--- title: The Information War Over Trump's Impeachment description: The irony is that your likes and shares may well decide the presidency of @realdonaldtrump writes P.W. Singer. canonical: https://time.com/5705334/information-war-impeachment/ author: P.W. Singer article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2019-10-19T11:00:53.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T12:06:01.884Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Information War Over Trump's Impeachment og:description: The irony is that your likes and shares may decide the presidency og:url: https://time.com/5705334/information-war-impeachment/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte179d4132cdb4f7d/698a048b97cdff00736b9b45/information-war-impeachment-cyberwar.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: Cybercrime og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Information War Over Trump's Impeachment twitter:description: The irony is that your likes and shares may decide the presidency twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte179d4132cdb4f7d/698a048b97cdff00736b9b45/information-war-impeachment-cyberwar.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Information War Over Trump's Impeachment > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a9829137-14a7-46c4-b238-7a63bd5f0f47&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a9829137-14a7-46c4-b238-7a63bd5f0f47&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=a9829137-14a7-46c4-b238-7a63bd5f0f47&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [P.W. Singer](https://time.com/author/p-w-singer/) ## P.W. Singer Oct 19, 2019 11:00 AM UTC  Cybercrime. Cybercrime. Dominic Lipinski—AP by [P.W. Singer](https://time.com/author/p-w-singer/) ## P.W. Singer Oct 19, 2019 11:00 AM UTC When a White House whistleblower reported that Donald Trump asked a foreign nation to “do us a favor” if it wanted U.S. military aid, it didn’t just start an impeachment. It started a war playing out on your screens that could determine the outcome. Over the last generation, nations, militaries, businesses, and political parties have all come to grips with the threat of computer networks being hacked, commonly thought of as “cyberwar.” Yet these efforts to steal information now come with a twin that tries to spread it, often with even more powerful results. As illustration, while the DNC may have been famously hacked during the 2016 election of greater import was that [over half the US population in 2016 was unknowingly exposed to Russian propaganda via their Facebook accounts](https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2017/11/01/facebook-says-146-million-americans-targeted-russia-campaign/821306001/). Indeed, as a [bipartisan Senate report](https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report%5FVolume2.pdf) revealed last week, Russian information warriors literally celebrated their success with a toast of champagne. If “cyberwar” is the hacking of networks, this kind of [“likewar”](http://likewarbook.com/) is the hacking of people on them, by driving ideas viral through likes, shares, and sometimes lies. Just as in 2016, we’re now seeing all the elements of likewar deployed into the battle over impeachment. Supporters of the president have funded [crowdsourced manhunts](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/50-000-reward-offered-to-out-trump-whistleblower), mining the web for clues to the whistleblower’s identity. If they are found, any tiny nuggets in their background will then be weaponized, not just to try to discredit them via some unrelated belief or gaffe posted years back, but to threaten them and their family. Indeed, the risk of violence has been already been massively [spurred on by the loudest voice on social media of all](https://www.washingtonpost.com/), who described the whistleblower and then those supporting impeachment as committing a crime punishable by death. Given the history of past mass killers echoing Trump’s words, this falls somewhere between a direct call to violence and what is known as [“stochastic terrorism](https://qz.com/1436267/trump-stochastic-terror-and-the-hate-that-ends-in-violence/),” where you create the supporting conditions for it. In turn, opponents of the president are engaged in their own online hunt for open-source intelligence of a kind even the CIA found hard to collect a decade back. Networks of anti-Trump activists are mining everything from old Pentagon documents on delayed missile deliveries to the travel history of Ukrainian oligarchs to see when and where they crossed paths with Rudy Giuliani and even [Jared Kushner](https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-russia-zelensky-trump-impeachment-kushner-1461734). While truth may be surfaced by these dueling hunts, the response to it is to follow the lessons of Russian information warfare: bury it underneath a sea of lies. Online warfare is fought not by consistency, but a constantly altering set of explanations and “alternative facts.” The day by day shift of the contents of the infamous call or whether Giuliani was acting as the president’s personal lawyer or not is a deliberate feature not a bug. Russia may have pioneered this tactic (such as how it responded to to [its 2014 shootdown of the airliner over Ukraine, by pushing out a dozen different conflicting stories in its defense](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/peeling-away-russias-lies-about-the-downed-malaysia-airlines-flight/2019/06/20/611a7a1c-92b6-11e9-aadb-74e6b2b46f6a%5Fstory.html) ) but it is now the new normal in our own politics, appearing in everything from the impeachment debate (where the President and his staff have said he did and didn’t demand a quid pro quo with Ukraine, with his chief of staff Mick Mulvaney literally providing both versions over the course of mere hours) to the Syria withdrawal (where the President has pushed out [at least a half dozen different explanations](https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2019-10-16/trump-defiant-amid-intensifying-fallout-from-syria-withdrawal) for why he did and didn’t greenlight the Turkish invasion and abandonment of America’s Kurdish allies). Simply put, if you can muddy the waters enough, then you might just be able to daze and confuse your audience into submission, or at least just have them think that [“both sides”](https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=both%20sides) are the same. In these battles for virality, all the familiar tactics and tools are being deployed. The [whistleblower’s memo has already been turned into a series of gifs](https://twitter.com/CrispinBurke/status/1177623674561581056), using Internet memes like scenes from _Anchorman_, to leverage web culture to help it take off. In turn, opponents to the memo are leaning into classic conspiracy theories to try to undermine its spread, such as [the old stand-by that somehow George Soros and the “globalists” (I.E. the Jews) are involved](https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/26/dossier-2-0-whistleblower-complaint-relies-on-soros-funded-investigative-reporting-group-that-partnered-with-buzzfeed/). Even the efforts to push out multiple competing hashtagged names for the affair are part of an effort to keep it from coalescing in the public mind. As long as there is no equivalent to #watergate , there is no single way for the public to unite around it. This back and forth can be shrugged off as mere online games, but the effect is real. What shapes social media shapes not just what you see on your screen, and then share with your friends and family to echo out repeatedly wider. It also shapes what happens on other media, with over [90% of journalists](https://muckrack.com/blog/2017/07/31/the-2017-state-of-journalism-on-twitter) regularly using social media for their work. What trends online, even if artificially driven, helps influence everything from what stories newspaper reporters pursue to which guests radio show producers book. Again and again, we have seen how an influence operation-shaped shift in online trends and then perceptions can shape elections (ranging from Brazil to Brexit) to even congressional votes. Indeed, almost exactly one year ago it swung the hearings for Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh. When Kavanaugh was accused of sexual assault by Christine Blasey Ford, an obscure Internet conspiracy theory that mixed was created in his defense, that [Kavanaugh somehow had a doppelganger, who had actually committed the sexual assault](https://www.vox.com/2018/10/23/18014580/ed-whelan-kavanaugh-zillow-eppc-absence). It[ was originally mocked and even led to its originator to resign his job from a DC thinktank in shame](https://www.vox.com/2018/10/23/18014580/ed-whelan-kavanaugh-zillow-eppc-absence). Yet, as the theory subsequently went viral, it gave moderate Republican senators a narrative to vote to confirm Kavanaugh, without explicitly calling his accuser a liar. The same model may have already happened in the looming battle over impeachment, [where a false claim that the “deep state” secretly altered U.S. whistleblower law](https://www.mediamatters.org/federalist/false-report-federalist-about-whistleblower-complaints-fuels-trump-defenders-impeachment) first popped in online conservative forms. Despite being debunked repeatedly, it has gone viral with amplifying repeats by the President and GOP House Leader Kevin McCarthy. The next few weeks will be a crucial moment for American democracy. As the battle over impeachment plays out, we all need to wise up to this online war that is targeting each of us. Both the public and media need to understand its features and be careful to distinguish when something is organic and when both we and the algorithms of the networks are being played with. Most of all, we need to recognize our own power and responsibility. It will be us who will ultimately determine if it is veracity or virality that matters most in our democracy. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5705334/information-war-impeachment/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5705334/information-war-impeachment/"},"headline":"The Information War Over Trump's Impeachment","datePublished":"2019-10-19T11:00:53.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T12:06:01.884Z","description":"The irony is that your likes and shares may well decide the presidency of @realdonaldtrump writes P.W. Singer.","url":"https://time.com/5705334/information-war-impeachment/","keywords":["Impeachment","politics","ideas"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte179d4132cdb4f7d/698a048b97cdff00736b9b45/information-war-impeachment-cyberwar.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"P.W. Singer","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/p-w-singer/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte179d4132cdb4f7d/698a048b97cdff00736b9b45/information-war-impeachment-cyberwar.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Cybercrime","caption":"Cybercrime","creditText":"Dominic Lipinski—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/impeachment/","name":"Impeachment"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5705334/information-war-impeachment/","name":"The Information War Over Trump's Impeachment"}}]}] ```