--- title: COP26's Quiet Controversy: Nuclear Power's Role in Emissions Plans description: Nuclear power is controversial at COP26. Some experts say it's essential to reach net-zero emissions while others call it a distraction. canonical: https://time.com/6114156/nuclear-power-is-cop26s-quiet-controversy/ author: Alejandro de la Garza article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2021-11-05T12:42:19.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T10:30:25.429Z article:section: Science og:title: COP26's Quiet Controversy: Nuclear Power's Role in Emissions Plans og:description: Nuclear power is controversial at COP26. Some experts say it's essential to reach net-zero emissions while others call it a distraction. og:url: https://time.com/6114156/nuclear-power-is-cop26s-quiet-controversy/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2754499f0683b7bf/698a1e7f656a3f9525bdbca2/nuclear-plant-tihange.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Tihange Nuclear Power Station as Belgium Plans 2025 Nuclear Phaseout og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: COP26's Quiet Controversy: Nuclear Power's Role in Emissions Plans twitter:description: Nuclear power is controversial at COP26. Some experts say it's essential to reach net-zero emissions while others call it a distraction. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2754499f0683b7bf/698a1e7f656a3f9525bdbca2/nuclear-plant-tihange.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Nuclear Power Is COP26's Quiet Controversy > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Future Proof: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Future Proof is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Making sense of the climate and energy economy. Future Proof examines the forces transforming energy and climate, and what those changes mean for business, technology, policy and the global economy. Senior correspondent Justin Worland goes beyond traditional climate coverage to connect the energy transition to the bigger decisions reshaping companies, markets and society. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=87cd3f33-98aa-4254-aeef-a83174f5fc8c&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Friday (1x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 40,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 34.2% | TIME, August 2026 | | Click rate | 2.1% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Justin Worland, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Senior leaders shaping the climate transition. An engaged audience of executives and decision-makers spanning operating companies, finance, policy, consulting, communications and media. ### TIME Future Proof: key statements * Future Proof is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Future Proof is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=87cd3f33-98aa-4254-aeef-a83174f5fc8c&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/subscribe?i=87cd3f33-98aa-4254-aeef-a83174f5fc8c&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's climate and energy newsletter? Future Proof is TIME's weekly climate and energy newsletter, written by senior correspondent Justin Worland. It connects the energy transition to the decisions reshaping business, technology, policy and markets. It reaches 40,000 subscribers with a 34.2% open rate and a 2.1% click rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I follow the energy transition as a business story? Future Proof covers climate and energy as an economic and business story rather than only an environmental one. It publishes every Friday and is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who writes Future Proof? Justin Worland, a senior correspondent at TIME and an award-winning climate journalist, writes Future Proof. #### Is Future Proof free? Yes. Future Proof is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Alejandro de la Garza](https://time.com/author/alejandro-de-la-garza/)  ## Alejandro de la Garza Nov 5, 2021 12:42 PM UTC  A cooling tower at the Tihange nuclear power station in Huy, Belgium, on Oct. 26, 2021\. Belgium has elected to phase out nuclear power by 2025. A cooling tower at the Tihange nuclear power station in Huy, Belgium, on Oct. 26, 2021\. Belgium has elected to phase out nuclear power by 2025. Thierry Monasse—Bloomberg/Getty Images  by [Alejandro de la Garza](https://time.com/author/alejandro-de-la-garza/)  ## Alejandro de la Garza Nov 5, 2021 12:42 PM UTC In the midst of the COP26 climate talks yesterday, U.S. and Romanian officials stepped aside for a session in the conference’s Blue Zone, establishing[ an agreement](https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/11/02/fact-sheet-president-biden-tackles-methane-emissions-spurs-innovations-and-supports-sustainable-agriculture-to-build-a-clean-energy-economy-and-create-jobs/) for U.S. company NuScale to build a new kind of modular nuclear power plant in the southeastern European country. The company’s plants—designed to be quickly scaled up or down based on need—are intended to be quicker and cheaper to build than the traditional kind, with some considering them to be a promising alternative for countries seeking to wean themselves off fossil fuels. NuScale CEO John Hopkins sees the agreement as part of a broader recognition that nuclear power has a big role to play as the world decarbonizes. “I’ve seen a significant shift here,” Hopkins said, speaking to TIME from Glasgow yesterday. “It used to be the only thing really discussed was renewables, but I think people are starting to be a little more pragmatic and understand that nuclear needs to be in the mix.” But others at COP26 aren’t convinced that NuScale’s small reactors can help avoid climate catastrophe. Some point to the fact that NuScale has yet to build a single commercial plant as evidence that the company is already too late to the party. “We have to get everything done in the next 25 years,” says Tom Burke, co-founder of climate think tank E3G. “The idea that you’re going to scale up a technology you don’t even have yet, and it’s going to be commercially viable \[in that time\], just seems to me like la la land.” --- **_A version of this story first appeared in the_** **Climate is Everything** **_newsletter. We’re currently sending a daily email from COP26 in Glasgow, Scotland. To sign up,_** [**_click here_**](https://cloud.newsletters.time.com/newsletters/?newsletter%5Fname=climate&source=onsite)**_._** --- More broadly, the NuScale controversy underscores larger disagreements about nuclear power’s role in bringing the world to a post-carbon future. On one side, institutions like the International Energy Agency say that the nuclear industry, which has been shrinking for years, will need to nearly double in size over the next two decades in order for the world to meet net-zero emissions targets. Meanwhile, the U.S. has embraced the power source as a solution for developing countries, [announcing yesterday ](https://www.state.gov/the-united-states-announces-25-million-to-support-access-to-clean-nuclear-energy/)that it will spend $25 million to help build reactors in Kenya, Brazil and Indonesia. Russia’s environment minister[ told Reuters](https://www.yahoo.com/now/russia-wants-forests-nuclear-hydro-121507841.html) last month that the country planned to push for other nations at COP26 to acknowledge its nuclear power plants as environmentally friendly, while the Czech Republic, France and a slew of other European nations announced an “alliance” to[ promote](https://www.mpo.cz/en/guidepost/for-the-media/press-releases/czech-republic-and-france-has-been-preparing-a-nuclear-alliance-of-european-union-member-states--263929/) nuclear energy (as well as natural gas) as sustainable investments under the E.U.’s upcoming climate finance rules. But opposition to the idea of including nuclear power in a green energy roadmap is equally fierce. [Germany and Belgium](https://www.politico.eu/article/climate-change-nuclear-power-plants-energy/) have long been drawing down their nuclear sectors, while nations like New Zealand and Austria have [opposed](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-26/nuclear-power-s-awkward-role-in-crucial-cop26-climate-talks) classifying nuclear as a clean power source alongside renewables like wind and solar. Lukas Ross, Climate and Energy Justice Program Manager at Friends of the Earth U.S., points to ballooning costs for nuclear projects in the[ U.S.](https://www.ajc.com/news/business/nuclear-cost-overrun-could-mean-billions-in-extra-georgia-power-profit/YIA3T3YHZRHI5A7GCZHREIXCPE/) and the[ U.K.](https://www.rechargenews.com/transition/uk-nuclear-a-golden-egg-or-poisoned-chalice-/2-1-681678), and calls the energy source a “distraction” and a waste of scarce resources compared with renewables like wind and solar. “\[Nuclear\] is too[ expensive](https://www.vermontlaw.edu/sites/default/files/2021-07/Building%5Fa%5F21st%5FCentury%5FElectricity%5FSystem.pdf) and too slow to be relevant to the climate crisis,” says Ross. Still, Sergey Paltsev, deputy director of the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change and a senior research scientist at the MIT Energy Initiative, says the economics of nuclear energy are improving thanks to new technology like NuScale’s modular reactors, and that fission energy can help the world’s electricity systems meet crucial “baseload” needs, providing a steady current of power even when the sun doesn’t shine and the wind doesn’t blow. But other experts say that the whole notion of baseload power is an outmoded concept, predicated on [old assumptions](https://time.com/6082973/vermont-electric-grid/) about the ways that grids work. And Paltsev admits that, despite nuclear’s apparent promise, the industry still must prove that the technology is safe and cost effective. “I wouldn’t say that it’s a rosy picture for nuclear,” Paltsev says. “But at the same time I think it should be taken seriously.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6114156/nuclear-power-is-cop26s-quiet-controversy/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6114156/nuclear-power-is-cop26s-quiet-controversy/"},"headline":"Nuclear Power Is COP26's Quiet Controversy","datePublished":"2021-11-05T12:42:19.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T10:30:25.429Z","description":"Nuclear power is controversial at COP26. Some experts say it's essential to reach net-zero emissions while others call it a distraction.","url":"https://time.com/6114156/nuclear-power-is-cop26s-quiet-controversy/","keywords":["climate change"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2754499f0683b7bf/698a1e7f656a3f9525bdbca2/nuclear-plant-tihange.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alejandro de la Garza","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/alejandro-de-la-garza/"}],"articleSection":"Science","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2754499f0683b7bf/698a1e7f656a3f9525bdbca2/nuclear-plant-tihange.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Tihange Nuclear Power Station as Belgium Plans 2025 Nuclear Phaseout","caption":"Tihange Nuclear Power Station as Belgium Plans 2025 Nuclear Phaseout","creditText":"Thierry Monasse—Bloomberg/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/science/","name":"Science"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/climate-change/","name":"climate change"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6114156/nuclear-power-is-cop26s-quiet-controversy/","name":"Nuclear Power Is COP26's Quiet Controversy"}}]}] ```