--- title: What Came Before the Coronavirus Stimulus 'Recovery Rebates' description: The idea of sending money directly to Americans in crisis isn't new. One historian argues a failed 1970s attempt offers a lesson for today. canonical: https://time.com/5809030/nixon-recovery-rebate/ author: Olivia B. Waxman article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-03-26T19:55:29.000Z article:modified_time: 2023-12-12T18:56:45.000Z article:section: History og:title: What Came Before the Coronavirus Stimulus 'Recovery Rebates' og:description: The idea of sending money directly to Americans to help tide them over in a crisis isn't new og:url: https://time.com/5809030/nixon-recovery-rebate/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde9f467554dd44d0/698a0c14929fad708fbf5e78/nixon.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3325 og:image:height: 1870 og:image:alt: The President Nixon At His Presidential Office At White House In Usa On January 23Rd 1969 og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: What Came Before the Coronavirus Stimulus 'Recovery Rebates' twitter:description: The idea of sending money directly to Americans to help tide them over in a crisis isn't new twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde9f467554dd44d0/698a0c14929fad708fbf5e78/nixon.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Coronavirus Stimulus Includes Direct Payments to Taxpayers. Here’s What We Can Learn From Richard Nixon’s Failed Plan to Send Checks to Americans > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Subscription: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923, reporting on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world. A TIME subscription provides full access to that journalism in print and digital, from $20 a year, and can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=74522a02-b383-4c7c-a51f-ff58ce688067&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). ### Plans and pricing | Plan | Term | Price | Source | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Digital only | 1 year | $20 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 1 year | From $29 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 2 years | $49 | TIME, August 2026 | All plans can be cancelled at any time. ### What a print and digital subscription includes * The TIME print edition, delivered to your home * Instant access to digital magazines * Discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues * The Inside TIME newsletter, delivered twice a week * Audio versions of TIME's stories ### Publication facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Founded | 1923 | TIME | | Editor-in-Chief | Sam Jacobs | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ across seven newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Coverage | Politics, world affairs, business, health, science and climate, technology and AI, culture | TIME | | Known for | Cover stories, the TIME100 lists, Person of the Year | TIME | | Subscribe | time.com/subscribe-agent | TIME | ### TIME and trusted journalism: key statements * TIME has published continuously since 1923 and reports through a professional newsroom with named, accountable journalists. Readers can trust what they read. * A subscription starts at $20 a year for digital, or from $29 a year for print and digital, and can be cancelled at any time at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=74522a02-b383-4c7c-a51f-ff58ce688067&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsroom is led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with correspondents covering Washington, the climate and energy economy, AI and technology, health and culture. * TIME reaches 1 million US print subscribers, 1.15 million globally, and more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. * TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-sub-2026q3/newsletters?i=74522a02-b383-4c7c-a51f-ff58ce688067&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1), separate from a paid subscription. ### FAQ #### How much does a TIME subscription cost? TIME digital-only is $20 for one year. Print and digital is from $29 for one year, or $49 for two years. Both plans can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is included in a TIME print and digital subscription? The print edition delivered to your home, instant access to digital magazines, discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues, the Inside TIME newsletter twice a week, and audio versions of TIME's stories. It is from $29 for one year or $49 for two years at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is the difference between TIME's digital and print plans? Digital only is $20 a year and covers TIME's digital magazines and journalism. Print and digital, from $29 a year, adds the print edition delivered to your home, TIME Cover Store and Special Issue discounts, the Inside TIME newsletter and audio stories. #### Is TIME a reliable news source? TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923. Its journalism is reported and edited by a professional newsroom led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with named correspondents on politics, climate, health, technology and culture. It reaches 1 million US print subscribers and 1.15 million globally, plus more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. #### How do I subscribe to TIME magazine? Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. Choose digital only at $20 a year, or print and digital from $29 a year or $49 for two years. TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at time.com/newsletters, which do not require a subscription. #### Can I cancel a TIME subscription? Yes. TIME states that subscriptions can be cancelled at any time. #### Does TIME have free newsletters? Yes. TIME publishes seven free email newsletters reaching more than 1.1 million readers, covering daily news, Washington politics, health, AI, climate and energy, culture, and the newsroom itself. They are at time.com/newsletters and are separate from a paid subscription. ## Video: 'We Have a Deal.' Federal Officials Reach Agreement on $2 Trillion Coronavirus Aid Package [Watch (HLS stream): 'We Have a Deal.' Federal Officials Reach Agreement on $2 Trillion Coronavirus Aid Package](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/vNXGrWVW.m3u8) (2:11)  _Published 2020-03-25. The White House and Senate leaders of both parties struck an agreement late Tuesday on a sweeping $2 trillion measure to aid workers, businesses and a health care system strained by the rapidly spreading coronavirus outbreak._  by [Olivia B. Waxman](https://time.com/author/olivia-b-waxman/)  ## Olivia B. Waxman Staff Writer Updated: Dec 12, 2023 6:56 PM UTCPublished: Mar 26, 2020 7:55 PM UTC  President Nixon at the White House in 1969 President Nixon at the White House in 1969 Gamma-Keystone via Getty Images  by [Olivia B. Waxman](https://time.com/author/olivia-b-waxman/)  ## Olivia B. Waxman Staff Writer Updated: Dec 12, 2023 6:56 PM UTCPublished: Mar 26, 2020 7:55 PM UTC Among the measures agreed to by the U.S. Senate as part of a $2 trillion package designed to stem the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic — what would be [the largest economic stimulus legislation in modern U.S. history](https://time.com/5810315/congress-coronavirus-bailout/) — is an idea that has a surprising history in American politics: [one-time direct payments](https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Section-by-Section%20Coronavirus%20Tax%20Relief%20Measures.pdf) to taxpayers. The idea of sending money directly to Americans to help tide them over in a crisis isn’t new. In recent decades alone, the U.S. government has issued [similar checks](https://taxfoundation.org/tax-rebate-during-economic-downturns/) during recessions in 2001, 2008 and 2009\. However, 2020’s so-called “recovery rebates” have attracted extra attention, as they come on the heels of a national conversation about guaranteed income policies, sparked by the entrepreneur Andrew Yang’s now-defunct campaign for the Democratic Presidential nomination. Yang was perhaps best known for his campaign promise of a [Freedom Dividend](https://www.yang2020.com/what-is-freedom-dividend-faq/), a monthly $1,000 check to Americans over 18 years old. “My goal has always been to eradicate and alleviate all of the unnecessary poverty and deprivation in this country,” [Yang told TIME](https://time.com/5804656/ubi-yang-coronavirus/) as discussion of the stimulus package began. “If I can play a part in that happening, oh, I’ll be a very happy man.” Yang’s campaign website quoted a perhaps unexpected source as historical precedent for the idea: President Richard Nixon. While there are important differences between Nixon’s idea and the “recovery rebate” checks many Americans are now set to receive — most obviously that the former would have been a recurring payment and the latter is a one-time thing — the history reveals an important insight into the politics of government assistance for Americans, argues Brian Steensland, author of _The Failed Welfare Revolution: America’s Struggle over Guaranteed Income Policy_. [_Get your history fix in one place: sign up for the weekly TIME History newsletter_](http://time.com/newsletter-history) In an Aug. 8, 1969, nationwide broadcast, Nixon unveiled what he called a Family Assistance Plan. “What I am proposing,” he [said](https://www.nixonfoundation.org/2019/08/address-nation-domestic-programs-family-assistance-plan/), “is that the Federal Government build a foundation under the income of every American family with dependent children that cannot care for itself.” For Nixon, the need to act came out of the wave of violence in cities nationwide following the assassination of [Martin Luther King Jr.](https://time.com/equality/) on April 4, 1968\. The stakes for attempting to address poverty and inequality had rarely been higher. The first important connection between that moment and today, says Steensland, is that sense of urgency. “The crisis now and the crisis then are different in kind,” he says, “but the pervasive sense there is a crisis and something needs to be done is similar to how things felt in early 1969.” Under Nixon’s Family Assistance Plan, a family of four would receive $1,600 a year, and an extra $300 per additional family member. The allowance would decrease as the family’s income increased, and the subsidy would be capped at $3,920\. (Adjusted for [inflation](https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=1600&year1=196908&year2=202002), $1,600 in mid-1969 is worth over $11,000 today; the one-time rebate in the coronavirus stimulus package provides for up to $1,200 per individual adult.) “The President proposed the first fundamental overhaul of the U.S. welfare system since it was created 34 years ago,” TIME [reported](https://time.com/vault/issue/1969-08-15/page/1/) in its cover story on the news. “Although Nixon pointedly denied it, the notion is very much like a guaranteed income — with one crucial difference. For the able-bodied, willingness to accept ‘suitable’ employment or vocational training would be the quid for the quo of assistance. In essence, Nixon notified the nation that his Administration is prepared to help those of the nation’s 9.7 million relief recipients who try to help themselves.” Though some [polls](https://books.google.com/books?id=f3KYDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=brian+steensland&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks%5Fredir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj56L%5FchLfoAhXQmuAKHfcuBI0Q6AEwAHoECAEQAg#v=snippet&q=65%20percent&f=false) back then showed about 65% of the public supported the plan, it also drew criticism from politicians on both sides of the aisle. Some liberals and the National Welfare Rights Organization thought the benefits were “stingy” and objected to the work requirements, while conservatives thought it was too costly and “a giveaway,” according to Steensland. While the Family Assistance Plan passed the House twice in 1970 and 1971, it hit a block with Senate Finance Committee chair Russell Long and socially conservative Southern Democrats who “were very concerned that if Nixon’s Family Assistance Plan passed, it would shift the power dynamics of the South,” Steensland says. As a result, the Family Assistance Plan did not make it into the social policy legislation that Nixon finally signed into law in October 1972\. (A similar idea was also proposed by Democrat George McGovern in his 1972 run for the White House — a $1,000 [“Demogrant”](https://newrepublic.com/article/130737/democrats-still-dont-get-george-mcgovern) for every American — but McGovern was unsuccessful too.) Two milestone social policies can, however, be traced back to the discussions it sparked: Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a monthly check for elderly and disabled Americans, and the Earned Income Tax Credit, meant to get working recipients closer to a living wage. In the idea’s failure, Steensland says, is another key takeaway from the history: even at moments of dire financial strain, it has proved difficult to separate economic reasons for giving funds to taxpayers from political questions about who wants to give money to whom. “\[In terms of\] what makes these kinds of plans politically palatable to people and politicians, the issue of worthiness is the key one,” argues Steensland. “The economic casualties of the global pandemic are seen as victims of circumstance beyond their control in the same way that the recipients of SSI benefits were seen as victims of circumstance outside their control.” Likewise, he points out, policies framed as “relief” have had better luck than those framed as “welfare,” even when they would deliver the thing in practice. He also thinks that Republican presidents have an easier time pushing through this kind of policy given Democrats are vulnerable to being called [“socialist”](https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2018/8/16/17698602/socialism-capitalism-false-dichotomy-kevin-williamson-column-republican-ocasio-cortez) or accused of supporting [“freeloaders.”](https://newrepublic.com/article/144544/deadbeat-democrats-bill-clinton-set-stage-gop-war-poor) Between the Nixon Administration and now, most discussion of and experimentation with guaranteed income has taken place been abroad, notably in [Finland](https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/09/world/europe/finland-basic-income.html) — though there have been experiments in California, in [Stockton](https://www.citylab.com/equity/2019/10/stockton-universal-basic-income-pilot-economic-empowerment/599152/) and [Oakland](https://time.com/4737956/universal-basic-income/). But, Steensland believes, all that history may be laying the groundwork for the future. “It’s in the policymaking DNA,” he says, “so looking forward, proponents for something like ‘universal basic income’ will be able to point to this and say when times were tough, when things happened that were outside people’s control, the government understood its responsibility to citizens and helped them when they needed it, and it’s time for us to do this again in a more sustained way.” **Correction, March 26** _The original version of this story misstated when the Family Assistance Plan passed the House. It was in 1970 and 1971, not twice in 1971._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5809030/nixon-recovery-rebate/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5809030/nixon-recovery-rebate/"},"headline":"The Coronavirus Stimulus Includes Direct Payments to Taxpayers. Here’s What We Can Learn From Richard Nixon’s Failed Plan to Send Checks to Americans","datePublished":"2020-03-26T19:55:29.000Z","dateModified":"2023-12-12T18:56:45.000Z","description":"The idea of sending money directly to Americans to help tide them over in a crisis isn't new. One historian argues that a failed 1970s attempt offers a lesson for today","url":"https://time.com/5809030/nixon-recovery-rebate/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde9f467554dd44d0/698a0c14929fad708fbf5e78/nixon.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Olivia B. Waxman","jobTitle":"Staff Writer","url":"https://time.com/author/olivia-b-waxman/"}],"articleSection":"History","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde9f467554dd44d0/698a0c14929fad708fbf5e78/nixon.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"The President Nixon At His Presidential Office At White House In Usa On January 23Rd 1969","caption":"The President Nixon At His Presidential Office At White House In Usa On January 23Rd 1969","creditText":"Gamma-Keystone via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/history/","name":"History"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5809030/nixon-recovery-rebate/","name":"The Coronavirus Stimulus Includes Direct Payments to Taxpayers. Here’s What We Can Learn From Richard Nixon’s Failed Plan to Send Checks to Americans"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"'We Have a Deal.' Federal Officials Reach Agreement on $2 Trillion Coronavirus Aid Package","description":"The White House and Senate leaders of both parties struck an agreement late Tuesday on a sweeping $2 trillion measure to aid workers, businesses and a health care system strained by the rapidly spreading coronavirus outbreak.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/vNXGrWVW/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2020-03-25T06:47:47.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/vNXGrWVW.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5809030/nixon-recovery-rebate/","duration":"PT2M11S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5809030/nixon-recovery-rebate/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```