--- title: Why Trump's GOP Rivals Aren't Completely Wasting Their Time description: Both the schedule and the rules for the 2024 Republican primaries remain in flux. How that shakes out could give Trump's rivals a boost. canonical: https://time.com/6272743/trump-2024-republican-primaries-schedule/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-04-18T20:16:47.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T15:45:09.982Z article:section: Politics og:title: Why Trump's GOP Rivals Aren't Completely Wasting Their Time og:description: The order and the rules surrounding next year’s GOP primaries remain in flux. How they shake out could set Trump up to do good, but not great, in the first few contests og:url: https://time.com/6272743/trump-2024-republican-primaries-schedule/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb444cf24a90154e3/698a3c1b011682de92982f0b/GettyImages-1251828712.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: US-POLITICS-GUNS-NRA-CONVENTION og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why Trump's GOP Rivals Aren't Completely Wasting Their Time twitter:description: The order and the rules surrounding next year’s GOP primaries remain in flux. How they shake out could set Trump up to do good, but not great, in the first few contests twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb444cf24a90154e3/698a3c1b011682de92982f0b/GettyImages-1251828712.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why Trump's GOP Rivals Aren't Completely Wasting Their Time > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=16e127e2-8469-434e-ae8d-9d750f22bf0d&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=16e127e2-8469-434e-ae8d-9d750f22bf0d&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=16e127e2-8469-434e-ae8d-9d750f22bf0d&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Apr 18, 2023 8:16 PM UTC  Former President Donald Trump speaks during the National Rifle Association's annual convention at the Indiana Convention Center in Indianapolis, on April 14, 2023 Former President Donald Trump speaks during the National Rifle Association's annual convention at the Indiana Convention Center in Indianapolis, on April 14, 2023 Alex Wroblewski—AFP via Getty Images  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Apr 18, 2023 8:16 PM UTC _This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [_here_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox._ As he closed out the gun lobby’s biggest annual gathering on Friday with an hour-long keynote, Donald Trump had tough words for Communists, foreign wars, critics of Christianity, and supporters of transgender rights—oh, and his former Vice President. “I hope you gave Pence a good warm approval,” Trump [said](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-mocks-desantis-pence-stump-speech-nra-convention), clearly knowing his potential rival for the 2024 nomination had been [welcomed](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/14/trump-pence-nra-2024/) earlier with a smattering of boos. “No, because he is a nice man. If you want to really know the truth, he is, he’s a good man. And I heard it was very rough.” To be clear: Trump is polling right around [50%](https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-primary-r/2024/national/) among Republican voters, while Pence is stuck at 6%. Trump also couldn’t help but take a swipe at Ron DeSantis, mocking the potential rival who appeared by video as “DeSanctus,” despite enjoying a robust roughly 24-point [advantage](https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-primary-r/2024/national/) over the Florida Governor. If all of this seems typically [petty](https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-pundits-trash-trumps-childish-desantis-pudding-fingers-ad) for the former President, it is. But Trump’s punching down is not without reason. Despite retaining a clear frontrunner status for his party’s nomination next year, it’s not as strong a footing as it may seem at first glance. While the prospects of multiple indictments loom, Trump’s biggest latent flaw is hiding in plain sight. Both the order and the rules surrounding next year’s Republican primaries remain in flux. How they shake out could set Trump up to do good, but not great, in the first few contests, with one or more competitors drawing enough support that it punctures the air of invincibility around the former President heading into the free-for-all elections that follow. After all, Lyndon Johnson [came](https://www.npr.org/2018/03/11/592301682/the-night-in-1968-when-a-nation-watched-an-american-presidency-crumble) within six points of losing the New Hampshire primary in 1968; two weeks later, he bowed out of the campaign altogether. The so-called Early States have to award their delegates proportionally, although each can implement a bare minimum of as high as 20% of the vote to qualify for even a single delegate. After that early window, most of the states will shift to a winner-take-all model, though some may choose to split the spoils based on congressional districts rather than statewide totals. But of course, all of this requires an important hedge: virtually everything about next year’s primaries remains subject to change. There is no hardened calendar yet. The outline of a schedule exists, although ultimately it is up to every individual state to decide when and how to execute their nominating events, down to whether the format is a one-person-one-vote election, a caucus held in various church basements and bingo halls, or even a party convention where—if history has shown us time and again—extremists have their best chance of grabbing hold and derailing [campaigns](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/robert-bennett-utah-senator-ousted-by-tea-party-insurgency-dies-at-82/2016/05/05/8345472e-12b3-11e6-81b4-581a5c4c42df%5Fstory.html), if not [careers](https://www.npr.org/2021/04/30/992156839/for-virginia-republicans-running-their-own-election-hasnt-gone-smoothly). There are plenty of opportunities for state legislators, party leaders, election chiefs, and some Governors to get hinky with the nominating calendar here. No one can reliably win a contest without a basic understanding of the rules. Those rules, for what it’s worth, aren’t even due to the Republican National Committee until Oct. 1. Further complicating matters: Republicans in some states might not actually have the final say on when their nominating contest takes place. In Maryland, for instance, the Democratic legislature has [hinted](https://www.frontloadinghq.com/2023/02/maryland-legislative-leaders-signal.html) it has plans to move the state’s current winner-take-all tentatively scheduled for April 23, 2024, to avoid a conflict with Passover. Similar [conflicts](https://www.frontloadinghq.com/2023/02/passover-will-conflict-with-late-april.html) are playing out in Delaware, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island; moving too far ahead, though, could strip the power to run winner-take-all contests and give an edge to candidates who can pass the minimum viability test. Go too far afield, and parties could trigger penalties for delegates, as is shaping up under a [plan](https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2023/02/01/michigan-presidential-primary-bill-whitmer/69862167007/) backed by Michigan’s Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer that could cost her state’s Republican comrades seats at the GOP convention for going too early. Or take New Hampshire, a state that [by law](https://time.com/6238835/new-hampshire-primary-dnc-future/) has to have the first-in-the-nation primary. (Folks in Concord, N.H., dismiss Iowa’s caucuses as a curiosity and not anything to be taken as a true peer.) National Democrats have taken steps to downgrade New Hampshire’s importance in favor of South Carolina, [arguing](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/democrats-make-south-carolina-first-presidential-primary-voting-state-rcna68918) it is a more representative snapshot of the party’s electorate. The Democratic National Committee has [told](https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/04/politics/democrats-dnc-2024-primary-calendar-president/index.html) New Hampshire that it has until June to find an offramp and a later date. But New Hampshire leaders—led by Republican Gov. Chris Sununu, who may on his own end up becoming a 2024 contender still—have [rejected](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/01/19/new-hampshire-2024-primary-sununu-democrats/11025071002/) that and are planning to plow forward with its lead-off contest. “I dare you: come and take it,” Sununu [said](https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/3/22/chris-sununu-iop/) last month. So New Hampshire—or other jailbreak states—could find itself with a meaningless contest for delegates, a raft of party activists sidelined at the conventions, and plenty of uncertainty if the parties would make good on threats to punish candidates who play in scofflaw states. (The most obvious precedent is Democrats’ [punishment](https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/us/politics/01rules.html) of Michigan and Florida in 2008 for hopscotching ahead; the delegates were seated, but got only one-half of a vote apiece.) To be clear, Trump clearly has advantages at the moment that simply cannot be matched: the power of being a former President, a two-time national nominee, a fundraising machine that looks formidable if untested for one last huzzah. And he’s not exactly clueless to the complexities of winning a presidential nomination. In 2016, facing a floor revolt at his nominating convention in Cleveland, he deputized some of the smartest rules-masters in the GOP and [dodged](https://www.cleveland.com/open/2016/07/dump%5Fdonald%5Ftrump%5Feffort%5Ffalls.html) a disastrous insurrection. In 2020, his campaign team shrewdly started working the refs early to either [cancel](https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/06/republicans-cancel-primaries-trump-challengers-1483126) primaries or to [make](https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/massachusetts-republicans-trump-2020-primary-1302875) them more difficult for his challengers. This time around, Trump’s team is hardly being coy about the steps they’re [considering](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/02/24/trump-states-2024-election/) to make Trump’s ascent less difficult, and his rivals are taking notice of his efforts to woo party insiders in case he needs them. Still, the nominating matrix is a tough one, and the Republican one changes with every state border that is crossed. For candidates not named Trump, a fluid path to the nomination favors those who are nimble and can flex person-to-person retail stops. For all the trappings of the former Presidency, the agility to wing a schedule does not work in any meaningful way. Popping into states is easy when expectations are low; things get tougher for candidates who demand enormous crowds. The most compelling [speech](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/king-rfk-speech.html) of Robert F. Kennedy’s 1968 campaign was an on-the-fly set of remarks delivered from the back of a pick-up truck in Indianapolis, hours after Dr. Martin Luther King had been assassinated. This all help explains why none of the [cohort](https://time.com/6256382/who-is-running-for-president-2024/) of Republicans looking to challenge Trump are entirely irrational individuals. Still, knowing Trump’s instincts, there are better than even odds he thinks suckerpunches downward may have more impact than anything his quants might tally for slide decks. Just ask Pence and DeSantis how their latest run-ins with their former patron have gone. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [_Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6272743/trump-2024-republican-primaries-schedule/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6272743/trump-2024-republican-primaries-schedule/"},"headline":"Why Trump's GOP Rivals Aren't Completely Wasting Their Time","datePublished":"2023-04-18T20:16:47.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T15:45:09.982Z","description":"Both the schedule and the rules for the 2024 Republican primaries remain in flux. How that shakes out could give Trump's rivals a boost.","url":"https://time.com/6272743/trump-2024-republican-primaries-schedule/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","republicans","Donald Trump"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb444cf24a90154e3/698a3c1b011682de92982f0b/GettyImages-1251828712.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb444cf24a90154e3/698a3c1b011682de92982f0b/GettyImages-1251828712.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US-POLITICS-GUNS-NRA-CONVENTION","caption":"US-POLITICS-GUNS-NRA-CONVENTION","creditText":"Alex Wroblewski—AFP via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6272743/trump-2024-republican-primaries-schedule/","name":"Why Trump's GOP Rivals Aren't Completely Wasting Their Time"}}]}] ```