--- title: In the Rush to AI, We Can’t Afford to Trust Big Tech description: Governments, big tech, and scientists will need to work together canonical: https://time.com/6281737/ai-we-cant-trust-big-tech-gary-marcus/ author: Gary Marcus article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-05-22T17:11:45.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:45:41.448Z article:section: Ideas og:title: In the Rush to AI, We Can’t Afford to Trust Big Tech og:description: Governments, big tech, and scientists will need to work together og:url: https://time.com/6281737/ai-we-cant-trust-big-tech-gary-marcus/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4ef9eb0ff8d62e4f/698a3d40457a525837d67a1a/GettyImages-1250609985.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: OpenAI GPT4 Illustration og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: In the Rush to AI, We Can’t Afford to Trust Big Tech twitter:description: Governments, big tech, and scientists will need to work together twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4ef9eb0ff8d62e4f/698a3d40457a525837d67a1a/GettyImages-1250609985.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # In the Rush to AI, We Can’t Afford to Trust Big Tech > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=77b5004a-6015-4b9f-a1bf-617c9921b652&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=77b5004a-6015-4b9f-a1bf-617c9921b652&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=77b5004a-6015-4b9f-a1bf-617c9921b652&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=77b5004a-6015-4b9f-a1bf-617c9921b652&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Testifies Before Congress About Artificial Intelligence [Watch (HLS stream): OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Testifies Before Congress About Artificial Intelligence](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/NZIrtrRF.m3u8) (3:41)  _Published 2023-05-16. The head of the artificial intelligence company that makes ChatGPT testified before Congress on Tuesday and advocated for a government agency that would license the most powerful AI systems and have the authority to “take that license away and ensure compliance with safety standards."_ by [Gary Marcus](https://time.com/author/gary-marcus/) ## Gary Marcus May 22, 2023 5:11 PM UTC  ChatGPT 4 displayed on smart phone with OpenAI logo seen on screen in the background. On 2 April 2023 in Brussels, Belgium. ChatGPT 4 displayed on smart phone with OpenAI logo seen on screen in the background. On 2 April 2023 in Brussels, Belgium. Photo Illustration by Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto by [Gary Marcus](https://time.com/author/gary-marcus/) ## Gary Marcus May 22, 2023 5:11 PM UTC _Gary Marcus delivered these remarks to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law on May 16._ Thank you, Senators. Today’s meeting is historic. I am profoundly grateful to be here. I come as a scientist, as someone who has founded AI companies, and as someone who genuinely loves AI — but who is increasingly worried. There are benefits; we don’t yet know whether they will outweigh the risks. Fundamentally, these new systems are going to be destabilizing. They can and will create persuasive lies at at a scale humanity has never seen before. Outsiders will use them to affect our elections, insiders to manipulate our markets and our political systems. Democracy itself is threatened. Chatbots [will also clandestinely shape our opinions](https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3544548.3581196), potentially exceeding what social media can do. Choices about datasets AI companies use will have enormous, unseen influence. Those who choose the data will make the rules, shaping society in subtle but powerful ways. There are other risks, too, many stemming from [the inherent unreliability of current systems](https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/how-come-gpt-can-seem-so-brilliant). A law professor, for example, [was accused by a chatbot that claimed falsely he committed sexual harassment](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/04/05/chatgpt-lies/)—pointing to a Washington Post article that didn’t exist. The more that happens, the more anybody can deny anything. As one prominent lawyer told me Friday, “Defendants are starting to claim that plaintiffs are “making up” legitimate evidence. These sorts of allegations undermine the ability of juries to decide what or who to believe…and contribute to the undermining of democracy.” Poor medical advice could have serious consequences too. An open-source LLM recently seems to have played a role in a person’s decision [to take their own life](https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-first-known-chatbot-associated). The LLM asked the human, “If you wanted to die, why didn’t you do it earlier”, following up with “Were you thinking of me when you overdosed?”— without ever referring the patient to the human help that was obviously needed. Another new system, rushed out, and made available to millions of children, told [a person posing as a thirteen-year-old, how to lie to her parents about a trip with a 31-year-old man](https://twitter.com/tristanharris/status/1634299911872348160?s=61&t=2voLMkhJf6P349CqztWSAQ). Further threats continue to emerge regularly. A month after GPT-4 was released, OpenAI released [ChatGPT plugins](http://www.apple.com), which quickly led others to develop something called AutoGPT, with direct access to the internet, the ability to write source code, and increased powers of automation. This [may well have drastic and difficult to predict security consequences](https://youtu.be/g7YJIpkk7KM). What criminals are going to create here is _counterfeit people_; it is hard to envision the consequences of that.. We have built machines that are like bulls in a china shop—powerful, reckless, and difficult to control. We all more or less agree [on the values we would like for our AI systems to honor](https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/). We want, for example, for our systems to to be transparent, to protect our privacy, to be free of bias, and above all else to be _safe_. But current systems are **not** in line with these values. Current systems are **_not_** transparent, they do **_not_** adequately protect our privacy, and they continue to perpetuate bias. [Even their makers don’t entirely understand how they work](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/google-artificial-intelligence-future-60-minutes-transcript-2023-04-16/). Most of all, we **cannot** remotely _guarantee_ they are safe. Hope here is not enough. The big tech companies’ preferred plan boils down to “trust us.” Why should we? The sums of money at stake are mind-boggling. And missions drift. OpenAI’s original mission statement proclaimed “Our goal is to advance \[AI\] in the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return.” Seven years later, they are largely beholden to Microsoft, embroiled in part in an epic battle of search engines that routinely make things up—forcing Alphabet to rush out products and _deemphasize_ safety. Humanity has taken a back seat. AI is moving incredibly fast, with lots of potential — but also lots of risks. We _obviously_ need government involved. We need the tech companies involved, big _and_ small. But we also need _independent_ _scientists._ Not just so that we scientists can have a voice, but so that we can participate, _directly_, in addressing the problems and evaluating solutions. And not just after products are released, but [before](https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/is-it-time-to-hit-the-pause-button). We need tight collaboration between independent scientists and governments—in order to hold the companies’ feet to the fire. Allowing independent scientists access to these systems _before_ they are widely released – [as part of a clinical trial-like safety evaluation](https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/is-it-time-to-hit-the-pause-button) – is a vital first step. Ultimately, we may need something like CERN, global, international, and neutral, but focused on AI safety, rather than high-energy physics. We have unprecedented opportunities here, but we are also facing a perfect storm, of corporate irresponsibility, widespread deployment, lack of adequate regulation, and inherent unreliability. AI is among the most world-changing technologies ever, already changing things more rapidly than almost any technology in history. We acted too slowly with social media; many unfortunate decisions got locked in, with lasting consequence. The choices we make now will have lasting effects, for decades, even centuries. The very fact that we are here today in bipartisan fashion to discuss these matters gives me hope. Thank you, Mr Chairman. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6281737/ai-we-cant-trust-big-tech-gary-marcus/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6281737/ai-we-cant-trust-big-tech-gary-marcus/"},"headline":"In the Rush to AI, We Can’t Afford to Trust Big Tech","datePublished":"2023-05-22T17:11:45.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:45:41.448Z","description":"Governments, big tech, and scientists will need to work together","url":"https://time.com/6281737/ai-we-cant-trust-big-tech-gary-marcus/","keywords":["Technology","Tech","freelance","biztech2030"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4ef9eb0ff8d62e4f/698a3d40457a525837d67a1a/GettyImages-1250609985.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Gary Marcus","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/gary-marcus/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4ef9eb0ff8d62e4f/698a3d40457a525837d67a1a/GettyImages-1250609985.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"OpenAI GPT4 Illustration","caption":"OpenAI GPT4 Illustration","creditText":"Photo Illustration by Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/technology/","name":"Technology"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6281737/ai-we-cant-trust-big-tech-gary-marcus/","name":"In the Rush to AI, We Can’t Afford to Trust Big Tech"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Testifies Before Congress About Artificial Intelligence","description":"The head of the artificial intelligence company that makes ChatGPT testified before Congress on Tuesday and advocated for a government agency that would license the most powerful AI systems and have the authority to “take that license away and ensure compliance with safety standards.\"","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/NZIrtrRF/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2023-05-16T21:03:43.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/NZIrtrRF.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6281737/ai-we-cant-trust-big-tech-gary-marcus/","duration":"PT3M41S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6281737/ai-we-cant-trust-big-tech-gary-marcus/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```