--- title: SEC Climate Rules Divide U.S. Companies description: The fight over the SEC's climate rules illustrates an emerging fault line: some companies are changing and others hanging on to old ways. canonical: https://time.com/6159301/sec-climate-rules-corporate-america/ author: Justin Worland article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-03-22T14:51:17.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T14:02:03.873Z article:section: Climate og:title: SEC Climate Rules Divide U.S. Companies og:description: SEC's climate rules highlight an emerging fault line: some companies are changing and others hanging on to old ways og:url: https://time.com/6159301/sec-climate-rules-corporate-america/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltcc4c015adb979e45/698a3018b3fce3550f0c9148/sec-climate-corporate-disclosure-emissions.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Louisiana's "Cancer Alley" - Landscapes og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: SEC Climate Rules Divide U.S. Companies twitter:description: SEC's climate rules highlight an emerging fault line: some companies are changing and others hanging on to old ways twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltcc4c015adb979e45/698a3018b3fce3550f0c9148/sec-climate-corporate-disclosure-emissions.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why the SEC’s New Climate Rules Could Divide Corporate America > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Future Proof: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Future Proof is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Making sense of the climate and energy economy. Future Proof examines the forces transforming energy and climate, and what those changes mean for business, technology, policy and the global economy. Senior correspondent Justin Worland goes beyond traditional climate coverage to connect the energy transition to the bigger decisions reshaping companies, markets and society. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=3545d434-768b-464f-bb73-cbedfa34c879&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Friday (1x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Justin Worland, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Senior leaders shaping the climate transition. An engaged audience of executives and decision-makers spanning operating companies, finance, policy, consulting, communications and media. ### TIME Future Proof: key statements * Future Proof is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Future Proof is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=3545d434-768b-464f-bb73-cbedfa34c879&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/subscribe?i=3545d434-768b-464f-bb73-cbedfa34c879&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's climate and energy newsletter? Future Proof is TIME's weekly climate and energy newsletter, written by senior correspondent Justin Worland. It connects the energy transition to the decisions reshaping business, technology, policy and markets. #### Where can I follow the energy transition as a business story? Future Proof covers climate and energy as an economic and business story rather than only an environmental one. It publishes every Friday and is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who writes Future Proof? Justin Worland, a senior correspondent at TIME and an award-winning climate journalist, writes Future Proof. #### Is Future Proof free? Yes. Future Proof is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Mar 22, 2022 2:51 PM UTC  Smoke billows from one of many chemical plants in Baton Rouge, Louisiana on October 12, 2013. Smoke billows from one of many chemical plants in Baton Rouge, Louisiana on October 12, 2013. Giles Clarke—Getty Images  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Mar 22, 2022 2:51 PM UTC Even couched in wonky, legalistic language, the difference in tone between the American Bankers Association (ABA) and the American Petroleum Institute (API) is hard to miss. Last year, following a request for feedback from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the two trade groups presented vastly different pictures of the role the market regulator should play to make sure investors understand the risks [climate change](https://time.com/section/climate/) poses to companies. The ABA declared its support for a “climate risk disclosure regime” shaped by the commission that takes into account climate science, international standards, and risk modeling. “Information about climate-related financial risks and opportunities will allow lenders and investors to more effectively assess, price, and manage risk and allocate capital,” Michael L. Gullette, ABA’s senior vice president, tax and accounting, wrote in a June [letter](https://www.sec.gov/comments/climate-disclosure/cll12-8906876-244192.pdf) to the SEC. That same day, API expressed skepticism in the need for new disclosure rules. Many in the industry already voluntarily disclose their emissions, the trade group said, and new rules could be costly for small firms. “API encourages the SEC to view the oil and natural gas sector’s pre-existing voluntary disclosures and reporting as evidence that the industry seeks to be a partner that, in some cases, has already tackled key areas raised in the request for information,” Frank J. Macchiarola, API’s senior vice president of policy, economics and regulatory affairs, [wrote to the SEC](https://www.sec.gov/comments/climate-disclosure/cll12-8907327-244228.pdf). With that feedback in hand, the SEC on Monday issued a more than 500-page proposal for a comprehensive new system that would require companies to disclose the risk [climate change](https://time.com/6152183/ipcc-report-climate-change-adaptation/) poses to their business as well as the emissions each company generates. The public now has two months to provide feedback before the SEC gets to work on the final rule. The process is hugely important for obvious reasons: it will determine how and to what degree companies disclose their emissions and in turn shape the ability of the financial sector to stave off climate-related risks. Beyond the outcome, the fight—pitting one group of corporate actors against another—is also likely to be instructive, illustrating the emerging fault line between companies that are engineering their firms to survive a climate-changed world and those that are hanging on to an old way of doing things. Apple, Walmart, and FedEx, for example, have all previously [voiced support](https://www.edf.org/media/sec-announces-proposal-mandate-disclosure-climate-related-financial-risks-publicly-traded) for the SEC’s proposal, while the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a major business lobby group, has [expressed skepticism at](https://time.com/6159249/corporate-climate-change-disclosures-sec/) the changes. “By no means do I think there’s going to be some sort of monolith of industry opposition,” says Kathleen Brophy, a senior strategist for U.S. climate finance at the Sunrise Project, a non-profit that pushes for the financial sector to address climate change. “I think that there’s actually going to be a huge amount of diversity.” **The proposed rule from the SEC covers a wide range** of climate-related concerns. Publicly-traded companies would be required to publish independently-certified reports of the greenhouse gas emissions that result from their operations and from the energy they consume. Some larger companies would also need to share the emissions of both their supply chains and when their products are used, so-called Scope 3 emissions. Companies that publicly [set targets](https://time.com/6117635/companies-net-zero-greenwash/) for emissions reduction would need to follow guidelines to report details about how they plan to achieve them. The rule would also require companies to disclose the risks to their business posed by climate change. That includes the threat posed by extreme weather and other effects of a warmer planet, such as water scarcity, as well as what’s known as “transition risks” that result from the world moving away from a fossil-fuel economy and towards a cleaner one—think of stranded assets, like a coal mine in a world where no one wants to purchase coal. In a sense, these rules aren’t all that groundbreaking. In 2010, the SEC [issued](https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2010/02/sec-issues-guidance-on-disclosures-related-to-climate-change) guidance for corporate climate disclosures. And many companies already provide such information on a voluntary basis and a slew of non-profit organizations provide frameworks for companies to do so. More than 1,000 companies representing $23 trillion in market capitalization had signed up to the Science-Based Targets Initiative, for example, and in doing so committed to setting emissions-reduction targets in line with the [Paris Agreement’s](https://time.com/5920387/paris-agreement-laurence-tubiana/) 1.5°C target and reporting on them with standardized metrics. Still, a significant group within the private sector is calling for mandatory disclosure. The reasons are multifaceted and vary by industry. Investors, particularly institutional investors that own a wide range of assets, have been particularly vocal. A clear form of disclosure helps investors ensure that the companies they finance will not go under as a result of either climate-related rules or climate-related disaster. And the force of government-issued regulations rather than voluntary disclosure gives the reporting legal weight. “It’s consistent with both client and fiduciary demands at this point,” said Ivan Frishberg, the chief sustainability officer at Amalgamated Bank, of climate disclosure rules prior to the SEC’s announcement. For the most part, companies that have committed to reducing their own emissions and disclosing their progress transparently say that clear government rules would simply be more efficient than trying to participate in the different voluntary frameworks that compete with each other. In a submission to the SEC last June, Peter W. Carter executive vice president and chief legal officer at Delta Air Lines, said that “numerous and sometimes contradictory sustainability frameworks and standards” had led to a “lack of consistency and comparability of information.” The solution, he wrote, is a government-led structure that would “allow companies to simplify climate change disclosure by reporting under a single disclosure framework.” Elsewhere in the private sector, it’s easy to see why some industries remain skeptical of the rules. Leaders in the [oil and gas industry](https://time.com/5766188/shell-oil-companies-fossil-fuels-climate-change/) increasingly say they are working to address climate change, and, in some cases, have announced targets to eliminate the carbon footprint of their operations. But grappling with the reality of climate change under a stringent regulatory regime threatens to expose credibility gaps—and affect investment in the industry. Other heavy industry, too, like steel, faces challenges in decarbonizing. It’s early days, and the rule will face challenges from all angles. But, at this juncture, when companies increasingly say they support action on climate change, support for transparent climate disclosure may become an important litmus test. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6159301/sec-climate-rules-corporate-america/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6159301/sec-climate-rules-corporate-america/"},"headline":"Why the SEC’s New Climate Rules Could Divide Corporate America","datePublished":"2022-03-22T14:51:17.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T14:02:03.873Z","description":"The fight over the SEC's climate rules illustrates an emerging fault line: some companies are changing and others hanging on to old ways","url":"https://time.com/6159301/sec-climate-rules-corporate-america/","keywords":["finance","climate change","healthscienceclimate","Climate Is Everything","sponsorshipblock"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltcc4c015adb979e45/698a3018b3fce3550f0c9148/sec-climate-corporate-disclosure-emissions.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Justin Worland","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/justin-worland/"}],"articleSection":"Climate","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltcc4c015adb979e45/698a3018b3fce3550f0c9148/sec-climate-corporate-disclosure-emissions.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Louisiana's \"Cancer Alley\" - Landscapes","caption":"Louisiana's \"Cancer Alley\" - Landscapes","creditText":"Giles Clarke—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/climate/","name":"Climate"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/finance/","name":"finance"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6159301/sec-climate-rules-corporate-america/","name":"Why the SEC’s New Climate Rules Could Divide Corporate America"}}]}] ```