--- title: A Gen Z Colleague Called You Out. Here’s What to Do description: Older generations need break the cycle of outrage and engage with what Gen Z is trying to say, write Kenji Yoshino and David Glasgow. canonical: https://time.com/6259346/gen-z-colleague-workplace-conversations/ author: Kenji Yoshino article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-03-02T12:00:22.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:44:44.184Z article:section: Ideas og:title: A Gen Z Colleague Called You Out. Here’s What to Do Instead of Freak Out og:description: Older generations need break the cycle of outrage and engage with what Gen Z is trying to say. og:url: https://time.com/6259346/gen-z-colleague-workplace-conversations/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c73c738cd3733cf/698a3abc22fb8505cbe2e725/Misunderstanding-Work-Concept.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2121 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: Misunderstanding-Illustration og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: A Gen Z Colleague Called You Out. Here’s What to Do Instead of Freak Out twitter:description: Older generations need break the cycle of outrage and engage with what Gen Z is trying to say. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c73c738cd3733cf/698a3abc22fb8505cbe2e725/Misunderstanding-Work-Concept.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 --- # A Gen Z Colleague Called You Out. Here’s What to Do Instead of Freak Out > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=bfa280ca-14da-4290-be6c-e24da8589158&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=bfa280ca-14da-4290-be6c-e24da8589158&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=bfa280ca-14da-4290-be6c-e24da8589158&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: Young Professionals Are Using TikTok To Take On Corporate America [Watch (HLS stream): Young Professionals Are Using TikTok To Take On Corporate America](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Em50HCiz.m3u8) (6:15)  _Published 2022-05-11. TIME interviews TikTok content creators Laura Whaley, Rod Thill, and DeAndre Brown, who use humor to give young workers advice on how to navigate the corporate world._ Mar 2, 2023 12:00 PM UTC  Two businessmen are standing opposite each other. Impossible objects conceptual illustration. Two businessmen are standing opposite each other. Impossible objects conceptual illustration. Getty Images by [Kenji Yoshino](https://time.com/author/kenji-yoshino/) and [David Glasgow](https://time.com/author/david-glasgow/) Kenji Yoshino is a professor a at NYU School of Law David Glasgow is the executive director of the Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging Mar 2, 2023 12:00 PM UTC A senior leader at an entertainment company once told us he was bewildered by the[ language of Generation Z](https://time.com/4703299/how-to-work-with-generation-z/) on issues of diversity and identity. “Young people join us as new hires,” he said, “and they want forums to discuss the ‘systemic racism’ and ‘white supremacy’ in our workplace.” Older employees typically reacted to these demands with shock: “Whoa—we’re not _that_ bad, are we?” If you’re a manager, an educator, a parent of young adults, or even just a social media user, you’ve probably noticed this generational gap on topics such as race, gender, and LGBTQIA+ identity. Young people raise concerns about “racism,” “transphobia,” “oppression,” and “violence” (among others) to members of older generations for what the latter believe to be minor transgressions or legitimate disagreements. Puzzled and fearful, older people then enter cross-generational conversations inauthentically or completely avoid them. For instance, a university president shared with us that he scripts all speeches touching on diversity, because he worries he might otherwise ad lib his way into a career-ending error. Similarly, a corporate executive informed us that he had an even more drastic solution: cease interacting with any young person at work. A lot of ink has been spilled advising young people to tamp down their rhetoric on these issues. Yet the dynamics that have led to these rhetorical shifts won’t disappear any time soon. In earlier decades, many groups lacked the numbers or the power to speak up. Thanks to changing demographics and the courageous activism of marginalized groups, many young people now feel safer to challenge the status quo in increasingly blunt terms. **_Read More:_**[_Diversity Has Become a Booming Business. So Where Are the Results?_](https://time.com/5696943/diversity-business/) As diversity and inclusion scholars who belong to Gen X and the millennial generation respectively, we are grateful both sides of this divide talk to us—Gen Z students with cutting-edge activist values, as well as Boomer leaders struggling to do better. People often call on us to bridge the gap between what each side perceives as the excesses of the other: a generation too sensitive and quick to condemn, and another too reactionary and slow to change. In part because less attention has been paid to them, we want to focus on the role of older generations in these conversations. More specifically, when older generations are on the receiving end of language that feels overheated and unfair, how can they break the cycle of outrage and really engage with what younger conversation partners are trying to say? Feedback experts Douglas Stone and Sheila Heen [point out](https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/313485/thanks-for-the-feedback-by-douglas-stone-and-sheila-heen/) that people tend to blow constructive feedback out of proportion. “You need to improve your organizational skills” becomes “You’re a terrible employee who will never get promoted.” Stone and Heen suggest trying to see feedback at “actual size” by turning down the “ominous soundtrack playing in our minds.” While conversations about identity rarely involve formal performance evaluations, they constantly involve feedback on who someone is or what they’ve done—whether it’s a reference to their “privilege,” a charge that they’re “racist” or “sexist” or “homophobic,” or a suggestion that something they did was offensive or harmful. If you ever find yourself in these situations, you should right-size feedback in identity conversations by making sure what you’re hearing is what your counterpart is saying. To take a common example: Imagine a Gen Z’er reminds you of your “white privilege,” “male privilege,” or whatever forms of privilege you have. How do you interpret the word [“privilege”](https://time.com/5857561/dismantle-racial-bias/)? If you’re like many people we work with, you might hear it to suggest your life has been easy or that everything you’ve accomplished can be attributed to your group identity. Yet more often than not, the other person simply means you have advantages along certain dimensions of life (as we all do), and that those advantages have given you some boosts alongside your talents and hard work. Conversations about privilege aren’t the only place these misunderstandings arise. Another common and consequential mix-up occurs when people are accused of bias. United States Senator John Kennedy [once said](https://www.huffpost.com/entry/john-kennedy-racist-comment%5Fn%5F5f84cfb7c5b6e5c320026ab2): “It hurts to be called a racist. I think it’s one of the worst things you can call an American.” In our work, we have found that many young people don’t see it that way: They use the term [“racist”](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52993306) to refer to unconscious or systemic forms of bias. This way of talking about bias is still unfamiliar to many people. If that’s true of you, you might hear the statement “I think you’re racist” as the claim: “I think you, _unlike_ most people in this society, are racist.” But it may be the claim: “I think you, _like_ most people in this society, are racist.” Because of this misunderstanding, identity conversations can resemble slow-motion car crashes. One side believes racism is a “we” problem. The other interprets it as a “me” problem. **_Read More:_**[_How to Work With Generation Z_](https://time.com/4703299/how-to-work-with-generation-z/) Our friend Rhonda, a fierce advocate of diversity and inclusion who’s in her early 50s, avoided such a car crash after receiving a letter from junior employees who’d recently entered her creative arts organization. The letter urged her and other senior leaders to make changes to the workplace. It used terms like “white supremacy” and “racial violence” that sounded like accusations of rank bigotry. Rhonda was perplexed by the strength of the language and asked us to interpret the document. We sensed from our experience reading similar communications that the words were open to many interpretations, including that the leaders were unconsciously biased like everyone else. Sure enough, Rhonda spoke with the employees directly and found the dialogue less antagonistic than she feared. They weren’t accusing her and the other leaders of bigotry. Rather, they were bruised from bad experiences in previous jobs, and wanted assurances Rhonda’s organization would be different. The employees had a productive discussion with Rhonda about which workplace reforms were feasible and which ones weren’t. Rhonda couldn’t and didn’t give the employees everything they wanted. But she told them it was her job to create an inclusive work environment and said she welcomed more conversations to make sure she was delivering on that responsibility. We think Rhonda handled this situation impressively. Instead of assuming the most extreme and personal interpretation of the employee feedback was correct, she sought them out to clarify what they meant. Sometimes in these conversations, a person’s choice of words has less to do with you personally and more to do with experiences from their past. You can save yourself a lot of grief if, like Rhonda, you mind the gap between the other person’s words and your interpretation of them. Hearing feedback at actual size will give you the space to process and learn from it. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6259346/gen-z-colleague-workplace-conversations/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6259346/gen-z-colleague-workplace-conversations/"},"headline":"A Gen Z Colleague Called You Out. Here’s What to Do Instead of Freak Out","datePublished":"2023-03-02T12:00:22.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:44:44.184Z","description":"Older generations need break the cycle of outrage and engage with what Gen Z is trying to say, write Kenji Yoshino and David Glasgow.","url":"https://time.com/6259346/gen-z-colleague-workplace-conversations/","keywords":["justice","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Kenji Yoshino","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/kenji-yoshino/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"David Glasgow","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/david-glasgow/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/justice/","name":"justice"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6259346/gen-z-colleague-workplace-conversations/","name":"A Gen Z Colleague Called You Out. Here’s What to Do Instead of Freak Out"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Young Professionals Are Using TikTok To Take On Corporate America","description":"TIME interviews TikTok content creators Laura Whaley, Rod Thill, and DeAndre Brown, who use humor to give young workers advice on how to navigate the corporate world.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/Em50HCiz/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2022-05-11T19:44:00.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Em50HCiz.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6259346/gen-z-colleague-workplace-conversations/","duration":"PT6M15S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6259346/gen-z-colleague-workplace-conversations/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```