--- title: The COVID-19 Recession Should Be So Much Worse description: Why isn’t this a new Great Depression when the jobs numbers are Great Depression-like? Our unequal system explains a lot. canonical: https://time.com/5861134/covid-19-recession-should-be-worse/ author: Zachary Karabell article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-06-29T16:20:46.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:52:03.234Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The COVID-19 Recession Should Be So Much Worse. Why Hasn't It Been? og:description: Why isn’t this a new Great Depression when some of the jobs and other numbers are Great Depression-like? og:url: https://time.com/5861134/covid-19-recession-should-be-worse/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1d86cae1accd6767/698a0fd0db2987418b2658cc/us-economy-covid.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: US-HEALTH-VIRUS-BUSINESS og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The COVID-19 Recession Should Be So Much Worse. Why Hasn't It Been? twitter:description: Why isn’t this a new Great Depression when some of the jobs and other numbers are Great Depression-like? twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1d86cae1accd6767/698a0fd0db2987418b2658cc/us-economy-covid.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The COVID-19 Recession Should Be So Much Worse. Why Hasn't It Been? > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=3b8c3c92-9b7d-460f-80d9-8267c1f2d0e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=3b8c3c92-9b7d-460f-80d9-8267c1f2d0e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=3b8c3c92-9b7d-460f-80d9-8267c1f2d0e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=3b8c3c92-9b7d-460f-80d9-8267c1f2d0e6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: TIME 100 Talks With Andrew Yang [Watch (HLS stream): TIME 100 Talks With Andrew Yang](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/fDuFrmTZ.m3u8) (20:34)  _Published 2020-06-29. Andrew Yang talks with TIME about a potential Biden administration Cabinet role, and what needs to get done before focusing on reparations._ by [Zachary Karabell](https://time.com/author/zachary-karabell/) ## Zachary Karabell Jun 29, 2020 4:20 PM UTC  A man walks past a store going out of business in Brooklyn, New York on May 5, 2020. A man walks past a store going out of business in Brooklyn, New York on May 5, 2020. Angela Weiss—AFP via Getty Images by [Zachary Karabell](https://time.com/author/zachary-karabell/) ## Zachary Karabell Jun 29, 2020 4:20 PM UTC Nearly four months into the COVID-19 crisis, we are witnessing continued evidence of not just cost in lives lost but the economic devastation as well, with the [new surge in cases in states](https://time.com/5858539/us-covid19-cases-surge-two-month-high/) previously spared casting doubt on everything from the opening of theme parks and sporting events to the viability of interstate travel. And yet, as bad as things are economically, it remains an open question why things aren’t worse. The answer is simple, and challenging: we may all be in this together as humans facing a virus but we are not equally in this together in bearing the economic toll. We are not all in this together, by class or, as the recent protests amply highlight, by race, but we have a story in this country that says we are, and that story subtly shapes how we tell our economic narrative as well. We act as if the fact that many of us are hard hit means that the system must therefore be as well. And make no mistake, a less-bad economy in the age of COVID-19 is still a very bad one. But it is not an equally distributed less bad, just as it was not an equally or even equitably distributed good when times were better. The upside to that downside is that the system itself isn’t as harshly impacted; the downside is that the [brunt hits those least able to bear it](https://time.com/5833008/us-unemployment-coronavirus/). The national unemployment rate is likely at about 15%, given that [20 million](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/25/business/economy/coronavirus-unemployment-claims.html) people are receiving unemployment benefits, and the number who are underemployed is considerably higher. You would think that would translate into an economy-wide catastrophe, but while specific industries have been devastated, overall economic activity has not declined in sync with job losses. The sharp hit during April has been followed by a sharp rebound in many industries. Retail sales [increased 17%](https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/marts%5Fcurrent.pdf) in May and are only down 6% from May of 2019, which is bad but nowhere near as extreme as the job losses or the catering of air travel and the shuttered movie businesses for instance. New home sales in May not only [rebounded](http://nahbnow.com/2020/06/new-home-sales-jump-in-may-as-housing-rebound-continues/?%5Fga=2.181394279.1556914528.1593100814-46951296.1593100814) from their April crater but were up from May of 2019, which is rather extraordinary given how challenging things are now and how robust the economy was a year ago. And of course, then there is the stock market, which is up nearly 40% from the lows in March and as of late June is down about 5% year to date for the S&P 500\. Markets have one benefit that no person has: the [backstop of the Federal Reserve](https://time.com/5851870/federal-reserve-coronavirus/), which is committed to supplying almost endless liquidity in order to ensure no repeat of the 2008-2009 financial collapse. It is undoubtedly a good thing that the financial system is not currently imperiled, but it creates an even starker contrast when 20 million Americans are receiving unemployment benefits and millions more not even seeking employment. Markets aside, why aren’t those tens of millions out of work having a more immediate negative impact? Why isn’t there an echo of the Great Depression when some of the numbers are Great Depression-like? There are two reasons, one positive and one decidedly not. The positive reason is that for all the clunky ineptitude of the social safety nets created in April by Congress in the form of direct payments, small business relief and expanded unemployment benefits, those considerable amounts of money ended up buoying the depressed fortunes of tens of millions of people. In fact, given the extra $600 a week emergency supplement provided by the federal government, many people at the lower end of the wage spectrum pre-COVid have been taking home more money weekly than when they were employed. The [average amount](https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/many-americans-are-getting-more-money-from-unemployment-than-they-were-from-their-jobs/) earned by the 40 million people who have received unemployment at some point since March was less than $750 a week; the average amount received under the various emergency programs? $970 a week. That helps explain why overall economic activity hasn’t declined in lock-step with unemployment or with the contraction of so many industries. Those juiced benefits are due to expire in July, however, raising the prospect that unless those are extended further the trajectory will worsen. The other reason isn’t so benign. In terms of unemployment statistics and how we discuss work, a job is a job is a job. But in terms of wages and a living wage, all jobs are not created equal. Not even close. For many millions of jobs, the pay is barely above what constitutes the poverty line and isn’t enough to cover food and shelter for one person let alone a family. Hence the strong push in recent years to raise the minimum wage to at least $15 an hour, which many cities such as Seattle have done but which the federal government has not. In the current crisis, the preponderance of job losses have been human service industries, ones that depend of face-to-face contact and cannot be shifted via Zoom into the digital realm. Those industries – restaurants, hospitality, travel, tourism, retail stores, events – are also amongst the lowest paid. Overall, [average earnings](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t19.htm) in the U.S. are $28 an hour. But earnings for leisure and hospitality are $16 an hour and for retail $20 an hour. Those tens of millions of workers were never accounting for the same level of consumer spending or home sales or travel dollars or economic activity as the tens of millions who work in construction or manufacturing or technology or higher-end service industries such as finance and consulting or public servants like teachers and police. The result is that you can have 15-20% unemployment with 40 million people out of work at one point or another in the past months and not have a one-to-one hit to economic activity. One powerful lesson of the past months is that massive government assistance actually matters and when it is large and direct and not funneled through humiliating hoops of means-testing and people having to justify their vulnerability and need, you can actually maintain a fair amount of human activity and meet people’s needs. Providing nearly $1,000 a week to people for a few months has been a _raise_ for many of them, which has provided a glimpse into how much we have fallen short of providing a basic level to all people in an affluent society. It is hard to see silver linings in a crisis this deadly, but if we learn that no, we aren’t all in this equally, but yes we have the means to ameliorate those inequities, then the crisis will not have been all for the worst. It will have been the long-needed wake up that we have the power to provide basic economic security to everyone. All that has been lacking till now is the will to do so. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5861134/covid-19-recession-should-be-worse/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5861134/covid-19-recession-should-be-worse/"},"headline":"The COVID-19 Recession Should Be So Much Worse. Why Hasn't It Been?","datePublished":"2020-06-29T16:20:46.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:52:03.234Z","description":"Why isn’t this a new Great Depression when the jobs numbers are Great Depression-like? Our unequal system explains a lot.","url":"https://time.com/5861134/covid-19-recession-should-be-worse/","keywords":["COVID-19"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1d86cae1accd6767/698a0fd0db2987418b2658cc/us-economy-covid.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Zachary Karabell","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/zachary-karabell/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1d86cae1accd6767/698a0fd0db2987418b2658cc/us-economy-covid.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US-HEALTH-VIRUS-BUSINESS","caption":"US-HEALTH-VIRUS-BUSINESS","creditText":"Angela Weiss—AFP via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/covid-19/","name":"COVID-19"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5861134/covid-19-recession-should-be-worse/","name":"The COVID-19 Recession Should Be So Much Worse. Why Hasn't It Been?"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"TIME 100 Talks With Andrew Yang","description":"Andrew Yang talks with TIME about a potential Biden administration Cabinet role, and what needs to get done before focusing on reparations.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/fDuFrmTZ/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2020-06-29T17:07:02.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/fDuFrmTZ.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5861134/covid-19-recession-should-be-worse/","duration":"PT20M34S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5861134/covid-19-recession-should-be-worse/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```