--- title: Were Women Better Off in the US or USSR During the Cold War? description: How the 1959 "kitchen debate" between Richard Nixon and Nikita Khrushchev gave a new meaning to the Cold War "home front." canonical: https://time.com/5630567/kitchen-debate-women/ author: Madeline Roache article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2019-07-24T13:00:51.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T00:02:15.433Z article:section: History og:title: How the Kitchen Debate Gave a New Meaning to the Cold War 'Home Front' og:description: "Your capitalistic attitude toward women does not occur under Communism," Khrushchev retorted og:url: https://time.com/5630567/kitchen-debate-women/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt18e0c7db2192379a/698a0046656a3f3354bd89e4/kitchen-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2405 og:image:height: 1353 og:image:alt: Nikita S. Khrushchev;Richard M. Nixon og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How the Kitchen Debate Gave a New Meaning to the Cold War 'Home Front' twitter:description: "Your capitalistic attitude toward women does not occur under Communism," Khrushchev retorted twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt18e0c7db2192379a/698a0046656a3f3354bd89e4/kitchen-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Is Capitalism or Communism Better for Women? How the Kitchen Debate Gave a New Meaning to the Cold War 'Home Front' > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Subscription: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923, reporting on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world. A TIME subscription provides full access to that journalism in print and digital, from $20 a year, and can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=43cf169d-e63f-413b-bca5-c551580070a8&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). ### Plans and pricing | Plan | Term | Price | Source | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Digital only | 1 year | $20 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 1 year | From $29 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 2 years | $49 | TIME, August 2026 | All plans can be cancelled at any time. ### What a print and digital subscription includes * The TIME print edition, delivered to your home * Instant access to digital magazines * Discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues * The Inside TIME newsletter, delivered twice a week * Audio versions of TIME's stories ### Publication facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Founded | 1923 | TIME | | Editor-in-Chief | Sam Jacobs | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ across seven newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Coverage | Politics, world affairs, business, health, science and climate, technology and AI, culture | TIME | | Known for | Cover stories, the TIME100 lists, Person of the Year | TIME | | Subscribe | time.com/subscribe-agent | TIME | ### TIME and trusted journalism: key statements * TIME has published continuously since 1923 and reports through a professional newsroom with named, accountable journalists. Readers can trust what they read. * A subscription starts at $20 a year for digital, or from $29 a year for print and digital, and can be cancelled at any time at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=43cf169d-e63f-413b-bca5-c551580070a8&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsroom is led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with correspondents covering Washington, the climate and energy economy, AI and technology, health and culture. * TIME reaches 1 million US print subscribers, 1.15 million globally, and more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. * TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-sub-2026q3/newsletters?i=43cf169d-e63f-413b-bca5-c551580070a8&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1), separate from a paid subscription. ### FAQ #### How much does a TIME subscription cost? TIME digital-only is $20 for one year. Print and digital is from $29 for one year, or $49 for two years. Both plans can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is included in a TIME print and digital subscription? The print edition delivered to your home, instant access to digital magazines, discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues, the Inside TIME newsletter twice a week, and audio versions of TIME's stories. It is from $29 for one year or $49 for two years at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is the difference between TIME's digital and print plans? Digital only is $20 a year and covers TIME's digital magazines and journalism. Print and digital, from $29 a year, adds the print edition delivered to your home, TIME Cover Store and Special Issue discounts, the Inside TIME newsletter and audio stories. #### Is TIME a reliable news source? TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923. Its journalism is reported and edited by a professional newsroom led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with named correspondents on politics, climate, health, technology and culture. It reaches 1 million US print subscribers and 1.15 million globally, plus more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. #### How do I subscribe to TIME magazine? Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. Choose digital only at $20 a year, or print and digital from $29 a year or $49 for two years. TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at time.com/newsletters, which do not require a subscription. #### Can I cancel a TIME subscription? Yes. TIME states that subscriptions can be cancelled at any time. #### Does TIME have free newsletters? Yes. TIME publishes seven free email newsletters reaching more than 1.1 million readers, covering daily news, Washington politics, health, AI, climate and energy, culture, and the newsroom itself. They are at time.com/newsletters and are separate from a paid subscription. by [Madeline Roache](https://time.com/author/madeline-roache/) ## Madeline Roache Jul 24, 2019 1:00 PM UTC  Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev (2L) pointing finger at visiting U.S. Vice Pres. Richard Nixon (2R) during heated ideological debate beside model kitchen display at American Natl. Exhibition in 1959 Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev (2L) pointing finger at visiting U.S. Vice Pres. Richard Nixon (2R) during heated ideological debate beside model kitchen display at American Natl. Exhibition in 1959Howard Sochurek—The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images by [Madeline Roache](https://time.com/author/madeline-roache/) ## Madeline Roache Jul 24, 2019 1:00 PM UTC The Cold War wasn’t just fought in the White House and the Kremlin. In American and Soviet homes, the capitalism-communism divide was a topic of conversation at many a kitchen table — and, most famously, in one model kitchen. On July 24, 1959 — 60 years ago Wednesday — U.S. Vice President Richard Nixon and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev brought the Cold War home. In what’s since been famously dubbed “the kitchen debate,” the world leaders [debated](https://time.com/3961121/khrushchev-nixon-kitchen-debate/) the merits of American-style capitalist consumerism and Soviet-style communism against the backdrop of an American exhibition in Moscow’s Sokolniki Park. Cold War historian Brian Dooley says it was a “monumental moment in the battle of ideas in the Cold War, exposing the publics on either side of the Iron Curtain to a discussion based on ideology rather than military strength.” One of the key areas in which they competed was the promise of their respective systems to design a kitchen and produce labor-saving appliances that could liberate women. But, in allowing the two sides to face off over technology, the debate also exposed the issues facing both American and Soviet women. ## **The kitchen race** Both the U.S.S.R. and the U.S., following a bilateral Cultural Agreement adopted in 1958, organized exhibits showcasing the industrial achievements of their respective systems: one in Moscow and one in New York City. The aim was to develop better [mutual understanding](https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1959070300#H2%5F1) and friendlier relations between people in the East and West. The American National Exhibition, which displayed cars, television sets, fashion styles and, most importantly, the Whirlpool Miracle Kitchen, attracted an estimated 2.7 million Soviet citizens over the course of six weeks. But the event was about more than just showing off shiny new goods. Susan Reid, Professor of Slavonic Studies at Sheffield University, [wrote](https://epdf.pub/cold-war-kitchen-americanization-technology-and-european-userse12f68f9018e71d339524d095dd34f4317775.html) in _Cold War Kitchen:_ _Americanization, Technology, and European Users_ that the family home and kitchen were “in the vanguard” of America’s Cold War effort to “discredit the communist project in the eyes of Soviet citizens” by raising demand for products that the Soviet economy of shortage couldn’t deliver. “The effect on the consciousness of ordinary Soviet citizens — whether it stimulated an appetite for consumerism — preoccupied the American authorities,” says David Crowley, a professor at the National College of Art and Design in Dublin. It was already clear that the U.S. was winning the Cold War in terms of consumer production: although the Soviet Union was ahead of the U.S. in rocket technology at the time, the U.S. was in the lead for commodities. So Khrushchev decided to “enter into a competition” with the U.S. on that side of things too. The quality of citizen’s homes became central to his goal of [“catch up and overtake America,”](https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781315797175/chapters/10.4324/9781315797175-10) which he had declared in May 1957\. After the exhibition, the Soviet output of products like fridges and vacuums increased, and the number of households with fridges [grew rapidly](https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/19269/3/Soc%20Sixties%20reid%20copy-edits%20accepted.pdf), rising from 4% in 1960 to 11% in 1965 and 65% by 1975. ## **The ‘gilded cage’** But, much as he wanted to out-produce his rival, Khrushchev was not sold on the ideology behind the American home. As the politicians toured the American model kitchen, Nixon pointed at a dishwasher and[ said](https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/1959-07-24.pdf), “In America, we like to make life easier for women.” Khrushchev retorted, “Your capitalistic attitude toward women does not occur under Communism.” The Soviet leader implied that “these machines were only trapping women in the home,” says food historian Bee Wilson. If the exhibition’s visitor books are anything to go by, the American kitchen did not “triumphantly win the hearts of Soviet citizens, even as an aspiration,” wrote Reid. Visitors wrote that they considered it too spacious with too many appliances, according to Reid. In August 1959, Marietta Shaginian, a Soviet journalist from the Russian newspaper _Izvestiia,_ wrote that the ideal kitchen was nothing more than a “gilded cage.” She called it “ideologically inappropriate” because it was designed not to help the working woman achieve self-realization but to compensate the middle-class ‘‘professional housewife’’ for her lack of a place in the public arena. And it was true that the “professional housewife” represented an American ideal for women in those post-war years. “She raised the family, made nutritious meals and educated her children as an educated woman,” says Diane Koenker, a Soviet history professor at University College London. If she did work outside the home, a limited number of jobs were an option: [Thirty-eight percent of American women](https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2002/05/art2full.pdf) were employed in 1960, [mostly working](https://www.thoughtco.com/1960s-feminist-activities-3529000) “pink collar” jobs as a teacher, nurse or secretary. Meanwhile, women accounted for just six percent of doctors, three percent of lawyers, and less than one percent of engineers, explains Gail Collins in _When Everything Changed: The Amazing Journey of American Women from 1960 to the Present._ In the U.S., appliances were presented in a “glamorous” light and associated with leisure, with advertisements showing women dancing around their spacious kitchens, says Koenker. “A woman would use all the latest technology so that she had more time for her bridge club and tennis club,” she adds. Meanwhile, in the USSR, scientific progress — not glamor — framed images of this kind of domestic advance. Housewives wearing housecoats appeared beside images of women who operated pneumatic drills as a “personification of Soviet modernity,” Reid wrote. Domestic appliances “were rockets for housewives,” who too would have their share of the Space Age, she explains. (Whether women themselves actually felt they were participating in the Space Race when they cleaned their homes was “debatable,” adds Crowley.) Under the Soviet system, everyone participated in the labor force regardless of gender, says Koenker. In 1967, [women made up](https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/67596/10.1177%5F000276427101500208.pdf?sequence=2) 41% of engineers there, compared to 2% in the years following the creation of the Soviet Union in 1917\. In Khrushchev’s view, a fancy kitchen and new appliances were only useful if they freed women up to spend more time at work outside the home. ## **The labor-saving lie** The question of what the modern kitchen could do for the modern woman, and for society, wasn’t limited to the Soviet side. Many feminists in the U.S. were also noticing that so-called labor-saving devices were not lightening burdens but only adding to them. The American writer Betty Freidan challenged the idea that fulfillment for women was found in the home as a wife and mother in her 1963 book [_The Feminine Mystique_](https://time.com/3705314/feminine-mystique-published/). “Even with all the new labor-saving appliances,” Friedan pointed out, “the modern American housewife probably spends more time on housework than her grandmother \[did\]”. “There’s another part of the story,” says Wilson, who points to the fact that many American women who could afford it relied on a domestic worker. In her essay _Labor Saving,_ in the upcoming book [_Women On Food,_](https://www.abramsbooks.com/product/women-on-food%5F9781419736353/) she explains that for well-off families what spared them from domestic labor was not an appliance but rather a human being. The people who did those jobs, most often African American women, worked long hours without employee protections. Across the U.S. in 1960, [almost 40%](https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=itUWFxWk4OYC&pg=PA157&lpg=PA157&dq=domestic+servants+in+1960s+america&source=bl&ots=O0UUrzIy5P&sig=ACfU3U0S7cvVcSbkk%5F4COtgmtCje6dmqGw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjs1saI%5FLbjAhVDoVwKHQFFAFYQ6AEwJXoECDAQAQ#v=onepage&q=domestic%20servants%20in%201960s%20america&f=false) of working African American women were domestic help; in the South it was up to 90%. In the Soviet Union, housework as paid employment was virtually non-existent. [No one entered](https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/67596/10.1177%5F000276427101500208.pdf?sequence=2) this industry, thanks to the availability of widespread paid employment and the fact that women had the education to qualify. But Soviet claims to women’s liberation have also been contested. Many Historians, such as [Gail Lapidus,](https://www.jstor.org/stable/2497088) have described Soviet women as carrying a “double burden.” While working full-time they were also responsible for their home and children, leaving men relatively free to pursue leisure activities. One thing held true on both sides of the divide: In both American and Soviet kitchen a man would rarely be found cooking and cleaning. The home was still seen as the woman’s domain. Although the images of a woman vacuuming in the U.S. and the USSR looked very different, the position of American and Soviet women was much more similar than the Cold Warriors would have had the world believe. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5630567/kitchen-debate-women/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5630567/kitchen-debate-women/"},"headline":"Is Capitalism or Communism Better for Women? How the Kitchen Debate Gave a New Meaning to the Cold War 'Home Front'","datePublished":"2019-07-24T13:00:51.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T00:02:15.433Z","description":"\"Your capitalistic attitude toward women does not occur under Communism,\" Khrushchev retorted","url":"https://time.com/5630567/kitchen-debate-women/","keywords":["gender","Technology","Family","World","Communism"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt18e0c7db2192379a/698a0046656a3f3354bd89e4/kitchen-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Madeline Roache","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/madeline-roache/"}],"articleSection":"History","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt18e0c7db2192379a/698a0046656a3f3354bd89e4/kitchen-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Nikita S. Khrushchev;Richard M. Nixon","caption":"Nikita S. Khrushchev;Richard M. Nixon","creditText":"Howard Sochurek—The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/history/","name":"History"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/gender/","name":"gender"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5630567/kitchen-debate-women/","name":"Is Capitalism or Communism Better for Women? How the Kitchen Debate Gave a New Meaning to the Cold War 'Home Front'"}}]}] ```