--- title: California's CARE Court Could Violate the Rights of the Homeless description: California's new CARE Courts are aimed at helping treat the mentally ill and solving homelessness, but it raises concerns about civil rights. canonical: https://time.com/6340526/california-care-courts-homeless-mentally-ill/ author: Jerel Ezell article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-11-29T12:30:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:50:44.296Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Risks for California's New Plan for the Mentally Ill og:description: California's new CARE Courts are aimed at helping treat the mentally ill and solving homelessness, but it raises concerns about civil rights. og:url: https://time.com/6340526/california-care-courts-homeless-mentally-ill/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt83199fcdaee4275c/698a42c247ca38789b3bb5f3/Californina-CARE-Courts.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: State And Local Lawmakers Seek To Overturn Court Decisions Blocking Their Power To Clear Homeless Encampments og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Risks for California's New Plan for the Mentally Ill twitter:description: California's new CARE Courts are aimed at helping treat the mentally ill and solving homelessness, but it raises concerns about civil rights. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt83199fcdaee4275c/698a42c247ca38789b3bb5f3/Californina-CARE-Courts.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # California's New Plan to Treat the Mentally Ill May End Up Violating Their Rights > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6c43b6b4-457c-4197-8ce6-d3ed3db9005c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6c43b6b4-457c-4197-8ce6-d3ed3db9005c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=6c43b6b4-457c-4197-8ce6-d3ed3db9005c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: Teen Voices on Happiness and Mental Health Today [Watch (HLS stream): Teen Voices on Happiness and Mental Health Today](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/3L2FHepD.m3u8) (5:32)  _Published 2023-09-28. California's new CARE Courts are aimed at helping treat the mentally ill and solving homelessness, but it raises concerns about civil rights._ by [Jerel Ezell](https://time.com/author/jerel-ezell/) ## Jerel Ezell Nov 29, 2023 12:30 PM UTC  LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - SEPTEMBER 28: A homeless encampment stands in front of a city water and power building in the Skid Row community on September 28, 2023 in Los Angeles, California. State and local lawmakers, both Republicans and Democrats, are seeking to overturn lower court decisions which currently block their power to clear encampments with unhoused people. Dozens of leaders, many from Western states including California, have turned to the Supreme Court to overturn the rulings. Skid Row is home to thousands of people who either live on the streets or in shelters. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images) LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - SEPTEMBER 28: A homeless encampment stands in front of a city water and power building in the Skid Row community on September 28, 2023 in Los Angeles, California. State and local lawmakers, both Republicans and Democrats, are seeking to overturn lower court decisions which currently block their power to clear encampments with unhoused people. Dozens of leaders, many from Western states including California, have turned to the Supreme Court to overturn the rulings. Skid Row is home to thousands of people who either live on the streets or in shelters. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)Mario Tama—Getty Images by [Jerel Ezell](https://time.com/author/jerel-ezell/) ## Jerel Ezell Nov 29, 2023 12:30 PM UTC Facing enormous pressure to tame what appears to be a spiraling and increasingly intertwined statewide crisis in mental health, substance use, and homelessness, California officials have created the [Community Assistance, Recovery and Empowerment Court](https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Pages/CARE-ACT.aspx), or CARE Court. The new system is a policy smorgasbord that ranges from the provision of court-ordered treatment and housing to food assistance, social activities, and exercise programming for Californians with severe mental illness. CARE Court, which launched [in October to skeptical but hopeful Californians](https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-09-04/care-courts-families-voluntary-compliance), is aimed at tackling the Golden State’s perpetual public welfare emergency through a collaborative referral and treatment process. The plan, passed and signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom in July, is currently being piloted in San Francisco, San Diego, and Orange counties, with Los Angeles County, which has the state’s largest homeless population, launching on Dec. 1\. California’s remaining counties will implement CARE Courts by year’s end. Going back to the early 18th Century, American prisons and mental health wards have used coercive or involuntary treatment on their populations, while so-called drug courts, invented in the 1970s, often make enrollment into substance use treatment programs, like methadone, a condition for favorable adjudication terms. CARE Courts are presented as a more compassionate and flexible iteration, yet can still involuntarily retain patients under a variety of open-ended scenarios, while their ultimate value in solving California’s problems is very much open to question. ## Confronting America's largest homeless population At face value, CARE Court seems like a completely logical, if not desperate, solution for a state with [America’s largest homeless population](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/ahar/2022-ahar-part-1-pit-estimates-of-homelessness-in-the-us.html), one larger than those of the next three states of New York, Florida, and Washington, combined. Under the initiative, individuals with severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia can be recommended, or petitioned, for CARE Court proceedings, and their case reviewed at a clinical evaluation hearing in concert with a public defender. If clinically substantiated, the individual, their counsel and supporters, and the county’s behavioral health agency collaborate on a “CARE Plan” that can fast-track the individual into treatment and link them to services to help them further stabilize. These resources include medications, counseling, and substance-use recovery and management resources. But what qualifies someone to make a petition on behalf of another person, setting in motion such a potentially life-altering process? CARE Court [empowers virtually anyone in an individual’s orbit to make that call](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill%5Fid=202120220SB1338), including family members, roommates, healthcare and behavioral health providers, and first responders such as paramedics. ### More From TIME California’s focus on integrating family members and other potential sources of social support like friends into this process, would seem to be a big advantage to this approach. However, it’s an advantage that potentially presents [an exceptional burden on these supporters](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s001270050192), namely when there are conflicting desires about how to help the individual. In short, CARE Courts embody the “too many cooks in the kitchen” paradox that often plagues modern clinical decision-making. And this feature, too, cuts both ways: Court officials have the latitude to remove an individual’s social supports—including those who may reject the individual’s enrollment in CARE Courts—from the proceedings if they feel they have a conflict of interest. From the most basic civil rights perspective, CARE Courts would seem to run roughshod on the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which says that no state can abridge the privileges of citizens or deprive them of due process. But what are privileges of citizenship and due process to someone with severe mental illness, whose idea of life and liberty may be so radically different from others’? These are just some of the sticky questions animating the otherwise promising CARE Court initiative. Along these lines, multiple lawsuits—most arguing that the bill diminishes due process, personal liberty, and equal protection rights—were filed, [and rejected](https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-04-22/california-supreme-court-newsom-care-court-mentally-ill-homeless-substance-disorder), against Newsom before the effort even began. The effort nevertheless still faces legal headwinds similar to those that have recently upheld or reversed other landmark cases on medical rights, [as concerns likely continue to mount](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/new-california-law-aims-to-force-people-with-mental-illness-or-addiction-to-get-help) over the extent to which CARE Courts genuinely support the recovery and stabilization of individuals in severe mental distress, vs. simply serving as political cover for decades of failed public policy. ## The Faustian bargain of coerced treatment Coerced treatment is one of the thorniest topics in modern psychiatry, with the [American Psychiatric Association](https://www.psychiatry.org/getattachment/d50db97b-59aa-4dd4-a0ec-d09b4e19112e/Position-Involuntary-Outpatient-Commitment.pdf) and [practitioners long recognizing the Faustian bargain it always entails](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.790886/full). This is particularly true when intent and medicine’s longstanding Hippocratic principle of “first, do not harm” is considered. When is the practice being used for patient wellness and public safety? And when is it used as a means of shielding families, law enforcement, businesses, and the public from the discomfort and fear that comes from the [mere presence](https://www.businessinsider.com/homeless-people-read-mean-tweet-about-themselves-2015-4) of homeless individuals and having to deal with people who have a severe mental illness? U.S. law has generally supported an individual’s [right to refuse medical treatment](https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-6-5-1/ALDE%5F00000903/), but when competency is raised, things get fuzzy. And here we return to the question of choice and who gets to choose, for whom, and why. [Human Rights Watch](https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/07/22/human-rights-watchs-opposition-care-court-ca-sb-1338) and California’s [ACLU](https://aclucalaction.org/2022/06/why-oppose-care-court/) have framed the CARE Courts as an autonomy-crushing practice that will further advance the judiciary’s dangerous incursion into healthcare. Newsom, a Democrat [who has flirted with the idea of running for president](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/nov/12/california-gavin-newsom-biden-president-2024), made it clear he’s unphased by such criticisms as he seeks to improve the state’s diminished image. “Change has its enemies. I get it,” Newsom explained. “But one thing you cannot argue for, with all due respect to all the critics out there, is the status quo. You can't. And in the absence of alternatives, what the hell are we going to do to address this crisis?” In politics, doing something is almost always seen as better than doing nothing, and doing something new is almost always seen as better than staying the course. For that reason alone, CARE Court may have some lessons—both intended and not—for how we more broadly approach mental health policy across the country. [Roughly 90% of Americans believe the country is experiencing a mental health crisis](https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/05/health/cnn-kff-mental-health-poll-wellness/index.html). So, it’s no surprise that they may look at the most extreme manifestations of it—manic or zombified people loitering in their communities—in places like California and see initiatives like CARE Courts as, at worse, necessary evils. Are CARE Courts coercive though? It depends on your lens. [According to the law](https://www.chhs.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/CARECourt%5FFAQ.pdf), an individual cannot be forcibly entered into treatment or required to take stabilizing medications. However, if an individual refuses to voluntarily take treatment, conservatorship can then simply be imposed at the discretion of court officials. And it’s under conservatorship where CARE Courts can then be used as a kind of medical blackmail without theoretically conflicting with their primary selling point to the public: creating options for some of our society’s most vulnerable people. And should things go awry, CARE Courts and their operators are essentially immune. The bill [exempts counties or an employee of a county from civil or criminal liability](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill%5Fid=202120220SB1338) for any action by a CARE Court patient, except in cases of gross negligence, which is notoriously hard to prove. ## CARE Courts' limited power Yet for all of its testing of individual and constitutional rights, the CARE Courts’ actual ability to solve these core public health problems are quite limited. As Judge Michael Begert of the Superior Court in San Francisco recently explained, "[it’s hopefully going to help some people who need some help](https://www.kqed.org/news/11963122/californias-care-court-program-starts-amid-concerns-over-effectiveness), and it is probably not going to make a huge dent in what you observe in the community." Down I-5 in Riverside County, [another government official](https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/health/2023/09/30/riverside-county-among-first-in-california-to-implement-care-court-mental-health-treatment-program/70995634007/), focusing on the CARE Courts’ highly marketed focus on homelessness, noted, “the biggest thing we've learned is this is not the panacea to solve homelessness." And these modest expectations are perhaps not even modest enough. CARE Courts focuses only on diagnoses of schizophrenia and related “spectrum” disorders, [all of which are difficult to diagnose](https://www.nami.org/About-Mental-Illness/Mental-Health-Conditions/Schizophrenia). Respected Dutch psychiatrist Jim van Os went so far as to say schizophrenia, as constructed by the [fifth edition of the _Diagnostic_ and Statistical _Manual_ of Mental Disorders](https://psychcentral.com/schizophrenia/dsm-5-changes-schizophrenia-psychotic-disorders)—psychiatry’s gold standard for diagnoses—[doesn't even exist](https://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i375). This notion has gained considerable traction in clinical ranks over the last decade. And many of the complex medications used to treat schizophrenia and related conditions have serious and common side effects, [including weight gain and insulin resistance](https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/hmbci-2017-0065/html), which is a precursor to diabetes. Furthermore, schizophrenia and related disorders are greatly over-diagnosed in Black populations, who [represent roughly one-quarter of California’s homeless population](https://calbudgetcenter.org/resources/who-is-experiencing-homelessness-in-california/). CARE Court embodies the idea of clinical “diversion,” an intervention that can stall one’s descent from untreated mental illness and substance use into homelessness and incarceration. But considering that California has done very little in the past three decades to corral [its persistently high unemployment rates](https://www.ppic.org/blog/who-is-unemployed-in-california/) and address its chronically [expensive and scant housing stock](https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/04/california-single-family-zoning-housing/673758/), the key reasons behind this multidimensional mental health crisis, CARE Court is far from preventive enough. Homelessness is [directly connected to the economic health and opportunity](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616710110091525?casa%5Ftoken=2nypOYcYcO4AAAAA:qTBxvFERGS%5FMXR7xvjTokqjF6cMgFLkk%5F%5FBplR9EmvLYGG-6N3HUuctX8hLcGkwQ5K8V7VA-RAPqGg4) of a community. In turn, [severe mental illness is a major risk factor for homelessness](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1440783311422458?casa%5Ftoken=gEb86Wxv%5FtAAAAAA%3ADoaFVQpxPYj2LrVC2NziXOCB37gorkDIS2ZLAGYf9Zs6blICAZNJYV05SryPnT7gyp6pjiN0y2w-r%5FM), and homelessness is connected to [the worsening of mental illness symptoms](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395614001034) and [more intense substance use](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11524-017-0192-8). Of the 15 cities with the highest cost of living in the US, [five are in California](https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/22/us-cities-with-the-highest-cost-of-living.html), much of this tied to the state’s gilded tech sector and the [housing bubble and gentrification that it has conjured](https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=wAcqDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA30&dq=silicon+valley+california+tech+gentrification+housing+costs&ots=k6lIX9Toq%5F&sig=tAeYKFlCgmWxl%5FFkd2zwW9uSq5Y). California also has the nation’s [third-highest unemployment rate](https://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm). Even modest political solutions to address these dynamics have been jettisoned. For example, Newsom recently [vetoed employee protection bills](https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-10-09/newson-vetoes-bill-to-expand-worker-layoff-protections) that would have lengthened the period of time in which employers are required to notify employees of layoffs and axed [bills](https://www.governing.com/policy/which-big-california-bills-did-newsom-veto) aimed at supporting affordable housing projects and transitional housing for homeless LGBTQ+ youth. As state officials and advocates implement CARE Courts, they must consider the potentially coercive and disenfranchising aspects of the initiative. They must also make space for community dialogue on its rollout—the good, the bad, and the ugly—to develop culturally tailored solutions that are attuned to communities’ experiences with the causes and accelerants of mental illness, and consider these as the primary, or at least simultaneous, intervention targets. The path to promoting more positive and affirming engagements with these vulnerable populations is by bringing greater attention to the clear institutional and social causes—unemployment, homelessness and deficient healthcare high among them— rather than the perhaps more visceral and morbid individual and community outcomes. This is likely to be CARE Court’s most prescient yet obvious lesson for the rest of the country. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6340526/california-care-courts-homeless-mentally-ill/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6340526/california-care-courts-homeless-mentally-ill/"},"headline":"California's New Plan to Treat the Mentally Ill May End Up Violating Their Rights","datePublished":"2023-11-29T12:30:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:50:44.296Z","description":"California's new CARE Courts are aimed at helping treat the mentally ill and solving homelessness, but it raises concerns about civil rights.","url":"https://time.com/6340526/california-care-courts-homeless-mentally-ill/","keywords":["Health Care","California"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt83199fcdaee4275c/698a42c247ca38789b3bb5f3/Californina-CARE-Courts.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jerel Ezell","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/jerel-ezell/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt83199fcdaee4275c/698a42c247ca38789b3bb5f3/Californina-CARE-Courts.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"State And Local Lawmakers Seek To Overturn Court Decisions Blocking Their Power To Clear Homeless Encampments","caption":"A Homeless Encampment in Los Angeles","creditText":"Mario Tama—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health-care/","name":"Health Care"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6340526/california-care-courts-homeless-mentally-ill/","name":"California's New Plan to Treat the Mentally Ill May End Up Violating Their Rights"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Teen Voices on Happiness and Mental Health Today","description":"California's new CARE Courts are aimed at helping treat the mentally ill and solving homelessness, but it raises concerns about civil rights.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/3L2FHepD/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2023-09-28T17:15:27.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/3L2FHepD.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6340526/california-care-courts-homeless-mentally-ill/","duration":"PT5M32S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6340526/california-care-courts-homeless-mentally-ill/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```