• U.S.

Education: Buckley & the Blight

4 minute read
TIME

Texas-born, oil-rich William F. Buckley; 75, of Sharon. Conn, is a Roman Catholic, a capitalist of the old school, and a man who believes that U.S. education has long since gone to the dogs. When his own ten children were growing up, he insisted that each become trilingual and that all take piano lessons whether they had any talent or not. Once in Paris he rented a house, installed a French tutor on the fourth floor, a Latin tutor on the third, an English tutor on the second and a music teacher on the first. In their various colleges, all but one non-Catholic, the young Buckleys did well academically. They also made names for themselves in other ways.

In 1951 Yaleman William Buckley Jr. kicked up a noisy foofaraw with his God and Man at Yale, which accused Old Eli of subverting both capitalism and Christianity. Later, Patricia Buckley published an article in The Freeman accusing Vassar of having a leftish tinge. In a letter to her fellow alumnae, Aloise made much the same charge against Smith. U.S. higher education managed to survive—but it will not soon forget the Buckleys’.

Last week William Buckley Sr. was making plans for his 28 grandchildren. In a circular sent out to Sharon, Lakeville and Salisbury parents who he thought might be interested in going along with him, he announced that next fall he would open a school to train pupils “to resist the blight of Liberalism and Communism they will encounter in almost all elementary schools.” The new Buckley school —for students from four to 14—should be one of the more radical educational experiments of the coming year.

“There will be nothing ‘progressive’ about it,” says Buckley. The school will teach English, Latin, French, German (or Spanish), English and American literature, music (including compulsory piano) and botany. Students will get religious instruction according to their faiths. But aside from these subjects, it will also teach a number of “principles” that will “safeguard [the children] against contamination by the theories of so-called ‘liberalism’ . . . Teachers seem to be bent on creating a society where they will not have to face competition and will be the wards of the State.” Among Buckley’s principles:

The children “will be taught that since Cleveland and Theodore Roosevelt, there has been but one or two Presidents of patriotism and ability in this country; and that several of our Presidents have been thoroughly unscrupulous.” “They will be instructed that they should oppose all participation in war unless the vital interest of the United States is affected, and especially that they should oppose military service by Americans as unpaid Hessians in Europe and other countries.”

“They will often be reminded, as an ideal to be followed, of the incident that happened in 1904, when an American named Perdicarris was kidnaped in Morocco by a bandit named Rasuli, with whom it was suspected that the Sultan of Morocco was friendly. President Roosevelt, instead of starting negotiations that would have lasted until the death of Perdicarris, sent a cruiser to Morocco and the same day a cable to the Sultan saying: ‘I want Perdicarris alive or Rasuli dead. I sent a cruiser to Morocco today.’ Perdicarris was released immediately.*The attention of the children will be called to the contrast of the course taken by the great Roosevelt with that of Franklin Roosevelt, Truman and Eisenhower, which has won the contempt and derision of the world.”

*Generally accepted version: 1) Raisuii had already planned to release Perdicaris before the message was even sent; 2) the telegram went not to the Sultan but to the U.S. consul in Tangier; 3) it was written by Secretary of State John Hay, who did not mention a cruiser; 4) T. R. used it as a dramatic device to stir up the languid Republican National Convention in Chicago. Adds Pulitzer Prizewinning Historian Samuel Flagg Bemis: “It remained for historians later to discover that Roosevelt knew when he authorized the message that the American citizenship of Perdicaris was questionable.”

More Must-Reads from TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com