--- title: An AI Deepfake Could Be This Election's November Surprise description: In a digital war for democracy, truth is the first casualty, writes Miles Taylor. canonical: https://time.com/7033256/ai-deepfakes-us-election-essay/ author: Miles Taylor article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2024-10-03T17:15:35.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-19T07:47:24.392Z article:section: Ideas og:title: An AI Deepfake Could Be This Election's November Surprise og:description: In a digital war for democracy, truth is the first casualty, writes Miles Taylor. og:url: https://time.com/7033256/ai-deepfakes-us-election-essay/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta359c0ff2edea03b/698a5f3909208f60ad41e0f3/election-ai-deepfake.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2111 og:image:height: 1187 og:image:alt: election-ai-deepfake og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: An AI Deepfake Could Be This Election's November Surprise twitter:description: In a digital war for democracy, truth is the first casualty, writes Miles Taylor. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta359c0ff2edea03b/698a5f3909208f60ad41e0f3/election-ai-deepfake.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # An AI Deepfake Could Be This Election's November Surprise > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a8ec0f67-014c-43a3-85c8-9acb2d94d7ff&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a8ec0f67-014c-43a3-85c8-9acb2d94d7ff&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=a8ec0f67-014c-43a3-85c8-9acb2d94d7ff&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a8ec0f67-014c-43a3-85c8-9acb2d94d7ff&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: How AI May Meddle With The Election Year [Watch (HLS stream): How AI May Meddle With The Election Year](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Pe8KJmwX.m3u8) (4:21)  _Published 2024-02-23. The rise of generative AI tools like ChatGPT has increased the potential for a wide range of attackers to target elections around the world in 2024, according to a new report by cybersecurity giant CrowdStrike. Experts on AI explain how it may meddle with the 2024 election._ by [Miles Taylor](https://time.com/author/miles-taylor/) ## Miles Taylor Oct 3, 2024 5:15 PM UTC The rise of generative AI tools like ChatGPT has increased the potential for a wide range of attackers to target elections around the world in 2024, according to a new report by cybersecurity giant CrowdStrike. Experts on AI explain how it may meddle with the 2024 election. by [Miles Taylor](https://time.com/author/miles-taylor/) ## Miles Taylor Oct 3, 2024 5:15 PM UTC Just imagine: It’s the morning after Election Day 2024, and America wakes up to viral videos of ballots being tossed into dumpsters and security-camera footage of poll workers stuffing boxes in battleground states. Within hours, politicians, pundits, and social media influencers are crying foul. But here’s the twist—none of these events actually happened. They’re digital deepfakes, designed to look so real that even seasoned analysts can’t tell the difference. The scenario isn’t far-fetched, but we are far from prepared. I’ve spent the past year leading war games on the challenge of AI-powered threats to elections alongside technologists, current and former government officials, and civil society groups. Regardless of who wins the presidential race, one of our gravest concerns is the very real possibility of a “November surprise”—not just a late-breaking controversy before Election Day, but a post-election blitz of AI-generated forgeries meant to convince voters that the election was stolen. The groundwork for a crisis has already been laid. First, the field of bad actors has grown. After the 2016 election, I went to the Department of Homeland Security where I helped overhaul U.S. election security in the aftermath of Russia’s interference. You’d think that the public exposure of Moscow’s meddling would deter future attackers. But election interference has since become a professional sport, with more teams entering the game, like China and Iran. Second, the post-election period is now in the crosshairs. The 2020 [“Stop the Steal” movement ](https://time.com/6837548/disinformation-america-election/)showcased how Americans—especially the losing side—is susceptible to claims that the system is rigged. Foreign adversaries and domestic extremists learned that they don’t need to alter the vote count itself; they just need to sow doubt after the fact, when emotions are highest and faith in the outcome is weakest. Third, election officials admit they are unprepared. In my travels across the country, state and local leaders repeatedly told me that one of their biggest fears is the emergence of authentic-looking “evidence” that an election was stolen that they can’t readily disprove. Unlike in 2020, when most false claims were thrown out, AI forgeries today are easy to make and could take weeks—or even months—to debunk. By then, the damage will be done. **_Read More:_** [_How to Protect Yourself from AI Election Misinformation_](https://time.com/7022120/ai-election-misinformation-2024/) Worse still, the relationship between government officials and social media companies is more fractured than ever. Court cases and controversies about online censorship have created a chilling effect, making both sides reluctant to cooperate. The result is that localities have fewer technical resources to rely on in a crisis. To be clear, AI is not necessarily the enemy here. Machine-learning technologies will eventually help better protect our elections. Startups are emerging to combat these risks, from deepfake-detection startups to firms enhancing the cybersecurity of election networks. But today we are in a dangerous “arbitrage window” during which bad actors can go on offense before the good guys have the tools to mount a solid defense. So what’s the remedy between now and Election Day? The best answer is public awareness. Voters must develop pattern recognition for these spoofs the same way we did when spam started hitting our email inboxes in the 1990s. Deepfakes will become the new “Nigerian princes” in our inboxes, telling us to wire them $10,000\. Only now they’ll be more _personalized_, more _persuasive_, and more _pervasive_, including when it comes to deceiving us about our own democracy. In the long run, we need to overhaul our election security architecture. Yes, we made enormous strides after Russia’s 2016 attacks, but America is vulnerable again. Congress should require agencies to invest in technology that better safeguards voting systems, empower officials to identify synthetic content that is being used for fraud or voter suppression (without becoming arbiters of truth), and create the right guardrails for engagement between election workers and social media companies. Meanwhile, tech industry players should accelerate efforts to help users spot “real” or “manipulated” media by default, including through cryptographic signatures and watermarks. In a recent simulation, I saw just how easily a post-election deepfake could tip a bad situation into total chaos. The “red team” —playing the role of a foreign adversary—was able to craft a realistic video purporting to show poll workers destroying ballots in a swing state. As the clip spread, the “blue team”—playing the role of election officials—scrambled to verify the video’s authenticity while commentators fanned the flames. By the time we proved it was a fake, the damage was done. Voters had taken to the streets. A corrupt candidate or campaign could wreak havoc by doing the same. Just [last month](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/26/us/senator-cardin-deepfake.html), it was reported that the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was duped into a Zoom call with a top Ukrainian official who turned out to be a deepfake. Little imagination is needed to see how political operatives could use these tactics to pose as credible figures in order to share false information about election results with their opponents or supporters, to spread fabricated opposition research, or to distract other candidates in a crisis. Think of it as dirty tricks on steroids. This is the future we’re hurtling toward, and it’s not enough to be react quickly when it arrives. We need to talk about it now—before votes are cast and the battle for legitimacy begins. Otherwise, America could wake up on November 6th to a terrifying surprise: a digital war for democracy where truth is the first casualty. ## Transcript [00:00] 2024 is going to be the first AI election that we've had in the [00:06] United States and we should expect that there will be attempts [00:11] to use AI to attack our election infrastructure to further [00:15] poison the information environment. [00:25] The 2024 election will be more risky than before because [00:32] of artificial intelligence its own President Polk's are very [00:37] focused on RD pics and you fix could be used to make it look [00:43] like candidates are other officials are staying something [00:46] that they never said. [00:47] We've already had that other countries elections in Slovakia. [00:52] We saw a debate audio used against one of the candidates [00:57] in the weekend before the election. [00:59] And now we have a lot of the power generated by a generator [01:06] internet and social media are filled with AI generated [01:19] content in done because of the way those content is generated by [01:24] AI. [01:25] Call it was have certain biases. [01:27] The biases will manifest in those content in previous elections [01:34] would do see sociopaths. [01:36] We're used to spread misinformation. [01:39] There are concerns that they make it easier for Bad actors [01:45] to fool election workers by imitating a people who work in elections [01:50] in a phone call or in an email and getting election workers [01:54] to provide information that they shouldn't be providing [01:58] voter. Suppression is another area where I think people are worried that [02:01] day. I made may be helpful. [02:03] We have a history in the Uso robocalls being used to confuse [02:09] voters about went about social media being used by false information. [02:14] So maybe that voters don't show up or are scared to vote. [02:18] I am worried that a I may become yet another one. [02:25] That the dangers of AI and then start to believe that AI has [02:31] taken over our elections or maybe rely on a i to give them information. [02:35] I used all of the main commercial chat box and ask them questions [02:40] about the elections in different states to test them and all [02:43] of them provided some wrong information a little bit of a flip [02:47] side. I think it's really important but would say something [02:50] called the wires dividend if you think back to the 2012 election, [02:54] which was Romney vs. Obama [02:57] or the 2016 election, which was Trump versus Hillary [03:01] Clinton in both of those cases. [03:02] There were audios that leaps of one of the major candidates, [03:09] you know, she was down in Palm Beach. [03:15] If something like that comes out in the future that is legitimate. [03:18] It's going to be easier for candidates to deny that a video [03:22] or audio of them is actually real [03:25] It's critical to stop double check yourself and and do research [03:33] to find out whether or not what you're seeing on social media [03:36] is accurate a lot of election officials and other politicians [03:40] on social media have been verified the watermarking [03:45] and requiring some kind of authentication of video audio images [03:52] that appear on social media and long-term Year all of the security [04:02] measures that we talked about that we need to put in place [04:04] to defend our elections. [04:06] We have to double down on them and we have to invest further [04:08] over the course of the next few months to make sure that the [04:11] system is as resilient as possible. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/7033256/ai-deepfakes-us-election-essay/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/7033256/ai-deepfakes-us-election-essay/"},"headline":"An AI Deepfake Could Be This Election's November Surprise","datePublished":"2024-10-03T17:15:35.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-19T07:47:24.392Z","description":"In a digital war for democracy, truth is the first casualty, writes Miles Taylor.","url":"https://time.com/7033256/ai-deepfakes-us-election-essay/","keywords":["politics","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta359c0ff2edea03b/698a5f3909208f60ad41e0f3/election-ai-deepfake.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Miles Taylor","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/miles-taylor/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta359c0ff2edea03b/698a5f3909208f60ad41e0f3/election-ai-deepfake.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"election-ai-deepfake","caption":"US Election AI Deepfake","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/7033256/ai-deepfakes-us-election-essay/","name":"An AI Deepfake Could Be This Election's November Surprise"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"How AI May Meddle With The Election Year","description":"The rise of generative AI tools like ChatGPT has increased the potential for a wide range of attackers to target elections around the world in 2024, according to a new report by cybersecurity giant CrowdStrike. Experts on AI explain how it may meddle with the 2024 election.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/Pe8KJmwX/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2024-02-23T21:21:39.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Pe8KJmwX.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/7033256/ai-deepfakes-us-election-essay/","duration":"PT4M21S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/7033256/ai-deepfakes-us-election-essay/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```