• Ideas
  • Ukraine

There’s Still Hope for Ukraine’s Grain—and for Global Food Markets

3 minute read
Ian Bremmer is a foreign affairs columnist and editor-at-large at TIME. He is the president of Eurasia Group, a political-risk consultancy, and GZERO Media, a company dedicated to providing intelligent and engaging coverage of international affairs. He teaches applied geopolitics at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs, and his most recent book is The Power of Crisis.

On July 17, Russia suspended the Black Sea Grain Initiative, a deal brokered last year by the United Nations and Turkey that has moved some 33 million metric tons of grain and oilseeds from Ukraine to foreign ports. The deal, which Russia also briefly suspended in October 2022, had provided big benefits for poorer countries struggling with high food prices already exacerbated by COVID, higher energy prices, and then by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Now, Moscow claims the right to treat any foreign ship heading for a Ukrainian port as a legitimate target of war, making it all but impossible for outsiders to protect grain ships and pushing up shipping and insurance costs. Russian missile strikes on Ukrainian port infrastructure and grain storage in recent days have made matters worse.

But there are several reasons why Russia’s attack on Ukraine’s food exports probably won’t trigger an emergency for global food prices and the political turmoil that often comes with it. First, Ukraine is already sending larger amounts of food over land and by river. Data from the United Nations and USDA show that about 47% of the country’s wheat exports, 40% of its corn shipments, and 67% of exported sunflower oil now reach global markets via Europe through those routes.  

Second, following a record harvest in recent months, Russia now has more wheat and grain to export. Its own Black Sea exports will continue, easing some of the upward pressure on global food prices. Despite Ukrainian threats to attack Russian shipping, its high spending on its own  shipping and insurance costs will limit what Ukraine can afford to attempt. The USDA has also forecast big increases in corn and wheat production in coming months in Argentina, China, the EU, Turkey, and the US, which will help offset reduced exports from Ukraine.  

There are caveats here. Any fall in the global supply of agriculture products could persuade some governments to restrict their own food exports to protect food security at home. That could sharply raise food prices for everybody else. We’re already seeing a surge in tensions between Ukraine and some of its nearest European neighbors. In April and May, fears that a surge in Ukraine’s over land food exports will hurt their own farmers led Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, and Slovakia to impose temporary import restrictions, and these countries now want the European Commission to let them extend those limits beyond their scheduled expiration in September to at least the end of the year. The EU is now trying to help Ukrainian grain exports pass through Europe to be shipped to non-EU buyers.

Read More: The Ukraine Food Price Crisis is Just a Preview of What Could Happen as Climate Change Worsens

Finally, higher food prices can boost the risk of protests and unrest in countries heavily dependent on food supplies from the Black Sea region. Egypt hopes to buy more Ukrainian grain shipped overland across Europe. A foreign ministry official in Kenya has called Russia’s decision to suspend the grain deal a “stab on the back." [sic] Moscow is aware it now has real PR problems in poorer countries.

For now, food prices are rising but remain at half the high point reached just after Russia’s invasion 17 months ago. And though more uncertainty in Ukraine will create more risks for global food prices, all the relevant players are now better able to manage this fallout.

More Must-Reads from TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

TIME Ideas hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.