--- title: New Trump Rule Requires Officials to Weigh Pregnant Visa Applicants' Needs description: Will this new restriction impact pregnant women with legitimate medical needs? It'll depend on how individual consular officers enforce it. canonical: https://time.com/5770664/birth-tourism-trump-rule/ author: Madeleine Carlisle article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-01-24T23:40:25.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-24T08:06:51.554Z article:section: Politics og:title: New Trump Rule Requires U.S. Officials to Weigh Pregnant Visa Applicants' Medical Needs og:description: Would this new restriction impact pregnant women with genuine medical needs? It will come down to how individual counselors enforce it. og:url: https://time.com/5770664/birth-tourism-trump-rule/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1c1a9e4a95b6f9a6/698a0949457a52bd11d6372c/birth-tourism-trump-2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: Passport and Visa Stamps og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: New Trump Rule Requires U.S. Officials to Weigh Pregnant Visa Applicants' Medical Needs twitter:description: Would this new restriction impact pregnant women with genuine medical needs? It will come down to how individual counselors enforce it. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1c1a9e4a95b6f9a6/698a0949457a52bd11d6372c/birth-tourism-trump-2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # New Trump Rule Requires U.S. Officials to Weigh Pregnant Visa Applicants' Medical Needs > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=446ac578-401e-4114-a80e-4160a063baac&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=446ac578-401e-4114-a80e-4160a063baac&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=446ac578-401e-4114-a80e-4160a063baac&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Madeleine Carlisle](https://time.com/author/madeleine-carlisle/)  ## Madeleine Carlisle Jan 24, 2020 11:40 PM UTC  Yenwen Lu—Getty Images  by [Madeleine Carlisle](https://time.com/author/madeleine-carlisle/)  ## Madeleine Carlisle Jan 24, 2020 11:40 PM UTC The [Trump administration](https://time.com/tag/trump-administration/) issued a new rule on Thursday instructing United States consular officials to deny [pregnant women](https://time.com/tag/pregnancy/) visas unless they can prove [“to the satisfaction of the consular officer”](https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-01218.pdf) either that they are not traveling to the U.S. to give birth, or that they have a legitimate medical reason to give birth in the country. The administration says the new provision is an attempt to cut down on what’s known as “birth tourism,” or when women come to the U.S. specifically to give birth so that their children gain American citizenship. But critics say the new rule may be deeply flawed. One problem is that it relies on U.S. consular officials, who likely have no medical training, to review the evidence pregnant women provide and determine whether they have a legitimate medical reason to give birth in the U.S. “The fact that they’re trying to charge immigration officers, who have no medical background, with adjudicating people’s pregnancies” is very concerning, says Carolyn Sufrin, a doctor and a fellow with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. If a consular officer believes the visa applicant could receive similar treatment in her home country, or in a country that’s geographically closer to the U.S., he or she may deny the woman’s application. If that happens, the woman can’t appeal the decision, explains Leon Fresco, an immigration attorney who was the primary drafter of the Senate’s immigration reform bill in 2013.If a consular officer denies your visa on the grounds that he believes “you’re going to commit birth tourism, and you say are not, you cannot file a lawsuit where a judge says, ‘I agree. No. You’re not,’” Fresco says. Applicants whose visas are denied can try to apply again. Louise King, a doctor and the director of reproductive bioethics at the Harvard Medical School Center for Bioethics, says the new rule could have a “pretty detrimental impact” on pregnant women who require medical treatment, especially since the new rule could delay those who need care entering the U.S. But, Fresco says, the actual impact of the new provision is as yet unclear. It could be “extremely large or extremely narrow,” depending on how individual State Department officials choose to interpret and implement it. “It’s completely left to the viewpoint of the adjudicator,” he says. The [new rule](https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-01218.pdf) instructs consular officers to deny a visa to any pregnant woman seeking to give birth in the U.S. unless she can overcome a burden of proof. She must convince a consular officer that she has a legitimate medical need to give birth in the U.S. and that she cannot receive that care near her home country. She must also prove that she has arranged for her medical treatment, and that she has the means to pay for it, as well as “all incidental expenses, including transportation and living expenses.” In other words, pregnant women must “overcome the presumption that they are traveling to the U.S. to give birth,” says Theresa Cardinal Brown, the director of immigration and cross-border policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center. Sonia Canzater, a senior associate at the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University Law Center, tells TIME that while she has “concerns about the broad range of discretion that is left basically to these \[officials\],” she remains “cautiously optimistic.” If officials follow way the rule is written, she says, women with legitimate medical needs will receive visas. Women have usually begun arranging their care before they come to the U.S. and can show that documentation to officials, Canzater says. Traveling to the U.S. for the explicit purpose of giving birth was not previously banned, Canzater adds. In fact, “for the purpose of giving birth” was sometimes included in women’s visa applications. “Birth tourism” is most common among women from Russia, China and Nigeria and has become a sort of “industry” in recent years, especially among the wealthy, according to Canzater. But it’s unclear how common “birth tourism” actually is. In a press briefing, a State Department official estimated that “thousands of children” are born in the U.S. to people on visitor visas each year, but exact numbers are not readily available. Millions of visitor visas are issued every year. The rule will not affect people coming from 39 countries that are included in the U.S.’s Visa Waiver Program, which allows citizens from those countries to visit the U.S. for brief periods of time without visas. “So then this would be discriminatorily applied to certain women as opposed to other women,” King of Harvard’s Bioethics Program says. Brown of the Bipartisan Policy Center points out that the rule, even enforced strongly, would do an imperfect job of cracking down on birth tourism. Many visitors receive visas that expire after decade, so they could feasibly apply for a visitor visa, get pregnant, then come to the U.S. to give birth. U.S. Customs and Border Protection has not issued any guidance on the rule, and the new rule explicitly says it’s not changing any Department of Homeland Security standards of admission. Ali Noorani, the executive director of the immigrant advocacy organization the National Immigration Forum, says one problem about the rule is that it sends an ugly message. It “continues to advance a narrative by the administration,” he says, “that children of immigrant parents are not as good as children of parents from the U.S.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5770664/birth-tourism-trump-rule/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5770664/birth-tourism-trump-rule/"},"headline":"New Trump Rule Requires U.S. Officials to Weigh Pregnant Visa Applicants' Medical Needs","datePublished":"2020-01-24T23:40:25.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-24T08:06:51.554Z","description":"Would this new restriction impact pregnant women with genuine medical needs? It will come down to how individual counselors enforce it","url":"https://time.com/5770664/birth-tourism-trump-rule/","keywords":["Immigration","Pregnancy","Women's Health","Donald Trump","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1c1a9e4a95b6f9a6/698a0949457a52bd11d6372c/birth-tourism-trump-2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Madeleine Carlisle","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/madeleine-carlisle/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1c1a9e4a95b6f9a6/698a0949457a52bd11d6372c/birth-tourism-trump-2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Passport and Visa Stamps","caption":"New Trump Rule Requires U.S. Officials With No Medical Training To Determine Whether A Pregnant Woman Really Needs Medical Care","creditText":"Yenwen Lu—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/immigration/","name":"Immigration"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5770664/birth-tourism-trump-rule/","name":"New Trump Rule Requires U.S. Officials to Weigh Pregnant Visa Applicants' Medical Needs"}}]}] ```