By Tara Law
Updated: June 21, 2019 2:49 PM ET | Originally published: June 20, 2019

Iran shooting down a U.S. surveillance drone in the politically sensitive Strait of Hormuz has created a dangerous new level of tension between the two countries

President Donald Trump said Iran made a “big mistake,” and later added that it was a “new wrinkle” for Iran and the U.S.

Days after saying that Iran attacked two oil tankers in the Persian Gulf, the United States is now accusing the country of shooting down an unmanned surveillance aircraft in international airspace. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps declared that it had stuck down the RQ-4 Global Hawk over Iranian airspace, but the United States countered that the incident was an “unprovoked attack” and that the aircraft had been traveling in international airspace.

A few days ago, the U.S. officials also accused Iran of firing missile at a different drone that had been responding to the attack on the tankers.

But what exactly is an RQ-4A drone, and why does this attack matter? TIME spoke to drone aircraft experts to find out what you need to know.

What is the RQ-4 Global Hawk drone?

Northrop Grumman unveils the U.S. Navy MQ-4C Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) unmanned aircraft system during a ceremony at the Northrop Grumman Palmdale Calif. manufacturing facility.
Northrup Grumman—U.S. Navy

In technical terms, the drone that Iran shot down was a U.S. Navy Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS-D) aircraft, which is a Navy version of the Air Force’s high-flying RQ-4A Global Hawk. In simple terms, it is an unmanned aircraft that is intended for surveillance at sea.

Unlike the missile-launching MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper drones that are used to conduct airstrikes, Global Hawk drones are unarmed are used only to collect information.

To do this, they fly at altitudes of up to 60,000 feet–– almost twice as high as a commercial airliner. At that height, the drone can see beyond the curvature of the Earth.

“This drone typically has as its most important defense altitude,” says Amy Zegart, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute of International Studies. “It flies at a very high altitude, so the fact that the Iranians were able to shoot it down shows that they have some pretty significant capabilities. In some ways, the shoot down is a signaling mechanism to the United States that Iran is more capable than we might have assumed.”

Global Hawks are also expensive, says Zegart. The cost of a single drone was more than $176 million in 2011, according to the military––more than 10 times the price of drones like the Predator and Reaper.

Global Hawks may be used for surveillance, but they’re not considered to be stealth aircraft. The drone has a 130-ft wingspan, similar to a Boeing 737 passenger jet. It is large, heavy and slow compared to combat aircraft, Dan Gettinger, the co-director of the Center for the Study of the Drone at Bard College, tells TIME.

“They’re not fast. They have a high profile––they’re easily observable on radar. They’re purposely designed to fly slowly at high altitudes. They’re able to essentially loiter over an area and collect as much data as possible,” Gettinger says.

Such an aircraft would be carrying advanced technology such as high definition and infra-red cameras, as well as sensors that can intercept telephone and radio chatter.

Douglas Barrie, a senior fellow for military aerospace at the International Institute for Strategic Studies tells TIME that this kind of aircraft would be sent on missions to conduct maritime surveillance or to peer inside a country from outside its borders.

“The range of the sensors onboard would allow you to see, certainly, areas of Iran of interest, while you’re still in international airspace,” Barrie says.

What happened to the drone?

File photo of a RQ-4 Global Hawk unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft.
U.S. Air Force

The U.S. and Iran are telling conflicting stories. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard said that it shot down the aircraft over Iranian airspace. Revolutionary Guard’s Commander and Chief Hossein Salami said on Iranian TV that the U.S. aircraft crossed a “red line” and that Iran sent a message that it will respond to aggression, according to Reuters.

“Iran is not seeking war with any country, but we are fully prepared to defend Iran,” Salami said.

The U.S. Central Command, which is in charge of military operations in the Middle East, says the drone was attacked in international airspace at the Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman. The Strait is especially significant because much of the world’s oil supply flows through it.

“Iranian reports that the aircraft was over Iran are false. This was an unprovoked attack on a U.S. surveillance asset in international airspace,” Navy Capt. Bill Urban, a spokesperson for U.S. Central Command, said in statement Thursday.

How has the U.S. responded?

The U.S. has resoundingly denied that the drone entered Iranian airspace. The head of the U.S. Air Forces Central Command for the region, Lt. General Joseph Guastella, said Thursday that Iranian claims that the drone entered Iranian airspace were “categorically false.”

The U.S. military claims that the drone was never closer to Iran than 21 miles, and released a map which allegedly showed the drone’s launch site and the location where it was shot down.

Graphic showing the flight path of the U.S. Navy RQ-4A shot down on June 20, 2019
U.S. Central Command &mdash Twitter

The U.S. military also released a grainy video which it said showed smoke from the drone.

The U.S. made plans to conduct a military strike against Iran, but the mission was called off at the last minute. A U.S. official told the AP that the targets would have included radars and missile batteries.

In a series of tweets on Friday morning, Trump explained that he had decided to call off the attack after learning that it would kill about 150 people. He wrote that he felt that it was not a “proportionate” response for an attack on an unmanned drone.

“We were cocked & loaded to retaliate last night on 3 different [sites] when I asked, how many will die,” Trump wrote. “150 people, sir, was the answer from a General. 10 minutes before the strike I stopped it, not proportionate to shooting down an unmanned drone. I am in no hurry, our Military is rebuilt, new, and ready to go, by far the best in the world. Sanctions are biting & more added last night. Iran can NEVER have Nuclear Weapons, not against the USA, and not against the WORLD!

On Thursday, Trump declined to comment about the U.S. response to the attack, but said that “You’ll soon find out.”

The Federal Aviation Administration issued an emergency order on Thursday which prohibited pilots from entering Iranian airspace “due to heightened military activities and increased political tensions.” International airlines, including British Airways, Emirates and Lufthansa, also announced that they would avoid the area.

How has Iran responded?

Iran has insisted that the drone entered Iranian airspace. Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif tweeted a hand-drawn map of the drone’s alleged flight path through the Strait of Hormuz.

At 00:14 US drone took off from UAE in stealth mode & violated Iranian airspace,” Zarif wrote. “It was targeted at 04:05 at the coordinates (25°59’43″N 57°02’25″E) near Kouh-e Mobarak. We’ve retrieved sections of the US military drone in OUR territorial waters where it was shot down.”

Zarif also tweeted that the U.S. is “lying about international waters.”

“The US wages #EconomicTerrorism on Iran, has conducted covert action against us & now encroaches on our territory,” he wrote. “We don’t seek war, but will zealously defend our skies, land & waters.”

Iranian Brigadier General Rahimzadeh said that Iran had sent the U.S. “several warning” before downing the drone, according to Iran’s semi-official news agency, Tasnim.

Amirali Hajizadeh, head of the Revolutionary Guards aerospace division, said that a American Boeing P-8 Poseidon surveillance plane was in Iranian airspace at the same time as the drone, but Iran had decided not to shoot it down because Iran authorities did not want casualties, Tasnim reported, according to Reuters.

Iran said the P-8 was carrying 35 Americans, but the U.S. Navy says the crew compliment of the plane is nine.

Tasnim also released photos that it said were of the drone, as well as video that it said showed Iran firing a surface-to-air missile at the drone.

Has this happened before?

Although it’s not unusual for smaller drones to face attacks, attacks on drones that are as large and sophisticated as the RQ-4 are rarer, Barrie says. Such aircraft fly at high altitudes and are hard to hit with short-range missiles.

Americans may remember that Iran allegedly captured a smaller drone––the RQ-170 Sentinel––in 2011.

Gettinger argues that what’s happening now is a very different, and that now there’s a higher risk of escalation. In 2011, the United States declined to claim the aircraft.

“It was a very secret drone on a secret mission,” Gettinger says. “Here, it’s a much more public event.”

What does it mean that a drone was shot down?

Zegart warns that while the diplomatic situation isn’t as dire as it would be if an aircraft with American pilots had been shot down, she considers Iran’s attack to be an aggressive move for Iran, especially since the drone wasn’t carrying weapons.

“It’s a signaling device that Iran has capabilities that we might not have anticipated before––but it’s certainly less aggressive than shooting at something that would risk human lives,” said Zegart.

U.S. efforts to collect surveillance don’t mean that the drone was being used in an aggressive way, she says.

“Regardless of where you come down on is this international airspace or Iranian airspace, this was not an escalatory move by the United States. It was an escalatory move by Iran,” Zegart says. “You can imagine in some circumstances, gathering intelligence can be deescalating, because everyone has a better picture of what’s going on on the ground. So the simple fact of sending a surveillance drone over a conflict area does not in itself lead to escalation necessarily.”

Zegart warns that the situation is “very dangerous” and that the Trump Administration should take the potential for escalating tensions seriously.

“The President’s use of Twitter is perhaps the biggest wildcard here,” says Zegart. “There are a lot of mixed messages coming out of the Administration whether you’re listening to the National Security Adviser or the President or the Secretary of State. So messaging discipline––which has never been a hallmark of this administration––is all the more important with this particular adversary. I think we can’t assume that an adversary like Iran is going to discount what the President says on Twitter is just Trump being Trump.”

Beyond the current situation, Gettinger, of the Center for the Study of the Drone, argues that the U.S. is likely to see more incidents like this. Drones are becoming increasingly popular in regions with high political and military tensions.

“Because of this proliferation of drones, and because of the perceived low risk of deploying them in these situations, there is a potential that we could see more of these incidents in the future,” Gettinger says.

Correction, June 21

An earlier version of this story misstated the location where the United States military says the drone was shot down. It says it was shot down near Iran, not the U.S.

Write to Tara Law at tara.law@time.com.

Read More From TIME

EDIT POST