Spinning Gold

2 minute read
Richard Schickel

What a dork! Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) is behind in his rent, behind in his classwork, doing too many part-time jobs badly–and that says nothing about his intimacy problem. It’s dangerous for his beloved Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) to know he’s Spider-Man, so he has to keep his true, agonized self distant from her yearning heart. Every once in a while, this affects his superheroic night job: he loses the ability to spin the sticky webs that permit him boinging passage through the New York City skies, and–splat! ouch!–he tumbles to the concrete.

Is this any way to manage a franchise film? You bet it is. Written primarily by Alvin Sargent (who the credits indicate had a lot of help) and directed by Sam Raimi with his heart on his sleeve and his tongue in his cheek, Spider-Man 2 is 1) a sequel that’s much better than the original movie and 2) probably the best special-effects extravaganza since Raiders of the Lost Ark. This is because the effects, though handsomely managed, don’t overwhelm the story and characters.

The latter include a soulful scientist (Alfred Molina) who, having fooled with Mother Nature, is somehow transformed into a great, clanking mechanical octopus; back from Spidey I, Peter’s spunky, sweet-spirited aunt (the divine Rosemary Harris); and the meanest newspaper managing editor in movie history (J.K. Simmons). Occasionally, a street singer shows up to croak awful ballads about Spidey’s exploits, and poor Auntie can’t even get a toaster premium, much less a desperately needed loan, from her bank.

That’s the thing about this movie. It takes the time–all right, sometimes too much time–to meander up paths that are not strictly germane to its main narrative. But mostly that pays off–in funny tossed-off lines and quirky situations and a nice warm glow at the end. We’re not dealing with Jamesian complexity here. But we do have something almost as rare to contemplate: a big Hollywood machine that’s unexpectedly full of wit and–dare we say it?–intelligence. –By Richard Schickel

More Must-Reads from TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com