--- title: Why Labeling Some People as 'Gifted' Actually Hurts Us All description: Social psychologist Mary C. Murphy explains what happens when we create a culture that obsesses over the talents of the few. canonical: https://time.com/6962332/gifted-kids-future-success/ author: Mary C. Murphy article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2024-04-02T15:33:15.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T17:23:18.571Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why Labeling Some People as 'Gifted' Actually Hurts Us All og:description: Social psychologist Mary C. Murphy explains what happens in environments that obsess over the talents of the few. og:url: https://time.com/6962332/gifted-kids-future-success/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt044ae78338009b3e/698a5546457a529027d6a244/gifted-childre-classroom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: Elementary school og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why Labeling Some People as 'Gifted' Actually Hurts Us All twitter:description: Social psychologist Mary C. Murphy explains what happens in environments that obsess over the talents of the few. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt044ae78338009b3e/698a5546457a529027d6a244/gifted-childre-classroom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why Labeling Some People as 'Gifted' Actually Hurts Us All > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f8051273-db20-4b6a-a23d-69c9e891adc9&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f8051273-db20-4b6a-a23d-69c9e891adc9&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=f8051273-db20-4b6a-a23d-69c9e891adc9&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f8051273-db20-4b6a-a23d-69c9e891adc9&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Mary C. Murphy](https://time.com/author/mary-c-murphy/) ## Mary C. Murphy Apr 2, 2024 3:33 PM UTC  Social psychologist Mary C. Murphy explains what happens when we create an environment that obsesses over the talents of the few. Social psychologist Mary C. Murphy explains what happens when we create an environment that obsesses over the talents of the few. Getty Images by [Mary C. Murphy](https://time.com/author/mary-c-murphy/) ## Mary C. Murphy Apr 2, 2024 3:33 PM UTC One of the greatest musical geniuses of our time is [Itzhak Perlman](https://time.com/4339200/itzhak-perlman-cancels-north-carolina-concert/)—but carrying the weight of that title as a child wasn’t easy. The virtuoso violinist describes his early musical education as the “triangle of hell,” with pressure from (and between) his teacher and his parents. Their motto:do as I say. When Perlman got to Juilliard, he was shocked when he was encouraged by his new teacher to be more expressive and self-reflective. Now, in the program for young musicians that he runs with his wife Toby, he uses a similar style with his ownstudents, encouraging each to become the best version of themselves. The Perlmans say media outletsoften ask to see Itzhak working with his best students. The problem is they don’t have “best” students. They don’t believe “best” students exist. Instead, they encourage everyone to develop at their own pace and to collaborate rather than compete. They strive to foster a creative atmosphere in which there’s room for everyone’s true genius to develop. On the one hand, it’s easy to dismiss Perlman’s early experience as a misguided modeof the past and to assure ourselves that we don’t put kids through hell with prove-and-perform pressure anymore. That we don’t single out and celebrate the students we see as stars while relegating everyone else to a lower status. Yet, in effect, this is exactly what we do when [we label some as “gifted”](https://time.com/3698686/gifted-and-talented/)—a common practice not only in today’s educational system, but also in our family systems and beyond. Whether it happens at school, at home, or elsewhere (and whether it’s about academics, sports, music, or art), research has proven that [singling out a chosen few has negative consequences for us all](https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-04530-003). Our intentions in labeling kids as gifted are largely positive. After all, if you’re the parent or teacher of one of these children, it’s natural to want to ensure they’ll get access to the resources they need to grow. And yet, don’t we want that for every child? Don’t we want them all to be appropriately challenged and supported so they can fulfill their highest potential? When we single out those we deem to be exceptional, we create what I call a culture of genius. This is an environment where star performers get the most resources and where the dominant belief is the fixed mindset: some have it, and some don’t. In cultures of genius, the exceptional merit extra attention, the best strategies, and more support. In contrast, incultures of growth, the core belief is the growth mindset: a belief in universal potential—not necessarily that everyone can reach the top pinnacle of success, but that everyone has the capacity to grow, learn, and contribute from wherever they are. In cultures of growth, everyone receives the necessary resources and instruction to develop. Cultures of genius cater to the select few, while cultures of growth nurture everyone based on their needs, aptitudes, and abilities. **Read More:** [_I Raised Two CEOs and a Doctor. These Are My Secrets to Parenting Successful Children_](https://time.com/5578064/esther-wojcicki-raise-successful-kids/) And let’s not give ourselves too much credit for being able to pick [who’s gifted and who’s not](https://time.com/5077428/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-gifted-child/). After all, neither [Albert Einstein](https://time.com/4389123/a-genius-still-inspires-greatness/) nor [Martin Luther King, Jr.](https://time.com/6555360/martin-luther-king-jr-surprising-facts/) would likely have been labeled as exceptional by their grammar-school teachers—they both struggled in school. Billionaire entrepreneur Sara Blakely didn’t score high enough on the LSATs to get into law school. Spotting genius isn’t as easy as it seems. Just because a flower doesn’t bloom immediately doesn’t mean it never will, and just because a child blossoms early doesn’t mean they’ll go on to achieve greatness. In fact, labeling them as gifted may actually decrease their odds of success. Consider how many high school valedictorians—most of whom were probably labeled as gifted—go on to underperform. My research shows us why. As my team discovered in our work with thousands of students in hundreds of classrooms (and with thousands of adults in their workplaces, too), environments that have strong cultures of genius actually produce fewer geniuses, and are less successful overall when compared to cultures of growth. In these classrooms, everyone is focused on appearing intelligent. This ultimately distracts students from learning and harms their performance—and these impacts are even more severe for [girls in STEM classes](https://time.com/3835310/girls-stem-school/), racial and ethnic minority kids, kids from lower income backgrounds, and anyone else who belongs to groups negatively stereotyped for their intelligence and abilities. In fact, we found that the racial achievement gaps in classes with strong cultures of genius were twice as large as in classrooms with strong cultures of growth—where everyone performed better. Once you single out children as exceptional, you put them on a pedestal—one they often become afraid of falling off. If they fail at something, which is inevitable if they’re being challenged and learning, they worry they’ll lose their status and disappoint the adults around them. Therefore, they tend to lower their sights and take on less risk. Rather than stretching themselves to learn or innovate, many of these children take on tasks already well within their abilities. It’s like choosing an easy crossword puzzle because you know you can complete it rather than selecting one that will require you to learn new words. Additionally, those labeled as gifted tend to see themselves as [possessing a narrow set of skills,](https://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca/article/view/58611) and as such, are less likely to branch out into new areas. This has consequences for their long-term development. If I’ve been told my strength is math, and that’s where learning has always felt easy, then I’m unlikely to develop the artistic side of myself that may require putting in more effort, experiencing failure, and embracing new strategies. There are many adults who’ve been encouraged to “follow their strengths” and now see how limiting this advice has been. Many now yearn to branch out and try something new but wonder whether it’s “too late” for them to do so. (Spoiler: it’s never too late!) We set up our kids to feel boxed in by their strengths when we label them gifted in a narrow area of life. And the consequences aren’t just individual. Cultures of genius cause interpersonal issues, as well. In communities including homes, schools, and workplaces, my research shows that [uplifting select stars creates a hierarchy](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191308520300010). And being at the top isn’t as good as we might think. In these environments, where mistakes are taken as signs that people aren’t smart or can’t cut it, the stars are unable to relax and take on challenges. They’re also constantly watching their backs because a new star is born every day. Meanwhile, the supposedly “ungifted” at the bottom of the hierarchy can feel overlooked and start to doubt their abilities. Additionally, having access to fewer resources and laboring under lower expectations, they’re less likely to perform or develop to their potential. Our work shows that cultures of genius are also more likely to foster unhealthy competition, infighting, and unethical behavior, including cheating. Without a doubt, some students have more resources and support that help them develop their genius—and some just seem naturally made for certain pursuits. Yet when we build this fixed-mindset belief of genius into our learning environments, we limit these inherent “top performers”—and everyone else. We all have the power to create cultures of growth in our families, schools, and workplaces by upholding the belief that everyone can learn and contribute, and by supporting one another on the path to success. Because we know that it’s in cultures of growth where the real genius lies. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6962332/gifted-kids-future-success/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6962332/gifted-kids-future-success/"},"headline":"Why Labeling Some People as 'Gifted' Actually Hurts Us All","datePublished":"2024-04-02T15:33:15.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T17:23:18.571Z","description":"Social psychologist Mary C. Murphy explains what happens when we create a culture that obsesses over the talents of the few.","url":"https://time.com/6962332/gifted-kids-future-success/","keywords":["Psychology","Books","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt044ae78338009b3e/698a5546457a529027d6a244/gifted-childre-classroom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mary C. Murphy","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mary-c-murphy/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt044ae78338009b3e/698a5546457a529027d6a244/gifted-childre-classroom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Elementary school","caption":"A single desk sitting in front of a blackboard in a classroom","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/psychology/","name":"Psychology"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6962332/gifted-kids-future-success/","name":"Why Labeling Some People as 'Gifted' Actually Hurts Us All"}}]}] ```