--- title: A New Study Suggests COVID-19 Reinfection Is Possible description: A new study suggests you can get COVID-19 twice, but it's not clear how common it is. Here's what to know about COVID-19 reinfection. canonical: https://time.com/5882907/covid-19-reinfection/ author: Jamie Ducharme article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-08-24T16:49:30.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T09:08:53.765Z article:section: Health og:title: A New Study Suggests COVID-19 Reinfection Is Possible og:description: Here's what to know og:url: https://time.com/5882907/covid-19-reinfection/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d01b4aeea7a60b6/698a11a309208f7f844171b4/coronavirus-testing-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Coronavirus testing in Germany og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: A New Study Suggests COVID-19 Reinfection Is Possible twitter:description: Here's what to know twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d01b4aeea7a60b6/698a11a309208f7f844171b4/coronavirus-testing-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # A New Study Suggests COVID-19 Reinfection Is Possible. Here's What to Know > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=9a25cd14-f47e-4fef-87d2-39e7a85dbc5e&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=9a25cd14-f47e-4fef-87d2-39e7a85dbc5e&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=9a25cd14-f47e-4fef-87d2-39e7a85dbc5e&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Jamie Ducharme](https://time.com/author/jamie-ducharme/)  ## Jamie Ducharme Ducharme is a contributor to TIME. Aug 24, 2020 4:49 PM UTC  An employee takes a throat swab sample from a woman seeking a test for possible COVID-19 infection at a test station in Bonn, Germany on Aug. 24, 2020. An employee takes a throat swab sample from a woman seeking a test for possible COVID-19 infection at a test station in Bonn, Germany on Aug. 24, 2020.Andreas Rentz—Getty Images  by [Jamie Ducharme](https://time.com/author/jamie-ducharme/)  ## Jamie Ducharme Ducharme is a contributor to TIME. Aug 24, 2020 4:49 PM UTC Preliminary research released Monday suggests it’s possible to get COVID-19 twice—but experts say the news is not as concerning as that headline may seem. The new research, which was accepted for publication in the journal _Clinical Infectious Diseases_, details the case of a 33-year-old man living in Hong Kong. He first tested positive for COVID-19 in late March and developed symptoms including cough, sore throat, fever and headache. He made a full recovery, but again tested positive for COVID-19 while traveling home from Europe in mid-August. This time, he did not have any symptoms. The Hong Kong-based researchers behind the study say the man’s case is the first proven example of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19\. There have been[ other documented cases](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190077/) of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 multiple times, but it has not been clear whether they’re truly reinfected or if some of the virus’ genetic material[ lingers within the body](https://time.com/5880191/long-haul-covid-19/), leading to repeated positive tests. Viral sequencing, however, showed the Hong Kong patient was infected by two different strains of SARS-CoV-2, which suggests he indeed got sick twice. But in some ways, the case is actually encouraging, says Akiko Iwasaki, a professor of immunobiology at the Yale School of Medicine who was not involved in the study. “There’s no need to panic over this reinfection news,” Iwasaki says. “Even though he got reinfected…this is a good example of how immunity should work in a person.” By that, Iwasaki means that the man’s first infection likely protected him enough that he did not develop symptoms during his second infection. There’s no guarantee all patients’ immune systems will react that way, Iwasaki says, but it’s still a promising sign. It’s hard to draw sweeping conclusions from one case of apparent reinfection, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. (She also notes the paper was circulated without the researchers’ raw data, which makes it hard to assess the science.) One potential red flag is that the researchers found that the Hong Kong patient did not[ test positive for antibodies](https://time.com/5854242/antibody-test-use/)—proteins the body dispatches to fight an infection, and which may help prevent future infections—after his first bout of COVID-19\. (According to the study, the patient did develop antibodies after his second positive test.) It’s possible that the first time he got sick, he was tested too early to detect antibodies, or that they were present at low levels missed by the test, the study notes. But if he truly did not develop any antibodies, his case may be an anomaly rather than an example, since most patients do develop at least some antibodies, Rasmussen says. [Studies have shown](https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/covid-antibodies-fall-dramatically-in-first-three-months) that antibody levels decrease quickly in the months after a coronavirus infection, but researchers still don’t know how well, or for how long, COVID-19 antibodies provide immunity. Unfortunately, the Hong Kong patient’s case doesn’t help clear that up. “We still can’t make conclusions about people who do” test positive for antibodies, Rasmussen says. It’s also not clear whether the man was contagious during his second brush with coronavirus. The amount of virus in his system suggested he could pass it to others, but there’s no evidence as to whether he did. That’s an important question, Iwasaki says. If reinfected patients are contagious even if they’re asymptomatic, herd immunity—the point at which enough of a population is immune to a disease to slow its spread—would be difficult to achieve without a vaccine. The study is an important starting point for understanding coronavirus reinfection, but it will take more data to make any broad conclusions. “There’s been more than 24 million cases reported to date,” the World Health Organization’s[ Maria Van Kerkhove](https://time.com/5827383/maria-van-kerkhove-world-health-organization/) said at a briefing Monday. “And we need to look at something like \[the possibility for reinfection\] at a population level.” If reinfection does turn out to be common, Rasmussen says, it could be an argument for vaccinating even those who have recovered from COVID-19\. But right now, it’s difficult to apply the paper’s findings at scale—beyond urging everyone, whether they’ve had COVID-19 or not, to[ wear a mask](https://time.com/5880867/face-masks-coronavirus/) and continue practicing social distancing. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5882907/covid-19-reinfection/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5882907/covid-19-reinfection/"},"headline":"A New Study Suggests COVID-19 Reinfection Is Possible. Here's What to Know","datePublished":"2020-08-24T16:49:30.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T09:08:53.765Z","description":"A new study suggests you can get COVID-19 twice, but it's not clear how common it is. Here's what to know about COVID-19 reinfection.","url":"https://time.com/5882907/covid-19-reinfection/","keywords":["COVID-19"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d01b4aeea7a60b6/698a11a309208f7f844171b4/coronavirus-testing-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jamie Ducharme","jobTitle":"Ducharme is a contributor to TIME.","url":"https://time.com/author/jamie-ducharme/"}],"articleSection":"Health","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d01b4aeea7a60b6/698a11a309208f7f844171b4/coronavirus-testing-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Coronavirus testing in Germany","caption":"Coronavirus testing in Germany","creditText":"Andreas Rentz—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/health/","name":"Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/covid-19/","name":"COVID-19"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5882907/covid-19-reinfection/","name":"A New Study Suggests COVID-19 Reinfection Is Possible. Here's What to Know"}}]}] ```