--- title: Monica Lewinsky: In Praise of Her Talent for Self-Promotion description: Lewinsky was then and remains now distinguished by her Madonna-like talent for self-promotion. canonical: https://time.com/94782/in-praise-of-monicas-chutzpah/ author: Wendy Kaminer article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-05-10T04:01:42.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-13T08:54:04.941Z article:section: Ideas og:title: In Praise of Monica's Chutzpah og:description: Lewinsky was then and remains now distinguished by her Madonna-like talent for self-promotion. og:url: https://time.com/94782/in-praise-of-monicas-chutzpah/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt87fe70a3d6f72215/69868ebb3bc9990c7a1a3637/972678571.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2048 og:image:height: 1152 og:image:alt: Monica Lewinsky attends the Timothy Greenfield-Sanders portr og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: In Praise of Monica's Chutzpah twitter:description: Lewinsky was then and remains now distinguished by her Madonna-like talent for self-promotion. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt87fe70a3d6f72215/69868ebb3bc9990c7a1a3637/972678571.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # In Praise of Monica's Chutzpah > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6b93ec0a-c4dd-4a2d-8ae2-f4b24d491004&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6b93ec0a-c4dd-4a2d-8ae2-f4b24d491004&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=6b93ec0a-c4dd-4a2d-8ae2-f4b24d491004&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Wendy Kaminer](https://time.com/author/wendy-kaminer/) ## Wendy Kaminer May 10, 2014 4:01 AM UTC  Monica Lewinsky attends the Timothy Greenfield-Sanders portrait photo exhibit at Mary Boone Gallery. Monica Lewinsky attends the Timothy Greenfield-Sanders portrait photo exhibit at Mary Boone Gallery. New York Daily News Archive—NY Daily News via Getty Images by [Wendy Kaminer](https://time.com/author/wendy-kaminer/) ## Wendy Kaminer May 10, 2014 4:01 AM UTC Has Monica Lewinsky been blessed with fame or burdened by notoriety? She regards herself, with good reason, as a victim of notoriety, perhaps the first victim of new, digital media, as well as a target for maternalistic old media scribes_._ And yet she sought, at least, vicarious fame in seeking a relationship with a very famous man. She may have had a role model in her mother, who published a book [hinting](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/lewis020498.htm) that she’d had an affair with Placido Domingo. If the affair was a fantasy, as Domingo claimed, it reflected a perhaps inheritable interest in liaisons with celebrity alpha males_._ Would Bill Clinton have appealed to Lewinsky if he’d been a gas station attendant? Probably not. I don’t offer this as criticism of Lewinsky’s character or motives. As I commented on NPR when the affair was all the rage, I would have slept with the president when I was 21 — if he hadn’t been Richard Nixon. You can deride the mutual allure between powerful older men and attractive younger women as a reversion to traditional gender roles, but you can’t deny its resilience, even or especially as women embraced their own sexual liberation. In this context, Clinton didn’t appear to me to be a sexual harasser and Lewinsky, at 21, didn’t seem any more sexually precocious or promiscuous than her female peers. But while many young women would have seized an opportunity to have sex with the president, few would have had the nerve to create one. Lewinsky was then and remains now distinguished by her chutzpah and a Madonna-like talent for self-promotion. It makes her more interesting and complicated than caricatures of her as either sexual victim or “nutty” and “slutty” aggressor. It also makes it hard to know how to interpret her self-portrait, at 40, in _Vanity Fair_. Is it a marketing move or a _cri de coeur_, or both? No one should take Lewinsky’s testimony and account of her motives in _Vanity Fair_ at face value (one shouldn’t take at face value the presentation of any public figure). Did she really turn down offers in excess of $10 million that “didn’t feel like the right thing to do?” Perhaps. Did they not feel right morally or professionally, or both? Who knows? Maybe she has a sincere, relatively altruistic desire to speak up for victims of Internet bullying, but she also needs a job or consulting gig and a new public persona. Is her identification with Tyler Clementi a bit melodramatic? Yes, but so is her own life story. Again, I don’t ask these questions to disparage her. We all need serviceable images and incomes, and Lewinsky has a particular need for public rehabilitation. I ask them to point out the difficulties of knowing public figures we’ve never met, although they sometimes feel like active presences in our lives. I ask to underscore the skepticism with which we should read stories by them designed for our consumption. Lewinsky’s tale is told in the clichés of talk shows and pop therapies. She wants to share and care: “Perhaps by sharing my story, I reasoned, I might be able to help others in their darkest moments of humiliation.” She wants to “take back my narrative.” I wish her luck, really, and don’t assume that her use of canned language implies canned emotions. But as she says, she has a clear (understandable) purpose in telling this story, and I suspect she collaborated heavily with an editor or writer in an effort to market it most effectively. How should we view Monica Lewinsky? It’s complicated. I remember her not just for the sex scandal she ignited, but for her fortitude in standing up to multiple FBI agents and prosecutors. In 1998, they reportedly [ambushed](http://articles.latimes.com/1999/mar/14/books/bk-17995) and detained her at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington, D.C., denying her access to an attorney and threatening her with felony charges if she didn’t cooperate. (Special Prosecutor Ken Starr [disputed](http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1998-01-24/news/1998024006%5F1%5Flewinsky-starr-investigation-ginsburg) this account of the meeting, but to lawyers familiar with prosecutorial tactics, it rang true.) They reportedly wanted her to wear a wire, but she refused. Good for her. Maybe she was stronger than she appeared. Maybe she was buoyed by the chutzpah that enabled her encounters with the president or a sense of grandeur the affair bestowed. In any case, most 21 year olds, I suspect, would have caved. How do we understand Monica Lewinsky? Only a few intentional or accidental celebrities can know what it’s like to be thrust into a harsh national and international spotlight at 21\. Maybe Chelsea Clinton, subjected to public inspection in her teens, can understand, but I sure can’t imagine the effect of such exaggerated celebrity on your identity or sense of self-importance. Millions of people are paying attention to you, and maybe it’s attention you crave. At the same time, millions of people are mocking you, and you discover that there is, after all, such a thing as bad publicity. Can Lewinsky succeed in reclaiming her narrative? You can’t blame her for trying, regardless of her motives, which I assume are mixed. Who among us consistently acts with purity of purpose? Monica Lewinsky probably can’t escape her past, so she might as well try to exploit it. _Wendy Kaminer is lawyer and social critic, the author of eight books and a correspondent at_ [_The Atlantic_](http://www.theatlantic.com/)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/94782/in-praise-of-monicas-chutzpah/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/94782/in-praise-of-monicas-chutzpah/"},"headline":"In Praise of Monica's Chutzpah","datePublished":"2014-05-10T04:01:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-13T08:54:04.941Z","description":"Lewinsky was then and remains now distinguished by her Madonna-like talent for self-promotion.","url":"https://time.com/94782/in-praise-of-monicas-chutzpah/","keywords":["U.S.","politics","Monica Lewinsky","Bill Clinton"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt87fe70a3d6f72215/69868ebb3bc9990c7a1a3637/972678571.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Wendy Kaminer","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/wendy-kaminer/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt87fe70a3d6f72215/69868ebb3bc9990c7a1a3637/972678571.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Monica Lewinsky attends the Timothy Greenfield-Sanders portr","caption":"Monica Lewinsky attends the Timothy Greenfield-Sanders portr","creditText":"New York Daily News Archive—NY Daily News via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/u-s/","name":"U.S."}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/94782/in-praise-of-monicas-chutzpah/","name":"In Praise of Monica's Chutzpah"}}]}] ```