--- title: Why We Need the World Health Organization, Despite its Flaws description: The WHO certainly gets its share of criticism, some of it warranted, but there are several reasons why it should stay, writes Ian Bremmer. canonical: https://time.com/5836602/world-health-organization-coronavirus/ author: Ian Bremmer article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-05-14T10:04:49.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:03:47.492Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why We Need the World Health Organization, Despite its Flaws og:description: What lessons should we take from the COVID experience about the future of the WHO? og:url: https://time.com/5836602/world-health-organization-coronavirus/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e7b3193308f4efd/698a0e0001168207ea97f5f9/world-health-organization-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: world-health-organization-coronavirus og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why We Need the World Health Organization, Despite its Flaws twitter:description: What lessons should we take from the COVID experience about the future of the WHO? twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e7b3193308f4efd/698a0e0001168207ea97f5f9/world-health-organization-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why We Need the World Health Organization, Despite Its Flaws > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=39e9ae82-074b-44b4-9636-cf605870bc8c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=39e9ae82-074b-44b4-9636-cf605870bc8c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=39e9ae82-074b-44b4-9636-cf605870bc8c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=39e9ae82-074b-44b4-9636-cf605870bc8c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: Trump Says He'll 'Put a Hold' on World Health Organization Funding Before Backtracking [Watch (HLS stream): Trump Says He'll 'Put a Hold' on World Health Organization Funding Before Backtracking](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/1yAyyYU4.m3u8) (1:48)  _Published 2020-04-08. President Donald Trump said he would “put a hold” on U.S. funding for the World Health Organization, before backtracking and claiming, “I’m not saying I’m going to do it.”_  by [Ian Bremmer](https://time.com/author/ian-bremmer/)  ## Ian Bremmer May 14, 2020 10:04 AM UTC  World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus gestures during a press briefing on evolution of new coronavirus epidemic on Jan. 29 in Geneva World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus gestures during a press briefing on evolution of new coronavirus epidemic on Jan. 29 in Geneva Fabrice Coffrini—AFP/Getty Images  by [Ian Bremmer](https://time.com/author/ian-bremmer/)  ## Ian Bremmer May 14, 2020 10:04 AM UTC COVID-19 has a way of making both individuals and governments feel vulnerable, and it’s only human to look for someone to blame when things go badly wrong. That’s why it sometimes seems as if willingness to absorb abuse is a natural part of the World Health Organization’s mandate. The international agency has certainly come in for its share of criticism, and some of it is warranted. The WHO was slow to publicly recognize the scale of the threat posed by the outbreak in China. Though the organization declared the virus a global health emergency in January, [Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus](https://time.com/5735544/world-health-organization-chief-tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-interview/) didn’t begin characterizing it as a pandemic until March 11, when the virus had already been confirmed in at least 114 countries. In part, that’s probably because, like most large bureaucracies, the WHO is a cautious institution. It’s also fair to criticize the WHO’s relationship with Taiwan. China continues to condemn any recognition of Taiwan as an independent nation. Taiwan is unable to efficiently share information about its own outbreaks directly with the WHO because of China’s demands that Taiwan be denied formal representation within the U.N. system. Respecting China’s diplomatic sensitivities is one thing. Respect for the health of Taiwan’s nearly 24 million people is another. The [Trump Administration says](https://time.com/5830420/trump-china-rivalry-coronavirus-intelligence/) that the WHO’s greatest failure is in accepting Chinese lies about containment of the virus in its earliest days. In January, Tedros praised “China’s commitment to transparency and to supporting other countries. In many ways, China is actually setting a new standard for outbreak response.” This despite credible charges that China hid the scale of the virus and punished Chinese doctors who publicly warned that risks were growing. On April 14, citing the above mentioned criticisms of the WHO’s relationship with China, President Trump announced that Washington would temporarily [suspend U.S. funding](https://time.com/5821122/who-funding-trump-covid19-coronavirus-china/) while his Administration reviewed the organization’s handling of COVID-19\. That matters, because the U.S. is (by far) the largest single contributor to the WHO’s budget. **What lessons should we take** from the COVID experience about the future of the WHO? If Washington has no use for a multinational institution composed of medical professionals who identify, map and track public-health emergencies that can kill millions of people, China might be happy to step in. China, which didn’t stop possibly infected citizens from traveling the world, could use its financial muscle to build a new global health agency, one that could benefit from China’s unique position in the global medical-supply chain to become first responders to health crises. The U.S. is the biggest investor in the current WHO, but China is the dominant investor and trade partner in many of the countries most vulnerable to a pandemic. A Chinese version of the WHO would not allow the transparency that the world needs from such an organization. Today’s WHO, like all multinational institutions working in politically sensitive areas, has big flaws. Like any U.N. agency, it can’t function without the goodwill of the governments it must rely upon for access. The WHO can be accused of not calling out China for its first critical response to this virus, but the organization could not study the virus from outside Wuhan. Call Beijing a liar, and the resulting eviction of WHO officials from China could kill millions. Scrapping this organization would leave us racing to build a new one before the next crisis. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5836602/world-health-organization-coronavirus/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5836602/world-health-organization-coronavirus/"},"headline":"Why We Need the World Health Organization, Despite Its Flaws","datePublished":"2020-05-14T10:04:49.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:03:47.492Z","description":"The WHO certainly gets its share of criticism, some of it warranted, but there are several reasons why it should stay, writes Ian Bremmer.","url":"https://time.com/5836602/world-health-organization-coronavirus/","keywords":["Magazine","feature","COVID-19"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e7b3193308f4efd/698a0e0001168207ea97f5f9/world-health-organization-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Ian Bremmer","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/ian-bremmer/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e7b3193308f4efd/698a0e0001168207ea97f5f9/world-health-organization-coronavirus.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"world-health-organization-coronavirus","caption":"World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus gestures during a press briefing on evolution of new coronavirus epidemic on Jan. 29 in Geneva","creditText":"Fabrice Coffrini—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5836602/world-health-organization-coronavirus/","name":"Why We Need the World Health Organization, Despite Its Flaws"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Trump Says He'll 'Put a Hold' on World Health Organization Funding Before Backtracking","description":"President Donald Trump said he would “put a hold” on U.S. funding for the World Health Organization, before backtracking and claiming, “I’m not saying I’m going to do it.”","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/1yAyyYU4/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2020-04-08T02:44:54.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/1yAyyYU4.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5836602/world-health-organization-coronavirus/","duration":"PT1M48S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5836602/world-health-organization-coronavirus/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```