--- title: How Biden Could Short-Circuit McCarthy on the Debt Ceiling description: President Biden's best deal on debt ceiling negotiations doesn't run through Speaker Kevin McCarthy. He needs to court other House factions instead canonical: https://time.com/6276760/president-biden-mccarthy-debt-ceiling/ author: Philip Wallach article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2023-05-03T17:11:45.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:48:51.517Z article:section: Ideas og:title: How Biden Could Short-Circuit McCarthy on the Debt Ceiling og:description: President Biden's best deal on debt ceiling negotiations doesn't run through Speaker Kevin McCarthy. He needs to court other House factions instead og:url: https://time.com/6276760/president-biden-mccarthy-debt-ceiling/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte87a017cc28a9135/698a3c8c16d8847715c3bcdc/GettyImages-1246877339.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: US-POLITICS-BIDEN-STATE OF THE UNION og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How Biden Could Short-Circuit McCarthy on the Debt Ceiling twitter:description: President Biden's best deal on debt ceiling negotiations doesn't run through Speaker Kevin McCarthy. He needs to court other House factions instead twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte87a017cc28a9135/698a3c8c16d8847715c3bcdc/GettyImages-1246877339.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # How Biden Could Short-Circuit McCarthy on the Debt Ceiling > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=05c8b670-1d0c-4f24-b2c3-2f617980c284&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=05c8b670-1d0c-4f24-b2c3-2f617980c284&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=05c8b670-1d0c-4f24-b2c3-2f617980c284&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: The Fed's Latest Interest Rate Hike Could Set Off a 'Domino Effect' in Regional Bank Failures [Watch (HLS stream): The Fed's Latest Interest Rate Hike Could Set Off a 'Domino Effect' in Regional Bank Failures](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/DbZcwu9Z.m3u8) (2:14)  _Published 2023-05-03. The Federal Reserve reinforced its fight against high inflation Wednesday by raising its key interest rate by a quarter-point to the highest level in 16 years. But the Fed also signaled that it may now pause the streak of 10 rate hikes that have made borrowing for consumers and businesses steadily more expensive._ by [Philip Wallach](https://time.com/author/philip-wallach/) ## Philip Wallach May 3, 2023 5:11 PM UTC  US Vice President Kamala Harris and US Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) applaud as US President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address in the House Chamber of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on February 7, 2023. US Vice President Kamala Harris and US Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) applaud as US President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address in the House Chamber of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on February 7, 2023. Jacquelyn Martin- POOL / AFP by [Philip Wallach](https://time.com/author/philip-wallach/) ## Philip Wallach May 3, 2023 5:11 PM UTC The U.S. Treasury will soon exhaust the “extraordinary measures” currently allowing it to pay the country’s bills on time. We don’t know exactly when—maybe as late as August, but maybe as early as [June](https://apnews.com/article/x-date-debt-ceiling-yellen-treasury-borrowing-f726fd88a9bb7f72e50f0b948731ac57). What is certain is that if our country’s legislators delay raising our statutory debt limit much longer, we risk a [massive](https://time.com/6248656/what-debt-ceiling-means-for-you/) self-inflicted wound. There are two leading visions of how we can avoid calamity—both of which exhibit a regrettable complacency about the political dynamics of Washington. On the one hand there is President Biden’s: there will be no negotiation, and at some point, the House and Senate will both pass a “clean” increase of the debt limit whether they like it or not, because no one will want to take responsibility for bringing on a default. On the other hand is Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s: House Republicans will stick together, almost to a man, which will enable the Speaker to drive a hard bargain with Senate Democrats and the president. Some compromise will be worked out that most members on both sides of the aisle will accept, and a bill increasing the debt limit while (perhaps) putting in place caps on discretionary spending will sail through the House with 300 votes. McCarthy will declare, “Elections have consequences.” The problem is that, while neither of these scenarios is impossible, neither one looks terribly likely, either. For the first to come to pass at least a handful of House Republicans would have to decide to push through a bill that the vast majority of their conference sees as a total capitulation. That would be procedurally fraught and disastrous for party cohesion for the remainder of the 118th Congress. From the beginning, even moderate Republicans such as Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) have [insisted](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/centrist-republican-rules-sidestepping-mccarthy-debt-ceiling-rcna69431) they are against a clean increase bill. Biden and Democrats have no inherent right to a debt limit increase—when they controlled the House and Senate in December 2021, they chose to push through a modest-sized $2.5 trillion increase instead of [going bigger](https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/585087-raise-the-roof-democrats-should-go-big-in-raising-the-debt-ceiling/). Having now lost control of the House of Representatives, they have no choice but to persuade some Republicans. It might take a sizable stock market sell-off before enough pressure mounts, and, of course, it would be best to avoid that. --- ### More from TIME --- The second scenario probably has a better chance, but it requires a good faith negotiation between McCarthy and the White House. Biden has shown remarkably little willingness to enter into such negotiations, and it remains unclear if McCarthy can make concessions to the president without alienating his conference. Indeed, given some of the rhetoric during the Speakership fight in January, it seems that there are a significant number of Republicans (well beyond those who withheld their support from McCarthy through many rounds of voting) who would see any debt limit dealmaking as a sell-out to the Beltway establishment. The House’s recent narrow passage of the Limit, Save and Grow Act of 2023 does very little to change this underlying concern, since the bill was widely understood as an exercise in partisan agenda-setting with no chance of advancing in the Senate. Is there no other way out of this impasse? Some commentators will tell you that the best way is for the President to simply declare that the debt limit is contrary to the 14th Amendment, or for the Treasury Department to issue a trillion-dollar [platinum coin](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/02/business/trillion-dollar-coin-debt-ceiling.html). These exercises in executive self-aggrandizement are horrific ideas which would destabilize markets all on their own. As [counter-productive](https://www.nationalreview.com/2013/10/end-debt-ceiling-philip-wallach/) as the debt limit may be, it is the law of the land, and pretending otherwise would inflame our already acrimonious politics. **_Read More:_** [**_What Republican Work Requirements Do_**](https://time.com/6276193/republicans-work-requirements-debt-ceiling/) What is remarkable is that nobody seems to contemplate a negotiation process that rejects the model of top partisan leaders figuring everything out. That was the dominant model in the Pelosi years, and it is what brought us debt limit compromises in 1996 and 2011\. But it is the exception, not the norm, in American political history, and the difficulty of this present crisis suggests it may not be equal to the moment in 2023. If what the White House needs is a majority coalition for governing in the House, why not try to build one, by identifying potential partners among Republican members, asking them what they need to be able to vote for a debt limit increase, and then attempting to negotiate directly with them? Bacon, for his part, already indicated that he might be open to such an approach when he [told](https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/uphill/moderates-team-up-on-the-debt-ceiling/) Haley Byrd Wilt of _The Dispatch_, “If these negotiations fail, we want to have a landing spot where we can still have a compromise and make progress for the country.” Nor is he some kind of lone wolf. Rather, he is an active member of the Problem Solvers Caucus, which has already shown its seriousness on these issues by offering a sensible [framework](https://problemsolverscaucus.house.gov/media/press-releases/problem-solvers-caucus-endorses-bipartisan-debt-ceiling-framework) for pairing a debt limit increase with a set of reforms meant to help the country get its fiscal house in order in the years ahead. It may thrill some Democrats when Biden insists that attaching any conditions to a debt limit increase amounts to “hostage-taking.” But if he is serious about taking responsibility for governing, he needs to engage with members making reasonable asks. Moderates in particular do not want to go down with the ship. And yet it doesn’t make sense to just assume that they will accede to an increase in exchange for _nothing_. That’s all the White House has been offering so far. For that matter, Biden would be well-advised to try to open lines of communication with lots of Republican factions, from the Main Street Partnership to the Freedom Caucus. Getting these groups to make specific asks would help clarify what is really at issue in this debt limit struggle, even if they failed to produce a deal. The White House would be well-served by positioning itself to treat with factions for the future, rather than assuming it would need every deal to run through McCarthy. One need recall only as far as the Bush administration working with Democratic policy partners on education, health care, tax reform, and defense to see that building bipartisan coalitions does not always require a leadership-endorsed deal. To be sure, a majority coalition of Democrats and moderate Republicans in the House would not have an entirely straightforward path getting a vote on their plan if the Speaker opposed it. But getting hung up on procedural details is beside the point. The House is a majoritarian institution, through and through, such that a determined majority can always find a way. Party discipline has been remarkably steady in recent years, which has made it seem like the Speaker necessarily possesses an iron grip on the House’s agenda. But the potential for a bipartisan majority to assert itself always lurks. It may be time to realize it in pursuing a solution to the debt limit. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6276760/president-biden-mccarthy-debt-ceiling/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6276760/president-biden-mccarthy-debt-ceiling/"},"headline":"How Biden Could Short-Circuit McCarthy on the Debt Ceiling","datePublished":"2023-05-03T17:11:45.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:48:51.517Z","description":"President Biden's best deal on debt ceiling negotiations doesn't run through Speaker Kevin McCarthy. He needs to court other House factions instead","url":"https://time.com/6276760/president-biden-mccarthy-debt-ceiling/","keywords":["Biden Administration","freelance"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte87a017cc28a9135/698a3c8c16d8847715c3bcdc/GettyImages-1246877339.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Wallach","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-wallach/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte87a017cc28a9135/698a3c8c16d8847715c3bcdc/GettyImages-1246877339.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US-POLITICS-BIDEN-STATE OF THE UNION","caption":"US-POLITICS-BIDEN-STATE OF THE UNION","creditText":"Jacquelyn Martin- POOL / AFP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/biden-administration/","name":"Biden Administration"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6276760/president-biden-mccarthy-debt-ceiling/","name":"How Biden Could Short-Circuit McCarthy on the Debt Ceiling"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"The Fed's Latest Interest Rate Hike Could Set Off a 'Domino Effect' in Regional Bank Failures","description":"The Federal Reserve reinforced its fight against high inflation Wednesday by raising its key interest rate by a quarter-point to the highest level in 16 years. But the Fed also signaled that it may now pause the streak of 10 rate hikes that have made borrowing for consumers and businesses steadily more expensive.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/DbZcwu9Z/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2023-05-03T19:53:25.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/DbZcwu9Z.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/6276760/president-biden-mccarthy-debt-ceiling/","duration":"PT2M14S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/6276760/president-biden-mccarthy-debt-ceiling/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```