9576-4c60-a53f-e3f02d0ed1e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=e424d352-9576-4c60-a53f-e3f02d0ed1e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=e424d352-9576-4c60-a53f-e3f02d0ed1e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Matthew Smith](https://time.com/author/matthew-smith/) ## Matthew Smith Aug 18, 2020 5:18 AM UTC  Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer of Facebook, listens during a meeting at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. on Sept. 27, 2015. Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer of Facebook, listens during a meeting at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. on Sept. 27, 2015. David Paul Morris—Bloomberg/Getty Images by [Matthew Smith](https://time.com/author/matthew-smith/) ## Matthew Smith Aug 18, 2020 5:18 AM UTC Just when it seemed like Facebook’s controversies might have peaked, the company now appears to be obstructing [a genocide investigation](https://time.com/5748024/myanmar-aung-san-suu-kyi-icj-genocide-rohingya/), and it’s using U.S. law to do it. The West African nation The Gambia is seeking [to hold Myanmar accountable](https://time.com/5770080/myanmar-rohingya-genocide-un-court/) for charges of [genocide against the Rohingya people](https://www.fortifyrights.org/downloads/Fortify%5FRights%5FLong%5FSwords%5FJuly%5F2018.pdf), an ethnic and religious minority. In 2016 and 2017, Myanmar soldiers and their civilian proxies [massacred Rohingya](https://time.com/4951180/myanmars-shame-aung-san-suu-kyi/) men, women and children, raped women and girls and razed villages, forcing more than 800,000 to flee into neighboring Bangladesh. [Facebook’s role](https://time.com/5197039/un-facebook-myanmar-rohingya-violence/) in these atrocities isn’t news. In 2018, Facebook [acknowledged](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/06/technology/myanmar-facebook.html) it was used to “foment division and incite offline violence” in Myanmar, where the social media platform is so ubiquitous it’s often synonymous with the internet. An independent report commissioned by the company documented the same, as did [independent fact-finders](https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/MyanmarFFM/Pages/ReportoftheMyanmarFFM.aspx) appointed by the U.N. In response, Facebook [took down the account](https://about.fb.com/news/2018/08/removing-myanmar-officials/) of the commander-in-chief of the Myanmar military, [Senior General Min Aung Hlaing](https://time.com/5004822/myanmar-rohingya-min-aung-hlaing/), and other military officials and organizations. In 2018 alone it shut down numerous networks that sought to incite violence against Rohingya, removing 484 pages, 157 accounts, and 17 groups for “[coordinated inauthentic behavior](https://about.fb.com/news/2018/08/removing-myanmar-officials/).” To its credit, Facebook preserved the data and content it took down, and the company committed to cleaning up its act. “We know we need to do more to ensure we are a force for good in Myanmar,” a company representative said in an [official statement](https://about.fb.com/news/2018/11/myanmar-hria/) in 2018. Now, two years later, the company is doing exactly the opposite. In June, The Gambia filed an application in U.S. federal court seeking information from Facebook that would help it hold Myanmar accountable at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Specifically, The Gambia is seeking documents and communications from Myanmar military officials as well as information from hundreds of other pages and accounts that Facebook took down and preserved. The Gambia is also seeking documents related to Facebook’s internal investigations into the matter as well as a deposition of a relevant Facebook executive. All of this information could help to prove [Myanmar’s genocidal intent](https://time.com/4994524/myanmar-rohingya-fortify-rights-genocide/). **Read more:** [_Myanmar’s Crisis, Bangladesh’s Burden: Among the Rohingya Refugees Waiting for a_](https://time.com/5031342/bangladesh-myanmar-rohingya-refugee-crisis/)[ _Miracle_](https://time.com/5031342/bangladesh-myanmar-rohingya-refugee-crisis/) Back in May, The Gambia filed a similar application in U.S. court against Twitter. The case disappeared quickly because The Gambia pulled its application shortly after submitting it, presumably because Twitter agreed to cooperate. Not Facebook. Earlier this month, the company filed its opposition to The Gambia’s application. Facebook said the request is “extraordinarily broad,” as well as “unduly intrusive or burdensome.” Calling on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reject the application, the social media giant says The Gambia fails to “identify accounts with sufficient specificity.” The Gambia was actually quite specific, going so far as to name 17 officials, two military units and dozens of pages and accounts. Facebook also takes issue with the fact that The Gambia is seeking information dating back to 2012, evidently failing to recognize [two similar waves](https://www.hrw.org/reports/burma0413%5FFullForWeb.pdf) of atrocities against Rohingya that year, and that genocidal intent isn’t spontaneous, but builds over time. The management and [analysis of data](https://time.com/5516453/facebook-data-research/) is not new to Facebook. It’s a core competency. The company analyzes billions of data points on its users every day, monetizing information collected from personal posts, chats and photos. That is [Facebook’s business model](https://time.com/5237458/the-facebook-defect/). Now the company claims it’s unreasonable or “burdensome” for it to share data on a specific number of accounts that it already removed and preserved. The argument is not only unconvincing; it’s morally appalling. **Read more:** [_Could Facebook Have Helped Stop the Spread of Hate in Myanmar?_](https://time.com/5230474/facebook-myanmar-hate-speech-rohingya/) But the crux of Facebook’s argument is the claim that The Gambia is asking the court to issue a subpoena in violation of U.S. law, specifically a section of the Stored Communications Act (SCA). This important federal law prevents social media companies from releasing communications and data to third parties on a whim. Here’s the thing: the law is intended to protect the privacy of individuals, not shield unlawful actions of State actors. Under the SCA, there are exceptions to the privacy it protects, including when the government has a valid subpoena. And Facebook can divulge communications to protect its own rights, which would include its right to enforce its terms of service and deter unlawful behavior on the platform. In addition, if information shared on social media was intended for public viewing, the SCA does not require a company to keep that information private. Many of the pages and accounts that [Facebook took down](https://time.com/5383780/myanmar-facebook-propaganda-rohingya/) in relation to the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar were public. Facebook might say it’s concerned about setting a dangerous precedent, but sharing information of genocidal intent through a U.S. federal court would seem to be precisely the “precedent” the company should want to set, i.e. to deter State actors from using its platform for criminal purposes. Not to mention that voluntarily complying with The Gambia’s request wouldn’t create any legal precedent, only an internal one at the company. The Gambia is expected to respond to Facebook’s opposition in court on Aug. 18\. Regardless of how this request unfolds, U.S. law should never be used to protect perpetrators of genocide. If Facebook won’t do the right thing now, then Congress should make them. U.S. legislators should pass a swift amendment to the SCA that would require social media companies to share relevant information with official bodies and litigants at international tribunals attempting to hold perpetrators of genocide and mass atrocity crimes accountable. The law should impose civil liability for any failure to divulge such information when properly requested. Beyond that, for the time being, taking a stand against genocide could be as easy as deleting your Facebook account. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5880118/myanmar-rohingya-genocide-facebook-gambia/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5880118/myanmar-rohingya-genocide-facebook-gambia/"},"headline":"Facebook Wanted to Be a Force for Good in Myanmar. Now It Is Rejecting a Request to Help With a Genocide Investigation","datePublished":"2020-08-18T05:18:50.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T09:07:16.814Z","description":"Facebook is rejecting a request to help with a genocide investigation in Myanmar. Congress needs to intervene","url":"https://time.com/5880118/myanmar-rohingya-genocide-facebook-gambia/","keywords":["world affairs","overnight"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e14bf68aee16a90/698a11664ee2625eff317d26/facebook_gambida_myanmar_genocide_data_request.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Matthew Smith","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/matthew-smith/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e14bf68aee16a90/698a11664ee2625eff317d26/facebook_gambida_myanmar_genocide_data_request.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"facebook_gambida_myanmar_genocide_data_request.jpg","caption":"Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi Meets With Facebook Inc. Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg","creditText":"David Paul Morris—Bloomberg/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/world-affairs/","name":"world affairs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5880118/myanmar-rohingya-genocide-facebook-gambia/","name":"Facebook Wanted to Be a Force for Good in Myanmar. Now It Is Rejecting a Request to Help With a Genocide Investigation"}}]}] ```