--- title: Trump’s Biggest Foreign Policy Win So Far description: The Trump Administration has successfully pushed hard against China when it comes to the future of 5G. canonical: https://time.com/5868095/trumps-biggest-foreign-policy-win/ author: Ian Bremmer article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-07-20T18:19:55.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T09:00:53.513Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Trump’s Biggest Foreign Policy Win So Far Is With China og:description: The Trump Administration has successfully pushed hard against China when it comes to the future of 5G. og:url: https://time.com/5868095/trumps-biggest-foreign-policy-win/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfcfe6d89250973d3/698a1074929fad6ccabf65cb/huawei-tech-5g-trump-china-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: Donald Trump,Xi Jinping og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Trump’s Biggest Foreign Policy Win So Far Is With China twitter:description: The Trump Administration has successfully pushed hard against China when it comes to the future of 5G. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfcfe6d89250973d3/698a1074929fad6ccabf65cb/huawei-tech-5g-trump-china-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Trump’s Biggest Foreign Policy Win So Far > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=03ce9829-d562-414d-a03f-d0fe8285f361&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=03ce9829-d562-414d-a03f-d0fe8285f361&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=03ce9829-d562-414d-a03f-d0fe8285f361&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.  by [Ian Bremmer](https://time.com/author/ian-bremmer/)  ## Ian Bremmer Jul 20, 2020 6:19 PM UTC  President Donald Trump poses for a photo with Chinese President Xi Jinping during a meeting on the sidelines of the G-20 summit in Osaka, Japan, on June 29, 2019. President Donald Trump poses for a photo with Chinese President Xi Jinping during a meeting on the sidelines of the G-20 summit in Osaka, Japan, on June 29, 2019.Susan Walsh—AP  by [Ian Bremmer](https://time.com/author/ian-bremmer/)  ## Ian Bremmer Jul 20, 2020 6:19 PM UTC The British government announced that U.K. telecom carriers [will be banned from installing new Huawei equipment for their 5G network by year’s end](https://time.com/5866643/uk-huawei-5g-ban/), effectively cutting China’s tech champion out of the country’s 5G future… a future which Chinese companies had grand plans to dominate. It’s time we acknowledge that the U.S. fight for tech supremacy versus China has been the single most successful foreign policy of the Donald Trump Administration. It’s not even close. When Eurasia Group first wrote about the [global tech cold war back in 2018](https://www.eurasiagroup.net/live-post/risk-3-global-tech-cold-war), it wasn’t clear the Trump administration would be able to pull this off. Far from it. Yes, the U.S. had the advantage going into the battle, but China had spent the better part of the last decade frantically playing catch up, from plowing resources into market leaders like Huawei to engaging in alleged [corporate espionage and IP theft](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cyber-usa/u-s-allies-slam-china-for-economic-espionage-spies-indicted-idUSKCN1OJ1VN) to get China’s technology capabilities to the point where it could realistically compete with the U.S., if not always on innovation than at least on price. (Beijing denies systematically stealing U.S. IP.) Before the current Trump administration, the U.S. government’s tech policy was effectively allowing Silicon Valley companies to steer the course for the country’s tech future, with Washington responding as necessary. Meanwhile, [China had announced a strategy to dominate the world of 5G technology](https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/27/china-standards-2035-explained.html), seeing it as the highway to its geopolitical supremacy. It was inevitable that China’s publicly-backed tech ambitions would someday clash with the U.S.’s private sector-driven approach; under Trump, it finally has. And while the tech fight often gets folded into Trump’s broader all-out fight with China—a fight that still has a ways to go and is being waged across multiple fronts (among them Hong Kong, Xinjiang, trade, and the South China Sea)—the tech component is starting to yield real results. Countries like [Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-tech-results-idUSKCN24E22Z) have all cut out Huawei from their 5G infrastructure plans at the urging of the U.S. Europe has been more hesitant; while Poland, the Czech Republic, Estonia and a few others [have pledged to keep companies like Huawei out of their future infrastructure](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jul/13/europe-divided-on-huawei-as-us-pressure-to-drop-company-grows), bigger hitters like Germany, France and Italy have taken a more cautious approach to blanket bans against Chinese hardware in their telecoms systems, though critical decisions are expected to be made in the next few months. That’s what makes the U.K. decision so significant. The move has the potential to [cost the U.K. upwards of £7 billion and hold up 5G rollout in the country by three years](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jul/14/huawei-decision-may-delay-5g-rollout-by-three-years-and-cost-uk-7bn-). The British government has been agonizing over the decision for months, but what ostensibly pushed them to take the decision was [U.S. sanctions against Huawei that forced the company to seek third-party vendors](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-05/u-k-prepares-to-start-huawei-5g-phase-out-as-soon-as-this-year) for some of its hardware, introducing new cyber security threats that the U.K. would rather avoid (alongside the ire of the U.S., especially post-Brexit). Other European and Western holdouts will find it difficult to ignore those same considerations when planning for their own 5G futures. And to his credit, it was under Trump that the issue of tech divergence with China has been prioritized, exposing and publicizing the challenge of a system that potentially gives an authoritarian, state capitalist country such wide-ranging data and surveillance capacity. The Trump administration instituted [yet more restrictions on Huawei just](https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/15/pompeo-imposes-visa-restrictions-on-huawei-other-chinese-tech-companies.html), the latest in its [months-long push to get allies to fall in line](https://www.reuters.com/article/britain-usa-huawei-tech/shot-across-the-bow-u-s-increases-pressure-on-uk-ahead-of-key-huawei-decision-idUSL8N29B2EG) with its adversarial tech approach toward Beijing. It’s the effectiveness of this last bit that is most surprising—this isn’t exactly friendly multilateral diplomacy. Not many countries would willingly cede to the demands of a White House better known for browbeating traditional U.S. allies than diplomatically engaging with them in good faith. But there are two critical things the U.S., and by extension the Trump administration, has going for it when it comes to tech. The first is Silicon Valley; for all the billions China has pumped into its own tech industry, the most innovative and cutting-edge tech and talent is still coming out of the U.S.. What’s more, under Trump tech in the U.S. has gone from being just another industry to a critical strategic sector, which will continue no matter who wins the upcoming presidential election in November. Of course, there is a real concern that the continued success of this tech decoupling will ultimately limit the talent available to Silicon Valley and deprive them of the massive Chinese consumer market which will in turn hit their R&D budgets and ability to innovate… but that’s a problem for the next president (though maybe Trump’s if he wins a second term). The second thing the Trump administration has going for it is that despite Trump’s unorthodox style of diplomacy, at this point a decoupled tech sphere between China and the West is the preferred policy and strategic outcome of virtually every U.S. ally given current geopolitical realities. When the alternative is China potentially using its own dominant position in the market to divide and conquer—a particular concern for the EU that has seen China making aggressive moves [into the union’s eastern bloc](https://www.ft.com/content/4ba18efa-377b-11e9-b72b-2c7f526ca5d0)—that focuses minds fast. When your country’s tech future is at stake, you care less about the person sitting in the White House than the actual policy coming out of that White House. America First has often been criticized as America Alone. And that’s a fair criticism. But on the issue of tech decoupling, it’s America out front… with most allies on board. And for Trump, that’s far and away his biggest foreign policy win. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5868095/trumps-biggest-foreign-policy-win/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5868095/trumps-biggest-foreign-policy-win/"},"headline":"Trump’s Biggest Foreign Policy Win So Far","datePublished":"2020-07-20T18:19:55.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T09:00:53.513Z","description":"The Trump Administration has successfully pushed hard against China when it comes to the future of 5G.","url":"https://time.com/5868095/trumps-biggest-foreign-policy-win/","keywords":["Technology"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfcfe6d89250973d3/698a1074929fad6ccabf65cb/huawei-tech-5g-trump-china-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Ian Bremmer","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/ian-bremmer/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfcfe6d89250973d3/698a1074929fad6ccabf65cb/huawei-tech-5g-trump-china-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Donald Trump,Xi Jinping","caption":"Donald Trump,Xi Jinping","creditText":"Susan Walsh—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/technology/","name":"Technology"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5868095/trumps-biggest-foreign-policy-win/","name":"Trump’s Biggest Foreign Policy Win So Far"}}]}] ```