--- title: A Realistic Plan for Peace for Ukraine and Russia description: As the Russian invasion of Ukraine drags on, the outlines of what a peace settlement could look like are becoming clearer canonical: https://time.com/6159799/ukraine-russia-peace-plan/ author: Michael O'Hanlon article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-03-23T16:36:18.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:51:42.606Z article:section: Ideas og:title: A Realistic Plan for Peace for Ukraine and Russia og:description: As the Russian invasion of Ukraine drags on, the outlines of what a peace settlement could look like are becoming clearer og:url: https://time.com/6159799/ukraine-russia-peace-plan/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9a6c6bcd913d593/698a3041db29876066267a40/GettyImages-1239435737.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Evacuations from Mariupol continue og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: A Realistic Plan for Peace for Ukraine and Russia twitter:description: As the Russian invasion of Ukraine drags on, the outlines of what a peace settlement could look like are becoming clearer twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9a6c6bcd913d593/698a3041db29876066267a40/GettyImages-1239435737.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # A Realistic Plan for Peace for Ukraine and Russia > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=718f88e6-dee3-407c-b040-124b1c61b7b4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=718f88e6-dee3-407c-b040-124b1c61b7b4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=718f88e6-dee3-407c-b040-124b1c61b7b4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: President Zelensky to U.S. Congress: 'We Need You Right Now' [Watch (HLS stream): President Zelensky to U.S. Congress: 'We Need You Right Now'](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/mY6wXa0X.m3u8) (4:07)  _Published 2022-03-16. As the Russian invasion of Ukraine drags on, the outlines of what a peace settlement could look like are becoming clearer_ by [Michael O'Hanlon](https://time.com/author/michael-ohanlon/) ## Michael O'Hanlon Mar 23, 2022 4:36 PM UTC  Destroyed buildings are seen as civilians are evacuated along humanitarian corridors from the Ukrainian city of Mariupol under the control of Russian military and pro-Russian separatists, on March 21, 2022. Destroyed buildings are seen as civilians are evacuated along humanitarian corridors from the Ukrainian city of Mariupol under the control of Russian military and pro-Russian separatists, on March 21, 2022. Stringer-Anadolu Agency by [Michael O'Hanlon](https://time.com/author/michael-ohanlon/) ## Michael O'Hanlon Mar 23, 2022 4:36 PM UTC As the tragic war in Ukraine has now driven roughly 10 million from their homes and killed many thousands, with no end in sight and no real prospect of near-term victory for either side, it is increasingly necessary to focus on a possible peace plan. Ukraine and Russia will have to agree on specifics, and at this point it is very difficult to know what either side would accept, but this war involves us all in one way or another, and springs in part from a disagreement about whether Ukraine should ever be allowed into NATO. As such, the U.S. has a big stake in this issue, and the Biden Administration should play a major role in helping the parties conceptualize a possible compromise. The essence of any deal would presumably be that Ukraine [forgo its aspirations to join NATO](https://time.com/6155638/ukraine-war-how-it-could-end/), that the Ukrainian governments as well as NATO formalize that commitment, and that Russia agree to a ceasefire as well as withdrawal of its forces from Ukrainian territory. All parties would also formally commit to uphold and promote the security of a neutral Ukraine. NATO and the European Union would convey the resolute message that if Russia again attacked, all of our economic sanctions against Russia and [military assistance to Ukraine](https://time.com/6157257/nato-ukraine-military-aid/) would snap back on. Beyond these general principles, a number of additional ideas might be considered **Territory.** It is tolerable, and probably inevitable, that Russia will insist on holding onto the Crimean peninsula, given Crimea’s role in Russian history and its importance for the Russian Navy. However, we in the West are not obliged to recognize this annexation dating back to 2014\. Ukraine should be allowed to keep the issue alive in the future with Moscow, if it so chooses, perhaps proposing various types of dual citizenship and guaranteed access within this choice real estate. By contrast, the Donbas regions of eastern Ukraine should be returned to Ukraine, given the naked and violent Russian aggression that has since 2014 victimized this region—though if [Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky](https://time.com/6154139/volodymyr-zelensky-ukraine-profile-russia/) were willing to modify borders in that region, we should not oppose the idea. **U.N. peacekeepers.** To reduce the odds of renewed fighting, a U.N. monitoring mission (with troops from outside the Russia and NATO regions) could be deployed along whatever future borders are agreed upon. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe should deploy monitors as well. **U.N. presence.** Today, most U.N. agencies are home-based in New York, Italy, Switzerland, and Austria. The latter two countries are neutral, like Ukraine would itself remain in the future. Thus, it would be natural that some technical U.N. agencies (not security organizations per se) be moved to Ukraine in a demonstration of the confidence and commitment of the international community to Ukraine’s sovereignty and as a symbolic recognition of its enduring neutrality. **Rebuilding Ukraine.** The international community will need to help Ukraine rebuild after the war. Ideally, if improbably, Russia should make at least a token contribution to this effort itself, as one of the key members of the U.N. and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Its financial contribution should not however be couched as reparations, since that would make the idea a non-starter in Moscow. Russia itself should not be eligible for any financial assistance. **Ukraine’s future military and political system.** Some Russians are insisting on a demilitarized Ukraine as part of any deal, as well as the end of the Zelensky government. The latter demand would be an unconscionable infringement on Ukraine’s sovereignty. The former is also unacceptable; it would only give Putin the prospect of easily resuming the war at a future time. Ukraine cannot be a threat to Russia, given its size, and Putin knows it, so any Russian demand to demilitarize Ukraine demonstrates bad faith. That said, Ukraine’s future military forces should resemble those of Finland or Switzerland or Sweden—with a modest active-duty force and a large reserve capability, primarily of infantry, that can resist any attack or attempt at occupation. This is not too different from Ukraine’s current defense posture, so the goal should be to avoid new constraints, not change the basic situation dramatically. **Military aid.** The U.S. can and should commit as part of any deal to limit our own [military aid](https://time.com/6155330/ukraine-invasion-us-military-support/) to Ukraine to the scale and character that preceded the war—several hundred million dollars a year on average—rather than to the much greater flow that we have been providing in recent weeks since the conflict began. **Finland and Sweden.** These two countries have long been proud of their neutrality, but Putin’s behavior has made them reconsider fundamentally whether they wish [to join NATO](https://time.com/6158727/finland-sweden-wrestle-with-the-benefits-joining-nato/), and a majority in each country now support the idea. Putin must accept that possibility; it is not his right to deny it, Finland and Sweden’s choice even as they continue to mull whether such membership would in fact be a good idea. **Sanctions.** Even though most sanctions imposed recently on Russia would be relaxed, then lifted, under this deal, Putin will have to accept that many [western businesses](https://time.com/6155725/corporations-war-russia-ukraine/) will not choose to return to Russia for years to come, and western governments cannot force them to return. Such is the natural consequence of his military aggression, and he will have to live with it for some time to come. Still, such a prospect is far better for him than the kind of economic pain that will ensue if the war continues. With a deal, Russia will be able to resume most [energy trade](https://time.com/6155823/biden-ban-russian-oil/) and most access to the international financial system. Perhaps [China and the U.S.](https://time.com/6157160/china-stop-russias-war-in-ukraine/), often at each other’s throats on the Ukraine issue and many others these days, can even collaborate on how to pursue and support this kind of peace process. President Xi Jinping may be best able to persuade Putin of the logic of this kind of approach—a framework that is ideal for no one, but the “least bad” of the realistic paths forward for most. There is little further time to waste, before what is already a horribly tragic war becomes absolutely catastrophic. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6159799/ukraine-russia-peace-plan/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6159799/ukraine-russia-peace-plan/"},"headline":"A Realistic Plan for Peace for Ukraine and Russia","datePublished":"2022-03-23T16:36:18.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:51:42.606Z","description":"As the Russian invasion of Ukraine drags on, the outlines of what a peace settlement could look like are becoming clearer","url":"https://time.com/6159799/ukraine-russia-peace-plan/","keywords":["Ukraine"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9a6c6bcd913d593/698a3041db29876066267a40/GettyImages-1239435737.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Michael O'Hanlon","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/michael-ohanlon/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9a6c6bcd913d593/698a3041db29876066267a40/GettyImages-1239435737.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Evacuations from Mariupol continue","caption":"Evacuations from Mariupol continue","creditText":"Stringer-Anadolu Agency","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/ukraine/","name":"Ukraine"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6159799/ukraine-russia-peace-plan/","name":"A Realistic Plan for Peace for Ukraine and Russia"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"President Zelensky to U.S. Congress: 'We Need You Right Now'","description":"As the Russian invasion of Ukraine drags on, the outlines of what a peace settlement could look like are becoming clearer","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/mY6wXa0X/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2022-03-16T16:22:00.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/mY6wXa0X.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6159799/ukraine-russia-peace-plan/","duration":"PT4M7S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6159799/ukraine-russia-peace-plan/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```