--- title: Roe v Wade's End and the Politicization of the Supreme Court description: The politicization of abortion began before Roe, and history shows how, over time, the personal became the political on the Supreme Court. canonical: https://time.com/6190861/roe-v-wade-supreme-court-politicized-abortion/ author: Joshua Prager article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-06-24T18:11:43.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-11T04:54:08.928Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The End of Roe, and How the Personal Became Political on the Supreme Court og:description: The politicization of abortion began before Roe, and history shows how, over time, the personal became the political on the Supreme Court. og:url: https://time.com/6190861/roe-v-wade-supreme-court-politicized-abortion/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaabb5983d5932d4b/698a332e47ca387bd53b9bb9/dobbs-scotus-decision-01.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: dobbs-scotus-decision-01 og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The End of Roe, and How the Personal Became Political on the Supreme Court twitter:description: The politicization of abortion began before Roe, and history shows how, over time, the personal became the political on the Supreme Court. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaabb5983d5932d4b/698a332e47ca387bd53b9bb9/dobbs-scotus-decision-01.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The End of Roe, and How the Personal Became Political on the Supreme Court > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=cf338735-50a1-4dbd-8564-ad766cb192e3&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=cf338735-50a1-4dbd-8564-ad766cb192e3&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=cf338735-50a1-4dbd-8564-ad766cb192e3&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Joshua Prager](https://time.com/author/joshua-prager/) ## Joshua Prager Jun 24, 2022 6:11 PM UTC  Demonstrators gather outside the United States Supreme Court as the court rules in the Dobbs v Women's Health Organization abortion case, overturning the landmark Roe v Wade abortion decision in Washington, U.S., June 24, 2022. Demonstrators gather outside the United States Supreme Court as the court rules in the Dobbs v Women's Health Organization abortion case, overturning the landmark Roe v Wade abortion decision in Washington, U.S., June 24, 2022. Michael A. McCoy—Reuters by [Joshua Prager](https://time.com/author/joshua-prager/) ## Joshua Prager Jun 24, 2022 6:11 PM UTC In 1921, the future Supreme Court justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote a book examining how judges write their opinions. Judicial opinions, he asserted, did not simply reflect this or that legal theory but also the judges who wrote them—human beings influenced, as we all are, by upbringing and experience. “All their lives,” wrote Cardozo, “forces which they do not recognize and cannot name, have been tugging at them—inherited instincts, traditional beliefs, acquired convictions; and the resultant is an outlook on life.” He added: “There has been a certain lack of candor in much of the discussion of the theme, or rather perhaps in the refusal to discuss it, as if judges must lose respect and confidence by the reminder that they are subject to human limitations.” When [_Roe_](https://time.com/6189476/abortion-supreme-court-overturns-roe-v-wade/) reached the Supreme Court fifty years later, its justices were no more inclined to discuss how anything but law molded their opinions. Lewis Powell, for one, did not reveal that a few years before, a teenaged messenger at his Virginia law firm came to him for help after an illegal abortion killed his girlfriend. The young man had taken her to the abortion provider, and had since been charged with manslaughter. Powell later told his clerks that this double tragedy was why he had sided with the majority in _Roe_. “I don’t want to live in a country,” he said, “where a young man and a young woman like that are forced to go to a back-alley butcher.” Harry Blackmun, meantime, the justice who wrote the majority _Roe_ opinion, had been working as counsel at the Mayo Clinic when he too encountered women harmed grievously by illegal abortion. But he said nothing publicly of them, just as he said nothing of his own daughter who, in 1966, was derailed by an unwanted pregnancy in college. If the justices did not publicly confide these experiences, Blackmun did assert, in a preamble to _Roe_, that people often form their opinions of abortion based on their exposure to it—to what Blackmun termed “the raw edges of human existence.” He was right. For abortion had not yet been overtaken by politics. Indeed, both Powell and Blackmun had been nominated to the court by the Republican Richard Nixon while their fellow justice, Byron White, who opposed legalizing abortion, had been nominated by the Democrat John Kennedy. Kennedy’s younger brother, Senator Ted Kennedy, also opposed abortion which he described as an affront to his Catholicism. There was thus still room in this country for what Cardozo had called “acquired convictions.” And as the years passed, politicians continued to acquire convictions that ran counter to their parties’ ideologies. Ronald Reagan [endorsed background checks](http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/10/08/republicans-didnt-always-march-to-the-national-rifle-associations-drum/) on buyers of guns after his press secretary was shot. Dick Cheney supported gay marriage after his daughter came out. John McCain co-sponsored an anti-torture amendment years after he himself had been tortured. And Joe Biden, a traditional Catholic, supported the idea of a constitutional amendment that would allow states to overturn Roe. “I’m probably a victim, or a product, however you want to phrase it, of my background,” he explained. Experience trumped politics. When it came to abortion, however, more and more, politics trumped experience.  Pro abortion campaigners in Washington D.C. march for liberalization of US abortion laws, 1971. Leif Skoogfors—Camera Press/Re​dux The politicization of abortion began before _Roe_. In 1971, Nixon about-faced on the matter after his advisor Pat Buchanan suggested that he do so to win Catholic votes. The next year, a referendum in Michigan put the question of abortion on the ballot state-wide. But abortion did not begin to become a partisan issue until 1975 when presidential-candidate Ronald Reagan backed the “aims” of a human life amendment which would grant the unborn personhood. The National Right to Life Committee—which was led by Dr. Mildred Jefferson who had helped bring Reagan into the pro-life fold—challenged the other presidential candidates to take a position on the amendments, thereby turning abortion, wrote the _New York Times_, “into one of the major issues of the 1976 Presidential campaign.” The two political parties responded by adopting, in their official platforms, positions on abortion. **Read More**: [_The Failure of the Feminist Industrial Complex_](https://time.com/6190225/feminist-industrial-complex-roe-v-wade/) By 1980, the GOP was actively using abortion to court not only Catholics but the newly-forming evangelical vote. And after Reagan was elected president, he determined that federal judges, rather than laws, offered a clearer path to toppling _Roe_. He’d appointed more than one hundred of them when in 1984, Americans United for Life, a legal advocacy group, held a press conference titled “Reversing _Roe v. Wade_ through the Courts.” Judges themselves, however, could not be so explicit. This much was clear when in 1987, Reagan nominated to the Supreme Court Robert Bork—a judge who had called _Roe_ a “wholly unjustifiable judicial usurpation of state legislative authority.” Ted Kennedy, who had become pro-choice, warned that “Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions.” After the Senate then rejected Bork’s nomination, Senate confirmation hearings became not only a “proxies on _Roe_,” as one journalist called them, but a charade that left would-be justices to pretend that they had no thoughts on the ruling. More scrutiny of justices meant that there was less room for them to express personal convictions on abortion. For personal conviction would not only remind the public that justices, as Cardozo wrote, were human beings with outlooks on life, but might further be seen as political. Nonetheless, the court could still manage to transcend the politics enveloping abortion as when, in 1992, in the case of _Planned Parenthood v. Casey_, which concerned five abortion regulations, a Supreme Court composed of eight Republican appointees and Byron White preserved the core of Roe: legal abortion through viability. One of the eight was Sandra Day O’Connor. The first female justice on the court, and a married mother of three, she wrote that same year of the influence her newly retired colleague Thurgood Marshall, the first Black justice, had had upon her and their fellow justices. “Justice Marshall,” she [wrote](https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229051), “imparted not only his legal acumen but also his life experiences, constantly pushing and prodding us to respond not only to the persuasiveness of legal argument but also to the power of moral truth.” So O’Connor did. It is unsurprising that the one abortion regulation the plurality opinion in _Casey_ that she helped to write struck down required married women to get consent from their husbands. Noted the opinion: “Women do not lose their constitutionally protected liberty when they marry.” Conservatives were exasperated—most of all with Justice David Souter, the George Bush nominee who helped to orchestrate the _Casey_ ruling by winning over to it both O’Connor and Justice Anthony Kennedy. (Souter argued, in the words of _Casey_, that to overrule a precedent as longstanding as Roe would be to “surrender to political pressure.”) “No More Souters” became a conservative cry. And today, thirty years later, the Supreme Court reflects it. Indeed, in its opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that [struck down Roe](https://time.com/6189476/abortion-supreme-court-overturns-roe-v-wade/), every justice but one voted along party lines. Cardozo would struggle to recognize the court he once served. For one hundred and one years after he observed that justices and their opinions are subject not only to law but life, both have been overtaken by politics.[](#%5Fftnref1)[](#%5Fftnref2) ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6190861/roe-v-wade-supreme-court-politicized-abortion/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6190861/roe-v-wade-supreme-court-politicized-abortion/"},"headline":"The End of Roe, and How the Personal Became Political on the Supreme Court","datePublished":"2022-06-24T18:11:43.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-11T04:54:08.928Z","description":"The politicization of abortion began before Roe, and history shows how, over time, the personal became the political on the Supreme Court.","url":"https://time.com/6190861/roe-v-wade-supreme-court-politicized-abortion/","keywords":["abortion"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaabb5983d5932d4b/698a332e47ca387bd53b9bb9/dobbs-scotus-decision-01.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Joshua Prager","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/joshua-prager/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaabb5983d5932d4b/698a332e47ca387bd53b9bb9/dobbs-scotus-decision-01.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"dobbs-scotus-decision-01","caption":"Demonstrators gather outside the United States Supreme Court as the court rules in the Dobbs v Women's Health Organization abortion case","creditText":"Michael A. McCoy—Reuters","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/abortion/","name":"abortion"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6190861/roe-v-wade-supreme-court-politicized-abortion/","name":"The End of Roe, and How the Personal Became Political on the Supreme Court"}}]}] ```