For the fourth time, the New York Times’s august Arthur Krock wrote last week that the U.S. Army is thinking of replacing civilian war correspondents with soldier reporters. The Army swarmed all over him. Growled Colonel Stanley Grogan, acting director of the War Department’s public relations bureau: “There has never been any study of the question by the War Department and none is contemplated.”
War Secretary Henry L. Stimson was kinder, but no less firm. “Has my good friend Arthur Krock been sending shivers down your spine?” he asked reporters at his press conference. “There is no plan in the War Department to use military correspondents to replace civilians. There are now more than 230 civilian correspondents in the war theaters and they are doing a splendid job.”
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Donald Trump Is TIME's 2024 Person of the Year
- TIME’s Top 10 Photos of 2024
- Why Gen Z Is Drinking Less
- The Best Movies About Cooking
- Why Is Anxiety Worse at Night?
- A Head-to-Toe Guide to Treating Dry Skin
- Why Street Cats Are Taking Over Urban Neighborhoods
- Column: Jimmy Carter’s Global Legacy Was Moral Clarity
Contact us at letters@time.com