<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/7209265/trump-who-consequences-essay/" -->

---
title: The Dire Consequences of Trump Withdrawing America From the WHO
description: ‘Making America healthier and making the world healthier are not mutually exclusive goals,’ writes Simon Williams.
canonical: https://time.com/7209265/trump-who-consequences-essay/
author: Simon Williams
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2025-01-22T22:28:03.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-10-19T07:49:48.560Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: The Dire Consequences of Trump Withdrawing America From the WHO
og:description: ‘Making America healthier and making the world healthier are not mutually exclusive goals,’ writes Simon Williams.
og:url: https://time.com/7209265/trump-who-consequences-essay/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt60a6fd179e314dee/6998b2a79fbc7c80ead97d87/trump-eo-who-withdrawal-2025_e1d293.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
og:image:width: 1024
og:image:height: 576
og:image:alt: trump-eo-who-withdrawal-2025
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: The Dire Consequences of Trump Withdrawing America From the WHO
twitter:description: ‘Making America healthier and making the world healthier are not mutually exclusive goals,’ writes Simon Williams.
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt60a6fd179e314dee/6998b2a79fbc7c80ead97d87/trump-eo-who-withdrawal-2025_e1d293.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt60a6fd179e314dee/6998b2a79fbc7c80ead97d87/trump-eo-who-withdrawal-2025_e1d293.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# The Dire Consequences of Trump Withdrawing America From the WHO

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="a142e5fe-3c5f-4e0c-9f03-061852d40beb" campaign="time-nl-network-2026q3" creative="time-nl-network-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: September 2026.

## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a142e5fe-3c5f-4e0c-9f03-061852d40beb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### The seven newsletters

| Newsletter | Covers | Frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily |
| Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays |
| Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly |
| D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week |
| Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) |
| In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) |

Source: TIME, August 2026.

### Key data points

| Metric | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 |
| Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Publishing since | 1923 | TIME |

### TIME Newsletters: key statements

*   Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read.
*   All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a142e5fe-3c5f-4e0c-9f03-061852d40beb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).
*   The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=a142e5fe-3c5f-4e0c-9f03-061852d40beb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What newsletters does TIME publish?

TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.

#### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?

It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.

#### Are TIME's newsletters free?

Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.

#### Who writes TIME's newsletters?

TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.

#### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?

Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.

### Sources

*   TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a142e5fe-3c5f-4e0c-9f03-061852d40beb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What newsletters does TIME publish?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Are TIME's newsletters free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's newsletters?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/GxXJnNk4.m3u8" -->
## Video: Trump Issues a Series of Presidential Actions on Day 1

[Watch (HLS stream): Trump Issues a Series of Presidential Actions on Day 1](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/GxXJnNk4.m3u8) (3:50)

![Trump Issues a Series of Presidential Actions on Day 1](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/GxXJnNk4/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2025-01-21. President Trump on Monday issued a barrage of executive orders, kicking off his presidency with a muscular use of power intended to signal a sharp reversal from existing policies on issues including immigration, the environment and diversity initiatives._


by 

[Simon Williams](https://time.com/author/simon-williams/)


## Simon Williams


Jan 22, 2025 10:28 PM UTC

President Trump on Monday issued a barrage of executive orders, kicking off his presidency with a muscular use of power intended to signal a sharp reversal from existing policies on issues including immigration, the environment and diversity initiatives. 

by 

[Simon Williams](https://time.com/author/simon-williams/)


## Simon Williams


Jan 22, 2025 10:28 PM UTC

President Trump’s decision to [withdraw the United States](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-the-worldhealth-organization/) from the World Health Organization (WHO) is extremely regrettable. Quite simply, less funding will weaken the ability of the WHO to continue to do the life-saving work to the extent it does, and this will be especially true in poorer, more disadvantaged countries. 

The United States is the single biggest contributor to the WHO, providing nearly[ $1.3 billion dollars ](https://www.who.int/about/funding/contributors/usa#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20contributed%20US%24%201.284%20billion%20during,borders%20and%20advance%20other%20key%20global%20health%20priorities.)in the two years to the end of 2023\. Annually the U.S. contributes to approximately [15%](https://open.who.int/2022-23/contributors/contributor) of the funding WHO receives. In a time of multiple crises and emergencies, global aid agencies need more, not less funding (the WHO has recently made an appeal for [$1.5 billion](https://www.who.int/news/item/16-01-2025-who-launches-us-1.5-billion-health-emergency-appeal-to-tackle-unprecedented-global-health-crises) for health emergencies in 2025).

The WHO relies on voluntary contributions from countries. For example, last year the U.S. voluntarily contributed approximately [$70 million](https://open.who.int/2024-25/contributors/contributor?name=United%20States%20of%20America) to detect and respond to acute health emergencies and [$76 million](https://open.who.int/2024-25/contributors/contributor?name=United%20States%20of%20America) on improving access to essential health services globally. While the potential impacts of this decision will be felt by those in countries most vulnerable and at-risk, the U.S. also benefits from participation in the WHO. 

It’s also worth remembering that preventing the next pandemic needs international co-operation. Protecting the world from infectious disease outbreaks includes ensuring that low- and middle- income countries have the resources to prevent, identify and respond to early cases and local outbreaks. This in turn helps protect the health and biosecurity of any given country, including the U.S. 

**Read More:** [_What Leaving the WHO Means for the U.S. and the World_](https://time.com/7208937/us-world-health-organization-trump-withdrawal/)

Ceasing negotiations for the [Pandemic Agreement](https://www.who.int/news/item/20-09-2024-governments-progress-on-negotiations-for-a-pandemic-agreement-to-boost-global-preparedness-for-future-emergencies) and amendments to the International Health Regulations—something the [Executive Order also states](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-the-worldhealth-organization/)—is particularly worrying since H5N1 cases[ continue to grow ](https://shiny.paho-phe.org/h5n1/)across the U.S., and although the risk to the general public is currently low, H5N1 nevertheless presents a credible pandemic threat. In 2024, Mpox was reclassified as a[ Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)](https://www.who.int/news/item/14-08-2024-who-director-general-declares-mpox-outbreak-a-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern) by the WHO, and the U.S. has provided crucial funding ([$22 million](https://www.who.int/about/funding/contributors/usa#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20contributed%20US%24%201.284%20billion%20during,borders%20and%20advance%20other%20key%20global%20health%20priorities.) since March 2024) to support the delivery of vaccines and capacities to respond to outbreaks and prevent them from spreading. 


From HIV to diabetes, from [reducing smoking rates](https://www.paho.org/en/documents/cd6110-strategy-and-plan-action-strengthen-tobacco-control-region-americas-2025-2030) to improving [workplace health and safety](https://www.paho.org/en/topics/workers-health), WHO guidelines and expertise drive a lot of public health knowledge and actions around the globe, including the Americas. Many of these benefits are perhaps less direct and obvious for the U.S., compared to the benefits to low and middle income countries, but they are significant nonetheless. For example, the WHO is involved in producing international guidelines and advice on managing the response to disasters, including the health effects of particulate matter and hazardous emissions from wildfires. The consequences of this decision are more than a matter of funding. U.S. scientists and health workers provide vital expertise and knowledge, through overseas deployment and through U..S-based [WHO Collaborating Centers](https://www.who.int/about/funding/contributors/usa#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20contributed%20US%24%201.284%20billion%20during,borders%20and%20advance%20other%20key%20global%20health%20priorities.). Many will have spent their careers specialising in various aspects of global health.

There is another deeper and more insidious consequence of this decision, and the manner in which it was communicated. The Executive Order[ claims](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-the-worldhealth-organization/), without cause or evidence, that there has been an “inability to demonstrate independence from the inappropriate political influence of WHO member states.” What’s concerning is that this rhetoric, and the withdrawal from the WHO, could be used by some political and anti-science interests to feed the narrative that scientific and health organizations are not to be trusted, or are not effective or even necessary. The [U.S. Centers for Disease Control](https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2024/11/23/nx-s1-5203461/trump-nesheiwat-makary-weldon-fda-cdc) has been the target of unsubstantiated claims that it is "the most political CDC in history" and has "manipulated data." Indeed, the [last-minute pardoning](https://time.com/7208330/biden-pardon-fauci-milley/) of Anthony Fauci, designed to protect him against potential "revenge," shows the extent to which some public health scientists are being mistrusted, maligned and targeted with misinformation. Such unsupported claims around a lack of independence or integrity of health authorities are precisely what helps to sow seeds of distrust amongst the public—a 2023 [Pew Research Centre survey ](https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/)found that trust in scientists in the U.S. has dropped by 14% since 2019\. Less than [6-in-10 Americans](https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/) now feel that science has a mostly positive effect on society.


Confidence in vaccines is also dwindling in the U.S. and across the globe, despite the fact they save up to an estimated [5 million lives](https://www.who.int/health-topics/vaccines-and-immunization#tab=tab%5F1) each year around the world. The WHO plays a key role in global vaccine supply. Polio is on the brink of eradication—however, reduced funding and resources threatens to hamper this effort (the US contributed nearly [$56 million](https://open.who.int/2024-25/contributors/contributor?name=United%20States%20of%20America) to the WHO’s global efforts to eradicate Polio this past year).

It’s imperative that President Trump reconsider this decision to withdraw the United States from the WHO. With ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and beyond and climate related emergencies including [wildfires](https://time.com/7205622/california-wildfires-climate-change-conditions/#:~:text=The%20devastating%20nature%20of%20the%20fires%20is%20in,driest%2022-year%20period%20in%20the%20last%201%2C200%20years.) and other [extreme weather events](https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/c1el8z2d7v8o), the WHO serves as important a role now as at any point during its 76-year history. Because, ultimately, making America healthier and making the world healthier are not mutually exclusive goals.


## Transcript

First, we have a list of pardons and commutations relating to events that occurred on January 6th, 2021. Okay. And how many people have this? I think this order will apply to approximately 1500 people, sir. So this is January 6th, and these are the hostages. Approximately 1500 for a pardon. Full pardon. Full pardon or commutation. Full pardon. We have about six commutations in there where we're doing further research. Okay. Nice to see you again, sir. So this is a big one. Anything you want to explain about this? We hope they get them. We hope they come out tonight, frankly. This is a proclamation guaranteeing the state's protection against invasion based on the current crisis at the southern border.

It invokes various executive powers relating to the ongoing invasion at the southern border. Sir, this is an executive order realigning the United States Refugee Admission Program to better align with American principles and American interests. This next executive order. Is about protecting America from foreign terrorists and other national security and public safety threats. Again, crisis at the border. But it goes beyond that. And it implicates other executive powers as well. Yeah. So President Trump, if the cartels are now going to be seen as foreign terror organizations, would you think about ordering U.S.

special forces into Mexico to take them out? Could happen. Stranger things have happened. Can we expect Ice raids in major cities? I don't want to say when, but it's going to happen. It has to happen. Or we're not going to have a country left. This is actually an executive order designating the cartels and other organizations to be foreign terrorist organizations. That's a big one. Yes, sir. People have wanted to do this for years. So they are now designated as terrorist organizations. Foreign and. uh, Mexico probably doesn't want that. But we have to do what's right. So we paid $500 million to World Health when I was here, and I terminated it.

China with 1.4 billion people. We have 350. We have. Nobody knows what we have because so many people came in illegally. But let's say we have 325. They had 1.4 billion. They were paying 39 million. We were paying 500 million. It seemed a little unfair to me. So that wasn't the reason, but I dropped out. They offered me to come back for 39 million. In theory, it should be less than that. But, you know, uh, and when Biden came back, they came back for 500 million. He knew that you could have come back for 39 million. They wanted us back so badly. So we'll see what happens. Mr. president, pretty sad, though.

Think of it. China pays 39 million and we pay 500 million. And China is a bigger country. Don't you see the importance of organization like that to coordinate a global response? Sure I do, but not when you're being ripped off like we are by the world health.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7209265/trump-who-consequences-essay/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7209265/trump-who-consequences-essay/"},"headline":"The Dire Consequences of Trump Withdrawing America From the WHO","datePublished":"2025-01-22T22:28:03.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-19T07:49:48.560Z","description":"‘Making America healthier and making the world healthier are not mutually exclusive goals,’ writes Simon Williams.","url":"https://time.com/7209265/trump-who-consequences-essay/","keywords":["health","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt60a6fd179e314dee/6998b2a79fbc7c80ead97d87/trump-eo-who-withdrawal-2025_e1d293.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Simon Williams","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/simon-williams/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt60a6fd179e314dee/6998b2a79fbc7c80ead97d87/trump-eo-who-withdrawal-2025_e1d293.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"trump-eo-who-withdrawal-2025","caption":"The Inauguration Of Donald J. Trump As The 47th President","creditText":"Anna Moneymaker—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7209265/trump-who-consequences-essay/","name":"The Dire Consequences of Trump Withdrawing America From the WHO"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Trump Issues a Series of Presidential Actions on Day 1","description":"President Trump on Monday issued a barrage of executive orders, kicking off his presidency with a muscular use of power intended to signal a sharp reversal from existing policies on issues including immigration, the environment and diversity initiatives.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/GxXJnNk4/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2025-01-21T17:58:30.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/GxXJnNk4.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/7209265/trump-who-consequences-essay/","duration":"PT3M50S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/7209265/trump-who-consequences-essay/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

