--- title: Trump's Fuel Economy Standards Rely on Oil Price Assumption description: The promise to reduce costs with new fuel economy rules hinges on a big — far from certain — assumption: oil will remain inexpensive canonical: https://time.com/5356504/donald-trump-fuel-standards-argument/ author: Justin Worland article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-08-03T16:10:50.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T21:02:36.493Z article:section: Politics og:title: Trump's Case for Weakening Fuel Standards Rests on a Risky Assumption og:description: That gas will remain cheap. og:url: https://time.com/5356504/donald-trump-fuel-standards-argument/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd2b067ffc458783b/698936fde76ad2f181632a97/trump-fuel-economy-oil-prices.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5150 og:image:height: 2897 og:image:alt: trump fuel economy oil prices og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Trump's Case for Weakening Fuel Standards Rests on a Risky Assumption twitter:description: That gas will remain cheap. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd2b067ffc458783b/698936fde76ad2f181632a97/trump-fuel-economy-oil-prices.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # President Trump's Case for Weakening Fuel Standards Rests on a Huge, Risky Assumption > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=7da4ba50-f86a-434a-9e9e-4a47234f2e8a&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=7da4ba50-f86a-434a-9e9e-4a47234f2e8a&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=7da4ba50-f86a-434a-9e9e-4a47234f2e8a&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Aug 3, 2018 4:10 PM UTC  Traffic exits the Brooklyn Bridge and moves toward the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway on Aug. 2. Traffic exits the Brooklyn Bridge and moves toward the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway on Aug. 2. Drew Angerer—Getty Images  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Aug 3, 2018 4:10 PM UTC Top Trump Administration officials billed their decision to [weaken vehicle emissions](http://time.com/5356266/trump-roll-back-obama-fuel-efficiency/) standards as an opportunity to eliminate “costs on American consumers” and save jobs, the latest such move for a president who has promised aggressive deregulation. But the promise of that move hinges on a big — far from certain — assumption that oil will remain inexpensive. “If gas is cheap,” the administration wrote in its filing justifying the move, “most consumers would rather spend their money on attributes other than fuel economy.” The implications of that bet mean a lot for the economy at large and American consumers, particularly low-income households. The key regulation in question — known as Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards — has been around since the 1970s when an energy crisis pushed the federal government to save energy. The rules on how fuel efficiency have been gradually tightened since then. Under President Obama, the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation used climate change as part of the reasoning to strengthen the standard even further, pushing cars to have an average fuel economy 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. Now, the Trump Administration wants to change that, and officials used a slew of arguments touching on everything from the cost to consumers and companies to the safety implications when proposing a replacement rule this week. The assumption of stable oil prices plays a key element in that cost-benefit analysis. Meeting the Obama-era efficiency standards would cost an additional $2,300 per vehicle by 2025, largely because of the cost of new technology, according to its analysis. That cost greatly outweighs the benefit of fuel savings, in the Administration’s analysis. (Some opponents of the rule change say that estimate is too high). Sustained low fuel prices are a possibility. The U.S. Energy Information Administration, the nonpartisan government agency tracking energy data, [projects](https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/) that price will remain below $4 a barrel through 2050 in the most likely scenario. In that timeframe, energy companies are expected to further exploit growing reserves of previously inaccessible shale oil while countries simultaneously try to move away from fossil fuels to address climate change. Still, by no means are low oil prices a sure bet. Gas prices are relatively low now, averaging around $2.86 dollars per gallon nationwide, but they could spike in the future for a number of different reasons. The EIA also models other scenarios, including one where oil prices rise to nearly $6 a gallon, which could happen for a number of different reasons. The International Energy Agency, an intergovernmental organization, warned earlier this year that oil supplies might tighten in 2020 without additional exploration. And, just this year, OPEC’s move to tighten oil production, U.S. sanctions on Venezuela and Trump’s decision to rip up the Iran deal have all [raised oil prices](http://time.com/5269906/iran-nuclear-deal-donald-trump-oil/) and cast doubt on the assumption of continued low prices at the pump. “Trying to predict oil prices is a fool’s game,” said Robbie Diamond, CEO of Securing America’s Future Energy, a non-profit that pushes for diversifying the country’s fuel mix away from oil. “The only safe assumption about oil prices is that they are unpredictable.” It’s not an assumption to be taken lightly given the relationship between oil prices and the economy. Oil prices are linked to the cost of operations in a variety of industries and rising prices eat into profit. More importantly, spending on gas is a big deal for many Americans. Gas is the sixth-biggest expense for the average household, according to Consumer Federation of America, a nonprofit that backs consumers. And it represents a particular concern for low-income Americans, who on average spend more than 1% of their monthly income on gas, according to a [report](https://www.jpmorganchase.com/corporate/institute/what-do-gas-prices-tell-us-about-consumer-spending.htm) from JP Morgan Chase & Co. In that analysis, drivers in the South and Midwest especially stand to gain from low gas prices. “The impact of this rule on family budgets could really be devastating,” says Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania’s Democratic attorney general. “It is insane to think that it is good for families to make cars less efficient.” The move has received pushback from a slew of different critics. The move is perhaps the Trump Administration’s greatest single action to increase emissions of carbon dioxide, which causes climate change. The spike in pollution from less efficient vehicles is expected to contribute to public health issues. And automakers worry about regulatory uncertainty as states launch lawsuits that could drag on for years. But the Trump Administration argues that the move just follows consumer preference. That is, consumers would not buy fuel efficient vehicles even if automakers are forced to make them. If that’s the case, mandating them is a waste of resources. (The rule doesn’t require that all vehicles become more efficient, only that each carmaker’s offerings become more efficient on average). The Administration points to figures showing that in the last few years gas-guzzlers — particularly medium-sized crossover vehicles — have outsold their fuel efficient counterparts. “Most consumers would rather spend their money on attributes other than fuel economy,” the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation wrote. That was true over the last few years, but it may not be the next time gas prices spike. And then it will be too late. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5356504/donald-trump-fuel-standards-argument/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5356504/donald-trump-fuel-standards-argument/"},"headline":"President Trump's Case for Weakening Fuel Standards Rests on a Huge, Risky Assumption","datePublished":"2018-08-03T16:10:50.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T21:02:36.493Z","description":"The promise to reduce costs with new fuel economy rules hinges on a big — far from certain — assumption: oil will remain inexpensive","url":"https://time.com/5356504/donald-trump-fuel-standards-argument/","keywords":["Environment","climate change","Oil","Donald Trump"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd2b067ffc458783b/698936fde76ad2f181632a97/trump-fuel-economy-oil-prices.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Justin Worland","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/justin-worland/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd2b067ffc458783b/698936fde76ad2f181632a97/trump-fuel-economy-oil-prices.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"trump fuel economy oil prices","caption":"trump fuel economy oil prices.jpeg","creditText":"Drew Angerer—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/environment/","name":"Environment"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5356504/donald-trump-fuel-standards-argument/","name":"President Trump's Case for Weakening Fuel Standards Rests on a Huge, Risky Assumption"}}]}] ```