--- title: Congress' First Act on Big Tech Antitrust Investigations: Local News description: House lawmakers are aiming to shed light on the adverse impact Google and Facebook have had on local news. canonical: https://time.com/5601754/congress-anti-trust-local-news/ author: Alana Abramson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2019-06-06T17:08:34.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-13T08:52:04.433Z article:section: Politics og:title: Democrats Have Picked the First Target of Their Sweeping Tech Antitrust Probe og:description: "The loss of a diverse and free press has consequences for the future of our democracy" og:url: https://time.com/5601754/congress-anti-trust-local-news/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt19e1de39f656eb2a/698947f586f68e5d1b6eba3d/congress-hearing-social-media-hate-crimes.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3658 og:image:height: 2058 og:image:alt: A Congressional committee hearing began criticizing the spread of hate crimes in the U.S. and social media's role in the spread. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Democrats Have Picked the First Target of Their Sweeping Tech Antitrust Probe twitter:description: "The loss of a diverse and free press has consequences for the future of our democracy" twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt19e1de39f656eb2a/698947f586f68e5d1b6eba3d/congress-hearing-social-media-hate-crimes.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Democrats Have Picked the First Target of Their Sweeping Tech Antitrust Probe > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=7e0d8a06-5289-4181-993a-a1d5c3902ae8&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 85,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 37.0% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=7e0d8a06-5289-4181-993a-a1d5c3902ae8&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=7e0d8a06-5289-4181-993a-a1d5c3902ae8&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. It reaches 85,000 subscribers with a 37.0% open rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Alana Abramson](https://time.com/author/alana-abramson/)  ## Alana Abramson Jun 6, 2019 5:08 PM UTC  A man using a mobile phone walks past Google offices in New York on Dec. 17, 2018\. A Congressional committee hearing began criticizing the spread of hate crimes in the U.S. and social media's role in the spread. A man using a mobile phone walks past Google offices in New York on Dec. 17, 2018\. A Congressional committee hearing began criticizing the spread of hate crimes in the U.S. and social media's role in the spread. Mark Lennihan—AP  by [Alana Abramson](https://time.com/author/alana-abramson/)  ## Alana Abramson Jun 6, 2019 5:08 PM UTC House lawmakers are kicking off their antitrust investigations of technology companies by focusing on an industry crippled by the rise of big tech: local journalism. [The House Judiciary Committee,](https://time.com/5600218/congress-bipartisan-probe-tech-industry/) which announced a broad antitrust probe into the technology industry will hold its first hearing for the probe on June 11\. The hearing, titled “Online Platforms and Market Power, Part 1: The Free and Diverse Press,” will focus in particular on how the dominance of [Google](https://time.com/5601245/google-amazon-facebook-apple-antitrust/) and [Facebook](https://time.com/5594870/facebook-removes-3-billion-fake-accounts/) in online advertising has hurt the economic viability of local news organizations. Rhode Island Rep. David Cicilline, who chairs the House Judiciary sub-committee responsible for the hearing, says the decline of local journalism has been one of the most devastating consequences of the rise of the tech giants, and must be illuminated. “This is about the ability of people to access truthful, reliable local news which is essential to the functioning of our democracy,” he says. “The loss of a diverse and free press has consequences for the future of our democracy.” As readership has shifted from print to online, local news organizations have been hit particularly hard by the strangle-hold Google and Facebook have on digital ad money. One media investment firm [estimated](https://www.ft.com/content/cf362186-d840-11e7-a039-c64b1c09b482) that the two companies would take in 85% of all digital ad spending for 2018\. The revenue loss has been disastrous for the viability of local news. According to a 2018 [report](https://www.cislm.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/The-Expanding-News-Desert-10%5F14-Web.pdf) from the University of North Carolina, nearly 1 in 5 newspapers, nearly 1,800 in total, have closed over the last 15 years. While Google and Facebook have both pledged [hundreds of millions of dollars](https://www.vox.com/2019/1/15/18182973/facebook-journalism-300-million-google-advertising-subscriptions) into initiatives to help mitigate this problem, Cicilline says it doesn’t solve the larger issue of adequately compensating news organizations for creating content. “You’re seeing examples all over the country where local newspapers are going out of business, laying people off, and they don’t really have the ability to negotiate because these two companies are so large and so dominant.” Three witnesses are scheduled to appear so far at the hearing, although more could be added. They are: Gene Kimmelman, the president of Public Knowledge and a former senior antitrust official at the Department of Justice; David Chavern, the president of News Media Alliance, which represents 2,000 newspapers across the U.S. and Canada; and Sally Hubbard, Director of Enforcement Strategy at the Open Markets Institute, who worked on antitrust issues in the New York state government. The Judiciary Committee announced on June 3 that it was opening a bipartisan investigation into the major technology companies like Google, Facebook Apple and Amazon, primarily designed to assess whether they are stifling competition. Cicilline aims to have a report completed by the end of 2020 with recommendations, including legislative fixes. But on a broader level, he says, the investigation will enable lawmakers to investigate the efficacy of antitrust laws in the 21st century. “It’s easy to identify what the problems are and the anti-competitive behavior,” he says. “It’s harder to develop a solution. One of the values of the investigation is \[making sure\] we have the best data and the best thinking, so as we craft a response to this monopoly moment we are living in in this country we do it by relying on the best data and evidence.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5601754/congress-anti-trust-local-news/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5601754/congress-anti-trust-local-news/"},"headline":"Democrats Have Picked the First Target of Their Sweeping Tech Antitrust Probe","datePublished":"2019-06-06T17:08:34.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-13T08:52:04.433Z","description":"\"The loss of a diverse and free press has consequences for the future of our democracy.\"","url":"https://time.com/5601754/congress-anti-trust-local-news/","keywords":["Congress","Tech","Google","facebook","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt19e1de39f656eb2a/698947f586f68e5d1b6eba3d/congress-hearing-social-media-hate-crimes.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alana Abramson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/alana-abramson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt19e1de39f656eb2a/698947f586f68e5d1b6eba3d/congress-hearing-social-media-hate-crimes.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"A Congressional committee hearing began criticizing the spread of hate crimes in the U.S. and social media's role in the spread.","caption":"A man using a mobile phone walks past Google offices in New York","creditText":"Mark Lennihan—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/congress/","name":"Congress"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5601754/congress-anti-trust-local-news/","name":"Democrats Have Picked the First Target of Their Sweeping Tech Antitrust Probe"}}]}] ```