--- title: Growing List of Countries Agree on Net-Zero Emissions Goal description: Even as more countries commit to net zero emissions, policymakers will need to come up with the details to reach the target canonical: https://time.com/5609309/net-zero-emissions-new-york-european-union/ author: Justin Worland article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2019-06-21T18:30:54.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-11T04:56:55.426Z article:section: Politics og:title: More and More Countries Agree on This Climate Change Goal. But Will It Work? og:description: Several Democratic presidential candidates back it too og:url: https://time.com/5609309/net-zero-emissions-new-york-european-union/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9e87787cef22f3ce/6989465c16d8848cdbc34bcc/climate-change-deniers-connecticut-schools.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: A Connecticut lawmaker wants to strike climate change from state science standards og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: More and More Countries Agree on This Climate Change Goal. But Will It Work? twitter:description: Several Democratic presidential candidates back it too twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9e87787cef22f3ce/6989465c16d8848cdbc34bcc/climate-change-deniers-connecticut-schools.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # More and More Countries Agree on This Climate Change Goal. But Will It Work? > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=d2299f80-b73b-4dbd-a126-7666ac4edc72&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 85,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 37.0% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=d2299f80-b73b-4dbd-a126-7666ac4edc72&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=d2299f80-b73b-4dbd-a126-7666ac4edc72&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. It reaches 85,000 subscribers with a 37.0% open rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Jun 21, 2019 6:30 PM UTC  Smoke rises from a coal-fired power plant on Fe. 1, 2019 in Romeoville, Illinois. It was reported on Mar. 6, 2019 that a Connecticut lawmaker wants to strike climate change from state science standards. Smoke rises from a coal-fired power plant on Fe. 1, 2019 in Romeoville, Illinois. It was reported on Mar. 6, 2019 that a Connecticut lawmaker wants to strike climate change from state science standards. Scott Olson—Getty Images  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Jun 21, 2019 6:30 PM UTC As lawmakers around the world debate how best to fight climate change, one goal is rapidly becoming standard: net-zero emissions by 2050. That means that greenhouse gases would be dramatically reduced — most likely by using a combination of switching from coal and gas to wind and solar, becoming more energy-efficient and putting taxes or fees on carbon — and whatever remains would be offset by planting trees or using budding technology to pull carbon dioxide out of the air. Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom have agreed to work toward the net zero goal by the middle of the century. New York state passed a bill this week requiring the state to hit net zero by 2050\. Washington state Gov. [Jay Inslee](https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/05/jay-insles-climate-plan-keeping-it-100/588652/) called for net zero emissions by 2045 in his presidential campaign — after [signing a related bill](https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/inslee-signs-package-of-long-sought-climate-bills-that-include-a-phase-out-of-coal-and-natural-gas-fired-power-plants/) in his home state — while rivals [Joe Biden](https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/04/politics/joe-biden-2020-climate-plan/index.html), [Beto O’Rourke](https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/29/politics/beto-orourke-climate-change-policy/index.html), [Michael Bennet](http://fortune.com/2019/06/06/2020-climate-change-plans/) and [John Delaney](http://fortune.com/2019/06/06/2020-climate-change-plans/) are pushing for net zero by 2050. The European Union, meantime, has said it would move toward zero emissions, though it disappointed environmentalists by not setting a deadline. The newfound attention to the net zero target represents a significant development in the push to decarbonize the global economy along the lines scientists suggest is necessary to stave off the worst effects of global warming. But two key problems remain: the worst polluters, including the United States, haven’t yet signed on, and most places still need to figure out the details of how they will reach their goal. “We are in a very dangerous position now where action could go forward or backward,” Climate Analytics CEO Bill Hare told reporters Wednesday. “The next 12 months or so will really tell.” The goal didn’t come out of the blue. Scientists have known for years that achieving that target by the middle of the century is essential to limiting temperature rise. [Research](https://climateanalytics.org/publications/2015/timetables-for-zero-emissions-and-2015-emissions-reductions/?) from Climate Analytics released in early 2015, for example, suggested that global greenhouse emissions would need to hit zero by 2100 at the latest to have a good chance of keeping temperatures from rising more than 2°C by the end of the century.  Photograph by Christopher Gregory for TIME **Read More:** [_Our Sinking Planet_](https://time.com/longform/sinking-islands-climate-change/) Last fall, climate activism received a jolt of energy when a landmark report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that time is running out if the planet is to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, including everything from the loss of the world’s coral reefs to the impoverishment of hundreds of millions of people. Scientists behind the report lay many different potential pathways to stem warming, but no matter which pathway countries choose to follow urgent steps to eliminate net emissions by mid-century are crucial, they say. With that reminder, [countries](https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/06/14/countries-net-zero-climate-goal/) around the globe — as well as some cities and states — have pushed toward enacting a net zero goal. The list is long and includes a range of countries of varying geographies, resources and politics, from New Zealand to Ireland, Chile to Fiji. The net-zero commitments mean different things in different places. In some countries, such as Iceland, the net zero target is an “aim” while in others, like the U.K., leaders want the target to be legally binding. Obviously, a legally binding target is more stringent than a mere commitment, but it still only represents a start. In most cases, countries will need to follow up with a range of rules, regulations and laws to make the goal a reality, a process bound to be just as controversial as actually setting a target. And, in some cases, countries could make a bold commitment while kicking some of the hard work in actually cutting emissions down the road. “Ambitious plans are very good but not enough,” says Niklas Höhne, a founding partner of NewClimate Institute. “They need to be cast in stone with laws and regulation.” There’s an even bigger elephant in the room: such bold climate proposals are not on the table for the world’s three biggest emitters, the U.S., China and India. Global emissions rose last year at the fastest rate in years thanks in large part to a spike in those countries even as emissions fell in the European Union, Japan and elsewhere. Prior to Donald Trump’s election, the U.S. federal government had suggested the country could implement policies to reduce emissions 80% by 2050, which would have been a significant move in direction of a net-zero target. Trump has not only done away with long-term thinking to reduce the country’s emissions but targeted a slew of environmental rules for rollback. Carbon emissions rose last year more than 3% even as cities and states continued their own pushes to reduce emissions. China and India, both developing countries concerned with catching up with Western development standards, were never expected to hit net zero emissions by 2050\. Even still, conditions on the ground, particularly in China, have raised concerns that their emissions growth could derail efforts to stem temperature rise. China has reversed a ban on the construction of new coal-fired power plants while India is projected to continue to grow its use of that fossil fuel. Others including Brazil and Australia are also backtracking on their climate change commitments. Even with limited leadership from these three countries, global climate policy experts expect to see a slew of new climate change commitments from countries in the coming months ahead of the U.N. Secretary General’s climate summit held in September. And, following close behind that conference, most countries are expected to have new plans to share by next year in accordance with a provision under the Paris Agreement that calls on them to enhance commitments on a regular basis. “September is an impulse in that direction,” UN Secretary-General António Guterres [told TIME](https://time.com/5602482/antonio-guterres-climate-change-united-nations-summit/) last month, “and a mobilization of more and more countries.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5609309/net-zero-emissions-new-york-european-union/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5609309/net-zero-emissions-new-york-european-union/"},"headline":"More and More Countries Agree on This Climate Change Goal. But Will It Work?","datePublished":"2019-06-21T18:30:54.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-11T04:56:55.426Z","description":"Even as more countries commit to net zero emissions, policymakers will need to come up with the details to reach the target","url":"https://time.com/5609309/net-zero-emissions-new-york-european-union/","keywords":["climate change","Environment","Joe Biden","2020 Election","beto o'rourke"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9e87787cef22f3ce/6989465c16d8848cdbc34bcc/climate-change-deniers-connecticut-schools.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Justin Worland","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/justin-worland/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9e87787cef22f3ce/6989465c16d8848cdbc34bcc/climate-change-deniers-connecticut-schools.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"A Connecticut lawmaker wants to strike climate change from state science standards","caption":"Smoke rises from a coal-fired power plant","creditText":"Scott Olson—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/climate-change/","name":"climate change"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5609309/net-zero-emissions-new-york-european-union/","name":"More and More Countries Agree on This Climate Change Goal. But Will It Work?"}}]}] ```