<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/6078388/myth-generous-unemployment-benefits/" -->

---
title: Ungenerous Unemployment Explains Why People Can&#x27;t Get Jobs
description: We should be more generous, not less, with our unemployment benefits. It helps people find and keep jobs.
canonical: https://time.com/6078388/myth-generous-unemployment-benefits/
author: Sarah Damaske
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2021-07-07T16:47:20.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T10:05:48.134Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: The U.S. Spends Less Than Nearly Every Country on Unemployment. That&#x27;s Why People Can&#x27;t Get Jobs.
og:description: We should be more generous, not less, with our unemployment benefits. It helps people find and keep jobs.
og:url: https://time.com/6078388/myth-generous-unemployment-benefits/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c0f25307f0c90bc/698a1ae88fd2eeef4c362b3b/unemployment-benefits.jpeg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 1024
og:image:height: 576
og:image:alt: The Food Bank For New York City Holds Distribution Event For Those In Need At Lincoln Center
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: The U.S. Spends Less Than Nearly Every Country on Unemployment. That&#x27;s Why People Can&#x27;t Get Jobs.
twitter:description: We should be more generous, not less, with our unemployment benefits. It helps people find and keep jobs.
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c0f25307f0c90bc/698a1ae88fd2eeef4c362b3b/unemployment-benefits.jpeg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c0f25307f0c90bc/698a1ae88fd2eeef4c362b3b/unemployment-benefits.jpeg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# The U.S. Spends Less Than Nearly Every Country on Unemployment. That's Why People Can't Get Jobs.

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="c0d79b99-be0f-42a1-bdcc-10ae6c72bc38" campaign="time-nl-network-2026q3" creative="time-nl-network-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c0d79b99-be0f-42a1-bdcc-10ae6c72bc38&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### The seven newsletters

| Newsletter | Covers | Frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily |
| Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily |
| Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) |
| Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) |
| In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) |

Source: TIME, August 2026.

### Key data points

| Metric | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 |
| Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Publishing since | 1923 | TIME |

### TIME Newsletters: key statements

*   Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read.
*   All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c0d79b99-be0f-42a1-bdcc-10ae6c72bc38&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).
*   The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=c0d79b99-be0f-42a1-bdcc-10ae6c72bc38&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What newsletters does TIME publish?

TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.

#### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?

It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.

#### Are TIME's newsletters free?

Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.

#### Who writes TIME's newsletters?

TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.

#### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?

Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What newsletters does TIME publish?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Are TIME's newsletters free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's newsletters?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Sarah Damaske](https://time.com/author/sarah-damaske/)


## Sarah Damaske


Jul 7, 2021 4:47 PM UTC

![The Food Bank For New York City Holds Distribution Event For Those In Need At Lincoln Center](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c0f25307f0c90bc/698a1ae88fd2eeef4c362b3b/unemployment-benefits.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

New Yorkers in need wait in a long line to receive free produce, dry goods, and meat at a Food Bank For New York City distribution event at Lincoln Center on July 29, 2020 in New York City.

New Yorkers in need wait in a long line to receive free produce, dry goods, and meat at a Food Bank For New York City distribution event at Lincoln Center on July 29, 2020 in New York City. Scott Heins/Getty Images

by 

[Sarah Damaske](https://time.com/author/sarah-damaske/)


## Sarah Damaske


Jul 7, 2021 4:47 PM UTC

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported significant job growth in June: [850,000 new jobs](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm). But with the unemployment rate stubbornly stuck at [5.9 percent](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm), the debate about whether generous federal unemployment benefits keep people from returning to work continues. Last month, an Indiana state court judge, citing possible “irreparable harm” to the unemployed, ruled Indiana must continue participation in the federal unemployment benefits program. But twenty-five other states have [ended](https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/15/business/unemployment-benefits-end-date.html) or will soon end their use of federal unemployment benefits. Since a weaker than expected jobs report in April, there has been a steady drumbeat of [calls](https://www.uschamber.com/press-release/us-chamber-calls-ending-300-weekly-supplemental-unemployment-benefits-address-labor) to eliminate the current federal supplement of $300 a week, as well as other federal unemployment extensions, based on the [presumption](https://www.wsj.com/articles/millions-are-unemployed-why-cant-companies-find-workers-11620302440) that these benefits dampen the unemployed’s desire to return to work.

This is the wrong approach. There is little evidence generous [benefits](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/audio/2021-05-07/balance-of-power-jared-bernstein-on-slow-job-growth) discourage [employment](https://www.dropbox.com/s/q0kcoix35jxt1u4/UI%5FEmployment%5FHPS.pdf?dl=0). In fact, there appears to have been [_less_](https://www.hiringlab.org/2021/06/22/job-postings-through-june-18-2021/) job search activity in the states that have ended their use of federal unemployment benefits early. Another [study](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109722) found that when the augmented benefits from the Cares Act expired at the end of July 2020, workers became no more likely to return to work than they had been when they were receiving double the benefit the month before. In fact, the best national level data suggests there are either [no](http://reparti.free.fr/dube720.pdf) or [negligible](https://equitablegrowth.org/unemployment-insurance-might-increase-unemployment-but-only-slightly/) effects of having more generous unemployment benefits on labor supply.

Instead, we _need_ generous benefits to help people find and keep work. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports show that while nearly [15 million Americans](https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf) are receiving some form of unemployment insurance, there are only [9 million job openings](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/jolts.nr0.htm). Despite the rhetoric about [labor shortages](https://www.epi.org/blog/job-and-wage-growth-do-not-point-to-an-economy-wide-labor-shortage/), there are not enough jobs to go around. People have a difficult time [searching](https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219869381) for work if they are overwhelmed by a sudden drop into [poverty](https://www.epi.org/publication/state-of-working-america-wages-in-2020/#:~:text=Compared%20with%20other%20recent%20recessions,%25%20of%20the%20wage%20distribution%29). More generous benefits give workers the [time](http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001699305050985) they need to find jobs that fit their [skillsets](http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jae.2293) and their family’s needs. After nearly a decade of studying the unemployed, I am certain that the U.S. won’t reach an economic recovery for everyone unless we fix our unemployment system.


The pandemic was particularly hard on [low-wage workers](https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and-inequality/tracking-the-covid-19-recessions-effects-on-food-housing-and), who constituted [80%](https://www.epi.org/publication/state-of-working-america-wages-in-2020/#:~:text=Compared%20with%20other%20recent%20recessions,%25%20of%20the%20wage%20distribution%29) of the net jobs lost in 2020 and are disproportionately likely to face hardship—even poverty—during a period of unemployment, particularly Black and Latino [workers](https://equitablegrowth.org/research-on-race-and-consumption-shows-why-racial-disparities-in-unemployment-insurance-receipt-are-detrimental-to-economic-recovery-in-the-united-states/). The supplemental unemployment [benefits](https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/2020-report-economic-well-being-us-households-202105.pdf) have done exactly what FDR and his Secretary of Labor, Frances Perkins, [designed](https://www.fdrlibrary.org/perkins) them to do: spare unemployed workers and their families from [material hardship](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104273). But they also did something else: help the unemployed [return](https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/06/opinion/jobs-report-wages-unemployment-covid.html) to work.

Five years after the Great Recession, from 2013 to 2016, as part of a National Science Foundation funded research project to understand the social and economic experiences of the unemployed, I conducted a series of repeated in-depth interviews with 100 men and women of varying education levels and occupational backgrounds who had lost a job and were unemployed in the state of Pennsylvania. When I met Tracy, a single mom of two, she had been unemployed for almost three months. Her unemployment compensation was $154 per week. When we discussed what would happen next in her life, she said, “I hope to get back to work as soon as possible.” Yet when I asked about her job search details, she reluctantly shook her head, stating, “I’m not going to lie, I haven’t \[looked\].”


Tracy’s story sometimes surprises people: Don’t the unemployed need to search for work? Isn’t that need partly driven by state requirements surrounding unemployment benefits? And, perhaps more urgently for Tracy and her kids, isn’t that need driven also by the financial pressure she faced once she was unemployed?

In most states, those who receive unemployment insurance _do_ face fairly rigid job search requirements. Yet neither state mandates nor financial pressures ensure the start of a job search. In fact, I found that the greater the financial pressure, the harder it is to search for work and have a successful outcome. As weekly benefit [rates](https://equitablegrowth.org/the-importance-of-an-expanded-u-s-unemployment-insurance-system-during-the-coronavirus-recession/) range from only one-third to about half of one’s prior weekly wages (and the minimum allowable benefit is a meager [$5](https://equitablegrowth.org/fool-me-once-investing-in-unemployment-insurance-systems-to-avoid-the-mistakes-of-the-great-recession-during-covid-19/) a week), families can find themselves thrown immediately into [poverty](https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20337) after a job loss.

When I met Tracy, it seemed like a “good” time to be unemployed. The recession was over, [business](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjY8%5F2zrOjwAhX5EVkFHTueBT0QFnoECAsQAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2018%2F07%2F13%2Fbusiness%2Feconomy%2Fwages-workers-profits.html&usg=AOvVaw1oLIldPjZAqud5JPIKLrER) was booming, and the stock market was headed toward Wall Street’s [longest-ever](https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2018/08/21/bull-market-longest/1042011002/) winning streak. But this good news masked troubling trends: [five](https://www.cbpp.org/research/economy/the-legacy-of-the-great-recession) years after the Great Recession ended, the unemployment rate remained over 6%. The long-term unemployment rate (those who have been out of work for over six months) had declined, but was still [triple](https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2016/article/unemployment-rate-nears-prerecession-level-by-end-of-2015.htm) what it had been before the Great Recession. Between 2013 and 2015, [7.5 million](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiCu-X7qujwAhXgKVkFHcIIAAAQFnoECAUQAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bls.gov%2Fnews.release%2Farchives%2Fdisp%5F08252016.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3nqe5WH1D9KQxMOqDaOdz9) Americans still lost jobs.


Even though there were [signs](https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/the-depressed-economy-is-all-about-austerity/) the recovery had not reached all workers, our support of the unemployed quickly dwindled after the Great Recession. In 2012, nearly [2.5 million unemployed](https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/updated%5Fui%5Freport%5F-%5Ffinal.pdf) workers and their families were kept out of poverty by a combination of unemployment insurance and the Emergency Unemployment Compensation. By [the end of 2013](https://www.epi.org/blog/leaving-extended-unemployment-benefits-budget/), emergency benefits expired. In 2001, [nearly half](https://www.cbpp.org/research/addressing-longstanding-gaps-in-unemployment-insurance-coverage) of the unemployed qualified for benefits compared to as few as [a quarter](https://s27147.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/Closing-Doors-UI-Fact-Sheets.pdf) in 2020\. [All states](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjJi5WE65zwAhXVVDUKHRApDsoQFjABegQIBRAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.epi.org%2F2015%2Fhow-low-can-we-go-state-unemployment-r3.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3krjkavrziMUvIApW31NBh) offered at least 26 weeks of unemployment insurance benefits before the Great Recession; some offered [as few as 12 weeks](https://www.cbpp.org/research/introduction-to-unemployment-insurance#%5Fftnref9) by 2020\. To put it plainly, we looked at the devastation of the Great Recession and somehow decided to be less generous with the unemployed.

We should be [more generous](https://equitablegrowth.org/unemployment-insurance-reform-primer/), not less, with our unemployment benefits. The United States [spends less](https://data.oecd.org/socialexp/public-unemployment-spending.htm) than nearly every other country on its unemployment program. The result is the [underfunded](https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/21/business/economy/unemployment-insurance.html) and inadequate system that let down so many unemployed this past year. We must seriously consider adopting a federal unemployment system like that [proposed in June](https://equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Reforming-Unemployment-Insurance-June-2021.pdf) by labor experts from seven organizations to expand unemployment insurance eligibility, tie benefit duration to federal and state unemployment rates, and make the replacement rates more generous for those at the bottom of the wage pool.


In September, we will return to unemployment benefits funded almost entirely by states that have been relatively ungenerous during non-recessionary periods. This is alarming, as over [40%](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm) of the unemployed have been out of work for over six months (a rate [unseen](https://www.cbpp.org/research/economy/the-legacy-of-the-great-recession) in over half a century, except for the Great Recession). It will be hard for those like Tracy to find work in such an economy.

Until we realize that a lack of generosity prevents workers from searching for work, our unemployment system will continue to fail those who need it the most.

_Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation._

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/6078388/myth-generous-unemployment-benefits/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/6078388/myth-generous-unemployment-benefits/"},"headline":"The U.S. Spends Less Than Nearly Every Country on Unemployment. That's Why People Can't Get Jobs.","datePublished":"2021-07-07T16:47:20.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T10:05:48.134Z","description":"We should be more generous, not less, with our unemployment benefits. It helps people find and keep jobs.","url":"https://time.com/6078388/myth-generous-unemployment-benefits/","keywords":["Economy"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c0f25307f0c90bc/698a1ae88fd2eeef4c362b3b/unemployment-benefits.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Sarah Damaske","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/sarah-damaske/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4c0f25307f0c90bc/698a1ae88fd2eeef4c362b3b/unemployment-benefits.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"The Food Bank For New York City Holds Distribution Event For Those In Need At Lincoln Center","caption":"The Food Bank For New York City Holds Distribution Event For Those In Need At Lincoln Center","creditText":"Scott Heins/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/economy/","name":"Economy"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/6078388/myth-generous-unemployment-benefits/","name":"The U.S. Spends Less Than Nearly Every Country on Unemployment. That's Why People Can't Get Jobs."}}]}]
```

