--- title: Lawmakers Call to Protect IVF After Alabama Ruling description: Lawmakers of both parties across the country are scrambling to safeguard access to in vitro fertilization after the Alabama ruling. canonical: https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/ author: Nik Popli article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2024-02-27T15:13:10.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:50:32.603Z article:section: Politics og:title: Lawmakers Call to Protect IVF After Alabama Ruling og:description: Lawmakers of both parties across the country are scrambling to safeguard access to in vitro fertilization after the Alabama ruling. og:url: https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt654ba84090a50825/698a48e3b3fce369200cbc3e/GettyImages-1498980269.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2121 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: Close up In the fertility laboratory the Doctor preparing embryo cultivation plates og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Lawmakers Call to Protect IVF After Alabama Ruling twitter:description: Lawmakers of both parties across the country are scrambling to safeguard access to in vitro fertilization after the Alabama ruling. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt654ba84090a50825/698a48e3b3fce369200cbc3e/GettyImages-1498980269.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Lawmakers in Both Parties Call to Protect IVF After Alabama Ruling > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=961568ca-6627-495e-9f15-c96886f0b1b1&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 85,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 37.0% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=961568ca-6627-495e-9f15-c96886f0b1b1&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=961568ca-6627-495e-9f15-c96886f0b1b1&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. It reaches 85,000 subscribers with a 37.0% open rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. ## Video: Alabama State Lawmakers & Legal Experts React to IVF Ruling [Watch (HLS stream): Alabama State Lawmakers & Legal Experts React to IVF Ruling](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/n6CbvPWN.m3u8) (3:16)  _Published 2024-02-23. Doctors and patients have been grappling with shock and fear this week as they try to determine what they can and can’t do after the ruling by the all-Republican Alabama Supreme Court._  by [Nik Popli](https://time.com/author/nik-popli/)  ## Nik Popli Staff Writer Feb 27, 2024 3:13 PM UTC  In ta fertility laboratory, doctor preparing embryo cultivation plates. In ta fertility laboratory, doctor preparing embryo cultivation plates. Getty Images—Carlos Duarte  by [Nik Popli](https://time.com/author/nik-popli/)  ## Nik Popli Staff Writer Feb 27, 2024 3:13 PM UTC Lawmakers across the country are scrambling to safeguard access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) after several clinics in Alabama paused treatments over a recent state supreme court ruling that classified frozen embryos as children. The controversial decision by Alabama’s top court effectively opened the door for legal action against those who discard frozen embryos during IVF, a widely-used fertility treatment method involving the fertilization of eggs outside the body. Now the fight over the procedure will move to the legislative realm, with both Democrats and Republicans alike calling to protect the procedure in law.Some Democratic legislators have already introduced measures aimed at preserving the rights of individuals seeking fertility treatments, but a bipartisan solution is yet to emerge as Republicans grapple with reconciling their support for IVF with anti-abortion stances. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat who had her two children via IVF and has spearheaded the effort in Congress to protect the treatment, tells TIME that no Republicans have expressed support for her legislation. Her bill would enshrine a statutory right for patients to access IVF services nationwide and retain authority over how sperm or egg cells are used during such treatments. “Crickets. Not a single one of them has come forward,” Duckworth says. Yet several prominent Republican figures, including former President Donald Trump, have voiced their support for IVF treatments and called on legislators to come up with a solution that protects fertility clinics and preserves the treatment.Former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, [Trump's top rival](https://time.com/6696857/nikki-haley-south-carolina-republican-primary-trump/) for the Republican nomination, initially said she supported the Alabama ruling but then walked back her comments. The Senate GOP's campaign arm released a memo telling candidates to affirm support for IVF. "When responding to the Alabama Supreme Court ruling, it is imperative that our candidates align with the public's overwhelming support for IVF and fertility treatments," National Republican Senatorial Committee executive director Jason Thielman wrote, warning that Democrats could use the decision as a campaign issue. **Read More:** [_As Her Clinic Pauses IVF, an Alabama Doctor on What’s Next After the Court’s Embryo Ruling_](https://time.com/6767951/alabama-court-embryo-ivf-doctor-interview/) “Republicans seem to finally be getting the message that they are out of touch with what vast majorities of Americans—even pro-life Americans—want,” Duckworth says. She first introduced legislation to protect IVF in 2022, but Republicans blocked the bill from passing. Now, she’s hoping the pressure from voters will spur Republicans totake action on her latest bill. “I wish Republicans would have come around before people got hurt," she says, "but I hope that at least now they’ll help me fix it and protect Americans across the country from being criminalized for trying to start or grow a family through IVF before other states follow Alabama’s lead.” The Republicans calling to protect IVF come amid a broader struggle within the GOP to navigate the increasingly complex landscape of reproductive rights following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision in [_Dobbs_ _v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization_](https://time.com/6189476/abortion-supreme-court-overturns-roe-v-wade/), which overturned the [federal right to abortion](https://time.com/6208860/ohio-woman-forced-travel-abortion/). As Republicans rush to limit the damage of the court’s ruling and develop a unified position, the Biden Administration has pointed to legislation that more than 120 House Republicans, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, co-sponsored last year that would have restricted IVF by establishing that “the term human being includes all stages of life.” The GOP's previous legislative stance, the White House says, appears at odds with its recent calls to support IVF, highlighting a potential inconsistency in its approach to reproductive rights. There's even a difference between the positions of the two Republicans vying to be the next President. Trump on Friday called on the Alabama legislature to “find an immediate solution to preserve the availability of IVF” in the state, while Haley has cautioned against taking legislative action. “Government doesn't need to get into something this sensitive,” she told NBC News on Saturday. “This should be between the doctors and the parents, period… If they need to do legislation to fix it, that’s fine, but I don’t want states to have knee-jerk reactions to insert government into the conversations with doctors and parents.” The Alabama legislature is also wrestling with how to respond to the state court's decision. Alabama house minority leader Anthony Daniels, a Democrat, recently proposed legislation aimed at clarifying the legal status of embryos by establishing that “any fertilized human egg or human embryo that exists outside of a human uterus is not considered an unborn child or human being for any purpose under state law.” State sen. Tim Melson, a Republican, has said he plans to file a bill clarifying that embryos are not human life until they are implanted inside a uterus. But both bills could face an uphill legal battle. Daniels’ legislation, which has no Republican co-sponsors, would be at direct odds with the Alabama supreme court’s ruling that frozen embryos are considered children under the state constitution. And Melson’s bill, which is yet to be released, may require a constitutional amendment. “We firmly believe in the fundamental right to life and the dignity of every woman to bring life into the world,” Alabama senate Republicans said in a statement. “We are committed to supporting strong families and providing women grappling with infertility the resources and support they need to build healthy and happy families.” Alabama house speaker Nathaniel Ledbetter, a Republican, did not respond to a request for comment on how GOP state lawmakers would respond legislatively. Alabama’s Republican Attorney General Steve Marshall has reassured IVF patients and providers that the ruling will not be wielded to prosecute families or providers. But some clinics have decided to pause IVF treatments over the legal uncertainties stemming from the court's decision. Meanwhile at the federal level, Duckworth has been getting personal in her messaging. She told TIME that during her own IVF experience more than 10 years ago, three of her five fertilized eggs were found not to be viable and were discarded, an action that could now be considered manslaughter under Alabama law. “You can't have it both ways,” Duckworth says of pro-life Republicans who claim they support IVF. “Despite what Donald Trump says, you can’t actually be supportive of protecting IVF but then also say a fertilized egg is a human being so women can't have reproductive choice.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/"},"headline":"Lawmakers in Both Parties Call to Protect IVF After Alabama Ruling","datePublished":"2024-02-27T15:13:10.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:50:32.603Z","description":"Lawmakers of both parties across the country are scrambling to safeguard access to in vitro fertilization","url":"https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/","keywords":["Congress","feature","News Desk"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt654ba84090a50825/698a48e3b3fce369200cbc3e/GettyImages-1498980269.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Nik Popli","jobTitle":"Staff Writer","url":"https://time.com/author/nik-popli/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt654ba84090a50825/698a48e3b3fce369200cbc3e/GettyImages-1498980269.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Close up In the fertility laboratory the Doctor preparing embryo cultivation plates","caption":"Close up In the fertility laboratory the Doctor preparing embryo cultivation plates","creditText":"Getty Images—Carlos Duarte","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/congress/","name":"Congress"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/","name":"Lawmakers in Both Parties Call to Protect IVF After Alabama Ruling"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Advocates Urge Alabama Lawmakers to Restore IVF Services in the State","description":"More than 150 in vitro fertilization patients have gathered at the Alabama Statehouse to urge lawmakers to find some way to restore IVF services in the state.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/jGuwR4b5/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2024-02-28T21:00:45.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/jGuwR4b5.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/","duration":"PT45S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Alabama State Lawmakers & Legal Experts React to IVF Ruling","description":"Doctors and patients have been grappling with shock and fear this week as they try to determine what they can and can’t do after the ruling by the all-Republican Alabama Supreme Court.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/n6CbvPWN/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2024-02-23T17:46:35.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/n6CbvPWN.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/","duration":"PT3M16S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6835548/lawmakers-ivf-embryos-alabama-legislation/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```