--- title: Why the DNC Can’t Kill the New Hampshire Primary description: New Hampshire law requires it to hold its primary first. That's unlikely to change, no matter what Biden or national Democrats say or do. canonical: https://time.com/6238835/new-hampshire-primary-dnc-future/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-12-05T21:46:46.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T15:08:27.054Z article:section: Politics og:title: The DNC Can’t Stop New Hampshire's Primary og:description: New Hampshire law requires it to hold its primary first. That's unlikely to change in 2024, no matter what Biden wants. og:url: https://time.com/6238835/new-hampshire-primary-dnc-future/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7f3693aea5b1b361/698a38880116827446982930/GettyImages-1201231600.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: NHPRIMARY og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The DNC Can’t Stop New Hampshire's Primary twitter:description: New Hampshire law requires it to hold its primary first. That's unlikely to change in 2024, no matter what Biden wants. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7f3693aea5b1b361/698a38880116827446982930/GettyImages-1201231600.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Don’t Be So Quick to Declare the New Hampshire Primary Dead > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=805a2376-2ae5-4dfa-8e66-b92c726bc77c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=805a2376-2ae5-4dfa-8e66-b92c726bc77c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=805a2376-2ae5-4dfa-8e66-b92c726bc77c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Dec 5, 2022 9:46 PM UTC  Senator Bernie Sanders greets supporters after winning New Hampshire's Democratic primary on February 11, 2020 in Manchester. Senator Bernie Sanders greets supporters after winning New Hampshire's Democratic primary on February 11, 2020 in Manchester.Salwan Georges—The Washington Post via Getty Images  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Dec 5, 2022 9:46 PM UTC _This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [_here_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox._ In August of 2007, leaders from the “big three” of the presidential primary calendar—Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina—convened to show their detractors that they meant business. In New Hampshire’s State House in Concord, the delegations came together to present a united front against those vying to upend what they viewed as the natural order of things. An ultimatum was soon released. Iowa would keep its lead-off caucuses, followed a week later with New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation primary, then South Carolina’s first-in-the-South contest, thank you very much. Consequences be damned. Having [listened](https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/2007/08/09/south-carolina-pushes-up-gop-primary/61738187007/) to those [presentations](https://www.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/portsmouth-herald/2007/08/10/primary-push-is-on-for/52824225007/) as an Associated Press reporter who lived just nine blocks away from the Concord State House—and having seen the indifference to anything happening beyond the borders of those three privileged states in town hall meetings and grocery store aisles alike—I knew this was anything but a bluff. The cranky yankees who ran Concord weren’t likely to be spooked by outsiders’ threats. The 2008 calendar would ultimately begin, as always, with Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. And the crowded field of candidates that cycle—from Hillary Clinton to Dennis Kuchich, from John McCain to Fred Thompson—all suspected that would be the ultimate outcome, having built operations to match. Fast forward to 2022, and every political strategist is bracing for a major shake-up of the next primary calendar. National Democrats are [moving](https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/02/democrats-biden-2024-primaries-00071943) ahead with their [plans](https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/02/politics/dnc-south-carolina-primary-calendar-2024/index.html) to [fire](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/democrats-advance-plan-reorder-primary-calendar-rcna59895) the starting pistol in South Carolina, with Nevada and New Hampshire following a few days later. [Iowa](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/02/us/politics/iowa-caucus-democrats.html), meanwhile, would get [booted](https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/04/iowa-presidential-primary-calendar-joni-ernst-00072076) back in the pack, partly as [penance](https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2022/12/02/dnc-democrats-primary-calendar-south-carolina-first-over-iowa-caucus/69695090007/) for its [blown](https://time.com/5777176/iowa-caucuses-delay-inconsistencies/) tech experiment of a caucus in 2020\. The Midwest crown would instead go to Michigan, while Georgia would move ahead to reflect that state’s growing importance as a swing state. But even if it no longer has Iowa and South Carolina in its corner, the assumption that New Hampshire will eventually accept its fate as one of dozens of middle-of-the-pack primary states is misunderstanding the situation. Despite the threat of being stripped of its delegates and candidates being punished for even stepping foot there, New Hampshire is ready to once again refuse to go along. The state’s willingness to buck national Democrats is as much rooted in recent tradition as law. New Hampshire traces its lineage as an early presidential primary state to 1916, and a 1976 state law requires the state to have its primary a week ahead of any other “similar contest,” generally read as a presidential primary. (Iowa, having been a caucus then, was deemed a non-competitor.) Disregarding that requirement would be tantamount to the secretary of state—the top elections official in New Hampshire—breaking the law. Which means these two facts can simultaneously be true: New Hampshire can still go first; New Hampshire’s value may be purely symbolic. The arguments against New Hampshire are as familiar as they are old. New Hampshire—like Iowa—is a racially homogenous state. There’s no point pretending otherwise. Its largest city, Manchester, is among the state’s more varied; [82%](https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/manchestercitynewhampshire) is white, a full [10](https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/NH) points more diverse than the state as a whole. Still, the 115,000-resident Manchester is about one-quarter the size of Atlanta proper, one-fifth the size of Detroit, and a little less than half the size of even Des Moines. As Scott Conroy’s delightful [treatise](https://www.amazon.com/Vote-First-Die-Discerning-Magnificent/dp/1610395816) on the state’s electoral history—_Vote First or Die: The New Hampshire Primary: America’s Discerning, Magnificent, and Absurd Road to the White House—_details, The Boston _Globe_’s Mike Barnicle spent the lead-up to the 1984 primary on a crusade against the state’s vaunted first-in-the-nation status, joking at one point that it was “a truck stop, not a state.” It would continue his entire career. As much as its defenders will claim the “diversity of ideas” held by its residents as an important reason to campaign there, a perhaps more persuasive case can be made with cash: it doesn’t take a ton to eke out a win in a state as small as New Hampshire, giving upstarts a better shot of making an impression. New Hampshire has, at most, [two](https://www.mediamarketmap.com/new-hampshire-designated-market-media-map/) major media markets, while staying competitive in South Carolina means contending with as many as [seven](https://www.mediamarketmap.com/south-carolina-state-designated-market-media-map/). McCain was [flat broke](https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/2007/09/14/cindy-mccain-makes-case-for-husband/61715494007/) in the summer of 2007 when he put all his eggs into New Hampshire, relying on veterans halls for cheap venues, friends for rides in the backs of SUVs, and volunteer press aides to wrangle [reporters](https://www.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/portsmouth-herald/2007/03/27/open-honest-vulnerable/52942883007/) who arrived to write his campaign obituary. Elbow grease helped him win there, much like it helped Bill Clinton come in second place in 1992 and claim the [title](https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Bill%5FClinton/timeline-president-bill-clinton-years-life-presidency-post/story?id=247332) of The Comeback Kid. Yet, there remains the practical matter. New Hampshire voters are unlikely to support ditching their first standing, which would require the backing of a majority of the state’s lawmakers, not just its Democrats. Asked in June of this year about the requirement, a full 55% of Granite Staters said they supported the state law, and only 4% opposed it. Among Democrats, that figure stands at 56% support and 9% opposed, while 61% of Republicans support it and just 1% opposing it, [according](https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1698&context=survey%5Fcenter%5Fpolls) to the well-respected University of New Hampshire Survey Center Granite State Poll. Put simply: there isn’t the political will among voters to bend to the DNC’s wishes. It’s why the entire congressional delegation quickly rejected the plan, and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen was [skipping](https://twitter.com/PunchbowlNews/status/1599847505079910400) Monday night’s Congressional Ball at the White House in protest. Moving up South Carolina has the [backing](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/12/03/democrats-primaries-new-hampshire-iowa-south-carolina/) of President Joe Biden, whose own campaign was bolstered by the Palmetto State in 2020, after placing a distant [fifth](https://time.com/5781743/joe-biden-new-hampshire-primary/) in New Hampshire after finishing [fourth](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/04/us/elections/results-iowa-caucus.html) in Iowa. Yet New Hampshire is still a crucial state for Democrats. Its four electoral votes grow even more powerful as states like Ohio slip out of reach for Democrats, and angering the party’s [base](https://www.wmur.com/article/dnc-new-hampshire-primary-status-120222/42137115) there could be a long-term folly. It’s why the DNC [blinked](https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90907222) with Michigan and Florida in 2008, after all. Both states [violated](https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90995214) the DNC rules in 2008 by holding early primaries and saw their delegations cut to zero. But in the months that followed, their delegations were first restored to half of their original allotment, and then to full strength by the time the convention arrived. Granite Staters are betting the DNC flinches again, all the while preparing for the crush of candidates to route itself through New England, even if the national party would much prefer a detour. Still, that pact with Iowa and South Carolina 15 years ago helped them stay atop the field ahead of the 2008 reshuffle that added Nevada to the mix. Now, it looks like South Carolina could get [top billing](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/south-carolina-democratic-primary-calendar-rcna59811), with Nevada and New Hampshire sharing the undercard role. With Iowa on track to be replaced with Michigan, and Georgia rising, the mutual support seems a thing of the past. Until or unless, of course, the residents of the _Live Free or Die_ state remind Democrats that they’re pretty indifferent to national trends or the prospect of going it alone without DNC applause. They’re a hearty—and stubborn—bunch, after all. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [_Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6238835/new-hampshire-primary-dnc-future/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6238835/new-hampshire-primary-dnc-future/"},"headline":"Don’t Be So Quick to Declare the New Hampshire Primary Dead","datePublished":"2022-12-05T21:46:46.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T15:08:27.054Z","description":"New Hampshire state law requires it to hold its primary first. That's unlikely to change in 2024, no matter what Biden wants.","url":"https://time.com/6238835/new-hampshire-primary-dnc-future/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","democrats","White House","Voting","Second click","uspoliticspolicy"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7f3693aea5b1b361/698a38880116827446982930/GettyImages-1201231600.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7f3693aea5b1b361/698a38880116827446982930/GettyImages-1201231600.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"NHPRIMARY","caption":"NHPRIMARY","creditText":"Salwan Georges—The Washington Post via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6238835/new-hampshire-primary-dnc-future/","name":"Don’t Be So Quick to Declare the New Hampshire Primary Dead"}}]}] ```