--- title: Police Are Using Algorithms to Tell Them If You're a Threat description: In Chicago, Illinois, an algorithm rates every person arrested with a numerical threat score from 1 to 500-plus. canonical: https://time.com/4966125/police-departments-algorithms-chicago/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-10-03T15:29:55.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T17:41:57.341Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Police Are Using Computer Algorithms to Tell if You’re a Threat og:description: Which could become a threat itself og:url: https://time.com/4966125/police-departments-algorithms-chicago/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte1b9b24e4c821326/6988debce76ad2e70b62f3fc/gettyimages-627890264.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 6720 og:image:height: 3780 og:image:alt: 170928_police lights og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Police Are Using Computer Algorithms to Tell if You’re a Threat twitter:description: Which could become a threat itself twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte1b9b24e4c821326/6988debce76ad2e70b62f3fc/gettyimages-627890264.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Police Are Using Computer Algorithms to Tell If You’re a Threat > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=f8eda51e-5df9-40ff-8a3d-e13a8550d6fb&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=f8eda51e-5df9-40ff-8a3d-e13a8550d6fb&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=f8eda51e-5df9-40ff-8a3d-e13a8550d6fb&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Andrew Guthrie Ferguson](https://time.com/author/andrew-guthrie-ferguson/) ## Andrew Guthrie Ferguson Oct 3, 2017 3:29 PM UTC  Police Car with Lights. Law Enforcement themes. Police Car with Lights. Law Enforcement themes. Getty Images by [Andrew Guthrie Ferguson](https://time.com/author/andrew-guthrie-ferguson/) ## Andrew Guthrie Ferguson Oct 3, 2017 3:29 PM UTC Can a computer predict violence? In [Chicago](http://time.com/4840964/trump-federal-help-chicago-violence/), Illinois, an [algorithm](https://medium.com/equal-future/how-strategic-is-chicagos-strategic-subjects-list-upturn-investigates-9e5b4b235a7c) rates every person arrested with a numerical [threat score](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chicago-police-technology/as-shootings-soar-chicago-police-use-technology-to-predict-crime-idUSKBN1AL08P) from [1 to 500](http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57b85-155e9f4b-50c15-5e9f-7742e3ac8b0ab2d3.html)\-plus. The process has been going on for [four years](https://southsideweekly.com/predictive-policing-long-road-transparency/), and almost [400,000](http://www.chicagomag.com/city-life/August-2017/Chicago-Police-Strategic-Subject-List/) Chicago citizens now have an [official police risk score](https://medium.com/equal-future/how-strategic-is-chicagos-strategic-subjects-list-upturn-investigates-9e5b4b235a7c). This algorithm — still [secret](http://www.chicagomag.com/city-life/August-2017/Chicago-Police-Strategic-Subject-List/) and publicly unaccountable — shapes policing [strategy](http://www.chicagomag.com/city-life/August-2017/Chicago-Police-Strategic-Subject-List/), the use of force, and threatens to alter suspicion on the streets. It is also the future of [big data policing](https://nyupress.org/books/9781479892822/) in America — and depending on how you see it, either an innovative approach to [violence reduction](http://time.com/4635049/chicago-murder-rate-homicides/) or a terrifying example of data-driven social control. In practical effect, the personalized threat score automatically displays on police computer [dashboards](https://southsideweekly.com/predictive-policing-long-road-transparency/) so an officer can know the relative risk of the suspect being stopped. The predictive score also shapes [who gets targeted](https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/us/armed-with-data-chicago-police-try-to-predict-who-may-shoot-or-be-shot.html) for proactive police intervention. These interventions can range from a [home visit](http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/05/31/going-inside-the-chicago-police-departments-strategic-subject-list/) by police officers, to additional police surveillance, to an invitation to a [community meeting](https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/us/armed-with-data-chicago-police-try-to-predict-who-may-shoot-or-be-shot.html) — all of which convey the same clear message: law enforcement is watching. And while Chicago is in the vanguard of predictive policing, it is [not alone](https://www.nationalpublicsafetypartnership.org/clearinghouse/Content/ResourceDocuments/SMART%20Approaches%20to%20Reducing%20Gun%20Violence.pdf); other cities like [New York](https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/07/magazine/cyrus-vance-jrs-moneyball-approach-to-crime.html?mcubz=1) and [Los Angeles](http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/11/technology/future/lapd-big-data-palantir/index.html) are considering how to use big data policing to target at-risk individuals. Person-based predictive policing began in [2009](https://www.americaninno.com/chicago/chicago-pd-sued-over-crime-prediction-algorithm/) as an attempt to apply a [public health](https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/us/armed-with-data-chicago-police-try-to-predict-who-may-shoot-or-be-shot.html) approach to violence. Just as epidemiological patterns reveal environmental toxins that can increase health risks (like getting cancer), criminal patterns can increase [life risks](http://www.chicagomag.com/city-life/December-2013/The-Small-Social-Networks-at-the-Heart-of-Chicago-Violence/) (like getting shot). The key is to identify the [predictive risk factors](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/upshot/what-an-algorithm-reveals-about-life-on-chicagos-high-risk-list.html) and try to [remedy](http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122444) the underlying environmental causes. Researchers at [Chicago ITT](https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/us/armed-with-data-chicago-police-try-to-predict-who-may-shoot-or-be-shot.html) developed an algorithm for the police to prioritize those most at risk by [analyzing](https://southsideweekly.com/predictive-policing-long-road-transparency/): past arrests for violent crime, weapons offenses or narcotics; age at the most recent arrest (the younger the age, the higher the score); incidents where the individual was a victim of a shooting or assault; and the trend line of criminal activity (whether the rate is increasing or decreasing). A computer then crunches the variables and spits out a relative threat score to determine a likelihood of either shooting someone or getting shot. This is the risk score that places someone on the [Strategic Subjects List](http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57b85-155e9f4b-50c15-5e9f-7742e3ac8b0ab2d3.html) (colloquially known as “the [heat list](http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-08-21/news/ct-met-heat-list-20130821%5F1%5Fchicago-police-commander-andrew-papachristos-heat-list)”). Police claim the targeting mechanism [works](https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/us/armed-with-data-chicago-police-try-to-predict-who-may-shoot-or-be-shot.html) by pointing to a high percentage of shooting victims as being accurately predicted by the [heat list](http://www.chicagomag.com/city-life/August-2016/Chicago-Police-Data/). Critics have pointed out that the targeting is [overbroad](http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57b85-155e9f4b-50c15-5e9f-7742e3ac8b0ab2d3.html) and [ineffective](https://www.rand.org/blog/2016/09/cpds-heat-list-and-the-dilemma-of-predictive-policing.html), including [tens of thousands](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/upshot/what-an-algorithm-reveals-about-life-on-chicagos-high-risk-list.html) of people with high scores but no [history of prior arrest](https://medium.com/equal-future/how-strategic-is-chicagos-strategic-subjects-list-upturn-investigates-9e5b4b235a7c) for violent crimes. But, whether it works or not, three bigger unanswered questions exist about this use of a predictive risk score for everyone: Is it fair? Is it [biased](http://time.com/4528349/police-brutality-psa/)? And is it the future we want for policing? Fairness involves both how people get scored and how police treat those with threat scores. Relying on a black-box computer algorithm to rank threats in a society obviously creates its own risks. Society needs to be able to trust the data, to approve the inputs and to evaluate the outputs. Currently, there is [no public oversight](http://hpherald.com/2017/06/07/jamie-kalven-joins-chicago-journalists-lawsuit-cpd/) of the police data, inputs or outputs, so communities are left in the dark unable to [audit or challenge](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract%5Fid=2765525) any individual threat score. Equally troubling, the threat scores impact the fairness of how police interact with people on the streets. High-risk scores [guide violence-interruption strategies](http://www.chicagomag.com/city-life/August-2017/Chicago-Police-Strategic-Subject-List/), influencing who police contact and who falls under their heightened surveillance. But the threat scores also distort the day-to-day police decisions about use of force and [reasonable suspicion](https://mic.com/articles/127823/how-pre-crime-law-works#.0zFyK3ZMy). After all, once police have information that a person has a high threat score, this knowledge will [color criminal suspicion](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract%5Fid=2394683) and increase perceived danger, resulting in more frequent and more aggressive interactions with people the algorithm deems “high risk.” Bias can also creep into the system. As described in the 2017 Department of Justice Civil Rights Division’s [investigation of the Chicago Police Department](https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/925846/download), patterns of racial discrimination remain a real problem. While one could hope that algorithmic justice would avoid human bias, the reality is that those inputs (especially [arrests](http://www.chicagomag.com/city-life/August-2017/Chicago-Police-Strategic-Subject-List/)) are impacted by the all-too-human discretionary decisions of police officers as they patrol or investigate suspected crime. So while the big data math may be “objective,” the inputs are not free from human biases, distorting the ultimate outcomes. The biggest question remains whether we want police ranking every arrestee as a possible high- or low-risk threat. The original predictive targeting system in Chicago only focused on the top 400 or so highest risk individuals. But expanding the program citywide to everyone arrested or targets merely connected to a victim of violence means many people without significant criminal justice involvement are now identified as a [risk](http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-gun-violence-list-chicago-police-murder-perspec-0801-jm-20160729-story.html). The answers are not easy. Law-abiding citizens frustrated with being racially profiled may welcome an objective metric to reduce police contact. After all, the threat scores provide an [alternative](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract%5Fid=2394683) to suspicion based on stereotyping race, age or neighborhood. Threat scores could also reduce police suspicion for many low- or no-risk individuals. At the same time, the inability to control, audit or question the scoring process raises real legitimacy concerns. The temptation to intentionally or unintentionally manipulate the data to justify targeting certain people creates its own threat. And most fundamentally, the ease of quantifying risk masks the difficulties in deciding whether society should quantify humans as societal risks. These are the questions that big data policing raises as it spreads across the nation, and that local communities must debate before they enact new predictive policing strategies. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4966125/police-departments-algorithms-chicago/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4966125/police-departments-algorithms-chicago/"},"headline":"The Police Are Using Computer Algorithms to Tell If You’re a Threat","datePublished":"2017-10-03T15:29:55.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T17:41:57.341Z","description":"Which could become a threat itself","url":"https://time.com/4966125/police-departments-algorithms-chicago/","keywords":["Technology"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte1b9b24e4c821326/6988debce76ad2e70b62f3fc/gettyimages-627890264.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Andrew Guthrie Ferguson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/andrew-guthrie-ferguson/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte1b9b24e4c821326/6988debce76ad2e70b62f3fc/gettyimages-627890264.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"170928_police lights","caption":"Police Lights and Sirens Law Enforcements","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/technology/","name":"Technology"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4966125/police-departments-algorithms-chicago/","name":"The Police Are Using Computer Algorithms to Tell If You’re a Threat"}}]}] ```