--- title: Now Is Not the Time To Give in to Climate Fatalism description: There is clearly no time to waste when it comes to climate change, but there's a problem with saying it's "now or never." canonical: https://time.com/6166123/climate-change-fatalism/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2022-04-12T19:05:44.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-30T13:08:26.356Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Now Is Not the Time To Give in to Climate Fatalism og:description: There is clearly no time to waste when it comes to climate change, but there's a problem with saying it's "now or never." og:url: https://time.com/6166123/climate-change-fatalism/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2eb97475df628ee6/698a30cb86f68e7a276f11ab/GettyImages-1239874311.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Protesters march with banners during the demonstration og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Now Is Not the Time To Give in to Climate Fatalism twitter:description: There is clearly no time to waste when it comes to climate change, but there's a problem with saying it's "now or never." twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2eb97475df628ee6/698a30cb86f68e7a276f11ab/GettyImages-1239874311.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Now Is Not the Time To Give in to Climate Fatalism > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a9ccfcd2-3a5a-47ab-8c71-96244f9ba0fb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a9ccfcd2-3a5a-47ab-8c71-96244f9ba0fb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=a9ccfcd2-3a5a-47ab-8c71-96244f9ba0fb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Susan Joy Hassol](https://time.com/author/susan-joy-hassol/) and [Michael E. Mann](https://time.com/author/michael-e-mann/) Apr 12, 2022 7:05 PM UTC  Protesters march with banners during the demonstration. Climate change protest group Extinction Rebellion organized a protest in Central London calling on everyone to stand together for the final push in the plan to end fossil fuels. They believe that people's reliance on fossil fuels is funding wars, driving the cost of living scandal and leading to climate breakdown. This is why they are demanding an immediate end to all new fossil fuel investment. Protesters march with banners during the demonstration. Climate change protest group Extinction Rebellion organized a protest in Central London calling on everyone to stand together for the final push in the plan to end fossil fuels. They believe that people's reliance on fossil fuels is funding wars, driving the cost of living scandal and leading to climate breakdown. This is why they are demanding an immediate end to all new fossil fuel investment.Loredana Sangiuliano-SOPA Images/LightRocket by [Susan Joy Hassol](https://time.com/author/susan-joy-hassol/) and [Michael E. Mann](https://time.com/author/michael-e-mann/) Apr 12, 2022 7:05 PM UTC We are at an agonizing moment in world history. The combined stresses of the war in Ukraine, the climate crisis, and economic troubles stemming from spiking oil and gas prices, inflation, and growing global inequality have pushed us to our limits— geopolitically, environmentally, and psychologically. After centuries of colonialism, intensive resource extraction, and narrow, short-term thinking, the chickens have come home to roost. But what if we could feed three birds with one scone? Following the release of climate reports, such as the recent [IPCC assessments](https://time.com/6152183/ipcc-report-climate-change-adaptation/), we often observe a surge of [doomism](https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2022/0405/Earth-needs-climate-action-not-climate-doomism-scientists-say). When headlines proclaim it’s “[now or never](https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-60984663)” to limit warming, some assume we won’t do what’s needed in time. And if you think there’s nothing we can do, [why bother trying](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/doomsday-scenarios-are-as-harmful-as-climate-change-denial/2017/07/12/880ed002-6714-11e7-a1d7-9a32c91c6f40%5Fstory.html)? Some well-meaning people can be weaponized by those who stand to benefit if we throw up our hands in surrender rather than challenging the fossil fuel industry’s social license. We must stress the _urgency_. There is clearly no time to waste. But [there is _agency_ too](https://behavioralscientist.org/urgency-and-agency-michael-mann-on-conquering-climate-despair/). The problem with “now or never” is that it implies a hard threshold at 1.5°C that if we fail to achieve, it’s game over. But this game will never be over. There is no point beyond which we shouldn’t keep trying to limit warming. Every fraction of a degree matters to the level of suffering climate disruption will rain down on us. We are reaping what we’ve sown in a world that has remained dependent on fossil fuels for far too long. Bad actors like Russia and Saudi Arabia (which have done everything they can [to block global climate action](https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46496967)) have gained tremendous wealth and influence from our dependence on fossil fuels. And they have long held the world hostage with their leverage over oil and gas markets. They have weakened our ability to respond to their various aggressions from a place of strength. With so many crises competing for our attention and concern, how can we prioritize the greatest threats when the more immediate ones so often displace the most important? Someone needs to be thinking about the future, and fittingly, those who will inherit it, are. More than [80 percent of young people are worried](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract%5Fid=3918955) about climate change. And they are angry, as well they should be. Greta Thunberg, Alexandria Villaseñor, Vanessa Nakate, and other leaders of the youth climate movement are fueled with righteous anger against those who have stood by and watched as the world burned. Interesting thing about anger; turns out it’s a more [useful emotion](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278221000018) than anxiety or depression when it comes to climate action. It engages and empowers. There is good cause for righteous anger. There is a villain in this story. The fossil fuel industry, the richest in human history, has [known for decades](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/) the climate damage its products would do. Its own scientists told them decades ago. But instead of releasing the scientific findings and charting a different course, it bankrolled a massive disinformation campaign designed to thwart action on climate change. The industry, and the politicians it supports to do its bidding, have been largely successful in blocking effective measures to rein in climate change. These coal and oil barons say they’re just supplying people with what they want. But we don’t want fossil fuels. What we want is cold beer and hot showers, services like convenient ways to get around and good food to eat. If we can get those in a way that doesn’t destroy our planet’s life-support system, we’d surely prefer that. The IPCC’s [latest report](https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-3/), on climate change mitigation, that is, reducing future climate change by cutting heat-trapping gas emissions or increasing their uptake from the air, tells us that this is entirely possible, using current technologies. Many such actions are on the so-called “demand side,” because they reduce energy demand rather than increasing its supply. The IPCC found that demand-side strategies could reduce 40 to 70 percent of heat-trapping gas emissions across all sectors by 2050\. A pretty astounding finding, and as investigative journalist [Amy Westervelt bemoans](https://www.drilledpodcast.com/debunking-demand-ipcc-mitigation-report-part-1/), why wasn’t this a headline in every paper? Let’s return to our three birds: war in Ukraine, climate change, and the economy. A broader and more integrated approach sees these not as three separate crises but as one with a single win-win-win solution. Now is the time to tackle these related crises and seize the opportunity to move with determination into the clean energy future. The U.S. is in a good position to do so; we’re not starting from scratch. The [U.S. is second (to China) in both wind and solar](https://prod.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2021/supply). Fossil fuel companies can use their expertise, work force, and other resources to become broader energy companies. Their experience in geology can be [turned to geothermal](https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2020/10/21/21515461/renewable-energy-geothermal-egs-ags-supercritical) energy, which has tremendous untapped promise. Their experience in offshore oil can be [turned to offshore wind](https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/oil-companies-offshore-wind/), a resource with enormous potential, and in which the [U.S. lags far behind a dozen](https://www.statista.com/statistics/264264/capacity-of-offshore-wind-power-plants-worldwide-2010/) other nations. [Peabody coal](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-01/after-139-years-of-coal-mining-peabody-is-expanding-into-solar) owns extensive lands that can be used for solar farms and other renewable energy development. These companies have long been [agents of denial and delay](https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/09/oil-companies-discourage-climate-action-study-says/) on climate action. Even now, [big fossil fuel companies continue](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jun/07/wealthy-nations-breaking-climate-pledge-with-gas-dash-in-global-south) to explore for oil and gas and build new infrastructure, [with the support of big banks](https://www.bankingonclimatechaos.org/wp-content/themes/bocc-2021/inc/bcc-data-2022/BOCC%5F2022%5FvSPREAD.pdf). The top four banks making these investments are American: JPMorgan Chase, Citi, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America. [New oil and gas projects are being planned and approved](https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/exxon-mobils-fourth-guyana-offshore-oil-project-gets-environmental-permit-2022-04-01/) as we speak. The world is [on track to produce twice the fossil fuels in 2030](https://productiongap.org/) than would be consistent with the internationally agreed upon 1.5°C target. The time has come for the fossil fuel industry and the banks that fund it to be held accountable and have their social license revoked. The only path to lasting security is to get off fossil fuels, once and for all. Let this be the moment that the U.S. takes the lead in solving the related challenges before us, helping propel the world toward a climate safe, politically secure, and economically prosperous future. It is in _our_ hands. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6166123/climate-change-fatalism/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6166123/climate-change-fatalism/"},"headline":"Now Is Not the Time To Give in to Climate Fatalism","datePublished":"2022-04-12T19:05:44.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-30T13:08:26.356Z","description":"There is clearly no time to waste when it comes to climate change, but there's a problem with saying it's \"now or never.\"","url":"https://time.com/6166123/climate-change-fatalism/","keywords":["climate change"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2eb97475df628ee6/698a30cb86f68e7a276f11ab/GettyImages-1239874311.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Susan Joy Hassol","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/susan-joy-hassol/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Michael E. Mann","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/michael-e-mann/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2eb97475df628ee6/698a30cb86f68e7a276f11ab/GettyImages-1239874311.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Protesters march with banners during the demonstration","caption":"Protesters march with banners during the demonstration","creditText":"Loredana Sangiuliano-SOPA Images/LightRocket","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/climate-change/","name":"climate change"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6166123/climate-change-fatalism/","name":"Now Is Not the Time To Give in to Climate Fatalism"}}]}] ```