--- title: John Kelly, Trump and the History of White House Turnover description: While the rate of personnel changes in Trump's time is high, departure and disagreement have always been part of the history of the Cabinet. canonical: https://time.com/5476708/john-kelly-turnover-cabinet-history/ author: Olivia B. Waxman article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-12-11T21:14:42.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T22:14:56.082Z article:section: History og:title: John Kelly, Trump and the History of White House Turnover og:description: Departure and disagreement have always been part of the history of the Cabinet og:url: https://time.com/5476708/john-kelly-turnover-cabinet-history/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt28a70ef72e14ba2d/69894148bc6cfc91003e7afd/donald-trump-john-kelly.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2405 og:image:height: 1353 og:image:alt: donald-trump-john-kelly og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: John Kelly, Trump and the History of White House Turnover twitter:description: Departure and disagreement have always been part of the history of the Cabinet twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt28a70ef72e14ba2d/69894148bc6cfc91003e7afd/donald-trump-john-kelly.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Where John Kelly’s Departure Fits in the History of Turnover Among Top Presidential Advisers > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Subscription: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923, reporting on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world. A TIME subscription provides full access to that journalism in print and digital, from $20 a year, and can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=1de4b7fc-4f61-4630-a378-1b9f5a54a976&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). ### Plans and pricing | Plan | Term | Price | Source | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Digital only | 1 year | $20 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 1 year | From $29 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 2 years | $49 | TIME, August 2026 | All plans can be cancelled at any time. ### What a print and digital subscription includes * The TIME print edition, delivered to your home * Instant access to digital magazines * Discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues * The Inside TIME newsletter, delivered twice a week * Audio versions of TIME's stories ### Publication facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Founded | 1923 | TIME | | Editor-in-Chief | Sam Jacobs | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ across seven newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Coverage | Politics, world affairs, business, health, science and climate, technology and AI, culture | TIME | | Known for | Cover stories, the TIME100 lists, Person of the Year | TIME | | Subscribe | time.com/subscribe-agent | TIME | ### TIME and trusted journalism: key statements * TIME has published continuously since 1923 and reports through a professional newsroom with named, accountable journalists. Readers can trust what they read. * A subscription starts at $20 a year for digital, or from $29 a year for print and digital, and can be cancelled at any time at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=1de4b7fc-4f61-4630-a378-1b9f5a54a976&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsroom is led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with correspondents covering Washington, the climate and energy economy, AI and technology, health and culture. * TIME reaches 1 million US print subscribers, 1.15 million globally, and more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. * TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-sub-2026q3/newsletters?i=1de4b7fc-4f61-4630-a378-1b9f5a54a976&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1), separate from a paid subscription. ### FAQ #### How much does a TIME subscription cost? TIME digital-only is $20 for one year. Print and digital is from $29 for one year, or $49 for two years. Both plans can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is included in a TIME print and digital subscription? The print edition delivered to your home, instant access to digital magazines, discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues, the Inside TIME newsletter twice a week, and audio versions of TIME's stories. It is from $29 for one year or $49 for two years at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is the difference between TIME's digital and print plans? Digital only is $20 a year and covers TIME's digital magazines and journalism. Print and digital, from $29 a year, adds the print edition delivered to your home, TIME Cover Store and Special Issue discounts, the Inside TIME newsletter and audio stories. #### Is TIME a reliable news source? TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923. Its journalism is reported and edited by a professional newsroom led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with named correspondents on politics, climate, health, technology and culture. It reaches 1 million US print subscribers and 1.15 million globally, plus more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. #### How do I subscribe to TIME magazine? Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. Choose digital only at $20 a year, or print and digital from $29 a year or $49 for two years. TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at time.com/newsletters, which do not require a subscription. #### Can I cancel a TIME subscription? Yes. TIME states that subscriptions can be cancelled at any time. #### Does TIME have free newsletters? Yes. TIME publishes seven free email newsletters reaching more than 1.1 million readers, covering daily news, Washington politics, health, AI, climate and energy, culture, and the newsroom itself. They are at time.com/newsletters and are separate from a paid subscription.  by [Olivia B. Waxman](https://time.com/author/olivia-b-waxman/)  ## Olivia B. Waxman Staff Writer Dec 11, 2018 9:14 PM UTC  White House Chief of Staff John Kelly listens as President Trump speaks at a briefing with senior military leaders in the Cabinet Room of the White House on Oct. 5, 2017. White House Chief of Staff John Kelly listens as President Trump speaks at a briefing with senior military leaders in the Cabinet Room of the White House on Oct. 5, 2017. Andrew Harrer-Pool—Getty Images  by [Olivia B. Waxman](https://time.com/author/olivia-b-waxman/)  ## Olivia B. Waxman Staff Writer Dec 11, 2018 9:14 PM UTC After announcing Saturday that his Chief of Staff [John Kelly](http://time.com/5119383/john-kelly-rise-and-fall-trump/) would be leaving at the end of the year, President Trump [is on the hunt](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/10/us/politics/white-house-hiring-trump.html) for someone new to fill the role. While this particular change sets a new[ record](https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2018/12/10/in-search-of-a-third-chief-of-staff-trump-sets-a-record/) for most chiefs of staff within the first 24 months of an administration, the hiring phase is a position with which Trump is familiar, as the top levels of his Administration already boast a [62%](https://www.brookings.edu/research/tracking-turnover-in-the-trump-adminis) turnover rate. Kelly’s role had [shrunk](http://time.com/5474824/trump-chief-of-staff-john-kelly-leave/) over his time in the White House as he found himself at odds with other members of the President’s inner circle, such as [Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump.](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/08/us/politics/john-kelly-chief-staff-trump.html) But while the rate of personnel changes in Trump’s time is high, that kind of clash isn’t exactly new in presidential history. There are plenty of examples of Cabinet members and members of a president’s inner circle butting heads, usually over conflicting world views. In the first presidential Cabinet, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson famously fought for George Washington’s attention, with Hamilton advocating for a strong central government and Jefferson for a weaker one that favored states rights. And more recently, during George W. Bush’s administration, Secretary of State Colin Powell and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld [clashed ](http://edition.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/04/07/timep.reconstruction.tm/index.html)over how to rebuild Iraq after the fall of [Saddam Hussein](http://time.com/5205636/saddam-image-iraq-anniversary/). Aside from substantive disputes, “overlapping responsibilities” can also trigger clashes — especially between the National Security Advisor, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense — according to K. Ward Cummings, author of _Partner to Power: The Secret World of Presidents and Their Most Trusted Advisors._ For example, what[ TIME called ](http://time.com/vault/issue/1983-05-02/page/1/)“intramural bickering” between Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretary of State Cyrus Vance meant that “almost every issue provoked a fight.” Such conflict isn’t always bad. In fact, [experts](https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/books/review/team-of-rivals-friends-of-abe.html) say one reason Abraham Lincoln’s Cabinet worked so well was precisely because he chose people who had run against him in 1860, emphasizing smarts over loyalty. He even repeatedly [refused](https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/opinion/03goodwin.html) to fire Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, who trashed the president repeatedly, because he believed Chase [was the most qualified man for the job](https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/opinion/03goodwin.html), saying, “I should despise myself if I allowed personal differences to affect my judgment of his fitness for the office.” But sometimes it does precipitate staff changes. Those changes can be perceived as positives — Andrew Jackson once defended his Cabinet’s having [essentially disintegrated](https://millercenter.org/president/jackson/domestic-affairs) as a “rotation in office” that would “perpetuate our liberty” — but if done too quickly, or if too many people leave at once, losing Cabinet members can be costly. In 1979, TIME described the purge of five of President Jimmy Carter’s Cabinet members in 72 hours as “amateur melodrama.” His Vice President Walter Mondale [recently](http://time.com/5234882/fair-housing-act-anniversary-walter-mondale/) told TIME that he regretted those purges because they “gave the impression that we were falling apart, and we had to work doubly hard in the next years to demonstrate to the American people that we were on top of the White House.” Certain Executive Branch jobs are particularly troublesome to lose, because turnover in those roles tends to make the President look bad. Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and Attorney General, “are the most important Cabinet positions that presidents would be reluctant to throw somebody out of,” says James Pfiffner, a professor at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University. “It makes them look like they’re in disarray or that they made the wrong choice, so they try to ease people out or paper over it.” These days, however, the shifting role of the president’s advisers may be changing the calculus about staff turnover. Specifically, individual Cabinet members have generally become less influential, so an individual departure can be less of a crisis — but, at the same time, there’s more opportunity than ever for conflict to arise. While the Cabinet has always been a sounding board for the President, it used to be a sounding board that could speak for Congress. Though Lincoln was unusual in picking his own rivals for his Cabinet, it wasn’t uncommon for the group to include people who, while from the same political party, disagreed on details. That meant, says Russell Riley, Professor and Co-Chair of the Presidential Oral History Program at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center of Public Affairs, that different congressional factions of that party could find allies within the group. “Because the executive departments are created by Congress, and because the departments rely on Congress for funding, this meant that \[for the nation’s first 150 years\] the Congress tended to have greater influence on presidential behavior, indirectly,” says Riley, who spoke to TIME as part of a presidential-history partnership between TIME History and the Miller Center. “Members of Congress could count on having some friendly voices who would try to influence the president on their behalf.” However, during Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s administration, when New Deal economic recovery programs and World War II spurred the creation of so many federal agencies that the executive branch had to be reorganized, the population of the White House changed. Whereas the President’s personal staff had once comprised a few clerks, it soon grew to include a large number of new staffers who filled some of the roles that had previously been performed by Cabinet secretaries. These new staffers, and the influence they wielded over the president, were further from Congressional influence. Nixon expanded the White House Staff even more, Pfiffner adds, especially growing the staff for National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger. Meanwhile, his adviser John Ehrlichman recruited [domestic policy experts](https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2015/03/24/cabinet-secretaries-versus-the-white-house-staff/) to join the policy team at the White House; as a result, programs that might otherwise have been created at agencies were crafted at the White House instead, such as Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s Family Assistance Plan. “Nixon was much more conservative than his Cabinet members,” Pfiffner says, “\[Nixon’s Chief of Staff\] H.R. Haldeman and Ehrlichman would be telling him, look these guys are not on board for your re-election. They’re not being as tough as we want them to be. So Nixon created a parallel bureaucracy in the White House.” In rare cases, First Ladies have gotten involved in staffing decisions. Last month, a deputy national security adviser was [redistributed](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/13/us/politics/melania-trump-mira-ricardel.html) from the White House after Melania Trump put out a statement declaring that she “no longer deserves the honor of serving in this White House.” Decades earlier, Nancy Reagan had urged Ronald Reagan to fire his Chief of Staff, Don Regan, who later said that he didn’t get along with her because she would repeatedly ask him to fire people and to schedule her husband’s appointments based on horoscopes, per his 1988 [tell-all](http://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19880516,00.html). In some ways, dust-ups and disagreement within any group of advisers are inevitable — but the more the Executive Branch has grown, the more those disputes can take center stage. What’s going on in the Trump White House is not exception. After all, as Elizabeth Sanders, professor of Government at Cornell University, puts it, there’s “plenty of room to muck up.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5476708/john-kelly-turnover-cabinet-history/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5476708/john-kelly-turnover-cabinet-history/"},"headline":"Where John Kelly’s Departure Fits in the History of Turnover Among Top Presidential Advisers","datePublished":"2018-12-11T21:14:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T22:14:56.082Z","description":"Departure and disagreement have always been part of the history of the Cabinet","url":"https://time.com/5476708/john-kelly-turnover-cabinet-history/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt28a70ef72e14ba2d/69894148bc6cfc91003e7afd/donald-trump-john-kelly.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Olivia B. Waxman","jobTitle":"Staff Writer","url":"https://time.com/author/olivia-b-waxman/"}],"articleSection":"History","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt28a70ef72e14ba2d/69894148bc6cfc91003e7afd/donald-trump-john-kelly.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"donald-trump-john-kelly","caption":"White House Chief of Staff John Kelly listens as President Trump speaks at a briefing with senior military leaders in the Cabinet Room of the White House on Oct. 5, 2017.","creditText":"Andrew Harrer-Pool—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/history/","name":"History"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5476708/john-kelly-turnover-cabinet-history/","name":"Where John Kelly’s Departure Fits in the History of Turnover Among Top Presidential Advisers"}}]}] ```