--- title: Most Companies Buying Carbon Credits Are Not Greenwashing description: New research shows that companies that buy carbon credits typically do so as an add-on to their other climate adaptation efforts. canonical: https://time.com/6323461/carbon-credits-greenwashing/ author: Bronson Griscom article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-10-13T16:47:07.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T12:45:37.129Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Column: Most Companies Buying Carbon Credits Are Not Greenwashing og:description: New research shows that companies that buy carbon credits typically do so as an add-on to their other climate adaptation efforts. og:url: https://time.com/6323461/carbon-credits-greenwashing/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt61db9a8997ca24a4/698a4137457a52061ad68086/amazon-rainforest-river.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Amazon rainforest og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Column: Most Companies Buying Carbon Credits Are Not Greenwashing twitter:description: New research shows that companies that buy carbon credits typically do so as an add-on to their other climate adaptation efforts. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt61db9a8997ca24a4/698a4137457a52061ad68086/amazon-rainforest-river.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Most Companies Buying Carbon Credits Are Not Greenwashing > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=0381d5f1-8800-4859-aa02-9ab6f5e37791&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=0381d5f1-8800-4859-aa02-9ab6f5e37791&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=0381d5f1-8800-4859-aa02-9ab6f5e37791&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=0381d5f1-8800-4859-aa02-9ab6f5e37791&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Bronson Griscom](https://time.com/author/bronson-griscom/) ## Bronson Griscom Oct 13, 2023 4:47 PM UTC  A river running through the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, on Jan. 2, 2023. A river running through the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, on Jan. 2, 2023. Jens Büttner—Picture Alliance/Getty Images by [Bronson Griscom](https://time.com/author/bronson-griscom/) ## Bronson Griscom Oct 13, 2023 4:47 PM UTC In 1983, at a beach resort in Fiji, a young man named Jay Westerveld saw a request that hotel guests reuse their towels to “save our planet.” Reflecting on his experience in a college term paper, Westerveld pointed out the hypocrisy of guilt-tripping guests about towels while the hotel was hastily building more bungalows. “It all comes out in the greenwash,” he wrote, coining a new phrase in the process. Today, we understand what “greenwashing” looks like: A company makes a deceptive claim to appear more environmentally friendly and mislead consumers. This has been going on for decades. In the 1990s, for example, [Conoco](https://www.youtube.com/watch?time%5Fcontinue=14&v=zJZFfeLRCJs&embeds%5Freferring%5Feuri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2F&feature=emb%5Flogo) ran an ad campaign that featured seals clapping for the company’s new environmentally-friendly oil tankers. All the while, Conoco and other [oil giants allegedly](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/15/business/california-oil-lawsuit-newsom.html) hid the risks of fossil fuels that they knew about and were discussing internally at the time. More recently, media critics have attached this moniker to corporate purchasers of nature-based carbon credits, a way for companies to “offset” a fraction of their emissions by funding conservation projects through the voluntary carbon market (VCM) that protect and restore natural carbon sinks. A [recent deluge](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/19/do-carbon-credit-reduce-emissions-greenhouse-gases) of [media criticism](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-08-24/junk-offsets-are-feeding-mass-wave-of-greenwashing-study-shows) paints credit-buyers as lazy, even nefarious. These stories repeat a now familiar narrative: “They are not interested in decarbonizing, and credits are a way to virtue-signal without meaningfully reducing emissions.” A comprehensive [new study from Ecosystem Marketplace](https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/articles/new-research-carbon-credits-are-associated-with-businesses-decarbonizing-faster/), a D.C.-based nonprofit that researches environmental markets and financing, presents evidence that those broad-brush assumptions are wrong. It finds that most companies that participate in the VCM are climate leaders, not laggards. According to the study, which analyzed transactions reported by over 7,000 companies, those engaged in the carbon market are nearly twice as likely to be decarbonizing their operations year-over-year. They are investing three times more in reducing emissions of their own business than companies who steer clear of credits. They are also 3.4 times more likely to have science-based climate targets. In other words, companies are typically not using carbon credits to greenwash their operations, but rather as an add-on to the efforts they are already taking to clean their own houses. Anger at corporations that pollute is justified. But critics of carbon-credit systems are antagonizing the wrong actors, with perverse effect. Companies that engage in the VCM face near-constant media scrutiny, while companies who duck the conversation are able to entirely evade critique. The result is a chilling effect on corporate climate action. In a survey undertaken by Conservation International, a global non-profit, and the [We Mean Business Coalition](https://www.wemeanbusinesscoalition.org/), a group of influential companies working to galvanize climate action, 44% of corporate leaders said that accusations of “greenwashing” was a top concern regarding the voluntary carbon market—the highest-ranked concern among those listed. Recent conversations I’ve had with sustainability officers at Fortune 500 companies affirm this fear: if misplaced criticism continues, they say, their companies may pull out of the market. A mass withdrawal from the VCM would have disastrous consequences for climate stability, nature conservation, and human wellbeing. Terrestrial ecosystems currently absorb a quarter of all greenhouse gases emitted by humans. If we invested more in protecting and restoring nature, that could rise to at least [one-third](https://www.conservation.org/priorities/exponential-roadmap-natural-climate-solutions), a significant step towards stabilizing our climate. These projects are just one part of the solution, and require continued refinement—but without them, we have no chance of reaching our global climate goals. Certainly, there are some companies that choose to operate in bad faith and purchase low-quality, low-transparency credits, while also refusing to decarbonize their own emissions. But let’s not allow those bad apples to spoil the rest. Let’s work together to improve fidelity across the board. Indeed, the recent Ecosystem Marketplace study shows that demand for higher-priced credits has increased_—_a signal that companies are increasingly willing to pay a premium for quality in the carbon market. And there are ways to improve integrity across the board. Independent governance bodies like the [Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market](https://icvcm.org/about-the-integrity-council/) are providing concrete standards for high-quality credits. Meanwhile, companies should embrace endeavors like the [Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative](https://vcmintegrity.org/about/), which help them make credible climate claims by providing a “rulebook” to follow. By standardizing this market, we can all more clearly discern good-faith actors from bad-faith ones; high-quality credits from junk; and climate allies from foes. Shame is a powerful tool. It’s crucial that we channel it toward those inhibiting climate action—rather than those leading the way to solutions. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6323461/carbon-credits-greenwashing/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6323461/carbon-credits-greenwashing/"},"headline":"Most Companies Buying Carbon Credits Are Not Greenwashing","datePublished":"2023-10-13T16:47:07.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T12:45:37.129Z","description":"New research shows that companies that buy carbon credits typically do so as an add-on to their other climate adaptation efforts.","url":"https://time.com/6323461/carbon-credits-greenwashing/","keywords":["climate change"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt61db9a8997ca24a4/698a4137457a52061ad68086/amazon-rainforest-river.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Bronson Griscom","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/bronson-griscom/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt61db9a8997ca24a4/698a4137457a52061ad68086/amazon-rainforest-river.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Amazon rainforest","caption":"A river running through the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, on Jan. 2, 2023.","creditText":"Jens Büttner—Picture Alliance/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/climate-change/","name":"climate change"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6323461/carbon-credits-greenwashing/","name":"Most Companies Buying Carbon Credits Are Not Greenwashing"}}]}] ```