The U. S. Supreme Court this week handed the National Labor Relations Board its first serious setback in litigation, at the same time broadened its already vast powers over U. S. industry. In Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y. v. NLRB, the Court ruled:
1) That NLRB, lacking sufficient evidence, illegally voided contracts between Consolidated and A. F. of L.’s big International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.
2) That NLRB has authority over the utility and (by inference) over any other company which operates in only one State but affects essential services in other States.
An important point for other employers was that NLRB, suspecting connivance to defeat Consolidated workers’ preference for C. I. O., had forbidden the company to deal with A. F. of L.’s unions. In finding that Consolidated should deal with both A. F. of L. and C. I. O. for their respective members, the Court presumably left intact the principle that NLRB may void contracts when collusion is sufficiently proved. But Justices Reed and Black took pains to dissent, say the Board did retain this power—thus implying that the majority might think it did not.
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Breaking Down the 2024 Election Calendar
- How Nayib Bukele’s ‘Iron Fist’ Has Transformed El Salvador
- What if Ultra-Processed Foods Aren’t as Bad as You Think?
- How Ukraine Beat Russia in the Battle of the Black Sea
- Long COVID Looks Different in Kids
- How Project 2025 Would Jeopardize Americans’ Health
- What a $129 Frying Pan Says About America’s Eating Habits
- The 32 Most Anticipated Books of Fall 2024
Contact us at letters@time.com