--- title: Intel Officials Disagree Whether Russia Paid the Taliban description: Officials are divided on raw intelligence indicating Russian intelligence officers paid Afghan militants who killed U.S. soldiers canonical: https://time.com/5861815/intelligence-agencies-disagree-russia-taliban/ author: John Walcott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-06-30T19:22:16.000Z article:modified_time: 2023-12-12T17:53:08.000Z article:section: Politics og:title: Intel Officials Disagree Whether Russia Paid the Taliban og:description: Officials are divided on raw intelligence indicating Russian intelligence officers paid Afghan militants who killed U.S. soldiers og:url: https://time.com/5861815/intelligence-agencies-disagree-russia-taliban/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0b179fba7fca4bf2/698a0ead22fb85b864e2b0fe/GettyImages-1186510892.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: FILES-YEAR2019-US-POLITICS-DIPLOMACY-TRUMP og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Intel Officials Disagree Whether Russia Paid the Taliban twitter:description: Officials are divided on raw intelligence indicating Russian intelligence officers paid Afghan militants who killed U.S. soldiers twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0b179fba7fca4bf2/698a0ead22fb85b864e2b0fe/GettyImages-1186510892.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Intelligence Agencies Don’t Agree Whether Russia Paid the Taliban to Target U.S. Soldiers. That Doesn’t Mean Trump Wouldn’t Have Known About it > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4c572b7d-38d7-412d-9a85-62200f9d53e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4c572b7d-38d7-412d-9a85-62200f9d53e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=4c572b7d-38d7-412d-9a85-62200f9d53e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4c572b7d-38d7-412d-9a85-62200f9d53e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: White House Denies That Trump Was Briefed on Reported Russian Bounties on U.S. Soldiers [Watch (HLS stream): White House Denies That Trump Was Briefed on Reported Russian Bounties on U.S. Soldiers](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/CBoHJHcn.m3u8) (2:26)  _Published 2020-06-29. In his first comment on the matter, President Donald Trump tweeted Sunday that “nobody briefed or told me” about the “so-called attacks,” a comment that his former national security adviser termed “remarkable.”_ by [John Walcott](https://time.com/author/john-walcott/) ## John Walcott Updated: Dec 12, 2023 5:53 PM UTCPublished: Jun 30, 2020 7:22 PM UTC In his first comment on the matter, President Donald Trump tweeted Sunday that “nobody briefed or told me” about the “so-called attacks,” a comment that his former national security adviser termed “remarkable.” by [John Walcott](https://time.com/author/john-walcott/) ## John Walcott Updated: Dec 12, 2023 5:53 PM UTCPublished: Jun 30, 2020 7:22 PM UTC U.S. and allied military and intelligence officials in [Afghanistan](https://time.com/tag/afghanistan/) collected information indicating that Russian intelligence officers maintained a fund for rewarding Afghan militants who killed American and Afghans soldiers, but senior officials are divided on how much credence to give the raw intelligence. CIA and Special Operations Command officers in Afghanistan (SOCOM) concluded based on information from human sources that the Russians were, as one official who spoke on condition of anonymity put it, “incentivizing” Taliban fighters to kill Americans and Afghans to retaliate against America for Russia’s defeat in 1989 and disrupt the U.S.-sponsored [peace negotiations](https://time.com/5832017/hostage-afghanistan-peace-deal/) between the Taliban and the Afghan government. The National Security Agency, however, expressed less confidence than the CIA or SOCOM because there was no convincing evidence of that in intercepted Taliban and Russian communications. “Folks downrange are convinced,” said one official familiar with the matter, referring to U.S. personnel in the Afghanistan region. “But some (intelligence) analysts have expressed doubts.” The Trump Administration has seized on these divisions over the alleged Russian bounty system since the scheme was first reported by[ The New York Times](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/26/us/politics/russia-afghanistan-bounties.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article) on June 26\. President Donald Trump tweeted two days later that intelligence officials told him they did not consider the intelligence credible, so it was not reported to him, Vice President Mike Pence, or other top officials. White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany emphasized the dispute on June 29 to reporters, saying disagreements remain over the alleged Russian bounty campaign. “There is no consensus within the intelligence community on these allegations, and, in effect, there are dissenting opinions from some in the intelligence community with regards to the veracity of what’s being reported. And the veracity of the underlying allegations continue to be evaluated,” McEnany said. “Intelligence is verified before it reaches the President of the United States. And in this case, it was not verified.” However, despite the differing level of confidence in the intelligence from the field, the issue has been mentioned in interagency memos and discussed in meetings, several officials said, including at least one in the White House, although that was at what one official called “the working level.” And because the matter involved a possible Russian role in killing American soldiers, several officials said, it almost certainly would have appeared in at least one President’s Daily Brief (PDB), a top secret intelligence summary that is delivered in person and sometimes only in writing to the president and top officials. Although Trump has sided with Russia over U.S. officials on other major issues, including Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, CIA Director Gina Haspel and other officials would have included it in at least one PDB, as it’s commonly called. [The Associated Press](https://time.com/5861541/white-house-russia-bounties-2019/) has reported that top officials at the White House were made aware of the bounty payments as early as early 2019. When disagreements over intelligence included in the PDB arise, they often are noted in the document’s footnotes or text boxes, which officials compile between 2AM and 4AM each morning. In previous administrations, the president ordinarily received or read the PDB first, but in the Trump Administration, Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien often read it first and edit out material they think is inconclusive, particularly if it contradicts Trump’s policies, said a former senior CIA officer. Even when Trump is briefed specifically on an issue, officials familiar with the briefings said, he does not always pay close attention or pursue issues that do not interest him, as former national security advisor John Bolton alleges in his new book. McEnany would not confirm or deny to reporters that the intelligence in question was included in one of the PDBs during a June 30 press briefing, saying it was “a top secret document.” She did, however, say that Trump reads the daily briefings. “The President does read. And he also consumes intelligence verbally,” she said. “This president I’ll tell you is the most informed person on planet earth when it comes to the threats that we face.” Intelligence agencies frequently reach different conclusions, usually based on their sources of information. The National Security Agency, for example, also had a lower level of confidence than the CIA and FBI in the January 2017 assessment that [Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election](https://time.com/5567077/mueller-report-release/)_._ Another former human intelligence officer recalls internal debates within U.S. intelligence more than a decade ago over who was bankrolling bounties to Taliban fighters of $25,000 per U.S. soldier and $50,000 for U.S. senior officers during his service in Afghanistan. Defense intelligence sources concluded the Russian government was likely providing the money as part of a campaign to frustrate the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan, just as the U.S. had similarly sabotaged the Soviet occupation in the 1980s, the former officer said, speaking anonymously to discuss the sensitive matter. But even then, U.S. intelligence officials never concluded that with high confidence, he added. In this case, some officials said they are skeptical the Russians would risk rewarding members of the Taliban or other groups for doing something they’re already doing. “Why would they take a chance on that, knowing as they must that having it exposed would put Trump in a tough spot when (Russian President Vladimir) Putin wants to see him re-elected?” asked a second official. Other current and former U.S. and British officials, however, said that some of today’s senior Russian military and intelligence officers were junior field officers in Afghanistan when the U.S.-backed mujahedeen drove Soviet occupation forces out of the country in 1989 and may still have an axe to grind. “Putin’s big military parade was a celebration of what became a glorious Soviet victory over the Nazis, but the Russians never forget their defeats, either,” said one U.S. official. “Hell, they still hate the Tatar Mongols.” In addition, notes one official who finds the bounty report credible, unit 29115 of the GRU, the Russian military intelligence agency that has been providing assistance to the Taliban for years, has run other politically risky operations, including poisoning a former Russian spy and his daughter in Britain in 2018\. The schism between the intelligence agencies underscores the challenge of interpreting intelligence collected by agencies that use different tools. In response to the NSA’s objections that they had not intercepted communications confirming the alleged Russian scheme, one CIA officer drily responded: “Big surprise. The Russians didn’t call their friends and say, “I’ll give you $1,000 cash for every American infidel you kill? They use couriers — not phones and texts.” A Taliban spokesman rejected the allegation that members of the group killed U.S. troops for bounty from Russia on Tuesday, referring to an earlier June 27 statement from the group that stated the Taliban “is not indebted to the beneficence of any intelligence organ or foreign country and neither is the Islamic Emirate in need of anyone in specifying objectives.” The CIA has not confirmed its conclusion about the alleged Russian program publicly. “When developing intelligence assessments, initial tactical reports often require additional collection and validation,” Haspel said in a June 29 statement. “Hostile states’ use of proxies in war zones to inflict damage on U.S. interests and troops is a constant, longstanding concern. CIA will continue to pursue every lead; analyze the information we collect with critical, objective eyes; and brief reliable intelligence to protect U.S. forces deployed around the world.” Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman also said that the Department of Defense, which includes the NSA, has “no corroborating evidence” to validate the reports but that it “continues to evaluate intelligence that Russian GRU operatives were engaged in malign activity against United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan.” _—With reporting by Kimberly Dozier and W.J. Hennigan in Washington_ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5861815/intelligence-agencies-disagree-russia-taliban/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5861815/intelligence-agencies-disagree-russia-taliban/"},"headline":"Intelligence Agencies Don’t Agree Whether Russia Paid the Taliban to Target U.S. Soldiers. That Doesn’t Mean Trump Wouldn’t Have Known About it","datePublished":"2020-06-30T19:22:16.000Z","dateModified":"2023-12-12T17:53:08.000Z","description":"Officials are divided on raw intelligence indicating Russian intelligence officers paid Afghan militants who killed U.S. soldiers","url":"https://time.com/5861815/intelligence-agencies-disagree-russia-taliban/","keywords":["Foreign Policy","News"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0b179fba7fca4bf2/698a0ead22fb85b864e2b0fe/GettyImages-1186510892.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"John Walcott","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/john-walcott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0b179fba7fca4bf2/698a0ead22fb85b864e2b0fe/GettyImages-1186510892.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"FILES-YEAR2019-US-POLITICS-DIPLOMACY-TRUMP","caption":"FILES-YEAR2019-US-POLITICS-DIPLOMACY-TRUMP","creditText":"Olivier Douliery—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/foreign-policy/","name":"Foreign Policy"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5861815/intelligence-agencies-disagree-russia-taliban/","name":"Intelligence Agencies Don’t Agree Whether Russia Paid the Taliban to Target U.S. Soldiers. That Doesn’t Mean Trump Wouldn’t Have Known About it"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"White House Denies That Trump Was Briefed on Reported Russian Bounties on U.S. Soldiers","description":"In his first comment on the matter, President Donald Trump tweeted Sunday that “nobody briefed or told me” about the “so-called attacks,” a comment that his former national security adviser termed “remarkable.”","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/CBoHJHcn/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2020-06-29T22:12:47.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/CBoHJHcn.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5861815/intelligence-agencies-disagree-russia-taliban/","duration":"PT2M26S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5861815/intelligence-agencies-disagree-russia-taliban/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```