--- description: When the great Noah Webster brought out A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language in 1806, it was seen as a radical political act. title: Are Dictionaries Political? That's Nothing New image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt49aff906140c08fb/6989418122fb85c77be27673/webster.jpeg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  * [History](/section/history/) ## History Update your preferences in [Account Settings](/account/preferences/) Close * [language](/tag/language/) ## language Update your preferences in [Account Settings](/account/preferences/) Close # Dictionaries Have Been Inspiring Political Debates for Longer Than You Probably Think by [Rosemarie Ostler / History News Network](/author/history-news-network/) ## Rosemarie Ostler / History News Network Update your preferences in [Account Settings](/account/preferences/) Close Dec 14, 2018 4:20 PM CUT  Noah Webster portrait, circa 1891. Noah Webster portrait, circa 1891.Buyenlarge/Getty Images by [Rosemarie Ostler / History News Network](/author/history-news-network/) ## Rosemarie Ostler / History News Network Update your preferences in [Account Settings](/account/preferences/) Close Dec 14, 2018 4:20 PM CUT _This post is in partnership with the_ [_History News Network_](http://historynewsnetwork.org/ "undefined")_, the website that puts the news into historical perspective. A version of the article below was originally published at_ [_HNN._](http://hnn.us/article/170372 "undefined") Are dictionaries getting more political? That’s what some people claim. When [Dictionary.com](https://www.dictionary.com/ "undefined") or [Merriam-Webster.com](https://www.merriam-webster.com/ "undefined") post Twitter lists of trending lookups that include such politically charged items as _dotard, witch hunt_ and _dog whistle,_ it looks to some like presidential [trolling](https://n.pr/2Afx0O1 "undefined"). Others object to the dictionary’s adoption of controversial new terms like [_Latinx_](https://wapo.st/2Cld2my "undefined")_._ Lexicographers [reply](https://www.bustle.com/p/online-dictionaries-in-trumps-america-got-political-but-that-wasnt-the-plan-7813881 "undefined") that they are merely keeping up with what’s happening in the culture. The words that make their lists are the ones that users look up the most. Any new words added to the dictionary have been in common use for a while. If the dictionary seems politicized, it’s because we’re all politicized these days. Users reading their own views into the dictionary is nothing new. When the great lexicographer [Noah Webster](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah%5FWebster "undefined") brought out _A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language_ in 1806, it was seen as a radical political act. To some extent, it _was_ political. Webster believed that Americans needed and deserved their own linguistic standard, and as a Federalist, he hoped that such a standard would help to unify the new country. His main aim, however, was practical. He wanted to make as complete a record of the American language as possible, encompassing recent word inventions and changed definitions. As he explained in the preface, “The descendants of the settlers … will continue to speak the English language, but with numerous variations.” Americans will “originate new words, or give to old words new signification, which will never be generally received or known in Great Britain.” _A Compendious Dictionary_ contained over five thousand words never before recorded in a dictionary. Webster collected scientific terms like _telegraph_ and _vaccination_ and words with changed meanings like _girdle_ (choke off trees to kill them), and updated legal terms like _bankrupt_ and _default._ He also included American word inventions such as _advocate, obligate,_ the verb _to caucus,_ and _lengthy_ to describe a long, tedious speech. Some terms, like _constitutional_ (“legal, according to the original established government”) and _revolutionize_ (“to effect a change of government”) had definitions based on recent American political events. Most, however, were simply words in common use in the early republic. Nonetheless, Webster’s dictionary was seen as making a political statement. In 1806, when the Revolution was still fresh in the common memory, most Americans remained culturally loyal to England. English writers set the literary standard, and Samuel Johnson’s 1755 [_Dictionary of the English Language_](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%5FDictionary%5Fof%5Fthe%5FEnglish%5FLanguage "undefined")represented the benchmark for language use. Many of Webster’s fellow citizens weren’t ready for complete linguistic emancipation. Reviewers were scandalized by what they saw as Webster’s attempt to validate words that hadn’t been properly vetted by British authorities. The _Monthly Anthology_ huffed about “the approbation given to … vulgarisms … and unauthorized idioms.” John Pickering, a lawyer and linguist who had served at the British Embassy, considered Webster “a thirsty reformer,” prepared to “unsettle the whole of our admirable language.” A reviewer for _Port Folio_ magazine was aghast at Webster’s revelation that he was planning an even more substantial dictionary for the future. He speculated sarcastically about the inclusion of such American “idiotisms” as _hern_ and _yourn, tote_ for _carry,_ and _right good._ Like modern lexicographers, Webster responded that he was simply showing the language as it was. In a letter to his brother-in-law he admitted to introducing local terms, but asked, “Must they be left unexplained because they are local? This very circumstance renders their insertion in a dictionary the more necessary.” Many at the time remained unconvinced. Webster’s monumental _An American Dictionary of the English Language_ appeared in 1828\. It was far more comprehensive than his earlier work, with about 12,000 new words and between 30,000 and 40,000 new or updated definitions. It also included a daring new feature — hundreds of example quotations from American sources. Instead of relying on British literary greats like Dryden, Shakespeare and Milton, he looked to Franklin, Jefferson, Adams and Washington Irving. Webster’s aim in writing the dictionary remained the same. “It is not only important, but in a degree necessary,” he wrote in the preface, “that the people of this country should have an _American Dictionary_ of the English language; for, although the body of the language is the same as in England, … yet some differences must exist.” Americans had a different physical environment, a different form of government, different laws and different customs. They needed a reliable record of the new and changed vocabulary resulting from that reality. The new dictionary included hundreds of Americanisms. It featured Native American words like _raccoon, persimmon, moose, tomahawk_ and _powwow._Webster also included many words from government and politics — _senate, congress, census._ In spite of the blowback that had hit him in 1806, he also retained and even added to the newly created verbs that so annoyed the critics — both political terms like _Americanize, legislate_ and _electioneer,_ and homespun words like _citizenize, to ambition_ and _calculate_ in the sense of think. He even swept in a handful of slang — _change of heart, let rip, chaw, boost._ Although Webster had doubled down on his commitment to American word creations, the response to his second dictionary was much friendlier than the outrage that met his first. Nearly all the reviews were positive. The same American words that had scandalized reviewers in 1806 came in for glowing mention 22 years later. The _New York Evening Post_ quoted from the report of a local educational committee: “The committee consider the excellence and value of this work to be much enhanced by the addition of more than twelve thousand words.” A writer for the _North American Review_ predicted that a dictionary containing “a copious vocabulary … will be sought for by the greatest number of readers.” What happened between 1806 and 1828 to change reviewers’ minds about Webster’s dictionaries? The War of 1812 was one likely influence. Sometimes called “the second War of Independence,” it was the final political break with the old country. At the same time, the country’s boundaries and population were both expanding. Americans began to see themselves as Britain’s cultural equals and their vernacular speech as a cause for pride. The contents of the dictionary hadn’t changed, but the people using it had. _Rosemarie Ostler is a linguist and former librarian, Her books about slang and word origins explore the colorful turns of phrase in America’s past lexicon. Her articles have appeared in_ The Saturday Evening Post, Whole Earth, Christian Science Monitor, Verbatim, Writer’s Digest_, and_ [Entrepreneur.com](http://entrepreneur.com/ "undefined") _among others. Her latest book is_ [Splendiferous Speech](https://www.chicagoreviewpress.com/splendiferous-speech-products-9780912777054.php?page%5Fid=21 "undefined"): How Early Americans Pioneered Their Own Brand of English (2018). ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5479920/dictionary-political-history/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5479920/dictionary-political-history/"},"headline":"Dictionaries Have Been Inspiring Political Debates for Longer Than You Probably Think","datePublished":"2018-12-14T16:20:52.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T22:16:40.129Z","description":"Noah Webster was dismissed by one contemporary linguist as “a thirsty reformer\"","url":"https://time.com/5479920/dictionary-political-history/","keywords":["language","Books"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt49aff906140c08fb/6989418122fb85c77be27673/webster.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Rosemarie Ostler / History News Network"}],"articleSection":"History","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt49aff906140c08fb/6989418122fb85c77be27673/webster.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Noah Webster - Schoolmaster of the Republic","caption":"Noah Webster - Schoolmaster of the Republic","creditText":"Buyenlarge/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/history/","name":"History"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/language/","name":"language"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5479920/dictionary-political-history/","name":"Dictionaries Have Been Inspiring Political Debates for Longer Than You Probably Think"}}]}] ```