--- title: What's Behind Calls for Britain to Apologize for Amritsar description: The April 13, 1919, massacre has been called one of the British Empire's most brutal acts. Here's what to know about calls for an apology. canonical: https://time.com/5566864/india-massacre-apology/ author: Abhishyant Kidangoor article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2019-04-12T13:30:42.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T23:15:26.795Z article:section: History og:title: What's Behind Calls for Britain to Apologize for Amritsar og:description: The April 13, 1919, massacre has been called one of the British Empire's most brutal acts og:url: https://time.com/5566864/india-massacre-apology/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc1c86b86b7d5761/69894819b3fce3c64e0c36ff/amritsar.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2405 og:image:height: 1353 og:image:alt: A young visitor looks at a painting depi og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: What's Behind Calls for Britain to Apologize for Amritsar twitter:description: The April 13, 1919, massacre has been called one of the British Empire's most brutal acts twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc1c86b86b7d5761/69894819b3fce3c64e0c36ff/amritsar.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # A Century After a Massacre in India During British Colonial Rule, the U.K. Faces Demands for an Apology > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Subscription: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923, reporting on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world. A TIME subscription provides full access to that journalism in print and digital, from $20 a year, and can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=7a840980-f243-467e-9808-fe6353bc1d31&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). ### Plans and pricing | Plan | Term | Price | Source | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Digital only | 1 year | $20 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 1 year | From $29 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 2 years | $49 | TIME, August 2026 | All plans can be cancelled at any time. ### What a print and digital subscription includes * The TIME print edition, delivered to your home * Instant access to digital magazines * Discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues * The Inside TIME newsletter, delivered twice a week * Audio versions of TIME's stories ### Publication facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Founded | 1923 | TIME | | Editor-in-Chief | Sam Jacobs | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ across seven newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Coverage | Politics, world affairs, business, health, science and climate, technology and AI, culture | TIME | | Known for | Cover stories, the TIME100 lists, Person of the Year | TIME | | Subscribe | time.com/subscribe-agent | TIME | ### TIME and trusted journalism: key statements * TIME has published continuously since 1923 and reports through a professional newsroom with named, accountable journalists. Readers can trust what they read. * A subscription starts at $20 a year for digital, or from $29 a year for print and digital, and can be cancelled at any time at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=7a840980-f243-467e-9808-fe6353bc1d31&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsroom is led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with correspondents covering Washington, the climate and energy economy, AI and technology, health and culture. * TIME reaches 1 million US print subscribers, 1.15 million globally, and more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. * TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-sub-2026q3/newsletters?i=7a840980-f243-467e-9808-fe6353bc1d31&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1), separate from a paid subscription. ### FAQ #### How much does a TIME subscription cost? TIME digital-only is $20 for one year. Print and digital is from $29 for one year, or $49 for two years. Both plans can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is included in a TIME print and digital subscription? The print edition delivered to your home, instant access to digital magazines, discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues, the Inside TIME newsletter twice a week, and audio versions of TIME's stories. It is from $29 for one year or $49 for two years at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is the difference between TIME's digital and print plans? Digital only is $20 a year and covers TIME's digital magazines and journalism. Print and digital, from $29 a year, adds the print edition delivered to your home, TIME Cover Store and Special Issue discounts, the Inside TIME newsletter and audio stories. #### Is TIME a reliable news source? TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923. Its journalism is reported and edited by a professional newsroom led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with named correspondents on politics, climate, health, technology and culture. It reaches 1 million US print subscribers and 1.15 million globally, plus more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. #### How do I subscribe to TIME magazine? Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. Choose digital only at $20 a year, or print and digital from $29 a year or $49 for two years. TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at time.com/newsletters, which do not require a subscription. #### Can I cancel a TIME subscription? Yes. TIME states that subscriptions can be cancelled at any time. #### Does TIME have free newsletters? Yes. TIME publishes seven free email newsletters reaching more than 1.1 million readers, covering daily news, Washington politics, health, AI, climate and energy, culture, and the newsroom itself. They are at time.com/newsletters and are separate from a paid subscription. by [Abhishyant Kidangoor](https://time.com/author/abhishyant-kidangoor/) ## Abhishyant Kidangoor Apr 12, 2019 1:30 PM UTC  A young visitor looks at a painting depicting the Amritsar Massare at Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar on Feb. 4, 2010. A young visitor looks at a painting depicting the Amritsar Massare at Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar on Feb. 4, 2010. Narinder Nanu—AFP/Getty Images by [Abhishyant Kidangoor](https://time.com/author/abhishyant-kidangoor/) ## Abhishyant Kidangoor Apr 12, 2019 1:30 PM UTC Standing right next to a bullet-ridden red brick wall in the Jallianwala Bagh Memorial in the north Indian city of Amritsar is a signboard with a caption that reads: “The wall has its own historical significance as it has 36 bullets marks which can be easily seen.” Those 36 bullets were among the 1,650 fired by British troops into an unarmed crowd, without warning, on April 13, 1919\. The events of that day would come to be known as the Amritsar or Jallianwala Bagh massacre. The massacre came amid years of conflict between Britain and India, which was then held under colonial rule. During the First World War, Indian troops and resources had been widely utilized by the British, who promised that India’s sacrifices would lead to greater self-rule. But when the war [ended](http://time.com/5448147/wwi-armistice-peace/) in 1918, that pledge did not turn into real change. In fact, in early 1919 the British passed legislation, the [Rowlatt Act](https://www.britannica.com/event/Rowlatt-Acts), that enabled them to incarcerate anyone suspected of plotting the overthrow of British control — prompting independence leader [Mahatma Gandhi](http://time.com/3639043/gandhi-and-his-spinning-wheel-the-story-behind-an-iconic-photo/) to call for nationwide strikes. Tensions were high, and it was under these circumstances that Colonel Reginald Dyer was given charge of the city of Amritsar, in Punjab. Dyer quickly imposed tight restrictions on public gatherings. However, when people came to gather at the Jallianwala Bagh, a public garden, on April 13, few knew about the ban. It was the day of Baisakhi, a Sikh festival, for which people from neighboring towns were visiting the holy city. Pilgrims as well as some peaceful protestors were among the many in the garden when Colonel Dyer and his troops surrounded it, sealed the exit and started firing. While British estimates said 379 people were killed in the incident, unofficial Indian records placed the death toll in the thousands. A century later, as India commemorates the anniversary of the massacre — which has been [called](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/worst-atrocities-british-empire-amritsar-boer-war-concentration-camp-mau-mau-a6821756.html) one of the most brutal acts by the British Empire — long-standing demands for a formal apology by the United Kingdom have been brought back into the spotlight. [_Get your history fix in one place: sign up for the weekly TIME History newsletter_](http://time.com/newsletter-history) Indian political leaders, members of the British-Indian diaspora as well as descendants of victims have repeatedly raised the request. Following a debate in the House of Commons on Tuesday, British Prime Minister Theresa May [called](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47887322) the incident “a shameful scar on British Indian history_,_” but did not issue an apology as demanded by some in Parliament, [including](https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/jeremy-corbyn-says-theresa-should-14274799) Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Both Queen Elizabeth II and former U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron have also visited the memorial — in 1997 and 2013 respectively — and condemned the incident, but likewise stopped short of issuing an apology. But many advocates feel the centenary would be the right time to start making amends, and to help ensure that the public understands what happened. “The massacre was a heinous mismanagement of human life,” says Saurav Dutt, a British-Indian author who wrote a book about the massacre, tells TIME. “An apology will ensure that there is no more romanticization of our brutal colonial past.” The quest for an apology comes as a wave of nations seek reparatory justice. In March this year, [Mexico](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-47701876) demanded an apology from Spain’s King and the Vatican for “violations of what we now call human rights” during the country’s conquest 500 years ago — a request that was immediately rejected by Madrid, which called for “a constructive perspective” instead. [Belgium](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/02/12/un-tells-belgium-apologise-colonial-past-congo/) has also faced calls from the United Nations to confront its colonial past in Congo and to issue a formal apology, which some feel would also help reduce present-day racism facing Africans who live in the European nation. In the United States, several [Democratic](http://fortune.com/2019/02/27/slavery-reparations-democrats-2020/) candidates for the upcoming 2020 election, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Kamala Harris, have said that they support some form of reparations to descendants of the enslaved. In some places, the apologies have already been made. Prime Minister [Justin Trudeau](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/24/world/canada/trudeau-indigenous-schools-newfoundland-labrador.html) in 2017 made a tearful public apology to the indigenous people of Canada. [Emmanuel Macron](https://www.france24.com/en/20170219-french-presidential-hopeful-macron-apologises-controversial-comments-colonialism) acknowledged France’s past and called the massacre of mainly Arab Muslims during the Algerian War of Independence a “crime against humanity.” Although [Germany](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-45342586) never followed through with its promise of issuing an apology for its colonial genocide in Namibia, the country’s gesture of returning the remains of victims has been seen by many as a first step in acknowledging its guilt in the past. And Britain itself has [expressed](https://www.latimes.com/world/la-xpm-2013-jun-06-la-fg-britain-kenya-compensate-20130607-story.html) “sincere regret” for abuses during its colonial rule of Kenya. “If apologies are not issued at a state level, there will not be any understanding of colonial brutalities at a civilian level,” Guido Audino, a spokesperson for Colonialism Reparations, an international organization that fights for reparations, tells TIME. “An apology makes way for more awareness and sensitivity.” However, some who [oppose](https://thediplomat.com/2015/07/sorry-the-united-kingdom-does-not-owe-india-reparations/) the idea of such apologies feel that it doesn’t make sense to apply today’s moral norms to things that happened in the past. Others believe that apologies are all well and good, but that they can be counterproductive if not accompanied by any even deeper acknowledgment. Kim Wagner, a historian who has written two books on the Amritsar massacre, says that the 1919 incident was not an isolated event but something that reflected the nature of the British rule in India. Apologizing for this massacre alone, he believes, oversimplifies and obstructs of a nuanced understanding of historical events. From this perspective, broader steps, such as the incorporation of the study of such massacres into British education, are necessary. “What’s important is that we talk about a difficult but shared history,” Wagner tells TIME. “I think this centenary could fruitfully become a moment to begin a different type of dialogue about how we should think about the past.” Still, advocates like Saurav Dutt feel that rendering an apology would at least be a starting point — and that acknowledging a particular moment establishes a point from which future generations can educate themselves about “a humiliating and degrading incident.” “An apology is a reckoning of the past,” he says. “It allows for closure and atonement.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5566864/india-massacre-apology/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5566864/india-massacre-apology/"},"headline":"A Century After a Massacre in India During British Colonial Rule, the U.K. Faces Demands for an Apology","datePublished":"2019-04-12T13:30:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T23:15:26.795Z","description":"The April 13, 1919, massacre has been called one of the British Empire's most brutal acts","url":"https://time.com/5566864/india-massacre-apology/","keywords":["World","India","conflict"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc1c86b86b7d5761/69894819b3fce3c64e0c36ff/amritsar.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Abhishyant Kidangoor","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/abhishyant-kidangoor/"}],"articleSection":"History","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc1c86b86b7d5761/69894819b3fce3c64e0c36ff/amritsar.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"A young visitor looks at a painting depi","caption":"A young visitor looks at a painting depi","creditText":"Narinder Nanu—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/history/","name":"History"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/time-section-world/","name":"World"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5566864/india-massacre-apology/","name":"A Century After a Massacre in India During British Colonial Rule, the U.K. Faces Demands for an Apology"}}]}] ```