--- title: To Save Roe, Democrats Pour Cash Into Flipping Statehouses description: Some Democratic strategists plan to spend millions to find and register likely Democrats in parts of key states they had previously ignored. canonical: https://time.com/6176327/democrats-abortion-roe-statehouses-midterms/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-05-12T21:10:06.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T14:15:21.299Z article:section: Politics og:title: To Save Roe, Democrats Pour Cash Into Flipping Statehouses og:description: Some strategists are wishing they had paid more attention to state legislative races in recent years og:url: https://time.com/6176327/democrats-abortion-roe-statehouses-midterms/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaa86fe2dedf943ed/698a31cd86f68e012d6f1383/democrats-dc-brief.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: democrats-dc-brief og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: To Save Roe, Democrats Pour Cash Into Flipping Statehouses twitter:description: Some strategists are wishing they had paid more attention to state legislative races in recent years twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaa86fe2dedf943ed/698a31cd86f68e012d6f1383/democrats-dc-brief.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # To Save Roe’s Protections, Democrats Pour More Money Into Flipping Statehouses > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=aa1beefc-4925-4ee4-a4a7-78d7ee41a95f&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Twice a week | time.com/newsletters, September 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=aa1beefc-4925-4ee4-a4a7-78d7ee41a95f&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=aa1beefc-4925-4ee4-a4a7-78d7ee41a95f&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, twice a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=aa1beefc-4925-4ee4-a4a7-78d7ee41a95f&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1)  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent May 12, 2022 9:10 PM UTC  Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, surrounded by fellow Democrats, makes a statement on the Supreme Court outside the Senate steps in Washington, May 3, 2022. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, surrounded by fellow Democrats, makes a statement on the Supreme Court outside the Senate steps in Washington, May 3, 2022. Tom Brenner—The New York Times/Redux  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent May 12, 2022 9:10 PM UTC _This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up_ [_here_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite) _to get stories like this sent to your inbox._ The numbers are comically small, rounding errors in tallies with far fewer consequences. The non-funny punchline? Races for the state legislature, where as few as a dozen votes could make the difference between which candidate wins, and, in some cases, which party controls a major lever of state government. Because the margins are often so miniscule, a group of Democratic strategists are looking at quickly shelling out millions of dollars to track down likely Democrats and adding them to the voter rolls, no matter how inefficient or costly the chase may be. It’s decidedly unsexy work and can be grueling, but Democrats have for decades been complacent—and, as a [result](https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/partisan-composition.aspx), 54% of state legislators in this country are Republican, and 62% of the state legislative chambers are under Republican control. Put another way: Democrats [outnumber](https://news.gallup.com/poll/388781/political-party-preferences-shifted-greatly-during-2021.aspx) Republicans on voter rolls, but they are concentrated in urban areas while ceding suburban and rural areas to Republicans. Gerrymandering has kept Republicans competitive because they own the sparsely-populated rural parts of states while ceding the cities to the Democrats. The result is diluted Democratic power that doesn’t match their objective clout. Forward Majority, one of the independent [groups](https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-10-08/democratic-party-trump-2016-election-hillary-clinton-activists) that sprung up to fill in the gaps laid [bare](https://time.com/longform/democrat-midterm-strategy/) in Hillary Clinton’s [loss](https://time.com/4565978/how-hillary-clinton-lost/) in 2016, has already spent some $50 million in the years since on getting Democrats competitive again in state legislative races. Now they are joining a newer effort to get out into less densely populated areas and reach some of their hardest-to-reach likely voters. “State legislatures are ground zero in the fight for democracy, but that’s just starting to hit people’s radar,” says Vicky Hausman, a co-founder of Forward Majority. “Every single issue that you care about will be decided in state legislatures.” The frontline priorities for Forward Majority are Arizona, Michigan, and Pennsylvania—three states where independent redistricting programs reset the political boundaries. Strategists estimate that there are as many as 500,000 Democratic-minded allies in those states who are not on voter registration lists. As the theory goes, their participation in the next election could make the difference between continued Republican control of state legislatures in those three states. In 2020, Arizona Democrats could have swung back into control of their legislature with roughly 3,000 more votes. Another 8,600 Michiganders could have done the same, and the gap in Pennsylvania was a still-doable 22,000 votes. In other words, even if only 10% of the new registrations on the list of highly targeted districts show up, that’s a pickup of 25 seats and a check on Republicans in major battleground states. The long-term plans have investments going to Texas, Georgia, and North Carolina, where Forward Majority’s data scientists estimate a combined 1.7 million unregistered Democratic voters live in the six competitive states. Strategists concede that running up tallies in cities is more cost-effective, and has the added benefit of helping statewide candidates, like those running for the White House or Senate. But that still leaves plenty of room for growth in state House and Senate districts in more rural and suburban areas. And some of the maps for those districts are fairer than they’ve been in a long time, if not favoring Democrats. If all of this sounds super-nerdy, it is. But consider what would have happened if then-President Donald Trump had successfully [organized](https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/21/trump-state-legislatures-overturn-election-results-439031) a pressure campaign on Republican-controlled state legislatures in Arizona, Michigan, and Pennsylvania to ignore the results of the 2020 elections and send alternative electors to Washington for the Electoral College vote. It seems insane, but Trump has not relented on his [theory](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2022/election-overturn-plans/) that allies in state capitals can legally do such a [thing](https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/27/opinions/gop-blueprint-to-steal-the-2024-election-luttig/index.html). Congress is dragging its heels in putting in place protections against that kind of bananas effort, as TIME’s Eric Cortellessa [reports](https://time.com/6175720/jan-6-electoral-count-act/) today, and time is running out to do so. That leaves state lawmakers as perhaps the final safeguard to Trump—or someone like him—hijacking the next presidential vote count. Then, there’s the recent shock to Democrats that the Supreme Court appears ready to [overturn](https://time.com/6173931/wisconsin-abortion-roe-supreme-court/) abortion protections embedded in the 1973 _Roe v. Wade_ decision this summer. If that happens, as a leaked Supreme Court ruling suggests, many states will rush to institute new limits or guarantees when it comes to abortion access. Again, Democrats in Congress [appear](https://time.com/6175921/senate-filibuster-roe-wade-abortion/) unable to get their act together to codify abortion rights into federal law, which again leaves state lawmakers in an especially powerful position. “_Roe_ is a wake-up call for a lot of folks, but sadly for anyone who has been working in the state legislative space, it’s in no way a surprise,” Hausman says. The fight for these handful of voters may seem small in the grand debates unfolding over [war](https://time.com/6171279/volodymyr-zelensky-transcript/) in Europe, a [pandemic](https://time.com/tag/covid-19/) that has now claimed 1 million lives, and [threats](https://time.com/6174825/americans-views-abortion/) to a half-century of abortion rights. But when so few voters can tip power in Phoenix, Lansing and Harrisburg, it’s hard for partisans on either side to argue against such an investment. And this group of well-funded Democrats appears poised to spend heavily in the chase for neighbors that they have every reason to believe would vote for their candidates, if only they were registered to vote. _Make sense of what matters in Washington._ [_Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter_](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/signup?nln=dc-brief&source=dc%5Fonsite)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6176327/democrats-abortion-roe-statehouses-midterms/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6176327/democrats-abortion-roe-statehouses-midterms/"},"headline":"To Save Roe’s Protections, Democrats Pour More Money Into Flipping Statehouses","datePublished":"2022-05-12T21:10:06.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T14:15:21.299Z","description":"Democrats have for decades been complacent when it comes to state legislatures.","url":"https://time.com/6176327/democrats-abortion-roe-statehouses-midterms/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","Supreme Court","abortion","democrats","republicans","2022 Midterm Elections"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaa86fe2dedf943ed/698a31cd86f68e012d6f1383/democrats-dc-brief.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltaa86fe2dedf943ed/698a31cd86f68e012d6f1383/democrats-dc-brief.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"democrats-dc-brief","caption":"Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), surrounded by fellow Democrats, makes a statement on the Supreme Court outside the Senate steps","creditText":"Tom Brenner—The New York Times/Redux","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6176327/democrats-abortion-roe-statehouses-midterms/","name":"To Save Roe’s Protections, Democrats Pour More Money Into Flipping Statehouses"}}]}] ```