--- title: Study: EPA Not Imposing Laws to Protect Kids from Pesticides description: A new study found that the EPA is only applying legally mandated safety standards to 5 of 47 non-organophosphate pesticides. canonical: https://time.com/5782994/pesticides-kids-epa/ author: Jeffrey Kluger article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-02-12T23:30:43.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T08:14:12.095Z article:section: Health og:title: When it Comes to Pesticides and Kids, The EPA Looks the Other Way og:description: A good law goes unenforced og:url: https://time.com/5782994/pesticides-kids-epa/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7ca723e0633b4beb/698a0a2ce76ad249e46373cc/Pesticides.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: Fighting a fruit fly outbreak, pesticides are sprayed under an avocado tree in Florida og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: When it Comes to Pesticides and Kids, The EPA Looks the Other Way twitter:description: A good law goes unenforced twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7ca723e0633b4beb/698a0a2ce76ad249e46373cc/Pesticides.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # New Study Shows That When It Comes to Pesticides and Kids, the EPA Has Looked the Other Way > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6ccd07c9-ebe7-4e84-be67-246d13a6cf77&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6ccd07c9-ebe7-4e84-be67-246d13a6cf77&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=6ccd07c9-ebe7-4e84-be67-246d13a6cf77&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6ccd07c9-ebe7-4e84-be67-246d13a6cf77&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Feb 12, 2020 11:30 PM UTC  Fighting a fruit fly outbreak, pesticides are sprayed under an avocado tree in Florida in 2015. Fighting a fruit fly outbreak, pesticides are sprayed under an avocado tree in Florida in 2015. Getty Images  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Feb 12, 2020 11:30 PM UTC It’s easy to lose count of all of the pesticides that are sprayed on crops in the U.S., and well-nigh impossible to know all of the names (dichloropropene and pyraclostrobin and spinetoram and on and on). But it’s not hard to guess who gets hit hardest by all of these chemicals: kids, whose brain, nervous and hormonal systems are still developing at the time of exposure. What’s more, a new pesticide introduced today will have fewer years to build up in the tissues of, say, a 50-year old, compared to a child who will accumulate a lifetime load of the stuff. That’s the biggest reason that, in 1996, Congress passed and President Bill Clinton signed the [Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)](https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-food-quality-protection-act). The legislation represented one of the most effective crackdowns on pesticides in the food supply to date, requiring the Environmental Protection Agency not simply to establish a safe threshold of exposure for the population as a whole, but to limit permissible levels much further—10-fold further in fact—to ensure that children are protected too. The legislation benefits everyone of course: Ten times less pyraclostrobin on your apple is a good thing no matter how old you are, but it’s children who are the most important beneficiaries. But a law is only as good as its enforcement and [a new study](https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-020-0571-6) conducted by the [Environmental Working Group](https://www.ewg.org/), —a nonprofit advocacy organization—and published in the journal [_Environmental Health_](https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/) found that when it comes to the FQPA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is laying down on the job. The group surveyed 47 non-organophosphate pesticides—a category that tends to persist in soils—and found that the 10-fold safety standard was being applied only to five of them. “The FQPA was a revolution in how we think about pesticides’ effects on children,” said Environmental Working Group president Ken Cook in a statement accompanying the release of the study, “but it does no good if the EPA doesn’t use it.” In response to the study’s release, an EPA spokesperson told TIME: “EPA takes our commitment to protect public health, including our most vulnerable populations, and following the law seriously. EPA uses the default 10X safety factor unless a wealth of high-quality, peer-reviewed data has shown an alternative safety factor can provide an equal amount of protection.” The study, which stands by the the ten-fold standard as the true gold standard, looked back at FQPA enforcement from as early as 2011, during the Obama administration—generally seen as an environmentally friendly presidency—and saw the same spotty pesticide enforcement even then. But the Obama White House did take some proactive steps, seeking to extend the 10-fold standard to organophosphate pesticides as well, which break down relatively quickly, [according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention](https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/clusters/fallon/organophosfaq.htm#what), but while they are around can be even more toxic than other varieties of pesticides, affecting the nervous system in [much the way sarin and other nerve gasses](https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/7/130718-organophosphates-pesticides-indian-food-poisoning/) do. Under the Trump Administration, however, the Obama ruling was reversed for the most widely used organophosphate, known as chlorpyrifos. Nonetheless, Corteva Agriscience, the nation’s largest manufacturer of the chemical, under pressure from multiple states that are banning its use, announced on Feb. 6 that it would voluntarily agree to stop producing it. It’s a manifestly good thing that in that one case, market forces were sufficient to stop a bad chemical from getting into the food supply. But it’s a manifestly bad thing that in a far larger share of cases, apparently the health of America’s children does not have the same power in Washington. “With the FQPA legislation, Congress clearly gave the EPA the power to protect children’s health from pesticides,” says Olga Naidenko, vice president of science investigations at the Environmental Working Group, and lead author of the paper. “The EPA should be able to fully use this authority without waiting for additional instructions, if the EPA leadership decides to do so.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5782994/pesticides-kids-epa/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5782994/pesticides-kids-epa/"},"headline":"New Study Shows That When It Comes to Pesticides and Kids, the EPA Has Looked the Other Way","datePublished":"2020-02-12T23:30:43.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T08:14:12.095Z","description":"The law is there, the will to act isn't","url":"https://time.com/5782994/pesticides-kids-epa/","keywords":["Environmental Health","Environment","Pesticides"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7ca723e0633b4beb/698a0a2ce76ad249e46373cc/Pesticides.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jeffrey Kluger","jobTitle":"Editor at Large","url":"https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/"}],"articleSection":"Health","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7ca723e0633b4beb/698a0a2ce76ad249e46373cc/Pesticides.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Fighting a fruit fly outbreak, pesticides are sprayed under an avocado tree in Florida","caption":"Fighting a fruit fly outbreak, pesticides are sprayed under an avocado tree in Florida in 2015.","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/health/","name":"Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/environmental-health/","name":"Environmental Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5782994/pesticides-kids-epa/","name":"New Study Shows That When It Comes to Pesticides and Kids, the EPA Has Looked the Other Way"}}]}] ```