--- title: AI Isn't Our Election Safety Problem, Disinformation Is description: A digital storm is brewing. And it’s heading straight for the 2024 elections. canonical: https://time.com/6914961/ai-2024-election-disinformation/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2024-03-13T20:29:30.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:44:42.793Z article:section: Ideas og:title: AI Isn't Our Election Safety Problem, Disinformation Is og:description: A digital storm is brewing. And it’s heading straight for the 2024 elections. og:url: https://time.com/6914961/ai-2024-election-disinformation/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt96cd3ddb1b941178/698a4d16b21a9c7338509095/GettyImages-2005141298.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: WhatsApp and Facebook og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: AI Isn't Our Election Safety Problem, Disinformation Is twitter:description: A digital storm is brewing. And it’s heading straight for the 2024 elections. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt96cd3ddb1b941178/698a4d16b21a9c7338509095/GettyImages-2005141298.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # AI Isn't Our Election Safety Problem, Disinformation Is > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=803d2951-d1bb-4065-ae02-eaaec01bfe51&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=803d2951-d1bb-4065-ae02-eaaec01bfe51&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=803d2951-d1bb-4065-ae02-eaaec01bfe51&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: How AI May Meddle With The Election Year [Watch (HLS stream): How AI May Meddle With The Election Year](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Pe8KJmwX.m3u8) (4:21)  _Published 2024-02-23. The rise of generative AI tools like ChatGPT has increased the potential for a wide range of attackers to target elections around the world in 2024, according to a new report by cybersecurity giant CrowdStrike. Experts on AI explain how it may meddle with the 2024 election._ by [Paul Barrett](https://time.com/author/paul-barrett/) and [Justin Hendrix](https://time.com/author/justin-hendrix/) Mar 13, 2024 8:29 PM UTC  The Facebook and WhatsApp apps are shown on the display of a smartphone. The Facebook and WhatsApp apps are shown on the display of a smartphone. Sebastian Kahnert/dpa Getty Images by [Paul Barrett](https://time.com/author/paul-barrett/) and [Justin Hendrix](https://time.com/author/justin-hendrix/) Mar 13, 2024 8:29 PM UTC This election cycle will be the first exposed to generative artificial intelligence—the technology behind popular apps like ChatGPT that enables even non-experts to create fake, but realistic-looking text, video, and audio perfectly suited for political manipulation. At the same time, a number of the major social-media companies have retreated from some of their prior commitments to promote “election integrity.” The November election is also the first that will register the impact of the enormous popularity of TikTok, which uses a recommendation algorithm that some experts believe is particularly suited to spreading misinformation. Let’s start with the rise of generative AI, which allows virtually anyone to produce persuasive text, imagery, or sound based on relatively simple natural-language prompts. In January, Facebook circulated a fake [AI-generated image](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/01/12/ai-donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-jet-fact-check/72202337007/) of Donald Trump sitting next to Jeffrey Epstein on the disgraced financier and sex offender’s private jet. In February, a Democratic consultant working for a long-shot rival [admitted](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/26/ai-robocall-biden-new-hampshire/) that he commissioned an AI-generated robocall impersonating President Joe Biden that sought to discourage thousands of voters from participating in New Hampshire’s primary. The state’s attorney general has opened a criminal investigation. The U.S. is not alone on this score. Last September, an audio clip posted on Facebook just two days before Slovakia’s national election for prime minister appeared to capture the candidate of the pro-NATO, pro-Ukraine Progressive Slovakia Party discussing how to rig the results. The [AI-crafted fake audio](https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/01/politics/election-deepfake-threats-invs/index.html) post went viral during a pre-election media moratorium, limiting the degree to which it could be debunked, and the candidate lost to a pro-Russia rival. Analysts are struggling to keep up with the possibilities. A [study](https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae035/7591134?login=false) published in February in the academic journal _PNAS Nexus_ finds that any political ad maker armed with generative AI tools has the capacity to build “a highly scalable ‘manipulation machine’ that targets individuals based on their unique vulnerabilities without requiring human input.” This suggests cause for concern that the sort of Russian digital operatives who interfered in the 2016 election in support of Donald Trump could use AI as a force multiplier to once again seek to inflame the already polarized American electorate. ### More From TIME But AI is far from the whole story. The threat of artificially generated disinformation is made all the more daunting by a more familiar technology: social media. Despite the confusion and violence caused by Trump’s attempt to undermine the 2020 election result and the threat of similar volatility this year, major platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and, most dramatically, X have backed away from some of their past election-integrity policies, according to a new [report](https://bhr.stern.nyu.edu/tech-elections-2024-report) we co-authored for the [Center for Business and Human Rights](https://bhr.stern.nyu.edu/) at New York University’s Stern School of Business. Any discussion of backsliding necessarily begins with X, which Elon Musk acquired in October 2022\. Competition from Meta’s new Threads app, as well as Musk-related controversies, have [cost X users](https://techcrunch.com/2023/10/26/despite-usage-declines-x-remains-stickier-than-first-thought/). But an average of [more than 220 million people still visit](https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/x-reports-new-usage-insights-mark-first-year-elon-musks-takeover/698001/) the site each month, and it retains the loyalty of many influential politicians, journalists, and entertainers. By spring 2023, Musk had [fired](https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/12/tech/elon-musk-bbc-interview-twitter-intl-hnk/index.html) 6,000, or 80%, of X’s employees. In September 2023, [he said](https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1707147926789554422) of the platform’s election integrity unit, “Yeah, they’re gone.” The new owner’s scaling back of content moderation in the name of promoting free speech has contributed to a [surge](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/18/technology/elon-musk-twitter-x-advertisers.html) of racist and antisemitic expression that prompted advertisers to quit X in droves. Following hiring binges during the COVID-19 pandemic, other social media companies also have executed mass layoffs, with a number of them reducing their “trust and safety” teams—the people who craft and enforce content policies. For the 2020 election, Meta built a 300-person unit dedicated to election integrity. But despite the chaos that erupted when Trump supporters stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021, the company subsequently [reduced](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/23/technology/mark-zuckerberg-meta-midterm-elections.html) the size of that team to about 60 people and ended regular meetings between the group’s leaders and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Meta officials told us that some former team members who have new assignments still contribute to election-integrity efforts, and that top management is kept apprised of this work. But the signals are decidedly mixed. Meta, to its credit, still funds an industry-leading [network](https://www.facebook.com/formedia/mjp/programs/third-party-fact-checking) of more than 90 outside fact-checking organizations that helps the platform de-emphasize and label false content. But the company continues to [exempt politicians](https://www.facebook.com/business/help/315131736305613?id=673052479947730) from having their statements fact-checked. YouTube, meanwhile, has [rescinded a policy](https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/us-election-misinformation-update-2023/) under which it earlier had removed tens of thousands of videos falsely claiming that the 2020 election was illegitimate. Both companies argue their new approaches encourage free speech. Meta has also said that, with the same goal of promoting free-flowing debate, it will [loosen its rules](https://www.wsj.com/tech/meta-allows-ads-claiming-rigged-2020-election-on-facebook-instagram-309b678d?st=rqlu09a42lhue3p) to allow political ads on Facebook and Instagram to question the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election. Sure enough, in August 2023, Facebook allowed the Trump campaign to run a spot declaring: “We had a rigged election in 2020.” TikTok, which now has upwards of 1 billion average monthly users worldwide and more than 170 million in the U.S. alone, presents new and entirely different challenges. Its connection to Chinese parent corporation ByteDance has led to [allegations](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/video/2024/jan/31/im-singaporean-tiktok-ceo-grilled-by-us-senator-repeatedly-about-ties-with-china-video)—so far, unproven—that the autocratic Beijing government exerts influence over the U.S. platform. The House of Representatives just [approved legislation](https://www.npr.org/2024/03/13/1237501725/house-vote-tiktok-ban) that would force ByteDance to sell TikTok or face a U.S. ban of the short-video app. But there are also questions about TikTok’s recommendation algorithm, which selects the content presented to users. Other major platforms rely on a “social graph,” which chooses content based on what is shared by the people whom they follow and who follow them. TikTok, by contrast, selects short videos for its “For You” page based on algorithmic recommendations of content from _outside_ of their social network, as well. This difference may help explain why TikTok is so successful at serving up videos that users find novel and compelling. But the distinction could present a danger during election season, according to [researchers](https://www.brookings.edu/articles/misunderstood-mechanics-how-ai-tiktok-and-the-liars-dividend-might-affect-the-2024-elections/) with NYU’s Center for Social Media and Politics: “With generative AI making fabricated videos easier to produce,” the researchers wrote in January, “we could see political misinformation reaching users on TikTok that it wouldn’t reach on other social graph-based platforms.” What’s more, TikTok users are younger, and [studies](https://www.kateto.net/covid19/COVID19%20CONSORTIUM%20REPORT%2014%20MISINFO%20SEP%202020.pdf) show that young people are more likely to believe misinformation. TikTok told us that this analysis is “entirely speculative” and reflects “a poor understanding of how our platform works.” There is still time for platforms to take pre-election precautions. They can impose limits on rampant re-sharing of content, which is one way that misinformation spreads. They can institute “circuit breakers” on certain viral posts to give content moderators an opportunity to determine whether the material is malicious. They can replenish their depleted content moderation teams. And they can remove demonstrably false content from users’ feeds, while retaining a marked, archived copy that’s not sharable but is available as a reference for those who track misinformation. The social media industry should view these and other protective steps as the cost of doing business responsibly during what is shaping up to be another volatile election season. Inaction could exacerbate a true crisis for U.S. democracy. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6914961/ai-2024-election-disinformation/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6914961/ai-2024-election-disinformation/"},"headline":"AI Isn't Our Election Safety Problem, Disinformation Is","datePublished":"2024-03-13T20:29:30.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:44:42.793Z","description":"A digital storm is brewing. And it’s heading straight for the 2024 elections.","url":"https://time.com/6914961/ai-2024-election-disinformation/","keywords":["Misinformation & Disinformation","Tech","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt96cd3ddb1b941178/698a4d16b21a9c7338509095/GettyImages-2005141298.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Barrett","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/paul-barrett/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Justin Hendrix","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/justin-hendrix/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt96cd3ddb1b941178/698a4d16b21a9c7338509095/GettyImages-2005141298.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"WhatsApp and Facebook","caption":"WhatsApp and Facebook","creditText":"Sebastian Kahnert/dpa Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/misinformation-disinformation/","name":"Misinformation & Disinformation"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6914961/ai-2024-election-disinformation/","name":"AI Isn't Our Election Safety Problem, Disinformation Is"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"How AI May Meddle With The Election Year","description":"The rise of generative AI tools like ChatGPT has increased the potential for a wide range of attackers to target elections around the world in 2024, according to a new report by cybersecurity giant CrowdStrike. Experts on AI explain how it may meddle with the 2024 election.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/Pe8KJmwX/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2024-02-23T21:21:39.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Pe8KJmwX.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6914961/ai-2024-election-disinformation/","duration":"PT4M21S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6914961/ai-2024-election-disinformation/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```