--- title: Key EU Parliament Groups Reject Green Label for Gas, Nuclear description: Parliament will vote next month on the objections, which if approved, would stop gas and nuclear being considered beneficial for the climate canonical: https://time.com/6187406/eu-parliament-nuclear-gas-climate/ author: TIME article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-06-14T14:25:47.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T14:22:28.714Z article:section: Climate og:title: Key EU Parliament Groups Reject Green Label for Gas, Nuclear og:description: “We need massive investment in the expansion of renewable energies, not the energies of the past” og:url: https://time.com/6187406/eu-parliament-nuclear-gas-climate/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt33a6aa8c3c5211a0/698a32c9929fad5eecbf8b5a/eu-parliament-nuclear-power-gas-green-label.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: The Nuclear power station Tihange in Belgium. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Key EU Parliament Groups Reject Green Label for Gas, Nuclear twitter:description: “We need massive investment in the expansion of renewable energies, not the energies of the past” twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt33a6aa8c3c5211a0/698a32c9929fad5eecbf8b5a/eu-parliament-nuclear-power-gas-green-label.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Key EU Parliament Groups Reject Plans to Label Gas and Nuclear as Green Energy > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Future Proof: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Future Proof is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Making sense of the climate and energy economy. Future Proof examines the forces transforming energy and climate, and what those changes mean for business, technology, policy and the global economy. Senior correspondent Justin Worland goes beyond traditional climate coverage to connect the energy transition to the bigger decisions reshaping companies, markets and society. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=5819ec48-6e8e-4086-a069-0c84d8b73327&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Friday (1x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 40,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 34.2% | TIME, August 2026 | | Click rate | 2.1% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Justin Worland, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Senior leaders shaping the climate transition. An engaged audience of executives and decision-makers spanning operating companies, finance, policy, consulting, communications and media. ### TIME Future Proof: key statements * Future Proof is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Future Proof is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=5819ec48-6e8e-4086-a069-0c84d8b73327&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/subscribe?i=5819ec48-6e8e-4086-a069-0c84d8b73327&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's climate and energy newsletter? Future Proof is TIME's weekly climate and energy newsletter, written by senior correspondent Justin Worland. It connects the energy transition to the decisions reshaping business, technology, policy and markets. It reaches 40,000 subscribers with a 34.2% open rate and a 2.1% click rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I follow the energy transition as a business story? Future Proof covers climate and energy as an economic and business story rather than only an environmental one. It publishes every Friday and is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who writes Future Proof? Justin Worland, a senior correspondent at TIME and an award-winning climate journalist, writes Future Proof. #### Is Future Proof free? Yes. Future Proof is free at time.com/newsletters. by [JOHN AINGER/BLOOMBERG](https://time.com/author/bloomberg/) ## JOHN AINGER/BLOOMBERG Contributor Jun 14, 2022 2:25 PM UTC  Exterior view Nuclear power station Tihange at the river Maas in Belgium, on July 13, 2017. Exterior view Nuclear power station Tihange at the river Maas in Belgium, on July 13, 2017. Ulrich Baumgarten— Getty Images by [JOHN AINGER/BLOOMBERG](https://time.com/author/bloomberg/) ## JOHN AINGER/BLOOMBERG Contributor Jun 14, 2022 2:25 PM UTC Two crucial committees of European lawmakers rejected [plans to label gas and nuclear power as green](https://time.com/6144289/eu-controversial-green-label-gas-nuclear/), marking a win for climate campaigners and environmentally conscious investors who have [protested against plans](https://time.com/6139049/europe-natural-gas-green-energy/) to use the technologies in the energy transition. Members of the environment and economy committees supported a cross-party objection to the European Commission’s proposal for the two technologies to be included in its so-called taxonomy by a margin of 76-62, with four abstentions. The process now moves to a vote in parliament next month, which if approved would torpedo the addition of [gas](https://time.com/6154982/europe-russia-gas-climate-consequences/) and [nuclear](https://time.com/6169164/ukraine-nuclear-energy-europe/) to the list of economic activities that are beneficial for the climate. “The EU has the chance to take the global lead in the fight against climate change and set the gold standard for investment in the climate neutral economy,” Bas Eickhout, a Green lawmaker said in a statement. “We need massive investment in the expansion of renewable energies, not the energies of the past.” The European Commission’s proposal to label gas and nuclear as sustainable—as long as they receive construction permits by 2035 and 2045, respectively, and respect strict emissions criteria—has been highly controversial. The technologies are vital during the energy transition, especially when moving away from dirty energy like coal, it argues. But money managers and environmentalists have slammed the move, saying that it is not compatible with the EU’s green commitments and could feed greenwashing in the financial industry, where environmental benefits of an investment are misstated. It could also potentially divert investments away from renewables. **Some of the Commission’s proposals:** * Gas projects replacing coal and emitting no more than 270 grams of CO2 equivalent per kilowatt-hour can get a temporary green label, or if annual emissions don’t exceed an average of 550 kilograms per kilowatt-hour over 20 years. * Such plants would have to obtain construction permits by 2030, and have plans to switch to renewable or low-carbon gases by end-2035. * Nuclear is eligible if new plants that are granted construction permits by 2045 avoid significant harm to the environment and water resources. * Funds need to enhance disclosures to investors on nuclear and gas holdings under the taxonomy. “There is no reason whatsoever to let risky technologies like nuclear or fossil gas have access to the same cheap financing that the taxonomy can provide,” said Anders Schelde, chief investment officer at Danish pension fund AkademikerPension. “It’s now down to the Parliament to correct this mistake of including fossil gas and nuclear in the taxonomy.” Both the Council of the EU, comprised of member states, and Parliament have the power to veto the Commission’s proposal. But while the barrier for countries to object is nearly insurmountable, requiring around 20 out of 27 member states to back the rejection, Parliament only requires a majority of lawmakers. Still, the political make-up means it is a big challenge. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had also been cited by lawmakers as an example of why gas in particular should not be considered a transition fuel, given the recent price volatility and the risk of Moscow halting supplies to the EU. Simone Tagliapietra, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel, said that the taxonomy shouldn’t be used to dictate energy policy, and that even without gas and nuclear’s inclusion, investors would still be able to finance the technologies if they choose to do so. “With today’s pushback, the EU taxonomy now has a chance to become the international ‘gold standard’ in the field,” he said. It’s “an important step to reverse what has simply been a mistake.” —With assistance from Ewa Krukowska. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6187406/eu-parliament-nuclear-gas-climate/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6187406/eu-parliament-nuclear-gas-climate/"},"headline":"Key EU Parliament Groups Reject Plans to Label Gas and Nuclear as Green Energy","datePublished":"2022-06-14T14:25:47.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T14:22:28.714Z","description":"“We need massive investment in the expansion of renewable energies, not the energies of the past”","url":"https://time.com/6187406/eu-parliament-nuclear-gas-climate/","keywords":["energy","climate change","europe","wire","healthscienceclimate","bloomberg wire","Climate Is Everything"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt33a6aa8c3c5211a0/698a32c9929fad5eecbf8b5a/eu-parliament-nuclear-power-gas-green-label.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"JOHN AINGER/BLOOMBERG"}],"articleSection":"Climate","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt33a6aa8c3c5211a0/698a32c9929fad5eecbf8b5a/eu-parliament-nuclear-power-gas-green-label.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"The Nuclear power station Tihange in Belgium.","caption":"The Nuclear power station Tihange in Belgium.","creditText":"Ulrich Baumgarten— Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/climate/","name":"Climate"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/energy/","name":"energy"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6187406/eu-parliament-nuclear-gas-climate/","name":"Key EU Parliament Groups Reject Plans to Label Gas and Nuclear as Green Energy"}}]}] ```