<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/5706707/hong-kong-emergency-regulations-ordinance/" -->

---
title: Hong Kong&#x27;s Use of Emergency Regulations Must Be Challenged
description: Hong Kong&#x27;s invocation of emergency powers may have lasting consequences, argues Jan Wetzel of Amnesty International.
canonical: https://time.com/5706707/hong-kong-emergency-regulations-ordinance/
author: Jan Wetzel
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2019-10-22T06:45:43.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:41:32.043Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Hong Kong&#x27;s Use of Emergency Powers &#x27;Must Be Challenged&#x27;
og:description: Use emergency powers may have lasting consequences, argues Amnesty&#x27;s Jan Wetzel
og:url: https://time.com/5706707/hong-kong-emergency-regulations-ordinance/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9f204dc7fa7ca5b/698a04a0b21a9c2ca65028ad/gettyimages-1172228553.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 4000
og:image:height: 2250
og:image:alt: Demonstrators Attend Global Anti Totalitarianism Rally In Hong Kong
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Hong Kong&#x27;s Use of Emergency Powers &#x27;Must Be Challenged&#x27;
twitter:description: Use emergency powers may have lasting consequences, argues Amnesty&#x27;s Jan Wetzel
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9f204dc7fa7ca5b/698a04a0b21a9c2ca65028ad/gettyimages-1172228553.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9f204dc7fa7ca5b/698a04a0b21a9c2ca65028ad/gettyimages-1172228553.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# The Hong Kong Government's Use of Emergency Regulations Must Be Challenged

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="5c6ddd5d-4278-429f-a5ee-0bb6be17d365" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=5c6ddd5d-4278-429f-a5ee-0bb6be17d365&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=5c6ddd5d-4278-429f-a5ee-0bb6be17d365&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=5c6ddd5d-4278-429f-a5ee-0bb6be17d365&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/CLIXJR4n.m3u8" -->
## Video: After Months of Unrest, Hong Kong Invokes Emergency Powers to Ban Face Masks

[Watch (HLS stream): After Months of Unrest, Hong Kong Invokes Emergency Powers to Ban Face Masks](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/CLIXJR4n.m3u8) (1:27)

![After Months of Unrest, Hong Kong Invokes Emergency Powers to Ban Face Masks](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/CLIXJR4n/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2019-10-04. Hong Kong’s embattled top official, Chief Executive Carrie Lam, invoked colonial-era emergency regulations Friday to announce a ban on the wearing of face masks at unauthorized assemblies and other gatherings._


by 

[Jan Wetzel](https://time.com/author/jan-wetzel/)


## Jan Wetzel


Oct 22, 2019 6:45 AM UTC

![Demonstrators Attend Global Anti Totalitarianism Rally In Hong Kong](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9f204dc7fa7ca5b/698a04a0b21a9c2ca65028ad/gettyimages-1172228553.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Riot police deploy tear gas to disperse demonstrators during a protest in the Admiralty district of Hong Kong, China, on Sunday, Sept. 29, 2019.

Riot police deploy tear gas to disperse demonstrators during a protest in the Admiralty district of Hong Kong, China, on Sunday, Sept. 29, 2019. Kyle Lam/Bloomberg via Getty Images

by 

[Jan Wetzel](https://time.com/author/jan-wetzel/)


## Jan Wetzel


Oct 22, 2019 6:45 AM UTC

When Chief Executive Carrie Lam announced a sweeping ban on face masks at protests earlier this month, [Hong Kong’s streets quickly filled](https://time.com/5692596/hong-kong-face-masks-ban-protests/) with people wearing paint, cartoon masks and even paper bags on their faces. The government had again failed at deescalating the situation, instead fueling the anger of protesters.

The mask ban was fast-tracked using the Emergency Regulations Ordinance (ERO), a colonial-era law whose implications are far-reaching and alarming. In fact, the invocation of emergency powers may have even more lasting consequences for security, law and order in Hong Kong than [violence and tear gas](https://time.com/5689617/hong-kong-protest-china-national-day-october-1/) in the streets.

The [chaotic scenes](https://time.com/5690681/hong-kong-crisis-unrest-protests/) being broadcast around the world belie the fact that the majority of Hong Kong’s protesters remain peaceful. The increasingly destructive nature of some protests is largely due to a violent minority’s frustration with political failures and virtually unchecked police abuse of power. The authorities’ approach of tightening restrictions is clearly not working, but using the ERO indicates they are doubling down on it.

The ERO, last used more than 50 years ago, is essentially a blank check for the government to restrict human rights without any conditions or safeguards. It could give the authorities the power to shut down social messaging apps and websites popular with protesters, or even impose a total Internet blackout, if they claim this is needed. It could allow for extended periods of detention—especially alarming given the well-documented abuse [and even torture](https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/09/hong-kong-arbitrary-arrests-brutal-beatings-and-torture-in-police-detention-revealed/) of arrested protesters.


The ERO expands powers to search premises and confiscate property and could enable the postponement of [upcoming local elections](https://time.com/5687863/joshua-wong-district-council-election-hong-kong/). Many similar proposals have been publicly floated by pro-Beijing politicians, perfectly illustrating the slide into [Beijing-style repression](https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa17/0944/2019/en/) that brought Hong Kong protesters out in the first place.

What’s more, the present and proposed uses of the ERO do not withstand legal scrutiny. The powers it grants are traditionally reserved for a state of “public emergency which threatens the life of a nation.” International law allows for “derogations”—the temporary and drastic reduction in the level of some human rights protections—in limited exceptional situations. Even in these situations however, the protection against torture and other ill-treatment is absolute, as is the prohibition of arbitrary detention. Fundamental requirements of fair trials must also remain intact. In such a situation, Hong Kong’s legal system must fairly and impartially assess the legitimacy and legality of exceptional measures and provide redress for any breaches.


Confusingly, Lam has stated that Hong Kong is not in the kind of exceptional situation that could allow such extreme steps. Perhaps to bolster business confidence, she has stressed that Hong Kong is not in a “state of emergency” right now. Invoking an emergency law without an “emergency” looks very much like a government that wants to have its cake and eat it too.

The ERO is a deeply flawed piece of legislation. Taken at face value, it grants the passing of emergency regulations to the executive alone, it trumps all other laws, and there is no requirement for periodic review. In short, the ERO theoretically gives the Hong Kong government free rein to restrict human rights but provides no safeguards against abuse.

An attempt by pro-democracy lawmakers to halt the use of the ERO failed at preliminary hearings, but a fast-tracked judicial review is scheduled for Oct. 31\. This will look at whether the century-old ERO is in line with the much newer Basic Law, Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, and other domestic law. It should also consider whether it is in line with international human rights law.


The Hong Kong government is aware of the ERO’s legal weak spots. In a [report to the U.N](https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b0550.html)., it acknowledged that the power granted under the emergency law “appears to be very wide” but confirmed that it was subject to Article 39 of the Basic Law, which embeds the U.N. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in Hong Kong law.

It is very possible that the government is using the mask ban as a canary in the coal mine for the ERO—a way to test which elements survive judicial scrutiny and guide future use of the sweeping powers granted by the emergency law’s wording. This is how prosecutions stemming from the Umbrella Movement operated—by building up a body of case law that could eventually be used to prosecute its leaders.

Instead of listening to protesters, deescalating the tension and trying to understand and address the root causes of the unrest, the government is abusing the law to quash protests and deter people from participating in the public sphere. This approach needs to be challenged, both nationally and internationally, to prevent an “emergency” situation from becoming Hong Kong’s new normal.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5706707/hong-kong-emergency-regulations-ordinance/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5706707/hong-kong-emergency-regulations-ordinance/"},"headline":"The Hong Kong Government's Use of Emergency Regulations Must Be Challenged","datePublished":"2019-10-22T06:45:43.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:41:32.043Z","description":"Invoking colonial-era emergency powers may have more lasting consequences for law and order than violence and tear gas in the streets.","url":"https://time.com/5706707/hong-kong-emergency-regulations-ordinance/","keywords":["Hong Kong"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9f204dc7fa7ca5b/698a04a0b21a9c2ca65028ad/gettyimages-1172228553.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jan Wetzel","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/jan-wetzel/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc9f204dc7fa7ca5b/698a04a0b21a9c2ca65028ad/gettyimages-1172228553.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Demonstrators Attend Global Anti Totalitarianism Rally In Hong Kong","caption":"Demonstrators Attend Global Anti Totalitarianism Rally In Hong Kong","creditText":"Kyle Lam/Bloomberg via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/hong-kong/","name":"Hong Kong"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5706707/hong-kong-emergency-regulations-ordinance/","name":"The Hong Kong Government's Use of Emergency Regulations Must Be Challenged"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"After Months of Unrest, Hong Kong Invokes Emergency Powers to Ban Face Masks","description":"Hong Kong’s embattled top official, Chief Executive Carrie Lam, invoked colonial-era emergency regulations Friday to announce a ban on the wearing of face masks at unauthorized assemblies and other gatherings.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/CLIXJR4n/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2019-10-04T08:17:41.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/CLIXJR4n.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5706707/hong-kong-emergency-regulations-ordinance/","duration":"PT1M27S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5706707/hong-kong-emergency-regulations-ordinance/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

