• U.S.

The Atom: The Grimmest Meeting

4 minute read
TIME

This was perhaps the grimmest meeting over which John Kennedy had presided as President of the U.S. Around him sat the members of the National Security Council, along with other diplomatic and military leaders and an assortment of top scientists. On the coffin-shaped Cabinet table rested a thin book, bound in blue paper and red-stamped TOP SECRET. It was an intelligence estimate of the results of the more than 50 recent Russian atomic tests. It made for unhappy reading, and its seriousness was only partly reflected by a public statement put out at week’s end by the Atomic Energy Commission.

At the core of the estimate was a report submitted by a committee of scientific advisers headed by Physicist Hans Bethe and based on air scoops from the fallout of Soviet test shots, on seismographic recordings and on analyses of heat, sound and light effects. Added to the Bethe report were findings compiled by the Central Intelligence Agency, the Atomic Energy Commission, Pentagon intelligence units and the President’s own national security advisers. The evidence was overwhelming, leading to the conclusion that the Russians have made giant strides in the field of strategic thermonuclear weaponry, that they are rapidly catching up with the U.S. in tactical atomic abilities, and that unless the U.S. starts moving fast, it may be mastered by the physical force that it first unleashed as an instrument of devastation. Items:

>The Soviet tests indicated substantial advances in the development of entire atomic weapons systems—particularly including progress in the anti-missile missile area, in which the U.S. is lagging and cannot pick up real impetus until it resumes its own atmospheric testing. The U.S. anti-missile missile, Nike-Zeus, will not even be ready for check-out testing until mid-1962.

>The Soviet tests showed a capability for developing atomic weapons with vastly more explosive energy yield per pound of weight. In the past, the U.S. nuclear lead has rested in great part on the superior yield-weight performance of its atomic devices. With the report on Red progress, scientists came to the inescapable conclusion that the Soviets are technically capable of producing just about any warhead in the U.S. arsenal. Moreover, in view of their yield-weight success, they might well be able to package one of their monstrous, 50-plus megaton bombs in a warhead tipping a missile well within known Soviet rocket-thrust capabilities.

>There was strong evidence that the Russians have developed an improved fission triggering device that greatly reduces the amount of radioactive fallout. Part of this new “cleanliness” might be attributed to high-altitude bursts, which do not suck up dust—but there was every reason to believe that the U.S.S.R. has made great strides in sophisticating its atomic art to a point almost equal to that of the U.S.

After discussing the atomic intelligence report with his advisers, President Kennedy looked around at the glum circle and said, “All right. Just what did you gentlemen expect after all of the Soviet shots?” The President said that the U.S., despite considerations of international opinion, would surely have to resume atmospheric atomic testing if the nation’s survival and that of our Allies seemed at stake. He said that he had explained the U.S. position to Britain’s Prime Minister Harold Macmillan—and that Macmillan had wholeheartedly agreed.

There was little question that the U.S., in the light of the analyses of the Soviet shots, would once again start bursting its bombs in the atmosphere. But when? And with what scientific and military priorities? The President instructed those around the table to consider all the manifold problems involved and to come up with answers “as expeditiously as possible, while still taking the time necessary for mature thought.”

More Must-Reads from TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com